潜孔锤钻进孔口密封器流场数值模拟及优化设计

J4 ›› 2011, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 511-517.

潜孔锤钻进孔口密封器流场数值模拟及优化设计

范黎明¹|殷琨¹|张晓光¹|王传留¹|赵志强¹|赵睿智²|朴金石¹

1.吉林大学建设工程学院/国土资源部复杂条件钻进技术开放研究实验室/教育部地球探测技术与仪器重点实验室|长春130026;
2.吉林省交通规划设计院|长春130021

收稿日期:2010-05-11 出版日期:2011-03-26 发布日期:2011-03-26
通讯作者: 殷琨（1952-），男，吉林长春人，教授，博士生导师，主要从事钻井工艺研究 E-mail:yinkun@jlu.edu.cn
作者简介:范黎明(1983-)|男|四川德阳人|博士研究生|主要从事多工艺冲击回转钻进技术研究|E-mail:fanliming671@163.com
基金资助:
中国地质调查局项目（1212010816018）；吉林大学“985工程”研究生创新基金资助项目（20080245）

Numerical Simulation of Geometry Parameters for Optimization Design of Orifice Sealer Used in DTH Hammer Drilling

1.College of Construction Engineering/Laboratory of Technology for Drilling Under Complex Condition of Ministry of Land and Resources/Key Labortory of Geodetection Teohnolody &|Instrumentation of Ministry of Education|Jilin University|Changchun130026|China;
2.Jilin Communications Planning and Design Institude|Changchun130021|China

Received:2010-05-11 Online:2011-03-26 Published:2011-03-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为定向收集风动潜孔锤钻进时排出的岩矿样，降低粉尘污染同时提高岩矿样采取率，对孔口密封器内流场进行了计算流体动力学分析（CFD），分别讨论了传统密封器、隔板式密封器、流线型式密封器结构形式及其相关结构参数（隔板位置L、出口直径d、出口角度θ）对密封效果的影响规律并进行优化设计。分析表明，三类密封器密封效果受结构形式和出口直径d影响最为明显:当d为40～160 mm时，隔板式和流线式密封器密封效果远好于传统密封器;当d>160 mm时，隔板式密封器与传统密封器的效果相当，而流线式密封器的效果始终是三者当中最好的。经现场试验证明，采用优化过的孔口密封器对岩矿样实施定向收集，除尘效果很好,且岩矿样平均采取率可达97%。

关键词: 孔口密封器, 除尘, CFD, 取样

Abstract:

For the purpose of directional dust collection, improving sampling rate and reducing air pollution caused by dust during the hole drilling, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) technique is employed to investigate how the structure types of traditional orifice sealer, clapboard orifice sealer and streamline orifice sealer and their geometry parameters(clapboard location(L), outlet diameter(d) and outlet angle(θ) )influence the orifice seal effect. And optimal parameters are selected to carry out structure design of the sealer. According to the results, the seal effect of three types of sealer is obviously affected by their types and the outlet diameter(d). When d=40-160 mm, clapboard orifice sealer and streamline orifice sealer perform much better than the traditional sealer, and when d>160 mm, the performance of clapboard sealer becomes lower than the traditional sealer. However, the streamline orifice sealer always performs the best among the three of them. On-the-spot experiment shows that when using the orifice sealer, the effect of dedusting turns out to be satisfied and the average of sampling rate which can reach 97% is also acceptable.

Key words: orifice sealer, dedusting, CFD, sampling

中图分类号:

P634.4

范黎明, 殷琨, 张晓光, 王传留, 赵志强, 赵睿智, 朴金石. 潜孔锤钻进孔口密封器流场数值模拟及优化设计[J]. J4, 2011, 41(2): 511-517.

FAN Li-ming, YIN Kun, ZHANG Xiao-guang, WANG Chuan-liu, ZHAO Zhi-qiang, ZHAO Rui-zhi, PIAO Jin-shi. Numerical Simulation of Geometry Parameters for Optimization Design of Orifice Sealer Used in DTH Hammer Drilling[J]. J4, 2011, 41(2): 511-517.

参考文献

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	张永光, 彭枧明, 柳鹤, 殷其雷, 范黎明. 射流式液动锤活塞回程缓冲机构[J]. J4, 2010, 40(6): 1415-1418.
[2]	邓洪超, 刘旭, 马文星. 油井射流排砂泵扩散管出口流场分析[J]. J4, 2010, 40(3): 689-693.
[3]	李国琳, 彭枧明, 柳鹤, 赵志强. 液动锤射流元件喷嘴临界流速预测与验证[J]. J4, 2010, 40(1): 159-163.
[4]	边伟华，陈玉魁，唐华风，杨帝，王璞珺. 火山岩相的岩屑识别--以松辽盆地南部东岭探区为例[J]. J4, 2007, 37(6): 1104-1109.