基于岩石物理模版的碳酸盐岩含气储层定量解释

doi:10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201502304

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

笔者针对碳酸盐岩储层勘探开发面临的储层预测与流体识别难度大的问题,基于岩石物理理论,提出了一种对碳酸盐岩含气储层进行定量解释的方法:首先,综合碳酸盐岩地质和测井信息,以岩石物理理论为依据,实现了适用的碳酸盐岩岩石物理模型的构建;然后基于岩石物理模型优选出对孔隙度、含气饱和度较为敏感的参数λρ和μρ,构建能够反映储层孔隙度与含气饱和度的碳酸盐岩岩石物理模版;最后,将岩石物理模版与工区反演提取的参数相结合,确定储层分布范围,并对储层范围内孔隙度和含气饱和度数值进行了定量解释。实例分析表明,基于该模版定量解释得到的孔隙度和含气饱和度与实际地层孔隙度及产气结果基本一致,经验证碳酸盐岩岩石物理模版的可靠性和适用性较好。

关键词: 碳酸盐岩, 岩石物理模版, 储层参数, 定量解释

Abstract:

In the process of carbonate reservoir exploration and development, it is difficult for reservoir prediction and fluid identification. Aiming at this problem, we put forward a quantitative prediction method through making carbonate gas reservoir parameters based on the rock physics theories. First of all, considering the geological and well logging information of carbonate rock and according to the rock physics theories, we establish the carbonate rock physics model; and further we optimize the sensitive parameters (λρ and μρ) with the change of porosity, gas saturation, and establish the rock physics template for quantitative interpretation. Finally, the template and extracted parameters from seismic inversion were combined to decide the reservoir distribution and quantitatively interpret the porosity and gas saturation within the range of reservoir. The example analyses show that the porosity and gas saturation getting by our carbonate rock physics template are basically identical with the actual gas production and porosity. The reliability and applicability of carbonate rock physics template are thereby verified.

Key words: carbonate rocks, rock physics template, reservoir parameters, quantitative interpretation

中图分类号:

P631.4

张广智, 陈娇娇, 陈怀震, 张金强, 印兴耀. 基于岩石物理模版的碳酸盐岩含气储层定量解释[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(2): 630-638.

Zhang Guangzhi, Chen Jiaojiao, Chen Huaizhen, Zhang Jinqiang, Yin Xingyao. Quantitative Interpretation of Carbonate Gas Reservoir Based on Rock Physics Template[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2015, 45(2): 630-638.

参考文献

[1] 蒋涔, 余瀚熠. 岩石物理分析技术的应用[J]. 内蒙古石油化工, 2010 (5):97-99. Jiang Cen, Yu Hanyi. Petrophysical Analysis of the Application Areas[J]. Inner Mongulia Petrochemical Industry, 2010(5): 97-99.

[2] 马淑芳, 韩大匡, 甘利灯, 等. 地震岩石物理模型综述[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2010, 25(2):460-471. Ma Shufang, Han Dakuang, Gan Lideng, et al. A Review of Seismic Rock Physics Models[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2010, 25(2): 460-471.

[3] 徐胜峰, 李勇根, 曹宏. 地震岩石物理研究概述[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2009, 24(2):680-691. Xu Shengfeng, Li Yonggen, Cao Hong. A Review of Seismic Rock Physics[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2009, 24(2): 680-691.

[4] 赵迎月, 顾汉明, 李宗杰, 等. 塔中地区奥陶系典型地质体地震识别模式[J]. 吉林大学学报:地球科学版, 2010, 40(6):1262-1270. Zhao Yingyue, Gu Hanming, Li Zongjie, et al. The Seismic Wave Field Recognition Mode of Typical Geological Bodies in the Ordovician in Tazhong Area[J]. Journal of Jilin University: Earth Science Edition, 2010, 40(6): 1262-1270.

[5] 郄莹, 付晓飞, 孟令东, 等. 碳酸盐岩内断裂带结构及其与油气成藏[J]. 吉林大学学报:地球科学版, 2014, 44(3):749-761. Qie Ying, Fu Xiaofei, Meng Lingdong, et al. Fault Zone Structure and Hydrocarbon Accumulation in Carbonates[J]. Journal of Jilin University: Earth Science Edition, 2014, 44(3): 749-761.

[6] 刘春园, 魏修成, 徐胜峰, 等. 地球物理方法在碳酸盐岩储层预测中的应用综述[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2007, 22(6):1815-1822. Liu Chunyuan, Wei Xiucheng, Xu Shengfeng, et al. The Overview of Geophysical Techniques in Prediction of Carbonate Rock Reservoir[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2007, 22(6): 1815-1822.

[7] 吕其彪, 孙作兴. 岩石物理模版在储层定量解释中的应用[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2012, 27(2):610-618. Lü Qibiao, Sun Zuoxing. Application of Rock Physics Chart to Quantitative Reservoir Interpretation[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2012, 27(2): 610-618.

[8] Ødegaard E, Avseth P. Interpretation of Elastic Inversion Results Using Rock Physics Templates[C]//Presented at the 65th EAGE Mtg. Stavanger: EAGE, 2003:E-17.

[9] Ødegaard E, Avseth P. Well Log and Seismic Data Analysis Using Rock Physics Templates[J]. First Break, 2004, 22: 37-43.

[10] Avseth P, Mukerji T, Mavko G. Quantitative Seismic Interpretation: Applying Rock Physics to Reduce Interpretation Risk[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

[11] Xin G, Han D. Lithology and Fluid Differentiation Using Rock Physics Templates[J]. The Leading Edge, 2009, 28: 60-65.

[12] Boruah N. Rock Physics Template (RPT) Analysis of Well Logs for Lithology and Fluid Classification[C]//Presented at the 8th International Conference & Exposition on Petroleum Geophysics. Hyderabad: SPG, 2010:1-8.

[13] Andersen C F, Grosfeld V, Wijngaarden A V, et al. Interactive Interpretation of 4D Prestack Inversion Data Using Rock Physics Templates, Dual Classification, and Real-Time Visualization[J]. The Leading Edge, 2009, 28(8): 898-906.

[14] Gupta S D, Chatterjee R, Farooqui M Y.Rock Physics Template (RPT) Analysis of Well Logs and Seismic Data for Lithology and Fluid Classification in Cambay Basin[J]. International Journal of Earth Sciences, 2012, 101: 1407-1426.

[15] Mavko G, Mukerji T, Dvorkin J. The Rock Physics Handbook Tools for Seismic Analysis of Porous Media[M]. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

[16] Keys R G, Xu S Y. An Approximation for the Xu-White Velocity Model[J]. Geophysics, 2002, 67: 1406-1414.

[17] Xu S Y, Payne M A. Modeling Elastic Properties in Carbonate Rocks[J]. The Leading Edge, 2009, 28(1): 66-74.

[18] Baechle G T, Colpaert A, Eberli G P, et al.Modeling Velocity in Carbonates Using a Dual Porosity DEM Model[C]//Presented at the 77th SEG Mtg. San Antonio: SEG, 2007: 1589-1593.

[19] Kumar M, Han D H. Pore Shape Effect on Elastic Properties of Carbonate Rocks[C]//Presented at the 75th SEG Mtg. Houston: SEG, 2005, 24: 1477-1480.

[20] Gassmann F. Über Die Elastizitat Poröser Medien[J]. Vie der Natu Geselschaft in Zürich, 1951, 96: 1-23.

[21] White J E. Computed Seismic Speeds and Attenuation in Rocks with Partial Gas Saturation[J]. Geophysics, 2002, 67: 1406-1414.

[22] 周水生, 张波, 伍向阳. 流体替换方法研究及应用分析[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2009, 24(5):1660-1664. Zhou Shuisheng, Zhang Bo, Wu Xiangyang.Reseanch on Fluid Substitution Method and Its Application[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2009, 24(5): 1660-1664.

[23] 巴晶, 晏信飞, 陈志勇, 等. 非均质天然气藏的岩石物理模型及含气饱和度反演[J]. 地球物理学报, 2013, 56(5):1696-1706. Ba Jing, Yan Xinfei, Chen Zhiyong, et al. Rock Physics Model and Gas Saturation Inversion for Heterogeneous Gas Reservoirs[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2013, 56(5): 1696-1706.

相关文章 15

[1]	黄志, 叶涛, 肖述光, 李飞, 高文博, 戴建芳. 渤海湾盆地沙垒田西北斜坡带碳酸盐岩潜山储层形成与油气成藏[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 1815-1828.
[2]	谢兵, 徐昉昊, 范彩伟, 满勇, 江凡, 徐国盛, 张喜淳, 李安然. 北部湾盆地涠西南凹陷灰岩潜山储层岩溶识别及发育模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 2029-2046.
[3]	吴兆徽, 刘显太, 杜玉山, 吴颖昊. 碳酸盐岩微观测试技术对比与应用——以济阳坳陷乐安油田潜山为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(5): 1519-1529.
[4]	朱一丹. 河北秦皇岛驻操营剖面寒武系张夏组均一石生物丘沉积特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(5): 1403-1416.
[5]	贺婷, 周宁, 吴啸宇. 基于深度全连接神经网络的储层有效砂体厚度预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(4): 1262-1274.
[6]	韩学雨, 李玉海, 楼达, 王文庆, 王铸坤, 孙沛沛, 郑直, 远光辉. 黄骅坳陷孔西斜坡区奥陶系原生油气藏成藏过程及模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(2): 356-.
[7]	史江涛, 郝君明, 王小雷. 塔河地区奥陶系鹰山组储层特征及其主控因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(2): 348-362.
[8]	侯贤沐, 王付勇, 宰芸, 廉培庆. 基于机器学习和测井数据的碳酸盐岩孔隙度与渗透率预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(2): 644-653.
[9]	叶涛, 王清斌, 黄志, 孙哲, 李飞, 陈安清. 碳酸盐岩层序地层格架对岩溶储层的控制作用——以渤海西南海域下古生界为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(4): 991-1005.
[10]	张亚蒲, 杨正明, 黄延章, 李海波, 侯海涛, 朱光亚. 低渗孔隙型碳酸盐岩油藏储层特征及剩余油分布规律[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(3): 659-668.
[11]	史冀忠, 牛亚卓, 许伟, 宋博, 王宝文. 银额盆地石板泉西石炭系白山组碳酸盐岩地球化学特征及其环境意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(3): 680-693.
[12]	王恒, 姜亚楠, 张欣, 仲鸿儒, 陈庆轩, 高世臣. 基于梯度提升算法的岩性识别方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(3): 940-950.
[13]	王磊, 沈金松, 邹榕, 蔺学敏, 徐忠祥, 苏朝阳, 杨萍. 融合地震属性和成像测井信息优化的储层缝洞带评价与钻井轨迹[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(2): 607-623.
[14]	王建功, 张道伟, 石亚军, 张平, 孙秀建, 王爱萍, 王玉林, 高妍芳, 张世铭, 易定红. 柴达木盆地西部地区渐新世下干柴沟组上段盐湖沉积特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(2): 442-453.
[15]	李博南, 曲寿利, 沈珲. 基于岩石物理模型的碳酸盐岩储层微观孔隙特征分析方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(1): 285-293.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed