吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (3): 924-936.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20240157

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同施工参数下深层页岩水力压裂数值模拟

夏英杰1,2, 陈华斌1,2, 陈健3, 姚明宇1,2, 杨海3   

  1. 1.大连理工大学建设工程学院,辽宁大连116024
    2.大连理工大学海岸与海洋工程全国重点实验室,辽宁大连116024
    3.中国石油集团川庆钻探工程有限公司,成都610051
  • 出版日期:2026-05-26 发布日期:2026-06-03
  • 通讯作者: 姚明宇(2000—),男,博士研究生,主要从事深部储层水力压裂策略优化方面的研究,E-mail:mingyu_yao@163.com
  • 作者简介:夏英杰(1987—),男,教授,博士生导师,主要从事油气田开采水力压裂试验与模拟方面的研究,E-mail:xiayingjie@dlut.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(42377156)

Numerical Simulation of Hydraulic Fracturing of Deep Shale Reservoir with Different Construction Parameters

Xia Yingjie1,2, Chen Huabin1,2, Chen Jian3, Yao Mingyu1,2, Yang Hai3   

  1. 1. School of Infrastructure Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, Liaoning, China
    2. State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, Liaoning, China
    3. Chuanqing Drilling Engineering Company Limited, CNPC, Chengdu 610051, China

  • Online:2026-05-26 Published:2026-06-03
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42377156)

摘要: 为研究不同施工参数对深层页岩储层水力压裂的影响,基于四川盆地龙马溪组3 500 m埋深页岩储层施工现场测井数据,根据油气储层赋存条件和地质特征,采用细观统计损伤有限单元方法,建立了深层页岩储层多簇水力压裂三维数值模型,并分别进行了不同射孔簇间距、压裂液黏度、射孔簇数的水力压裂数值模拟研究,分析了不同施工参数下起裂压力、声发射能量及裂缝扩展形态的变化。结果表明:在射孔簇数为7、压裂液黏度为1 mPa·s条件下,簇间距从6 m增至12 m时,起裂压力由16.47 MPa线性增至22.14 MPa,声发射能量由10.27 kJ增至13.98 kJ,水平/竖直面裂缝扩展面积显著增大;在簇间距为10 m、压裂液黏度为1 mPa·s条件下,射孔簇数从3增至9时,起裂压力由 10.65 MPa 增至 25.36 MPa,声发射能量由6.43 kJ增至16.09 kJ,裂缝扩展面积同步提升;在簇间距为10 m、射孔簇数为7条件下,压裂液黏度从1 mPa·s增至6 mPa·s时,起裂压力由20.08 MPa降至12.14 MPa,声发射能量由13.06 kJ降至7.18 kJ,裂缝扩展区域减小且形态在水平面和竖直面趋于似圆形。

关键词: 深层页岩储层, 水力压裂, 数值模拟, 施工参数, 裂缝扩展, 四川盆地

Abstract: To investigate the effects of varied operational parameters on hydraulic fracturing in deep shale reservoirs, a three-dimensional numerical model for multi-cluster hydraulic fracturing in deep shale formations was established, anchored in logging data collected from a 3 500 m deep shale reservoir site within the Longmaxi Formation of the Sichuan basin. The micro-statistical damage finite element method was integrated into this model, which was tailored to the specific conditions and geological features of hydrocarbon-bearing reservoirs. Simulations were carried out separately to examine the effects of differing perforation cluster spacing, fracturing fluid viscosity, and number of perforation clusters. The variations in fracture initiation pressure, acoustic emission energy, and fracture propagation patterns under different operational parameters were analyzed. Specific results showed: When the number of perforation clusters was 7 and the viscosity of the fracturing fluid was 1 mPa·s, the cluster spacing increased from 6 m to 12 m, the fracture initiation pressure linearly increased from 16.47 MPa to 22.14 MPa, the acoustic emission energy increased from 10.27 kJ to 13.98 kJ, and the fracture propagation areas on the horizontal and vertical planes significantly increased. When the cluster spacing was 10 m and the viscosity was 1 mPa·s, the number of perforation clusters increased from 3 to 9, the fracture initiation pressure increased from 10.65 MPa to 25.36 MPa, the acoustic emission energy increased from 6.43 kJ to 16.09 kJ, and the fracture propagation area increased. When the cluster spacing was 10 m and the number of clusters was 7, the viscosity of the fracturing fluid increased from 1 mPa·s to 6 mPa·s, the fracture initiation pressure decreased from 20.08 MPa to 12.14 MPa, the acoustic emission energy decreased from 13.06 kJ to 7.18 kJ, the fracture propagation area decreased and the shape tended to be circular in the horizontal and vertical planes.


Key words: deep shale reservoir, hydraulic fracturing, numerical simulation, construction parameters, fracture propagation, Sichuan basin

中图分类号: 

  • P59
[1] 涂君汕, 陈辉, 邓居智, 陈康, 李焱, 余辉. 水库堤坝对高密度电法的影响及校正技术[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 1013-1025.
[2] 陈泽熙, 徐志明, 李斌, 钟笠, 彭军, 张昆, 魏祥峰, 郝景宇. 基质型页岩甜点特征及评价方法:以四川盆地涪陵地区中侏罗统凉高山组陆相页岩为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 788-803.
[3] 束龙仓, 位书静, 澈丽木格, 温中琦, 刘波. 西辽河平原生态输水的地下水响应及不确定性量化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 647-660.
[4] 黄兴国, 翁央央, 韩丽. 基于广义递归卷积的孔隙黏弹地震波正演模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(1): 377-385.
[5] 吴小奇, 刘全有, 王萍, 黎华继, 朱东亚, 李朋朋. 沉积盆地天然气藏中氦气贫化机理及资源潜力:以四川盆地新场气田为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(6): 1837-1850.
[6] 周柳湘, 余思琴, 陈俊华, 刘城, 陈义, 张鑫鑫, . 潜孔锤与冲击钻机联合钻进工艺成孔碎岩过程数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1608-1618.
[7] 肖正录, 李勇, 路俊刚, 秦春雨, 刘章昊, 周翔, 蒋奇君, 周易鑫. 四川盆地侏罗系大安寨段页岩油富集条件及有利勘探目标[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1039-1050.
[8] 苑成旺, 张敏, 张少龙, 秦磊, 郭海洋, 墨海滢, 信旸. 长春地铁基坑支护结构变形与地表沉降特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 879-892.
[9] 于子望, 卢帅屹, 白林, 郑天琪. CO2地质封存岩石力学问题研究进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 930-942.
[10] 刁国君, 何昕.

地铁明挖车站下穿越既有建筑物的局部暗扩挖施工关键技术 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 536-549.

[11] 屈海洲, 陈润, 徐伟 , 张云峰, 张亚 , 何溥为, 唐松, 李文皓.

白云石胶结物特征及其对深层白云岩孔隙的作用 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 401-416.

[12] 程瑶, 陆丹丹, 赵龙飞.

微波加热油页岩储层的热响应 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 387-400.

[13] 考佳玮, 杨康, 谭鹏, 陈作. 干热岩储层裂缝扩展及采热一体化数值模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 575-586.
[14] 蔺学旻, 肖红琳. 缝洞型储层声波远探测测井响应模拟及应用——以塔河油田碳酸盐岩缝洞型储层为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 312-327.
[15] 魏虹羽, 李世超, 王伟安. 地球动力学数值模拟算法的应用现状与展望[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 98-124.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!