大庆徐家围子不同储层改造的干热岩潜力评估

doi:10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201602202

吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2): 525-535.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201602202

大庆徐家围子不同储层改造的干热岩潜力评估

郭亮亮¹, 张延军^1,2, 许天福², 金显鹏³

1. 吉林大学建设工程学院, 长春 130026;
2. 吉林大学地下水资源与环境教育部重点实验室, 长春 130021;
3. 大庆油田井下作业分公司, 黑龙江大庆 163453

收稿日期:2015-06-14 发布日期:2016-03-26
通讯作者: 张延军(1968-),男,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土多场耦合研究,E-mail:zhangyanj@jlu.edu.cn E-mail:zhangyanj@jlu.edu.cn
作者简介:郭亮亮(1988-),男,博士研究生,主要从事干热岩压裂及开采研究,E-mail:792087685@qq.com
基金资助:
国家高技术研究发展计划("863"计划)项目(2012AA052803);国家自然科学基金项目(41372239);高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金(20110061110055)

Evaluation of Hot Dry Rock Resource Potential Under Different Reservoir Conditions in Xujiaweizi Area, Daqing

Guo Liangliang¹, Zhang Yanjun^1,2, Xu Tianfu², Jin Xianpeng³

1. School of Construction Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China;
2. Key Lab of Groundwater Resource and Environment, Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China;
3. Downhole Operation Company of Daqing Oilfield, Daqing 163453, Heilongjiang, China

Received:2015-06-14 Published:2016-03-26
Supported by:
Supported by the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (2012AA052803), National Natural Science Foundation of China (41372239) and the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (20110061110055)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对如何评估大庆徐家围子不同储层干热岩开采潜力的问题,基于徐家围子深井的地质和测井资料,对其深部存在的三种储层情况进行了划分。首先提出了各储层改造方案并建立了三维压裂模型;然后基于储层改造结果,采用水热耦合软件TOUGH2对其进行了换热分析;最终得出了不同储层的干热岩开采潜力。研究结果显示,徐家围子营城组储层是该区目前最适合进行干热岩开采的储层:根据天然裂隙发育程度,可以分为致密储层和天然裂隙发育储层,天然裂隙储层经清水剪切压裂后,采用三垂直井开采模式,最大注入速率30 kg/s,20 a产热量达17000~18500 kJ/s;根据地应力遮挡情况,可以分为遮挡层和无遮挡层,遮挡层和无遮挡层采用传统支撑剂型压裂后,采用三水平井(水平段2000 m)的开采模式,最大注入速率分别为20和32 kg/s,20 a的产热量分别为3500~5350 kJ/s和5600~7760 kJ/s。此外,虽然致密层产出热量远低于天然裂隙发育储层,但传统支撑剂型压裂和水平井技术结合后,致密储层也具有了开采干热岩的潜力。

关键词: 干热岩, 水力压裂, 水平井, 水热模拟, 开采潜力

Abstract:

To evaluate the hot dry rock (HDR) resource under different conditions in Xujiaweizi area in Daqing, based on the real logging data of one deep well we divided the existing conditions into several types. For each formation type, we proposed the corresponding fracturing strategy and created 3D fracturing model. Based on the stimulated reservoir, the hydro-thermal simulations were performed by using TOUGH2, and the extracted thermal energy was evaluated. The results indicate that Yingcheng formation is the most suitable reservoir for HDR development at present; the target formation based on feature fracture could be divided into tight and fractured formation; based on stress confinement condition, it could be subdivided to confined and unconfined formation; after 20 years operation (horizontal part length is 2000 m), the heat production from the confined and unconfined formation are 3500-5350 kJ/s and 5600-7760 kJ/s respectively, when the injection rate are 20 and 32 kg/s respectively; whereas the heat from naturally fractured formation is much higher than that from tight formation (injection rate is 30 kg/s, heat production is 17000-18500 kJ/s). Above all, the horizontal technique makes the tight formation also have the HDR resource development potential.

Key words: hot dry rock, hydraulic fracturing, horizontal well, hydro-thermal simulation, development potential

中图分类号:

P641

郭亮亮, 张延军, 许天福, 金显鹏. 大庆徐家围子不同储层改造的干热岩潜力评估[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(2): 525-535.

Guo Liangliang, Zhang Yanjun, Xu Tianfu, Jin Xianpeng. Evaluation of Hot Dry Rock Resource Potential Under Different Reservoir Conditions in Xujiaweizi Area, Daqing[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2016, 46(2): 525-535.

参考文献

[1] 雷宏武, 金光荣,李佳琦,等.松辽盆地增强型地热系统地热能开发热-水动力耦合过程[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014,44(5):1633-1646. Lei Hongwu, Jin Guangrong, Lijiaqi, et al. Coupled Thermal-Hydrodynamic Processes for Geothermal Energy Exploitation in Enhanced Geothermal System at Songliao Basin, China[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2014,44(5):1633-1646.

[2] 许天福,张延军,曾昭发,等. 增强型地热系统(干热岩)开发技术进展[J].科技导报,2012,30(32):42-45. Xu Tianfu, Zhang Yanjun, Zeng Zhaofa, et al. Technology Progress in an Enhanced Geothermal System (Hot Dry Rock)[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2012,30(32):42-45.

[3] Hofmann H, Babadagli T, Zimmermann G. Hot Water Generation for Oil Sands Processing from Enhanced Geothermal Systems:Process Simulation for Different Hydraulic Fracturing Scenarios[J]. Applied Energy,2014,113:524-547.

[4] Van der Hoorn K, Heijnen L J, Gankema M E, et al. Hydraulic Fracturing in Limestone:A Case Study of Two EGS Projects in The Netherlands[C]//Proceedings of the 37th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering.Stanford:Stanford University,2012.

[5] Zeng Y C, Wu N Y, Su Z, et al. Numerical Simulation of Heat Production Potential from Hot Dry Rock by Water Circulating Through a Novel Single Vertical Fracture at Desert Peak Geothermal Field[J]. Energy,2013,63:268-282.

[6] Huang X X, Zhu J L, Niu C K, et al. Heat Extraction and Power Production Forecast of A Prospective Enhanced Geothermal System Site in Songliao Basin, China[J]. Energy,2014,75:360-370.

[7] 周庆华,冯子辉,门广田. 松辽盆地北部徐家围子断陷现今地温特征及其与天然气生成关系研究[J].中国科学:D辑:地球科学,2007,37(增刊2):177-188. Zhou Qinghua, Feng Zihui, Men Guangtian. Research on Relationship Between Natural Gas Generation and Geothermal Characteristics in Xujiaweizi Depression Area in Northern Songliao Basin[J]. Science China:Series D:Earth Sciences, 2007,37(Sup.2):177-188.

[8] Nolte K G, Smith M. STIMPLAN User's Guide[R]. Tulsa:NSI Technologies, Inc, 2011.

[9] Zhang Y J,Li Z W,Guo L L,et al.Electricity Generation from Enhanced Geothermal Systems by Oilfield Produced Water Circulating Through Reservoir Stimulated by Staged Fracturing Technology for Horizontal Wells:A Case Study in Xujiaweizi Area in Daqing Oilfield, China[J]. Energy, 2014,78:788-805.

[10] Chabora E, Zemach E, Spielman P, et al. Hydraulic Stimulation of Well 27-15, Desert Peak Geothermal Field, Nevada, USA[C]//Proceedings, Thirty-Seventh Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. Stanford:Stanford University, 2012:SGP-TR-194.

[11] Genter A, Fritsch D, Cuenot N, et al. Overview of the Current Activities of the European EGS Soultz Project:From Exploration to Electricity Production[C]//Proceedings, Thirty-Fourth Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. Stanford:Stanford University, 2009:SGP-TR-187.

[12] Pruess K, Oldenburg C, Moridis G. TOUGH2 User's Guide Version 2.0[R]. Berkeley:Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1999.

相关文章 15

[1]	夏英杰, 陈华斌, 陈健, 姚明宇, 杨海. 不同施工参数下深层页岩水力压裂数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 924-936.
[2]	陈晨, 李宏达, 姜升, 许振华, 侯星澜, 张山岭, 钟秀平. 干热岩闭环地热系统井壁稳定及热能提取方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(1): 327-341.
[3]	考佳玮, 杨康, 谭鹏, 陈作. 干热岩储层裂缝扩展及采热一体化数值模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 575-586.
[4]	冯波, 曹云龙, 齐晓飞 , 崔振鹏, 张兰新. 增强型地热系统开发热-水动力-力学（THM）耦合模拟：以河北马头营凸起区为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(6): 1892-1906.
[5]	闫佰忠, 李瑶, 秦光雄, 于开宁, 吴云霞, 王亚楠. 基于遥感技术的贵德盆地多元信息干热岩靶区预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(4): 1288-1300.
[6]	罗卫锋, 胡志方, 王胜建, 杨云见, 张林, 张云枭. 基于可控源电磁技术的页岩压裂监测试验——以宜昌地区鄂阳页2HF井为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(4): 1338-.
[7]	孙明行, 王瑞湖, 管彦武, 刘德民. 广西陆域干热型地热资源潜力估算[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(4): 1302-.
[8]	康志强, 张起钻, 管彦武, 冯波, 袁金福, 孙明行, 刘德民, 王新宇, 杨志强, 陆济璞, 张勤军, 冯民豪. 广西合浦盆地干热岩资源成热条件及潜力评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(4): 1151-1160.
[9]	陈守田, 吴玉金, 付喜春, 张文龙, 安朝晖, 丛培泓. 肇源地区薄砂体精细刻画及水平井轨迹设计[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(2): 598-607.
[10]	周舟, 金衍, 曾义金, 张旭东, 周健, 汪文智, 孟翰. 青海共和盆地干热岩地热储层水力压裂物理模拟和裂缝起裂与扩展形态研究[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(5): 1425-1430.
[11]	樊冬艳, 孙海, 姚军, 李华锋, 严侠, 张凯, 张林. 增强型地热系统不同注采井网参数分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(3): 797-806.
[12]	吴云霞, 吕凤军, 邢立新, 刘新星. 独山城地区多元信息干热岩预测模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(3): 880-892.
[13]	高科, 高红通, 谭现锋, 赵长亮, 李梦. 仿生异型齿钻头在干热岩钻探中的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(6): 1804-1809.
[14]	冯智慧, 张文春, 李向群, 孙广利, 刘财. 高精度分频相干加强技术在微小断层识别中的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(5): 1571-1579.
[15]	许天福, 袁益龙, 姜振蛟, 侯兆云, 冯波. 干热岩资源和增强型地热工程:国际经验和我国展望[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(4): 1139-1152.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

大庆徐家围子不同储层改造的干热岩潜力评估

Evaluation of Hot Dry Rock Resource Potential Under Different Reservoir Conditions in Xujiaweizi Area, Daqing

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10