空冷中冷器百叶窗翅片结构参数优化

doi:10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb.20210797

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于中心复合设计对空冷中冷器百叶窗翅片的3个几何参数开窗角度、翅片间距和百叶间距，进行三因素五水平的试验设计，然后建立以传热特性Nu和流动阻力特性f为目标函数的完全二阶回归模型，并采用响应曲面法分析各结构参数的影响重要性，最后根据多目标遗传算法进行寻优计算。结果表明：传热特性主要受翅片间距影响，而阻力特性受开窗角度影响最大，多目标优化得到一组Pareto解集，决策者可以根据实际需求在Pareto解集中进行选取。

关键词: 机械工程, 空冷中冷器, 百叶窗翅片, 中心复合设计, 响应面法

Abstract:

Based on the central composite design， the three geometric parameters of the air-cooled intercooler shutter fins， the opening angle， the fin spacing， and the louver spacing， are tested with three factors and five levels. Then a complete second-order regression model with the heat transfer characteristics Nu and the flow resistance characteristics f as the objective function is established， and the response surface analysis is carried out to analyze the importance of the influence of each structural parameter， and finally the optimization calculation is carried out according to the multi-objective genetic algorithm. The results show that the heat transfer characteristics are mainly affected by the fin spacing， while the resistance characteristics are most affected by the opening angle. Multi-objective optimization can obtain a set of Pareto solutions， which can be selected by the decision maker according to actual needs.

Key words: mechanical engineering, air-cooled charge air cooler, louver fin, central composite design, response surface method

中图分类号:

U461.8

李胜,朱佳,黄德惠,陈存福,费洪庆,丰伟,胡兴军. 空冷中冷器百叶窗翅片结构参数优化[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2023, 53(4): 998-1006.

Sheng LI,Jia ZHU,De-hui HUANG,Cun-fu CHEN,Hong-qing FEI,Wei FENG,Xing-jun HU. Structural parameters optimization of louver fins of air⁃cooled charge air cooler[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(4): 998-1006.

图/表 13

图1

图2

图3

表1

图4

图5

表2

表3

表4

表5

图6

图7

图8

参考文献 21

1	沙拉·塞库利克.换热器设计技术[M].程林,译.北京:机械工业出版社, 2010.
2	钱颂文.换热器设计手册[M].北京:化学工业出版社, 2003.
3	Ferrero M, Scattina A, Chiavazzo E, et al. Louver finned heat exchangers for automotive sector: numerical simulations of heat transfer and flow resistance coping with industrial constraints[J]. Journal of Heat Transfer, 2013, 135(12):1-12.
4	Kwon Young Chul, Chang Keun Sun. Heat transfer and friction characteristics of louver fin and tube heat exchangers under wet conditions[J]. Applied Chemistry for Engineering, 2008, 19(1): 73-79.
5	Javaherdeh K, Vaisi A, Moosavi R. The effects of fin height, fin-tube contact thickness and louver length on the performance of a compact fin-and-tube heat exchanger[J]. International Journal of Heat and Technology, 2018, 36(3): 825-834.
6	王任远, 李建雄, 吴金星. 散热器空气侧百叶窗翅片结构参数优化[J]. 流体机械, 2013, 41(6): 74-78.
	Wang Ren-yuan, Li Jian-xiong, Wu Jin-xing. Structure parameters optimized for louvered fin in air side of radiator[J]. Fluid Machinery, 2013, 41(6): 74-78.
7	Taylor J R. 误差分析导论-物理测量中的不确定度[M]. 王中宇,译. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2015: 43-105.
8	胡兴军,张靖龙,辛俐,等. 冷却管结构及风速对空冷中冷器性能的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报: 工学版, 2021, 51(5): 1557-1564.
	Hu Xing-jun, Zhang Jing-long, Xin Li, et al. Investigation on influence of cooling tube structure and airflow speed on cold side performance of air-cooled charge air cooler[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(5): 1557-1564.
9	胡兴军, 张靖龙, 罗雨霏, 等. 冷却管结构及进气方向对空冷中冷器性能的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报: 工学版, 2021, 51(6): 1933-1942.
	Hu Xing-jun, Zhang Jing-long, Luo Yu-fei, et al. Influence investigation of cooling tube structure and airflow direction on the thermal-hydraulic performance of air-cooled charge air cooler[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(6): 1933-1942.
10	Han H Z, Li B X, Shao W. Multi-objective optimization of outward convex corrugated tubes using response surface methodology[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2014, 70 (1): 250-262.
11	张志红, 何桢, 郭伟. 在响应曲面方法中三类中心复合设计的比较研究[J]. 沈阳航空工业学院学报, 2007, 23(1): 87-91.
	Zhang Zhi-hong, He Zhen, Guo Wei. A comparative study of three central composite designs in response surface methodology[J]. Journal of Shenyang Institute of Aeronautical Engineering, 2007, 23(1): 87-91.
12	Qian Zuo-qin, Wang Qiang, Cheng Jun-lin, et al. Simulation investigation on inlet velocity profile and configuration parameters of louver fin[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2018, 138: 173-182.
13	王维. 外胀式螺旋波纹管强化传热机理及换热器优化研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学能源科学与工程学院, 2019.
	Wang Wei. Study on the heat transfer mechanism and heat exchanger optimization of outward helically corrugated tube[D]. Harbin: School of Energy Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, 2019.
14	Kamel M S, Mojtaba M, Soroush M, et al. Numerical investigation of heat exchanger effectiveness in a double pipe heat exchanger filled with nanofluid: a sensitivity analysis by response surface methodology[J]. Powder Technology, 2017, 313: 99-111.
15	Liu Y W, Liu L, Liang L L, et al. Thermodynamic optimization of the recuperative heat exchanger for Joule-Thomson cryocoolers using response surface methodology[J]. International Journal of Refrigeration, 2015, 60: 155-165.
16	Han H Z, Yu R T, Li B X, et al. Multi-objective optimization of corrugated tube with loose-fit twisted tape using RSM and NSGA-II[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2019, 131: 781-794.
17	Whitley D. A genetic algorithm tutorial[J]. Statistics and Computing, 1994, 4(2): 65-85.
18	陈凯,汪双凤. 基于遗传算法的风冷式动力电池热管理系统优化[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2018, 39(2): 384-388.
	Chen Kai, Wang Shuang-feng. Optimization of air-cooled battery thermal management system based on genetic algorithm[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2018, 39(2): 384-388.
19	Hemmat E M, Hajmohammad H, Moradi R, et al. Multi-objective optimization of cost and thermal performance of double walled carbon nanotubes/water nanofluids by NSGA-II using response surface method[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 112: 1648-1657.
20	易凯. “三条红线”约束下的钦州市水资源优化配置研究[D]. 南宁:广西大学土木建筑工程学院, 2017.
	Yi Kai. The research on water resources optimal allocation of qinzhou city under constraint of three red lines[D]. Nanning: College of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Guangxi University, 2017.
21	孙靖明,梁迎春. 机械优化设计[M]. 北京:机械工业出版社, 2012.

相关文章 15

[1]	王建,于威,王斌. 高原状态下甲醇替代率对柴油机燃烧与排放的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2023, 53(4): 954-963.
[2]	于立娟,安阳,何佳龙,李国发,王升旭. 机电装备载荷谱外推技术研究进展及发展趋势[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2023, 53(4): 941-953.
[3]	朱凌,王秋成. 空间几何约束下新能源汽车驱动系统协调控制方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2022, 52(7): 1509-1514.
[4]	金兆辉,谷乐祺,洪伟,解方喜,尤田. 液压可变气门系统压力波动的影响分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2022, 52(4): 773-780.
[5]	张岩,刘玮,张树勇,裴毅强,董蒙蒙,秦静. 二/四冲程可变柴油机燃烧室热负荷的改善[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2022, 52(3): 504-514.
[6]	姚玉权,仰建岗,高杰,宋亮. 基于性能-费用模型的厂拌再生沥青混合料优化设计[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2022, 52(3): 585-595.
[7]	李国发,王彦博,何佳龙,王继利. 机电装备健康状态评估研究进展及发展趋势[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2022, 52(2): 267-279.
[8]	章子玲,胡雄,亓寅,王微,陶志强,刘志峰. 基于向量投影响应面的数控机床几何误差分配方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2022, 52(2): 384-391.
[9]	王磊,黄秉汉,丛家慧,回丽,周松,徐永臻. 超声冲击对搅拌摩擦焊缝疲劳性能的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2022, 52(11): 2542-2548.
[10]	赵文伯,李玉洁,邓俊,李理光,吴志军. 针阀运动规律及其对喷嘴内流和喷雾特性影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2022, 52(10): 2234-2243.
[11]	胡兴军,张靖龙,罗雨霏,辛俐,李胜,胡金蕊,兰巍. 冷却管结构及进气方向对空冷中冷器性能的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2021, 51(6): 1933-1942.
[12]	胡兴军,张靖龙,辛俐,罗雨霏,王靖宇,余天明. 冷却管结构及风速对空冷中冷器性能的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2021, 51(5): 1557-1564.
[13]	杨开宇,刘伟,王天皓,于显利,高印寒,马喜来. 一种多导体传输线串扰不确定性问题的计算方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2021, 51(2): 747-753.
[14]	李志军,刘浩,张立鹏,李振国,邵元凯,李智洋. 过滤壁结构对颗粒捕集器深床过滤影响的模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2021, 51(2): 422-434.
[15]	赵庆武,程勇,杨雪,王宁. 高重频纳秒脉冲放电点火系统设计[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2021, 51(2): 414-421.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

序号	网格数量	h/［W·m^-2·K^-1］	ΔP/Pa	偏差h/%	偏差ΔP/%
1	21 346 758	152.3	477.6	2.4	0.5
2	32 298 984	149.1	475.9	0.3	0.1
3	43 585 629	148.7	475.4	-	-

序号	因子	取值水平
序号	因子	-α	-1	0	1	+α
1	开窗角度φ/（°）	10	12.5	15	17.5	20
2	翅片间距P_LF /mm	2	2.25	2.5	2.75	3
3	百叶间距L_P /mm	2.5	2.75	3	3.25	3.5

序号	φ	P_LF	L_P	Nu	f
1	-α	0	0	8.296	0.176
2	-1	1	-1	8.936	0.177
3	-1	-1	-1	8.543	0.213
4	-1	-1	1	8.237	0.285
5	-1	1	1	9.396	0.224
6	0	0	0	8.843	0.279
7	0	0	0	8.834	0.280
8	0	0	0	8.836	0.280
9	0	0	0	8.828	0.280
10	0	0	0	8.950	0.279
11	0	0	0	8.836	0.280
12	0	+α	0	9.998	0.225
13	0	-α	0	7.736	0.389
14	0	0	+α	9.138	0.376
15	0	0	-α	8.671	0.204
16	1	-1	1	8.473	0.497
17	1	-1	-1	8.170	0.352
18	1	1	1	9.878	0.371
19	1	1	-1	9.432	0.264
20	+α	0	0	8.974	0.459

来源	自由度	Adj SS	Adj MS	F 值	P 值
合计	19	5.783 52
模型	7	5.672 02	0.810 29	87.21	0.000
线性	3	5.291 01	1.763 67	189.81	0.000
φ	1	0.301 53	0.301 53	32.45	0.000
P_LF	1	4.778 10	4.778 10	514.24	0.000
L_P	1	0.211 38	0.211 38	22.75	0.000
平方项	1	0.078 11	0.078 11	8.41	0.013
φφ*	1	0.078 11	0.078 11	8.41	0.013
交互项	3	0.302 90	0.100 97	10.87	0.001
φP_LF*	1	0.155 27	0.155 27	16.71	0.002
φL_P*	1	0.044 38	0.044 38	4.78	0.049
P_LFL_P*	1	0.103 25	0.103 25	11.11	0.006
误差	12	0.111 50	0.009 29
失拟	8	0.100 90	0.012 61	4.76	0.074
纯误差	4	0.010 59	0.002 65

来源	自由度	Adj SS	Adj MS	F 值	P 值
合计	19	0.147 184
模型	9	0.147 078	0.016 342	1536.69	0.000
线性	3	0.139 884	0.046 628	4384.56	0.000
φ	1	0.082 530	0.082 530	7760.54	0.000
P_LF	1	0.025 435	0.025 435	2391.74	0.000
L_P	1	0.031 919	0.031 919	3001.41	0.000
平方项	3	0.002 794	0.000 931	87.59	0.000
φφ*	1	0.002 209	0.002 209	207.68	0.000
P_LFP_LF*	1	0.001 132	0.001 132	106.42	0.000
L_PL_P*	1	0.000 155	0.000 155	14.58	0.003
交互项	3	0.004 400	0.001 467	137.91	0.000
φP_LF*	1	0.001 717	0.001 717	161.41	0.000
φL_P*	1	0.002 197	0.002 197	206.55	0.000
P_LFL_P*	1	0.000 487	0.000 487	45.77	0.000
误差	10	0.000 106	0.000 011
失拟	6	0.000 105	0.000 017	41.73	0.001
纯误差	4	0.000 002	0.000 000