西湖凹陷平湖组不同煤系烃源岩热解生烃差异及其在油气勘探中的应用

doi:10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20190168

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文以西湖凹陷平湖组不同煤系烃源岩（煤、炭质泥岩和暗色泥岩）为研究对象，通过封闭体系黄金管-高压釜生烃动力热模拟实验，查明了3种煤系烃源岩生烃产物、产率特征及生烃演化规律的差异。研究结果表明：在西湖凹陷平湖组煤系烃源岩中，煤、炭质泥岩和暗色泥岩均具有很高的产气态烃能力和较高的产液态烃能力，但不同岩性样品的生烃演化模式存在一定差异。炭质泥岩生烃最早，生烃强度最大；煤居次，生烃稍晚，生烃强度稍低；暗色泥岩生烃最晚，生烃强度最低。根据热解生烃特征，指出西湖凹陷具有煤成油的勘探潜力，西部斜坡带是找油的有利区域。

关键词: 煤系烃源岩, 生烃特征, 勘探启示, 平湖组, 西湖凹陷

Abstract: This study mainly focuses on different coal-measures source rocks (coal, carbon mudstone, and dark mudstone) in Pinghu Formation of Xihu sag. Based on the thermal simulation experiment of closed-system gold tube-high pressure vessels, the differences of hydrocarbon products, yield characteristics, and the hydrocarbon generation dynamics among the three coal series source rocks were analyzed. It is discovered that coal, carbon mudstone, and dark mudstone have high generation capacity of gas and liquid hydrocarbon, but their hydrocarbon generation evolution models are different. The carbonaceous mudstone has the earliest hydrocarbon generation and the highest intensity; the coal rock ranks the second in hydrocarbon generation and the hydrocarbon generation intensity; the mudstone has the latest hydrocarbon generation, and its hydrocarbon generation intensity is the lowest. According to the characteristics of pyrolysis hydrocarbon generation, Xihu sag has the potential of coal-derived oil exploration, and the western slope belt is a favorable area for oil exploration.

Key words: coal-measures source rocks, hydrocarbon generation characteristics, exploration revelation, Pinghu Formation, Xihu sag

中图分类号:

P624.4

谭思哲, 侯凯文, 覃军, 汤睿, 杨敏. 西湖凹陷平湖组不同煤系烃源岩热解生烃差异及其在油气勘探中的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(4): 968-978.

Tan Sizhe, Hou Kaiwen, Qin Jun, Tang Rui, Yang Min. Differences in Pyrolysis Hydrocarbon Generation and Hydrocarbon Exploration of Different Coal-Measures Source Rocks in Pinghu Formation, Xihu Sag[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2020, 50(4): 968-978.

