吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6): 1839-1845.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201506301

• 地球探测与信息技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

固定翼电磁数据双分量联合电导率深度成像

朱凯光, 李冰冰, 王凌群, 谢宾, 王琦, 程宇奇   

  1. 吉林大学仪器科学与电气工程学院, 长春 130026
  • 收稿日期:2015-02-08 发布日期:2015-11-26
  • 作者简介:朱凯光(1970),女,教授,主要从事地球物理电磁探测及随机信号处理研究,E-mail:zhukaiguang@jlu.edu.cn。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(41274076);国家高技术研究发展计划项目(2013AA063904);国家重大科研装备研制项目(ZDYZ2012-1-03)

Conductivity-Depth Imaging of Fixed-Wing Airborne Electromagnetic Data

Zhu Kaiguang, Li Bingbing, Wang Lingqun, Xie Bin, Wang Qi, Cheng Yuqi   

  1. College of Instrumentation and Electrical Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China
  • Received:2015-02-08 Published:2015-11-26

摘要:

传统固定翼航空电磁探测采用总场dB/dt进行电导率深度成像,不仅损失多分量测量信息,dB/dt与电导率的非唯一性也影响数据的成像精度。笔者提出了一种基于磁场双分量(Bx, Bz)查表的联合电导率深度成像算法,根据固定翼电磁响应的正演计算,建立按时间道划分的Bx-Bz-电导率-飞行高度数据表,利用磁场双分量联合查表与插值算法确定视电导率,避免了由于电磁数据二值性引起的视导率不确定性问题;根据扩散深度公式得到视深度,并计算成像深度,从而得到双分量联合电导率深度成像结果。基于一维大地模型正演数据与准二维大地模型正演加噪数据,分别采用磁场双分量联合查表法、总场查表法和单分量查表法对仿真数据进行电导率深度成像,结果表明磁场双分量联合查表法优于单分量与总场查表法,较单分量电导率深成像精度提高了7%。

关键词: 固定翼航空电磁, 磁场双分量查表法, 联合电导率深度成像, 扩散深度

Abstract:

The traditional fixed-wing airborne electromagnetic survey lost multi-component measurement information for the reason of using the total field as the data base for the conductivity depth imaging. The imaging precision is decreased due to the non-uniqueness of the dB/dt. A joint conductivity depth imaging approach based on the lookup method of two-component B field response is proposed. Based on the fixed-wing electromagnetic forward calculation, this paper establishes a table of Bx-Bz-conductivity-altitude, uses B field to avoid the uncertainty of conductivity due to the binary value of electromagnetic data, uses the joint lookup method of two-component B field and interpolation algorithm to determine the conductivity, and then takes the advantage of the diffusion depth formula to obtain the depth, and finally to process the joint conductivity depth imaging. Compared to the total field and simple component lookup method applied in the one-dimensional and quasi-two-dimensional forward simulation, the CDI of two-component B field gets more ideal fitting effects; and the imaging precision is improved by 7%.

Key words: fixed-wing airborne electromagnetic, lookup method of two-component magnetic field, joint conductivity-depth imaging, diffusion depth

中图分类号: 

  • P631.3

[1] Fountain D. Airborne Electromagnetic Systems:50 Years of Development[J]. Exploration Geophysics, 1998, 29(2): 1-11.

[2] Annan A P.Effect of Differential Transmitter/Receiver Motion on Airborne Transient EM Interpretation[J]. Geophysics, 1999, 49(1): 670-670.

[3] 胡平, 李文杰, 李军峰, 等.固定翼时间域航空电磁勘查系统研发进展[J]. 地球学报,2012, 33(1): 7-12. Hu Ping, Li Wenjie, Li Junfeng, et al. The Advances in the Development of Fixed-Wing Airborne Time-Domain Electromagnetic System[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2012, 33(1): 7-12.

[4] Macnae J C, Smith R, Polzer B D, et al. Conductivity-Depth Imaging of Airborne Electromagnetic Step-Response Data[J]. Geophysics, 1991, 56(1): 102-114.

[5] 嵇艳鞠, 冯雪, 于明媚, 等.基于多元线性回归的HTEM三维异常体电导率-深度识别[J]. 吉林大学学报:地球科学版,2014, 44(5), 1687-1694. Ji Yanju, Feng Xue, Yu Mingmei, et al. Conductivity-Depth Identification of HTEM 3D Anomalies Based on Multiple Linear Regression[J]. Journal of Jilin University: Earth Science Edition, 2014, 44(5), 1687-1694.

[6] Liu G, Asten M. Conductance-Depth Imaging of Airborne TEM data[J]. Exploration Geophysics,1994, 24(4): 655-662.

[7] Wolfgram P, Karlik G. Conductivity-Depth Transform of GEOTEM Data[J]. Exploration Geophysics, 1995, 26(2/3): 179-185.

[8] Huang H, Rudd J. Conductivity-Depth Imaging of Helicopter-Borne TEM Data Based on a Pseudolayer Half-Space Model[J]. Geophysics, 2008,73(3): 115-120.

[9] 朱凯光, 林君, 韩悦慧, 等.基于神经网络的时间域直升机电磁数据电导率深度成像[J]. 地球物理学报,2010, 53(3): 743-750. Zhu Kaiguang, Lin Jun, Han Yuehui, et al. Research on Conductivity Depth Imaging of Time Domain Helicopter-Borne Electromagnetic Data Based on Neural Network[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2010, 53(3): 743-750.

