吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (1): 230-239.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201601207

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

裂隙网络管道模型弥散试验

刘波, 王明玉, 张敏, 李玮   

  1. 中国科学院大学资源与环境学院, 北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2015-04-09 出版日期:2016-01-26 发布日期:2016-01-26
  • 通讯作者: 王明玉(1961),男,教授,博士生导师,主要从事地下水环境模拟及污染控制与修复,E-mail:mwang@ucas.ac.cn E-mail:mwang@ucas.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:刘波(1989),男,研究生,主要从事地下水环境模拟研究,E-mail:bob_ucas@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家环保公益项目(201309003);国家科技重大专项(2011ZX05060-005);国家自然科学基金项目(40972166)

Dispersivity Experimental Investigation Based on Fracture Network Pipe Model

Liu Bo, Wang Mingyu, Zhang Min, Li Wei   

  1. College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2015-04-09 Online:2016-01-26 Published:2016-01-26
  • Supported by:

    Support by Environmental Public Welfare Scientific Research Projects of China (201309003),the Key National Science & Technology Resources Project (2011ZX05060-005) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (40972166)

摘要:

为了探求不同裂隙几何参数对裂隙网络溶质运移的影响,基于离散裂隙网络思想和优势流、沟槽流理论,建立裂隙管道网络概念模型,搭建不同管径、不同连通方式的管道网络试验装置,进行渗流和溶质运移实验。运用应用广泛的模拟软件CHEMFLO-2000建立等效多孔介质模型,拟合不同几何参数下等效弥散度,定量刻画不同管道网络几何参数对溶质运移的影响,讨论了不同管径、连通方式等与等效弥散度之间的关系。通过进一步分析得出:在连通方式相同的情况下,不同管径的管道网络等效弥散度存在差异,但是差异不大;溶质在小管径中的穿透时间短于大管径,穿透曲线缓和程度相差不大;管道网络连通方式越复杂,其等效弥散度越大、对溶质运移的影响越大、穿透曲线越缓和、路径越长,等效弥散度越大;用这种等效弥散度的方法表征管道网络对溶质运移的影响,与多孔介质弥散度具有相似性;管道数目、管道面数目与等效弥散度成正相关关系,且等效弥散度随尺度的增大而增加。

关键词: 裂隙, 管道模型, 物理模型, 溶质运移, 等效弥散度

Abstract:

In order to investigate the effects made by different geometric parameters on solute transport in fracture networks, a fracture network pipe flow conceptual model was established based on the discrete fracture network model and preferential flow groove theory. A representative physical model was built in different pipe diameters with different methods of connection. A set of fluid flow and solute transport experiments were carried out. In order to quantitatively analyze the effects made by the different pipeline network geometric parameters on solute transport, a modeling software package CHEMFLO-2000 was used to set up an equivalent porous medium model and calculate the equivalent dispersivity. The results show that with the same connective method, no obvious difference of equivalent dispersivity is found among pipe networks in different pipe diameters, the solute transport time increases with the increasing of diameters, and the curves breakthrough smoothness is similar to each other. Moreover, the more complex the connection mode is, the bigger the equivalent dispersivity is. Furthermore, the longer the transport path is, the bigger the equivalent dispersivity is. In conclusion, this parameter of equivalent disperisivity can be used to characterize the influence of the fracture pipe network on solute transport like that in porous media. The equivalent dispersivity has a positive correlation with the number of pipelines and pipe surfaces, and grows with the increase of spatial scales correspondingly.

Key words: fracture, pipe network, physical model, solute transport, equivalent dispersivity

中图分类号: 

  • P641.69

[1] Mahmoudzadeh B, Liu L, Moreno L, et al. Solute Transport in a Single Fracture Involving an Arbitrary Length Decay Chain with Rock Matrix Comprising Different Geological Layers[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2014,164:59-71.

[2] Berkowitz B. Characterizing Flow and Transport in Fractured Geological Media:A Review[J]. Advances in Water Resources,2002,25(8):861-884.

[3] 束龙仓,范建辉,鲁程鹏,等. 裂隙-管道介质泉流域水文地质模拟试验[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2015,45(3):908-917. Shu Longcang,Fan Jianhui,Lu Chengpeng,et al.Hydrogeological Simulation Test of Fissure-Conduit Media in Springs Watershed[J].Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),2015,45(3):908-917.

[4] 周志芳, 顾长存. 裂隙水研究进展[J]. 河海科技进展, 1994,14(1):50-55. Zhou Zhifang,Gu Changcun. Advances of Groundwater Flow in Fractures[J]. Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources, 1994,14(1):50-55.

[5] 钱家忠, 杨立华, 李如忠, 等. 基岩裂隙系统中地下水运动物理模拟研究进展[J]. 合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版),2003,26(4):510-513. Qian Jiazhong, Yang Lihua, Li Ruzhong, et al.Advances in Laboratory Study of Groundwater Flow in Fractures System[J]. Journal of Hefei University of Technology(Natural Science), 2003,26(4):510-513.

[6] 程诚, 吴吉春, 葛锐, 等. 单裂隙介质中的溶质运移研究综述[J]. 水科学进展, 2003,14(4):502-508. Cheng Cheng, Wu Jichun, Ge Rui, et al. Review of the Research on Solute Transport in a Single Fracture[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2003,14(4):502-508.

[7] 王礼恒, 李国敏, 董艳辉. 裂隙介质水流与溶质运移数值模拟研究综述[J]. 水利水电科技进展, 2013,33(4):84-88. Wang Liheng,Li Guomin,Dong Yanhui. Review of Numerical Simulation of Flow and Solute Transport in Fractured Media[J]. Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources, 2013,33(4):84-88.

[8] 王海龙. 基岩裂隙水渗流数值模拟研究综述[J]. 世界核地质科学, 2012,29(2):85-91. Wang Hailong.Review on the Numerical Simulation of Seepage of Bedrock Fissure Water[J]. World Nuclear Geoscience, 2012,29(2):85-91.

[9] 刘华梅, 王明玉. 三维裂隙网络渗流路径识别算法及其优化[J]. 中国科学院研究生院学报, 2010, 27(4):463-470. Liu Huamei,Wang Mingyu. Algorithms and Their Optimization for Identification of the Connected Flow Paths for 3D Fracture Networks in Fractured Rocks[J]. Journal of the Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences,2010,27(4):463-470.

[10] 黄勇. 多尺度裂隙介质中的水流和溶质运移随机模拟研究[D].南京:河海大学, 2005. Huang Yong. Stochastic Simulation Study of Flow and Solute Transport in Multi-Scales Fractured Media[D].Nanjing:Hohai University,2005.

[11] Long J C. Investigation of Equivalent Porous Medium Permeability in Networks of Discontinuous Fractures[M]. California:Lawrence Berkeley Lab, 1983.

[12] Long J, Remer J, Wilson C, et al. Porous Media Equivalents for Networks of Discontinuous Fractures[J]. Water Resour Res, 1982,18:645-658.

[13] Long J, Gilmour P, Witherspoon P A. A Model for Steady Fluid Flow in Random Three-Dimensional Networks of Disc-Shaped Fractures[J]. Water Resour Res, 1985,21:1105-1115.

[14] 万力, 李定方,李吉庆. 三维裂隙网络的多边形单元渗流模型[J]. 水利水运科学研究, 1993(4):347-353. Wan Li, Li Dingfang, Li Jiqing. A Fluid-Flow Model for Three-Dimensional Network of Polygonal Fractures[J]. Hydro-Science and Engineering, 1993(4):347-353.

[15] Dershowitz W S, Fidelibus C. Derivation of Equivalent Pipe Network Analogues for Three-Dimensional Discrete Fracture Networks by the Boundary Element Method[J]. Water Resour Res, 1999,35:2685-2691.

[16] Dverstorp B, Andersson J, Nordqvist W. Discrete Fracture Network Interpretation of Field Tracer Migration in Sparsely Fractured Rock[J]. Water Resour Res, 1992,28:2327-2343.

[17] Tsang Y W, Tsang C F. Channel Model of Flow Through Fractured Media[J]. Water Resour Res, 1987,23:467-479.

[18] Tsang Y W, Tsang C F, Neretnieks I,et al. Flow and Tracer Transport in Fractured Media:A Variable Aperture Channel Model and Its Properties[J]. Water Resour Res, 1988,24:2049-2060.

[19] Tsang C F, Tsang Y W, Hale F V. Tracer Transport in Fracutres-Analysis of Field Data Based on a Variable-Aperture Channel Model[J]. Water Resour Res, 1991,27:3095-3106.

[20] Wang M, Kulatilake P, Um J, et al. Estimation of REV Size and Three-Dimensional Hydraulic Conductivity[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2002,39:887-904.

[21] 王恩志, 孙役, 黄远智, 等. 三维离散裂隙网络渗流模型与实验模拟[J]. 水利学报, 2002(5):37-40. Wang Enzhi, Sun Yi, Huang Yuanzhi,et al.3-D Seepage Flow Model for Discrete Fracture Network and Verification Experiment[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2002(5):37-40.

[22] Xu Z, Ma G, Li S. A Graph-Theoretic Pipe Network Method for Water Flow Simulation in a Porous Medium:GPNM[J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2014,45:81-97.

[23] Li S, Xu Z, Ma G. A Graph-Theoretic Pipe Network Method for Water Flow Simulation in Discrete Fracture Networks:GPNM[J]. Tunn Undergr Space Technol, 2014,42:247-263.

[24] 腾强, 王明玉, 王慧芳. 裂隙管道网络物理模型水流与溶质运移模拟试验[J]. 中国科学院研究生院学报,2014,31(1):54-60. Teng Qiang,Wang Mingyu,Wang Huifang. Experiments on Fluid Flow and Solute Transport in the Fracture Network Pipe Model[J]. Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,2014,31(1):54-60.

[25] Huang Y, Tang Y, Zhou Z, et al. Experimental Investigation of Contaminant Migration in Filled Fracture[J]. Environ Earth Sci, 2014,71:1205-1211.

[26] Tsang C F. Modeling Groundwater Flow and Mass Transport in Heterogeneous Media:Issues and Challenges[J]. Earth Sciences:Journal of China University of Geosciences, 2000, 25(5):443-450.

[27] Cacas M C, Ledoux E, Marsily G, et al. Modeling Fracture Flow with a Stochastic Discrete Fracture Network:Calibration and Validation:1:The Flow Model[J]. Water Resour Res, 1990,26:479-489.

[28] 王洪涛. 多孔介质污染物迁移动力学[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社, 2008:47. Wang Hongtao.Dynamics of Fluid Flow and Conta-minant Transport in Porous Media[M].Beijing:China Higher Education Press,2008:47.

[1] 蒋政, 舒彪, 路伟. 高温花岗岩张拉与剪切裂隙的渗流与传热性能试验[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(1): 315-326.
[2] 吴燕清, 杨志亮, 王常东, 郝晓飞, 姜山, 林天发, 于兵, 董小宇, 张强, 周舰, 王天奇, 王一鸣.

内蒙古乌兰哈达—楚鲁达板地区铀矿化特征及找矿方向 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1103-1119.

[3] 漆琳靖, 王泽清, 那金, 岑畅, 马军.

基于离散裂隙-等效连续介质耦合模型的哈尔克山裂隙网络模拟 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1256-1268.

