吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (1): 253-263.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20220051

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于SWAT模型的滏阳河流域断流河道复流研究

洪梅1,2,赵明明1,2,魏涛1,2,林豪栋3   

  1. 1.吉林大学新能源与环境学院,长春 130021
    2.吉林大学石油化工污染场地控制与修复技术国家地方联合工程实验室,长春 130021
    3.台州市污染防治工程技术中心,浙江 台州 318000
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-02 出版日期:2024-01-26 发布日期:2024-03-11
  • 作者简介:洪梅(1972—), 女, 教授, 博士生导师, 主要从事污染场地控制与修复方面的研究, E-mail: hongmei@jlu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFC370220);国家重大科技专项(2018ZX07111001)

Study on Water Restoration in the Dried-up River of the Fuyang River Basin Based on the SWAT Model#br#

Hong Mei1,2, Zhao Mingming1,2, Wei Tao1,2, Lin Haodong3   

  1. 1. College of New Energy and Environment, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
    2. National Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Petrochemical Pollution Site Control and Remediation Technology, 
    Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
    3. Taizhou Engineering Technology Center of Pollution Control, Taizhou 318000, Zhejiang,China
  • Received:2022-03-02 Online:2024-01-26 Published:2024-03-11
  • Supported by:
    the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFC370220) and the National Science and Technology Major Project (2018ZX07111001)

摘要: 针对滏阳河流域断流河道生态修复的问题,为了实现断流河道尽可能恢复有水时间并且恢复基本生态功能的目标,基于节水措施和调水工程现状,通过建立滏阳河流域SWAT ( soil and water assessment tool) 水文模型,在模型中设置不同补水水量、补水方式的生态补水情景,分析不同情景下断流河道断面的径流量变化和恢复有水天数,并结合生态流量评价标准评价不同情景的河流生态恢复效果。结果表明:滏阳河流域邯郸断面在节水情景和调水情景中恢复河流生态效果较好,在通过上游节水措施和补充年调水1.00×108 m3/a的情景下,可以达到5—10月恢复有水184 d、恢复径流量3 486.7×104 m3/a的目标;年内恢复径流峰值在8月中旬,并且河道年均径流量可以恢复到“好”等级的生态流量标准。滏阳河下游邢台断面在节水情景和调水情景下恢复径流量较少,河道有水天数不达标,需要在上游节水条件下补充外来调水水量1.50×108 m3/a来达到恢复年有水天数304 d、恢复径流量1 906.5×104 m3/a的目标,年内恢复径流峰值分别在3月中旬和8月中旬;并且在达到恢复有水目标的情景下邢台断面仅达到“一般”等级的生态流量标准,需要考虑增加调水水量进行分时段单点位补水的补水方案。
关键词:SWAT模型;生态补水;恢复有水;情景分析;滏阳河流域

关键词: SWAT模型, 生态补水, 恢复有水, 情景分析, 滏阳河流域

Abstract: In order to achieve the goal of restoring water to the river as long as possible and to restore the basic ecological functions, a SWAT (soil and water assessment tool) hydrological model for the Fuyang River basin was established based on the current status of water conservation measures and water transfer projects. The different ecological water replenishment scenarios were designed, the variation of runoff volume and the restoration of the annual number of days with water were analyzed for different scenarios. Ecological restoration effects were analyzed based on the ecological base flow standard. The results show that the river ecological restoration effect is better in the water conservation scenario and the water transfer scenario in the Handan section of Fuyang River basin, and 184 days of water restoration from May to October can be achieved through the upstream water conservation measures and the scenario of 1.00×108 m3/a of supplemental annual water transfer, and the restored runoff volume of 3 486.7×104 m3/a, the water replenishment can reach the ecological baseflow standard and guarantee the basic ecological function of the river. The Xingtai section in the lower reaches of Fuyang River has less restored runoff under water-saving and water transfer scenarios, so the number of days with water in the river does not meet the standard, and it needs to supplement the external water transfer volume of 1.50×108 m3/a under the upstream water conservation condition to achieve the restoration of the annual number of days with water is 304 days and the restored runoff volume of 1 906.5×104 m3/a, and Xingtai section under the scenario of achieving the target of restoring water. The ecological replenishment scheme of increasing water transfer for single point replenishment in different periods needs to be considered as it cannot reach the ecological base flow standard of the river.

Key words: SWAT model, ecological water replenishment, water restoration, scenario analysis, Fuyang River basin

中图分类号: 

  • P641.1
[1] 洪梅, 林豪栋. CMADS降水数据在温带东亚季风气候区水库控制流域适用性——以潮白河、东洋河流域为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(3): 833-842.
[2] 汤洁, 杨巍, 李昭阳, 卞建民, 刘畅. 辽河大伙房水库汇水区农业非点源污染入库模拟[J]. J4, 2012, 42(5): 1462-1468.
[3] 尹雄锐, 章光新, 杨帆, 许斌. 东北半干旱地区流域分布式水文模拟——以洮儿河流域为例[J]. J4, 2011, 41(1): 137-144.
[4] 张树军,赵峰,罗陶露,姚文峰,边境. 生态补水综合效益评价指标体系建立[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 813-0819.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 程立人,张予杰,张以春. 西藏申扎地区奥陶纪鹦鹉螺化石[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 273 -0282 .
[2] 李 秉 成. 陕西富平全新世古气候的初步研究[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 291 -0295 .
[3] 和钟铧,杨德明,王天武,郑常青. 冈底斯带巴嘎区二云母花岗岩SHRIMP锆石U-Pb定年[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 302 -0307 .
[4] 陈 力,佴 磊,王秀范,李 金. 绥中某电力设备站场区地震危险性分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 641 -645 .
[5] 纪宏金,孙丰月,陈满,胡大千,时艳香,潘向清. 胶东地区裸露含金构造的地球化学评价[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 308 -0312 .
[6] 初凤友,孙国胜,李晓敏,马维林,赵宏樵. 中太平洋海山富钴结壳生长习性及控制因素[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 320 -0325 .
[7] 李斌,孟自芳,李相博,卢红选,郑民. 泌阳凹陷下第三系构造特征与沉积体系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 332 -0339 .
[8] 李涛, 吴胜军,蔡述明,薛怀平,YASUNORI Nakayama. 涨渡湖通江前后调蓄能力模拟分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 351 -0355 .
[9] 旷理雄,郭建华,梅廉夫,童小兰,杨丽. 从油气勘探的角度论博格达山的隆升[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 346 -0350 .
[10] 章光新,邓伟,何岩,RAMSIS Salama. 水文响应单元法在盐渍化风险评价中的应用[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 356 -0360 .