[10] 陈小红, 段奶军.时间域航空电磁快速成像研究[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2012,27(5): 2123-2127. Chen Xiaohong, Duan Naijun. Study on Fast Imaging of Airborne Time-Domain Electromagnetic Data[J]. Progress in Geophys., 2012, 27(5): 2123-2127.

[11] 毛立峰.中心回线式直升机TEM资料的电导率-深度成像方法[J]. CT 理论与应用研究, 2013,22(3): 429-437. Mao Lifeng. Conductivity-Depth Imaging Algorithm for Central-Loop Helicopter TEM[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2013, 22(3): 429-437.

[12] Smith R S, Keating P B. The Usefulness of Multicomponent, Time-Domain Airborne Electromagnetic Measurements[J]. Geophysics, 1996, 61(1): 74-81.

[13] 席振铢, 刘剑, 龙霞, 等.瞬变电磁法三分量测量方法研究[J]. 中南大学学报:自然科学版,2010,41(1):272-276. Xi Zhenzhu, Liu Jian, Long Xia, et al.Three-Component Measurement in Transient Electromagnetic Method[J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2010, 41(1): 272-276.

[14] 张莹莹.水平电偶源地空系统瞬变电磁法多分量解释技术及全域视电阻率定义研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学,2013. Zhang Yingying. Study on Multi-Component Interpretation and Full Field Apparat Resistivity Definition of Semi-Airborne Transient Electromagnetic Method with Electric Dipole on the Surface[D]. Xi'an: Chang'an University, 2013.

[15] 王琦, 林君, 于生宝, 等. 固定翼航空电磁系统的线圈姿态及吊舱摆动影响研究与校正[J]. 地球物理学报,2013,56(11):3741-3750. Wang Qi, Lin Jun, Yu Shengbao, et al. Study on Influence and Correction of Coil Attitude and Bird Swing for Fixed-Wing Time-Domain Electromagnetic System[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2013, 56(11):3741-3750.

[16] Huang H. Locating Good Conductors by Using the B-Field Integrated From Partial dB/dt Waveforms of Time-Domain EM Systems[C]. SEG/San Antonio Annual Meeting. San Antonio: SEG, 2007: 688-692.

[17] Wait J R. Geo-Electromagnetism[M]. [S.l.]: Academic Press Inc,1982.

[18] Guptasarma D, Singh B. New Digital Linear Filters for Hankel J0 and J1 Transforms[J]. Geophysical Prospecting, 1997, 45(5): 745-762.

[19] Guptasarma D, Singh B. Computation of the Time-Domain Response of a Polarizable Ground[J]. Geophysics, 1982, 47(11): 953-963.

[20] Wolfgram P, Karlik G. Conductivity-Depth Transform of GEOTEM Data[J].Exploration Geophysics, 1995, 26(3): 179-185.

[21] Vrbancich J, Fullagar P K, Macnae J. Bathymetry and Seafloor Mapping via One Dimensional Inversion and Conductivity Depth Imaging of AEM[J]. Exploration Geophysics, 2000,31(4): 603-610.

[22] 马铭遥.时间域航空电磁数据全波成像与处理技术研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学,2013. Ma Mingyao. Study on Full-Waveform Imaging and Processing of Time-Domain Airborne Electromagnetic Data[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2013.

[1] 朱凯光, 王昊, 彭聪, 张琼, 范天姣, 景春阳. 基于BP神经网络的固定翼航空电磁线圈姿态校正[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(1): 252-260.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 尤敏鑫,刘建民. 同位素地球化学在峨眉山大火成岩省研究中的应用现状与进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(4): 1231 -1243 .
[2] 杨春梅, 李洪奇,陆大卫,张方礼,高 原,邵英超. 不同驱替方式下岩石电阻率与饱和度的关系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 667 -671 .
[3] 祝洪臣,张炯飞,权 恒. 大兴安岭中生代两期成岩成矿作用的元素、同位素特征及其形成环境[J]. J4, 2005, 35(04): 436 -0442 .
[4] 朱建伟, 赵刚, 刘博, 郭巍, 成俊. 油页岩测井识别技术及应用[J]. J4, 2012, 42(2): 289 -295 .
[5] 陈力,梁海安,张文娟,荣帆. 模糊数学方法在城市工程地质环境区划中的应用--以抚顺市城区为例[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 837 -0840 .
[6] 高桂梅,苏 克,王文颖,甘树才,刘招君. 吉林省桦甸油页岩中稀土元素和微量元素的研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(6): 974 -0979 .
[7] 吴孔运,蒋忠诚,叶 晔. 不同植物群落对灰岩试块溶蚀速率的影响[J]. J4, 2007, 37(5): 967 -0971 .
[8] 周彦章,迟宝明,刘中培. 山东夏甸金矿床充水机理构造控制模式[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 255 -0260 .
[9] 张渊,刘连登,孙景贵,陈国华,张洪喜,闫复传,杨开春. 胶东西北部黄埠岭金矿床两期次叠加成矿[J]. J4, 2008, 38(1): 21 -0026 .
[10] 鲁程鹏, 束龙仓, 苑利波, 张蓉蓉, 黄币娟, 王彬彬. 基于示踪试验求解岩溶含水层水文地质参数[J]. J4, 2009, 39(4): 717 -721 .