[4] 袁益龙, 唐佳伟, 李鹏, 何瑞敏, 郭强, 钟承昊. 热-力耦合作用下花岗岩粗糙裂隙渗透率演化规律[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 179-187.
[5] 郑轩, 宗兆云, 付亚群, 骆坤. 海域油气盖层叠前地震反演预测方法及应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 2128-2141.
[6] 赵忠海, 崔晓梦, 孙景贵, 陈俊, 乔锴, 梁杉杉, Manirambona Alain Jospin .

基于三维地质-地球物理建模的深部成矿预测——以黑河地区永新金矿床为例 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(2): 498-515.

[7] 邓志颖, 范 祥, 何忠明, 崔志猛, 姜旭东. L形边裂隙单圆孔砂岩单轴压缩力学特性[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(2): 541-.
[8] 张延军, 袁学兵, 马跃强, 高雪峰, 高阳. 花岗岩双裂隙热-流耦合参数敏感性[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(6): 1971-1981.
[9] 孙启明, 高茂生, 党显璋, . 垃圾填埋场渗滤液变密度地下水溶质运移模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(4): 1265-.
[10] 亢佳乐, 卢全中, 占洁伟, 杨天亮, 沈首秀.

隐伏地裂缝破裂扩展物理模型试验边界效应 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(3): 941-954.

[11] 鲍新华, 于瀚博, 计量. 基于GMS的长春齐家地下水水源地二级保护区划分[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(3): 955-966.
[12] 陈祥忠, 王斌. 基于岩石物理模型的裂缝型储层AVOA反演方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(1): 266-276.
[13] 李博南, 曲寿利, 沈珲. 基于岩石物理模型的碳酸盐岩储层微观孔隙特征分析方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(1): 285-293.
[14] 王祝文, 徐方慧, 刘菁华, 宁琴琴, 于洋. 辽河盆地东部凹陷含气孔、裂隙火成岩地层斯通利波响应特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(6): 1876-1888.
[15] 李志远, 宫海灵, 张永辉, 李璞. 某电站地下厂房裂隙发育规律及其对围岩稳定性的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(5): 1574-1580.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 尤敏鑫,刘建民. 同位素地球化学在峨眉山大火成岩省研究中的应用现状与进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(4): 1231 -1243 .
[2] 杨春梅, 李洪奇,陆大卫,张方礼,高 原,邵英超. 不同驱替方式下岩石电阻率与饱和度的关系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 667 -671 .
[3] 祝洪臣,张炯飞,权 恒. 大兴安岭中生代两期成岩成矿作用的元素、同位素特征及其形成环境[J]. J4, 2005, 35(04): 436 -0442 .
[4] 朱建伟, 赵刚, 刘博, 郭巍, 成俊. 油页岩测井识别技术及应用[J]. J4, 2012, 42(2): 289 -295 .
[5] 陈力,梁海安,张文娟,荣帆. 模糊数学方法在城市工程地质环境区划中的应用--以抚顺市城区为例[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 837 -0840 .
[6] 高桂梅,苏 克,王文颖,甘树才,刘招君. 吉林省桦甸油页岩中稀土元素和微量元素的研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(6): 974 -0979 .
[7] 吴孔运,蒋忠诚,叶 晔. 不同植物群落对灰岩试块溶蚀速率的影响[J]. J4, 2007, 37(5): 967 -0971 .
[8] 周彦章,迟宝明,刘中培. 山东夏甸金矿床充水机理构造控制模式[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 255 -0260 .
[9] 张渊,刘连登,孙景贵,陈国华,张洪喜,闫复传,杨开春. 胶东西北部黄埠岭金矿床两期次叠加成矿[J]. J4, 2008, 38(1): 21 -0026 .
[10] 鲁程鹏, 束龙仓, 苑利波, 张蓉蓉, 黄币娟, 王彬彬. 基于示踪试验求解岩溶含水层水文地质参数[J]. J4, 2009, 39(4): 717 -721 .