参考文献

[1] 戴金星,钟宁宁,刘德汉,等.中国煤成大中型气田地质基础和主控因素[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2000. Dai Jinxing, Zhong Ningning, Liu Dehan, et al. The Geological Basis and Main Controlling Factors of Large and Middle Scale Coal-Derived Gas Fields in China[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2000.
[2] 赵文智,王红军,钱凯.中国煤成气理论发展及其在天然气工业发展中的地位[J].石油勘探与开发,2009,36(3):280-289. Zhao Wenzhi, Wang Hongjun, Qian Kai.Progress of Coal Formed Gas Geological Theory and Its Status in Natural Gas Industry in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2009,36(3):280-289.
[3] 张永刚,马宗晋,杨克明,等.川西坳陷中段海相层系油气勘探潜力分析[J].地质学报,2007,81(8):1041-1047. Zhang Yonggang, Ma Zongjin, Yang Keming, et al.The Forecast of Natural Oil & Gas Potential in Marine Strata, Western Sichuan Basin, Southwest China[J].Acta Geologica Sinica, 2007, 81(8):1041-1047.
[4] 张水昌,张保民,王飞宇,等.塔里木盆地两套海相有效烃源岩层:Ⅰ:有机质性质、发育环境及控制因素[J].自然科学进展,2001,11(3):261-268. Zhang Shuichang, Zhang Baomin, Wang Feiyu, et al.The Two Sets of Effective Source Rock Layers in Talimu Basin:Ⅰ:The Organic Matters Characteristics, Developing Environment and Controlling Factors[J]. Progress in Nature Science, 2001, 11(3):261-268.
[5] 赵长毅,程克明,王飞宇. 吐哈盆地煤成烃主要贡献组分剖析[J].沉积学报, 1997, 15(2):95-99. Zhao Changyi, Cheng Keming, Wang Feiyu. Analyses of the Macerals Contributing Mainly to Hydrocarbons Derived from Coals of the Turpan-Hami Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1997, 15(2):95-99.
[6] 黄家国,郭少斌,刘新社,等.鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界泥页岩热模拟实验[J].世界地质,2014,33(2):465-470. Huang Jiaguo, Guo Shaobin, Liu Xinshe, et al.Thermal Simulation Experiment of Late Paleozoic Shale in Ordos Basin[J]. Global Geology,2014,33(2):465-470.
[7] 戴金星,吴伟,房忱琛,等.2000年以来中国大气田勘探开发特征[J].天然气工业,2015,35(1):1-9. Dai Jinxing, Wu Wei,Fang Chenchen, et al.Exploration and Development of Large Gas Fields in China Since 2000[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2015,35(1):1-9.
[8] 魏恒飞, 陈践发, 陈晓东, 等.西湖凹陷平湖组滨海型煤系烃源岩发育环境及其控制因素[J].中国地质,2013,40(2):487-497. Wei Hengfei, Chen Jianfa, Chen Xiaodong, et al.The Controlling Factors and Sedimentary Environment for Developing Coastal Coal-Bearing Source Rock of Pinghu Formation in Xihu Depression[J]. Geology in China, 2013, 40(2):487-497.
[9] 朱扬明,周结,顾圣啸,等. 西湖凹陷始新统平湖组煤系烃源岩分子地球化学特征[J]. 石油学报,2012,33(1):32-39. Zhu Yangming, Zhou Jie, Gu Shengxiao, et al. Molecular Geochemistry of Eocene Pinghu Formation Coal-Bearing Source Rocks in the Xihu Depression, East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(1):32-39.
[10] 谢康珍,朱炎铭,司庆红,等. 西湖凹陷新生代煤系烃源岩生烃动力学研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术,2015,43(3):125-129. Xie Kangzhen, Zhu Yanming, Si Qinghong, et al. Study on Kinetics of Hydrocarbon Generation from Cenozoic Coal Measures of Xihu Depression.[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2015, 43(3):125-129.
[11] 沈玉林,秦勇,郭英海,等. 基于米氏聚煤旋回划分的西湖凹陷平湖组煤系烃源岩发育特征[J]. 石油学报,2016,37(6):706-714. Shen Yulin, Qin Yong, Guo Yinghai, et al. Development Characteristics of Coal-Measure Source Rocks Divided on the Basis of Milankovich Coal Accumulation Cycle in Pinghu Formation, Xihu Sag[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(6):706-714.
[12] 龚再升.中国近海含油气盆地新构造运动和油气成藏[J].石油与天然气地质,2004,25(2):133-138. Gong Zaisheng. Neotectonic Movement and Hydrocarbon Accumulation in Petroliferous Basins, Offshore China[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2004, 25(2):133-138.
[13] 张敏强,钟志洪,夏斌,等.东海西湖凹陷中南部晚中新世构造反转与油气运聚[J].中国海上油气,2005,17(2):73-79. Zhang Minqiang, Zhong Zhihong, Xia Bin, et al. Late Miocene Tectonic Inversion and Hydrocarbon Migration and Accumulation in Central and Southern Xihu Sag, East China Sea[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2005, 17(2):73-79.
[14] 周心怀,蒋一鸣,唐贤君. 西湖凹陷成盆背景、原型盆地演化及勘探启示[J]. 中国海上油气,2019,31(3):1-10. Zhou Xinhuai, Jiang Yiming, Tang Xianjun. Tectonic Setting, Prototype Basin Evolution and Exploration Enlightenment of Xihu Sag in East China Sea Basin[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2019, 31(3):1-10.
[15] 蔡华,张建培,唐贤君.西湖凹陷断裂系统特征及其控藏机制[J].天然气工业,2014, 34(10):18-26. Cai Hua, Zhang Jianpei, Tang Xianjun. Characteristics of the Fault Systems and Their Control on Hydrocarbon Accumulation in the Xihu Sag, East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2014, 34(10):18-26.
[16] 魏恒飞,陈践发,陈晓东. 东海盆地西湖凹陷凝析气藏成藏特征及分布控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2019,49(6):1507-1517. Wei Hengfei, Chen Jianfa, Chen Xiaodong.Characteristics and Controlling Factors of Condensate Reservoir Accumulation in Xihu Sag, East China Sea Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition),2019, 49(6):1507-1517.
[17] 王启军,陈建渝.油气地球化学[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1988:75-79. Wang Qijun, Chen Jianyu. Oi1 and Gas Geochemistry[M]. Wuhan:China University of Geosciences Press, 1988:75-79.
[18] 周心怀,西湖凹陷地质认识创新与油气勘探领域突破[J]. 中国海上油气,2020,32(1):1-12. Zhou Xinhuai. Geological Understanding and Innovation in Xihu Sag and Breakthroughs in Oil and Gas Exploration[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas,2020,32(1):1-12.
[19] Lynn P,Tom L,Paul G,et al. The Australian Structurally Enhanced View of Economic Basement[R]. Deakin:Geoscience Australia,2005:122-129.
[20] Blevin J,Cathro D. Australian Southern Margin Synthesis[R]. Deakin:Geoscience Australia,2008:7-96.
[21] Zhang Zijian,Wright C S. Quantitative Interpretations and Assessments of a Fractured Gas Hydrate Reservoir Using Three-Dimensional Seismic and LWD Data in Kutei Basin, East Kalimantan, Offshore Indonesia[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2017,84:257-273.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed