吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (3): 825-832.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20190322

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

ZYXC-244机械式旋冲螺杆钻具的研制与应用

甘心   

  1. 中石化中原石油工程有限公司钻井工程技术研究院, 河南 濮阳 457001
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-30 出版日期:2021-05-26 发布日期:2021-06-07
  • 作者简介:甘心(1987—),男,在站博士后,助理研究员,主要从事钻井提速技术及配套工具研究工作,E-mail:932213630@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    中石化中原石油工程有限公司科研项目（2017108）

Development and Application of ZYXC-244 Mechanical Rotary-Percussive Tool Based on Screw Drill

Gan Xin   

  1. Drilling Engineering and Technology Research Institute, Zhongyuan Petroleum Engineering Co. Ltd, SINOPEC, Puyang 457001, Henan, China
  • Received:2019-12-30 Online:2021-05-26 Published:2021-06-07
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the Scientific Research Project of Zhongyuan Petroleum Engineering Co.Ltd,SINOPEC (2017108)

PDF (PC)

40

摘要： 针对现有常规螺杆钻具在研磨性强、可钻性差的难钻地层中存在破岩能量不足、机械钻速低、钻头消耗量大的问题，引入旋冲钻井破岩理念及轴向机械冲击破岩功能，研制了集合旁通阀总成、动力总成、传动总成和冲击总成于一体的ZYXC-244机械式旋冲螺杆（新型螺杆），并创新设计了防掉功能。通过对新型螺杆主要性能参数计算模型的分析，获取了其主要性能参数的特征变化曲线。新型螺杆先后在足203H1-3井和大湾4011-2井的须家河组等地层进行了现场应用，应用效果表明，新型螺杆进尺分别为685.00 m和72.53 m时与常规螺杆相比，机械钻速分别提高了38.2%和31.5%，节省了起下钻2次和2只钻头消耗，为难钻地层的提速提效提供了有效的技术手段。

关键词: 旋冲钻井, 螺杆钻具, 凸轮机构, 防掉功能, 冲击功, 冲击频率

Abstract: Aiming at the problems of insufficient rock-breaking energy, low rate of penetration, and consumption of large number of bits when using a conventional screw drill in difficult-to-drill formations with strong abrasiveness and poor drilling ability, the concept of rotary-percussive drilling and the function of axial mechanical impact were introduced. Based on screw drill integrating bypass valve assembly, power assembly, transmission assembly, and impact assembly, the ZYXC-244 mechanical rotary-percussive tool was developed, and the function of fall prevention was also innovatively designed for the purpose of improving its reliability. Through analyzing the calculation model of the main performance parameters, the characteristic curve of the main performance parameters was obtained. Finally, the ZYXC-244 mechanical rotary-percussive tool based on screw drill was successively applied to Well Z203H1-3 and Well D4011-2 of Xujiahe Formation. When the drilling depth of the new type screw drill was 685.00 m and 72.53 m, the rate of penetration was improved by 38.2% and 31.5%, respectively, and two trips and two bits were saved, compared to those of the conventional screw drill. Through this research, an effective technical tool is provided for difficult-to-drill formations.

Key words: rotary-percussive drilling, screw drill, cam mechanism, fall prevention function, impact energy, impact frequency

中图分类号: 

  • TE921
[1] 张瀚之, 翟晓鹏, 楼一珊. 中国陆相页岩油钻井技术发展现状与前景展望[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2019, 41(3): 265-271. Zhang Hanzhi, Zhai Xiaopeng, Lou Yishan. Development Status and Prospect of the Drilling Technologies Used for Continental Shale Oil Reservoirsin China[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2019, 41(3): 265-271.
[2] 汪海阁, 葛云华, 石林. 深井超深井钻完井技术现状、挑战和"十三五"发展方向[J].天然气工业, 2017, 37(4): 1-8. Wang Haige, Ge Yunhua, Shi Lin. Technologies in Deep and Ultra-Deep Well Drilling: Present Status, Challenges and Future Trend in the "13th Five-Year" Plan Period (2016-2020)[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2017, 37(4): 1-8.
[3] 邱自学, 王璐璐, 徐永和, 等. 页岩气钻井螺杆钻具的研究现状及发展趋势[J]. 钻采工艺, 2019, 42(2): 36-37. Qiu Zixue, Wang Lulu, Xu Yonghe, et al. Status Quo and Development Trend of Positive Displacement Motor Used in Shale Gas Drilling[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2019, 42(2): 36-37.
[4] 苏义脑. 螺杆钻具研究及应用[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2001: 69-76. Su Yinao. Research and Application of Screw Drill[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2001: 69-76.
[5] 黄仁山. 油气工业可借鉴的冲击回转钻进技术[J].石油钻探技术, 1996, 24(4): 18-20. Huang Renshan. The Percussion Rotary Drilling Technique that Can Be Learned by Oil and Gas Industry[J].Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 1996, 24(4): 18-20.
[6] 殷琨, 王茂森, 彭枧明, 等. 冲击回转钻进[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2010: 52-57. Yin Kun, Wang Maosen, Peng Jianming, et al. Percussion Rotary Drilling[M]. Beijing: Geology Publishing House, 2010: 52-57.
[7] 陶兴华. 提高深井钻井速度的有效技术方法[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2001,23(5): 4-8. Tao Xinghua. Effective Measures for Improving the Penetration Rate of Deep Well[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2001, 23(5): 4-8.
[8] 李国华, 鲍洪志, 陶兴华. 旋冲钻井参数对破岩效率的影响研究[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2004, 32(2): 4-7. Li Guohua, Bao Hongzhi, Tao Xinghua. Effects of Drilling Conditions on Crushing Rocks While Rotary Percussion Drilling[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2004, 32(2): 4-7.
[9] 王雷, 郭志勤, 张景柱, 等. 旋冲钻井技术在石油钻井中的应用[J]. 钻采工艺, 2005, 28(1): 8-10. Wang Lei, Guo Zhiqin, Zhang Jingzhu, et al. Application of Percussive-Rotary Drilling Technology in Oil Wells[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2005, 28(1): 8-10.
[10] 蒋宏伟, 刘永胜, 翟应虎, 等. 旋冲钻井破岩力学模型的研究[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2006, 34(1): 13-16. Jiang Hongwei, Liu Yongsheng, Zhai Yinghu, et al. Research on Rock-Crushing Mechanics Model in Rotary and Percussive Drilling[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2006, 34(1): 13-16.
[11] Saksala T, Fourmeau M, Kane P A, et al. 3D Finite Elements Modelling of Percussive Rock Drilling: Estimation of Rate of Penetration Based on Multiple Impact Simulations with a Commercial Drill Bit[J]. Computers & Geotechnics, 2018, 99: 55-63.
[12] Kong X, Fang Q, Wu H, et al. Numerical Predictions of Cratering and Scabbing in Concrete Slabs Subjected to Projectile Impact Using a Modified Version of HJC Material Model[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2016, 95: 61-71.
[13] Bu Changgen, Qu Yegao, Cheng Zhiqiang, et al. Numerical Simulation of Impact on Pneumatic DTH Hammer Percussive Drilling[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2009, 20(5):225-232.
[14] Yin Qilei, Peng Jianming, Bo Kun, et al. Study on Dust Control Performance of a Hammer Drill Bit[J]. International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment, 2013, 27(6):393-406.
[15] 景英华, 袁鑫伟, 姜磊, 等. 高速旋转冲击钻井破岩数值模拟及现场试验[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 43(1): 75-80. Jing Yinghua, Yuan Xinwei, Jiang Lei, et al. Numerical Simulation and Field Experimental Study on Rock Breaking in High Speed Rotating Percussion Drilling[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2019, 43(1): 75-80.
[16] 张鑫鑫, 彭枧明, 孙铭泽, 等. 基于CFD的高能射流式液动冲击器活塞与缸体密封特性研究[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 534-541. Zhang Xinxin, Peng Jianming, Sun Mingze, et al. Study on the Sealing Characteristics Between the Piston and Cylinder in the High-Energy Liquid-Jet Hammer Based on CFD Method[J]. Journal of Jinlin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(2): 534-541.
[17] 李国琳, 葛东, 杨正龙, 等. 基于激光三角测量的射流式液动潜孔锤全行程实时运动规律试验[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(1): 185-191. Li Guolin, Ge Dong, Yang Zhenglong, et al. Experiment of Real-Time Motion Law of Fluidic Hammer in Stroke Based on Laser Triangulation[J]. Journal of Jinlin University(Earth Science Edition), 2021, 51(1): 185-191.
[18] 韩志勇. 垂直井眼内钻柱的轴向力计算及强度校核[J]. 石油钻探技术, 1995, 23(增刊1): 8-13. Han Zhiyong. Study on Axial Force Calculating and Strength Testing for Drilling in Vertical Holes[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 1995, 23(Sup. 1): 8-13.
[1] 高科, 高红通, 谭现锋, 赵长亮, 李梦. 仿生异型齿钻头在干热岩钻探中的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(6): 1804-1809.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 周彦章，迟宝明，刘中培. 山东夏甸金矿床充水机理构造控制模式[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 255 -0260 .
[2] 张渊，刘连登，孙景贵，陈国华，张洪喜，闫复传,杨开春. 胶东西北部黄埠岭金矿床两期次叠加成矿[J]. J4, 2008, 38(1): 21 -0026 .
[3] 张玉玲，姚军，赵晓波，曹春英，郑松志. 复合型微生物絮凝剂产生菌YL3的优化条件[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 864 -0868 .
[4] 于 强，任战利. 鄂尔多斯盆地黄陵、东胜地区地温场对比[J]. J4, 2008, 38(6): 933 -0936 .
[5] 杨春梅, 李洪奇,陆大卫,张方礼,高 原,邵英超. 不同驱替方式下岩石电阻率与饱和度的关系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 667 -671 .
[6] 崔迎春, 石学法, 刘季花, 马立杰. 70 Ma以来风尘活动在太平洋铁锰结壳中的记录[J]. J4, 2012, 42(2): 393 -399 .
[7] 巩向博，吕庆田，韩立国，谭尘青. 起伏地表地震波场角度域照明分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(2): 610 -615 .
[8] 祝洪臣，张炯飞，权 恒. 大兴安岭中生代两期成岩成矿作用的元素、同位素特征及其形成环境[J]. J4, 2005, 35(04): 436 -0442 .
[9] 吴孔运，蒋忠诚，叶 晔. 不同植物群落对灰岩试块溶蚀速率的影响[J]. J4, 2007, 37(5): 967 -0971 .
[10] 张彦龙，葛文春，柳小明，张吉衡. 大兴安岭新林镇岩体的同位素特征及其地质意义[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 177 -0186 .
版权所有 © 《吉林大学学报(地球科学版)》编辑部
地址：长春市西民主大街938号(130026)　电话：+86-431-88502374；13756165364　E-mail: xuebao1956@jlu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发