J4 ›› 2012, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (3): 698-704.

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

密闭取心饱和度校正数学模型

辛治国1,2,侯加根1,冯伟光2   

  1. 1.中国石油大学地球科学学院|北京102249;
    2.中国石油化工股份有限公司胜利油田分公司地质科学研究院|山东 东营257015
  • 收稿日期:2011-09-03 出版日期:2012-05-26 发布日期:2012-05-26
  • 作者简介:辛治国(1977-)|男|在站博士后|主要从事精细油藏描述研究|E-mail:xzgn6@yahoo.com.cn
  • 基金资助:

    国家重大科技专项(2011ZX05011-02)

Correction Model of Oil and Water Saturation in Sealing Core

Xin Zhi-guo1|2,Hou Jia-gen1,Feng Wei-guang2   

  1. 1.College of Geoscience|China University of Petroleum, Beijing102249, China;
    2.Geological Scientific Research Institute, Shengli Oil Field Company Ltd.Co.,Ltd., Dongying257015,Shandong, China
  • Received:2011-09-03 Online:2012-05-26 Published:2012-05-26

摘要:

利用密闭取心井资料分析油、水饱和度是目前最直接有效的方法,但是由于岩心上提导致的孔隙体积变大、降压脱气和钻井液侵入等过程的影响,岩心测试油、水饱和度之和一般均只有75%~85%,油、水饱和度都有较大损失,因而需要对油、水饱和度进行校正,争取求准饱和度数据。本次研究进行了挥发过程及岩心上提过程的室内实验,发现密闭取心降压脱气过程是造成油水饱和度损失的主要因素,目前实验条件难以如实模拟这一过程,研究中以流体分流率原理为核心,建立了降压脱气的数学校正模型;降压还会导致孔隙增大,岩心的覆压孔渗实验能够准确反映这一变化,为油水饱和度校正提供依据。建立的密闭取心饱和度校正数学模型精度与保压密闭取心的测试结果相当,具有推广意义。钻井液浸入造成的油水饱和度损失数量比较小,但是疏松砂岩中强浸的岩心样品油水饱和度数据需要校正,校正量一般不大于2%。

关键词: 密闭取心井, 饱和度损失, 校正模型, 降压脱气校正, 钻井液侵入校正, 油藏

Abstract:

It’s the most directand effective method to analyze oil and water saturation by using sealed coring data. However,the total saturationof oil and water is only 75%-85% due to the increasingpore volume caused by the processes of raising cores, degasification by release of pressure and mud invading. There are many losses in oil and water saturation during the process. Oil and water saturation should be corrected for exact data. This paper provides experiments of volatilization process and raising cores process. The process of degassing is the main factor that causes the loss of oil and water saturation. It’s very difficult to simulate this process really. Based on the split-flow principle, the correction model of degassing caused by pressure drop is made. Pressure dropping can cause the abundant porosity of the core, as can be accurately tested in the overburden pressure experiment and can provide the basic for oil and water saturation correcting. The precision of this correction model is similar with the result of the sealed coring pressure. And the influence caused by mud invading should be considered in coring of unconsolidated sand. Oil and water saturation should be corrected for complete invading specimen and high invading specimen, and the result is less than 2%.

Key words: sealing core well, saturation loss, correction model, degassing correction, mud invading correction, petroleum deposits

中图分类号: 

  • P618.13
[1] 张焕旭, 陈世加, 路俊刚, 刘超威, 陈娟, 李勇, 徐坤. “膨胀力”作用下致密砂岩储层石油运聚特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(5): 1341-1351.
[2] 谷团. 牛角塘伴生型镉矿床特殊的成矿环境[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 464-476.
[3] 刘仁强, 段永刚, 谭锋奇, 刘红现, 屈怀林. 用试井资料研究低渗透裂缝性油藏渗流模式及演化特征——以准噶尔盆地火烧山油田为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(2): 610-616.
[4] 张剑波, 李谢清, 石阳, 朱建勃. 油藏数值模拟中地质模型的建模流程与方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(3): 860-868.
[5] 赵 中 平. 井斜角对裂缝特征参数统计的影响及其意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(6): 1798-1804.
[6] 李双文,吴永平,刘化清,周立宏,肖敦清,姚军,倪长宽. 歧口凹陷新生界火成岩油藏特征及分布规律[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(4): 1071-1084.
[7] 孙乃泉,云露,蒲仁海,杨素举. 塔里木盆地顺9井区柯坪塔格组下段沉积微相与储层展布[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(6): 1716-1725.
[8] 李天义,何治亮,何生,周雁,孙冬胜,沃玉进,杨兴业. 中扬子北缘京山二叠系古油藏特征及石油地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(6): 1740-1752.
[9] 沈艳杰, 程日辉, 赵春满, 黄党委, 于振锋, 杨伟航. 与火山作用有关的岩系测井识别与物源分析--以松南十屋油田营城组为例[J]. J4, 2012, 42(3): 590-599.
[10] 黄劲松, 刘长国, 付晓飞, 吕延防, 孙永河. “小而肥”油藏油水分布特征及成因探讨——以海拉尔贝尔凹陷贝中油田为例[J]. J4, 2012, 42(1): 9-17.
[11] 张君龙. 塔南凹陷东部构造带南屯组储层宏观非均质性对油气分布的影响[J]. J4, 2011, 41(2): 351-358.
[12] 史彦尧, 宋新民, 郝志海, 俞宏伟. 基于沉积微相-岩石相建立砾岩油藏测井参数解释模型[J]. J4, 2010, 40(3): 707-712.
[13] 周炜, 王陶, 伍轶鸣. 示踪剂模拟技术在边水油藏水驱前缘研究中的应用--以哈德油田为例[J]. J4, 2010, 40(3): 549-556.
[14] 蒋恕,王华. 泌阳凹陷基于层序地层格架的油气成藏模式[J]. J4, 2007, 37(4): 744-0751.
[15] 李双文,刘洛夫,李超,姜振学,庞雄奇. 应用定量颗粒荧光技术研究塔中地区志留系古油藏分布特征[J]. J4, 2006, 36(05): 813-819.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!