川东北地区须家河组致密砂岩气藏异常高压成因

J4 ›› 2012, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (3): 624-633.

川东北地区须家河组致密砂岩气藏异常高压成因

李军¹|邹华耀¹|张国常²| 李平平¹|冯冲¹|张彦振¹|陈加松¹

1.中国石油大学油气资源与探测国家重点实验室, 北京102249;
2.中国石油化工股份有限公司南方分公司勘探处, 成都610041

收稿日期:2011-08-06 出版日期:2012-05-26 发布日期:2012-05-26
作者简介:李军(1982-)|男|博士研究生|主要从事油气成藏机理与分布规律研究|E-mail:lijun_qing126@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点项目(90914006)

Origins of Overpressure Tight Gas Reservoirs in the Xujiahe Formation, Northeastern Sichuan Basin

Li Jun¹,Zou Hua-yao¹, Zhang Guo-chang²,Li Ping-ping¹, Feng Chong¹,Zhang Yan-zhen¹,Chen Jia-song¹

1.State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing102249,China;
2. Exploration Department of South Company of Prospecting, SINOPEC, Chengdu610041,China

Received:2011-08-06 Online:2012-05-26 Published:2012-05-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

对川东北地区各种超压潜在成因的系统分析结果表明，欠压实作用不是异常高压成因，现今异常高压主要由天然气的充注增压（充气作用）和中燕山－喜山期的强烈构造挤压形成。利用SRK实际气体状态方程对元坝、通南巴气田充气增压贡献进行了计算：元坝气田天然气的充注增压平均为25.21 MPa，平均增压幅度60.86%;通南巴气田天然气的充注增压平均为45.81 MPa，平均增压幅度72.04%。其余主要为构造挤压增压，增压幅度在元坝、通南巴气田分别为39.14%和27.96%。中燕山－喜山期构造挤压活动强度的差异控制了应力释放区的分布和储层抬升降温降压的幅度，从而控制了现今压力场平面分布特征。通南巴地区由于晚期强烈的构造挤压活动，使其现今正处于应力充分释放的泄压区，充气增压、构造挤压之后降压过程的发生是其现今超压强度较低的主要原因。

关键词: 须家河组｜欠压实作用｜充气作用｜构造挤压｜致密砂岩｜天然气｜川东北

Abstract:

Systemic analysis on the potential causes of the overpressure in the northeastern Sichuan basin shows that the overpressures in tight gas reservoirs in Xujiahe Formation has been resulted mainly from the hydrocarbon accumulation and tectonic compression during the medium Yanshian to the Himalaya period, rather than compaction disequilibrium. By the SRK gas state equation, the pressure value of 25.21 MPa is calculated in Yuanba gas reservoirs, which indicates that there is an average pressure amplitude of 60.86% and resulted from hydrocarbon accumulation. Meanwhile, the pressure value of 45.81 MPa is calculated in Tongnanba gas reservoirs, which has average pressure amplitude of 72.04%. The additional excess pressures have been generated mainly by tectonic compression, which account for 39.14% and 27.96% of the excess pressures in Yuanba gas reservoirs and Tongnanba gas reservoirs respectively. The difference of the tectonic compression intensity during the Medium Yanshanian and Himalaya period controlled the distribution of present pressure, the distribution of stress release area as well as the pressure-temperature reducing extent for tectonic uplift. The Tongnanba area is located in stress release area nowadays, and the pressure reducing process after hydrocarbon accumulation and tectonic compression is the major cause of the currently lower pressure than in the Yuanba area.

Key words: Xujiahe Formation, compaction disequilibrium, hydrocarbon accumulation, tectonic compression, tight sandstone, natural gas, northeastern Sichuan basin

中图分类号:

P618.13

李军, 邹华耀, 张国常, 李平平, 冯冲, 张彦振, 陈加松. 川东北地区须家河组致密砂岩气藏异常高压成因[J]. J4, 2012, 42(3): 624-633.

LI Jun, ZOU Hua-yao, ZHANG Guo-chang, LI Ping-ping, FENG Chong, ZHANG Yan-zhen, CHEN Jia-song. Origins of Overpressure Tight Gas Reservoirs in the Xujiahe Formation, Northeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. J4, 2012, 42(3): 624-633.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	刘招君, 胡菲，孙平昌，孟庆涛，柳蓉. 再论陆相三级层序内四分方案及其在油气勘探中的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(1): 1-12.
[2]	高永利，孙卫，张昕. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组特低渗透储层微观地质成因[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(1): 13-19.
[3]	龚建明，李刚，杨传胜，须雪豪，张锦伟，王海荣，徐立明. 东海陆架盆地南部中生界分布特征与油气勘探前景[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(1): 20-27.
[4]	万永平，王根厚，归榕，李春霞，银晓，周进松. 陕北斜坡上古生界构造裂缝及其天然气成藏意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(1): 28-38.
[5]	曲希玉, 杨会东, 刘立, 刘娜, 齐赞, 唐惠. 松南油伴生CO₂气的成因及其对油气藏的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(1): 39-48.
[6]	白薷，张金功，李渭. 鄂尔多斯盆地合水地区延长组长6₃岩性油藏储层地质建模[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2012, 42(6): 1601-1609.
[7]	刘华，蒋有录，徐浩清，宋国奇，蔡东梅. 东营凹陷民丰地区深层裂解气藏成因类型与成藏模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2012, 42(6): 1638-1646.
[8]	王伟明，邓海，卢双舫，徐建军，王贵磊，陈国辉. 断陷盆地单层暗色泥岩厚度与优质烃源岩的关系及其对成藏的控制——以海拉尔盆地为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2012, 42(6): 1610-1616.
[9]	王卓超，叶加仁. 黄河口凹陷古近系超压发育特征及其成藏意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2012, 42(6): 1617-1628.
[10]	单玄龙, 高璇, 徐汉梁. 松辽盆地安达地区营城组中基性火山岩成藏主控因素[J]. J4, 2012, 42(5): 1348-1357.
[11]	刘招君, 孟庆涛, 贾建亮, 孙平昌, 柳蓉, 胡晓峰. 陆相盆地油页岩成矿规律：以东北地区中、新生代典型盆地为例[J]. J4, 2012, 42(5): 1286-1297.
[12]	李军辉. 海拉尔盆地呼和湖凹陷下白垩统层序构成样式及油气成藏模式[J]. J4, 2012, 42(4): 961-969.
[13]	王瑞飞, 吕新华, 国殿斌, 苏惠, 黄新文. 东濮凹陷三叠系砂岩油藏裂缝特征及主控因素[J]. J4, 2012, 42(4): 1003-1010.
[14]	刘宗堡, 赵淼, 吕延防, 马世忠, 方庆, 郭新. 松辽盆地三肇凹陷葡萄花油层地层减薄模式及控油意义[J]. J4, 2012, 42(4): 984-990.
[15]	文华国, 宫博识, 郑荣才, 刘合年, 吴蕾, 陈仁金, 李世临, 陈守春. 土库曼斯坦萨曼杰佩气田卡洛夫-牛津阶碳酸盐岩沉积-成岩系统[J]. J4, 2012, 42(4): 991-1002.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed