吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (2): 635-646.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20240032

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于地下水生态水位埋深阈值的可开采量评价——以三江平原普阳灌区为例

杜新强1,2,尹呈杉1,2,方永军1,2,李孜涵1,2,郭辉3   

  1. 1.地下水资源与环境教育部重点实验室(吉林大学),长春130021

    2.吉林大学新能源与环境学院,长春130021

    3.黑龙江省水利水电勘测设计研究院,哈尔滨150080

  • 出版日期:2026-03-26 发布日期:2026-04-16
  • 基金资助:

    黑龙江省重点研发计划项目(JD22B001)


Evaluation of Exploitable Groundwater Resources Based on Groundwater Ecological Water Depth Threshold:An Example of Puyang Irrigation District of Sanjiang Plain

Du Xinqiang1,2,Yin Chengshan1,2,Fang Yongjun1,2,Li Zihan1,2,Guo Hui3

#br#   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment (Jilin University), Ministry of Education, Changchun 130021, China

    2. School of New Energy and Environment, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China

    3. Heilongjiang Provincial Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Survey, Design and Research Institute, Harbin 150080,

     China

  • Online:2026-03-26 Published:2026-04-16
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the Key Research and Development Program of Heilongjiang Province (JD22B001)

摘要: 地下水可开采量是水资源开发利用与管理的重要依据,受相关生态环境和地质条件约束。本文以三江平原普阳灌区为例,为控制湿地植被退化、地面沉降、第四系含水层疏干及地下水与地表水脱节等风险,确定了地下水开发利用的生态水位埋深下限阈值。以此为基础,利用MODFLOW构建灌区数值模拟模型,对地下水可开采量进行模拟与评价。结果表明:灌区内生态水位下限埋深阈值在2.27~9.84 m之间;基于地下水数值模拟,灌区在研究时段(2013-2017年)内的年平均补给量为25 515.9×104 m3,排泄量为26 194.1×104 m3,储存量变化量为-678.3×104 m3,处于负均衡状态,但地下水位埋藏深度尚未到达下限阈值,地下水仍具备一定开采潜力。进一步以水均衡及生态地下水位埋深下限阈值为控制标准,结合研究时段内的气象和水文条件,建立长期预测模型并调算,确定灌区最大地下水可开采量为29 343.2×104 m3/a。

关键词: 地下水资源, 地下水生态水位埋深, 地下水可开采量评价, 三江平原

Abstract:

The groundwater exploitable quantity is an important basis for the development, use and management of water resources, and is subject to constraints imposed by the ecological environment and geological conditions. Taking the Puyang irrigation area of the Sanjiang plain as an example, this paper determined the lower limit of the ecological water depth for groundwater development and utilization, aiming to mitigate risks such as the prevention of wetland vegetation degradation, land subsidence, quaternary aquifer dredging, and the disconnection between groundwater and surface water. Based on this, a numerical simulation model of the irrigation area is constructed using MODFLOW to simulate and evaluate the groundwater exploitable quantity. The lower limit of ecological water depth in the irrigation area is between 2.27 and 9.84 m; Based on groundwater numerical simulations, the annual average recharge amount of the irrigation area during the study period (2013-2017) was 25 515.9×104 m3, the discharge volume was 26 194.1×104 m3, and the change of storage volume was -678.3×104 m3, indicating a negative equilibrium, but the burial depth of groundwater level had not yet reached the lower threshold, suggesting that the groundwater still has potential for exploitation. Furthermore, a long-term prediction model was established and calibrated based on the control criteria of ensuring a balance between recharge and discharge and the threshold of the lower limit of the buried depth of the ecological groundwater level, combined with the meteorological and hydrological conditions during the study period. The maximum recoverable groundwater in the irrigation area was determined to be 29 343.2×104 m3/a.

Key words: groundwater resources, groundwater ecological depth, groundwater exploitable resources, Sanjiang plain

中图分类号: 

  • P641.8
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 程立人,张予杰,张以春. 西藏申扎地区奥陶纪鹦鹉螺化石[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 273 -0282 .
[2] 李 秉 成. 陕西富平全新世古气候的初步研究[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 291 -0295 .
[3] 和钟铧,杨德明,王天武,郑常青. 冈底斯带巴嘎区二云母花岗岩SHRIMP锆石U-Pb定年[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 302 -0307 .
[4] 陈 力,佴 磊,王秀范,李 金. 绥中某电力设备站场区地震危险性分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 641 -645 .
[5] 纪宏金,孙丰月,陈满,胡大千,时艳香,潘向清. 胶东地区裸露含金构造的地球化学评价[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 308 -0312 .
[6] 初凤友,孙国胜,李晓敏,马维林,赵宏樵. 中太平洋海山富钴结壳生长习性及控制因素[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 320 -0325 .
[7] 李斌,孟自芳,李相博,卢红选,郑民. 泌阳凹陷下第三系构造特征与沉积体系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 332 -0339 .
[8] 李涛, 吴胜军,蔡述明,薛怀平,YASUNORI Nakayama. 涨渡湖通江前后调蓄能力模拟分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 351 -0355 .
[9] 旷理雄,郭建华,梅廉夫,童小兰,杨丽. 从油气勘探的角度论博格达山的隆升[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 346 -0350 .
[10] 章光新,邓伟,何岩,RAMSIS Salama. 水文响应单元法在盐渍化风险评价中的应用[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 356 -0360 .