开放体系和密闭体系恒速升温实验条件下有机质生烃动力学特征对比及意义

J4 ›› 2011, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4): 1040-1047.

开放体系和密闭体系恒速升温实验条件下有机质生烃动力学特征对比及意义

李婷婷¹|王民^1|2|卢双舫¹|田善思¹|陈国辉¹|韩璐³

1.东北石油大学地球科学学院|黑龙江大庆163318;
2.中国地质大学构造与油气资源教育部重点实验室|武汉430074;
3.河北科技师范学院园艺科技学院|河北秦皇岛066004

收稿日期:2010-10-27 出版日期:2011-07-26 发布日期:2011-07-26
通讯作者: 王民（1981-），男，河北省石家庄人，副教授，博士，主要从事油气地球化学和成藏研究，Tel： 0459-6505967 E-mail:quickking@163.com
作者简介:李婷婷(1979-)|女|黑龙江省佳木斯人|博士研究生|讲师|主要从事储层预测与开发地质研究|E-mail:ltt@dqpi.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(40972101)；国家油气重大专项（2008ZX05007-001，2008ZX05004-003）；国家重点基础研究发展计划项目（2009CB219306）；教育部重点实验室开放课题（TPR-2010-23）

Characteristic Comparison of Hydrocarbon Generation Kinetics Under Open-Closed Systems with Constant Heating Rates and Its Significance

LI Ting-ting¹,WANG Min^1|2,LU Shuang-fang¹,TIAN Shan-si¹,CHEN Guo-hui¹,HAN Lu³

1.College of Earth Sciences, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing163318, Heilongjiang,China;
2.Key Laboratory of Tectonics and Petroleum Resources (China University of Key Laboratory of Geosciences), Ministry of Eduction, Hubei Province, Wuhan430074, China;
3.College of Horticulture Science and Technology|Hebei Normal University of Science and Technology, Qinhuangdao066004, Hebei|China

Received:2010-10-27 Online:2011-07-26 Published:2011-07-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了揭示不同实验条件下有机质生烃动力学特征及其地质应用的差异性，对松辽盆地煤样进行了开放体系（Rock-Eval）和密闭体系（金管）的恒速升温热模拟实验。根据实验产物产率与温度关系标定了开放系下的有机质成油、成气及密闭体系下有机质成气动力学模型；将标定的2种体系下的动力学参数以实验室升温速率和地质升温速率条件下进行外推，表明密闭体系下的成气转化率相对开放体系下的变化要慢，原因在于开放体系下煤样热解生气为初次裂解，而密闭体系下煤样生气是初次裂解和二次裂解共同贡献的结果。进一步将2种体系下获得的生气动力学参数结合松辽盆地徐家围子地区埋藏史、热史资料进行应用表明：应用开放体系获得的动力学参数外推计算的生气门限对应时间（115 Ma）要比实际生气门限对应时间（110 Ma）偏早；应用密闭体系获得的动力学参数外推计算的生气门限对应时间（92 Ma）要比实际生气门限对应时间偏晚。

关键词: 开放体系, 密闭体系, 生烃动力学, 生烃门限, 徐家围子

Abstract:

In order to reveal the difference of hydrocarbon generation kinetics characteristics and its geologic application under different experiment conditions, two thermal simulation apparatus (open and closed systems) are employed to pyrolyze coal sample from Songliao basin. According to the relationship between experimental product yields and temperature, the kinetic models of the oil/gas generated from organic matter are calibrated. Then the kinetic parameters obtained from two experimental systems are extrapolated under the experimental heating rate and the geological heating rate, the results show that the TR (transformation ratio) increasing rate of the gas generation under closed system is slower than that under open system, the reason is that the coal sample pyrolysis to gas under open system is mainly primary cracking, but under closed system it is a common result of primary and secondary cracking. For further application, the hydrocarbon generation threshold is calculated, which combined the burial-thermal history of Xujiaweizi and the kinetic parameters obtained from two experimental systems. And the extrapolation result shows that the calculated geological time (115 Ma) corresponding to the threshold from open system is earlier than the geological time corresponding to the actual threshold (110 Ma), and the calculated geological time (92 Ma) corresponding to the threshold from closed system is later than the geological time corresponding to the actual threshold.

Key words: open system, closed system, hydrocarbon generation kinetics, hydrocarbon generation threshold, Xujiaweizi

中图分类号:

P618.13

李婷婷, 王民, 卢双舫, 田善思, 陈国辉, 韩璐. 开放体系和密闭体系恒速升温实验条件下有机质生烃动力学特征对比及意义[J]. J4, 2011, 41(4): 1040-1047.

LI Ting-ting, WANG Min, LU Shuang-fang, TIAN Shan-sai, CHEN Guo-hui, HAN Lu. Characteristic Comparison of Hydrocarbon Generation Kinetics Under Open-Closed Systems with Constant Heating Rates and Its Significance[J]. J4, 2011, 41(4): 1040-1047.

参考文献

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	陈树民，姜传金，刘立，初丽兰，裴明波. 松辽盆地徐家围子断陷火山岩裂缝形成机理[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(6): 1816-1826.
[2]	孟凡超, 刘嘉麒,崔岩. 松辽盆地徐家围子断陷营城组粗面岩成因与隐爆机制[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(3): 704-715.
[3]	付广, 胡明, 韩莹. 断裂对断陷盆地火山岩天然气的成藏与控制作用——以松辽盆地徐家围子断陷为例[J]. J4, 2012, 42(1): 1-8.
[4]	付广, 臧凤智. 徐深大气田形成的有利地质条件[J]. J4, 2011, 41(1): 12-20.
[5]	齐井顺, 李广伟, 孙立东, 谢豪, 刘庆民. 徐家围子断陷白垩系营城组四段层序地层及沉积相[J]. J4, 2009, 39(6): 983-990.
[6]	付广, 庞磊. 徐家围子断陷不同储量丰度气藏形成条件的定量研究[J]. J4, 2009, 39(6): 976-982.
[7]	于丹, 付晓飞, 吕延防, 付广, 胡明. 徐家围子断陷深层天然气盖层特征及封盖性评价[J]. J4, 2009, 39(5): 773-780.
[8]	徐立恒,陈践发,卢双舫,马广宇,李吉君. 应用生烃动力学法研究川东上二叠统烃源岩生烃史[J]. J4, 2008, 38(4): 594-0599.