吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5): 1482-1489.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201605204

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于Ls-Dyna的高能射流式冲击器活塞杆回程应力分析

王福平1, 李鹏2, 李国琳3, 彭枧明2   

  1. 1. 吉林大学应用技术学院, 长春 130012;
    2. 吉林大学建设工程学院, 长春 130026;
    3. 长春大学计算科学与技术学院, 长春 130022
  • 收稿日期:2016-03-04 出版日期:2016-09-26 发布日期:2016-09-26
  • 作者简介:王福平(1964-),男,副教授,主要从事多工艺冲击回转钻探工艺及工具研究;E-mail:wangfp@jlu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    国土资源公益性行业科研专项经费资助（201311112）

Stress Analysis of the Piston Rod Return in High-Energy Liquid-Jet Hammer Based on Ls-Dyna

Wang Fuping1, Li Peng2, Li Guolin3, Peng Jianming2   

  1. 1. Applied Technology College, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China;
    2. Construction Engineering College of Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China;
    3. College of Computer Science and Technology, Changchun University, Changchun 130022, China
  • Received:2016-03-04 Online:2016-09-26 Published:2016-09-26
  • Supported by:

    Supported by Public Science and Technology Research Founds Projects of Ministry of Land and Resources of China(201311112)

PDF (PC)

445

摘要：

针对在钻探实践中高能射流式冲击器的活塞杆频繁出现尾部塑性变形严重影响冲击器工作性能和整体寿命的现象，拟对活塞杆进行优化改进。利用非线性动力学仿真软件Ls-Dyna对活塞杆的回程撞击缸体进行数值模拟和优化分析，并进行了室内试验，结果表明：冲击末速度为4 m/s，活塞杆回程撞击缸体强制停止运动瞬间，尾部产生的应力集中值为3 339.28 MPa，导致其破坏；优化改进后，活塞杆上下端直径比为17/16、尾部圆弧直径为60 mm，活塞杆体内的应力集中值为1 419.66 MPa，较改进前活塞杆的应力集中值减小58%。试验验证表明，优化后的活塞能大幅提高使用寿命和耐久性。

关键词: 射流式冲击器, 应力集中, Ls-Dyna, 活塞杆, 塑性变形

Abstract:

The plastic deformation of piston rod of the liquid-jet hammer with high impacting energy is a key issue, which seriously affects the performance and working life. Numerical simulation is conducted to analyze the piston return impacting process and optimize parameters by nonlinear dynamics simulation software Ls-Dyna. Laboratory test is also carried out for the validation of the analysis. The results show that a very high concentrated stress of 3 339.2 MPa appears at the end of the piston rod when the piston rod impacts the cylinder block with the velocity of 4 m/s. The high transient stress is likely to lead to destruction of the piston rod. By optimizing the diameter ratio of the top surface to the bottom surface and the tail arc diameter of the piston rod to the value of 17/16 and 60 mm, respectively, the maximum transient stress is reduced to 1 419.66 MPa with a 58% decrease, which can largely improve the piston rod performance and working life.

Key words: liquid-jet hammer, concentrated stress, Ls-Dyna, piston rod, plastic deformation

中图分类号: 

  • P634.3

[1] 彭枧明.射流式液动锤增设蓄能装置的数值分析与实验研究[D]. 长春:吉林大学,2004. Peng Jianming. A Numerical and Experimental Study of Liquid Jet Hammer with Energy-Saving Mechanism[D]. Changchun:Jilin University,2004.

[2] 殷坤, 王茂森, 彭枧明,等.冲击回转钻进[M]. 北京:地质出版社,2010. Yin Kun, Wang Maosen, Peng Jianming, et al. Percussive-Rotary Drilling[M]. Beijing:Geological Publishing House,2010.

[3] 王达,张伟,张晓西,等.中国大陆科学钻探工程科钻一井钻探工程技术[M].北京:科学出版社,2007. Wang Da, Zhang Wei, Zhang Xiaoxi, et al. Drilling Techniques for China Continental Scientific Drilling Engineering No.1 Well[M]. Beijing:Science Press,2007.

[4] 菅志军, 殷琨, 蒋荣庆,等.增大液动射流式冲击器单次冲击功的试验研究[J].长春科技大学学报,2000, 30(3):303-306. Jian Zhijun, Yin Kun, Jiang Rongqing, et al. The Research on Increasing Impacting Energy of Hydro-Efflux Hammer[J]. Journal of Changchun University of Science and Technology, 2000, 30(3):303-306.

[5] 刘建林.气体钻井用贯通式潜孔锤关键技术研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2009:111-137. Liu Jianlin. Researches on the Key Technologies of Hollow-Through DTH Used in Gas Drilling[D]. Changchun:Jilin University, 2009:111-137.

[6] 赵统武.冲击凿入效率的波动理论研究[J].金属学报,1980(3):263-276. Zhao Tongwu. The Wave Theory Study of Efficiency of Percussive Penetration[J]. Acta Metallurgica Sinica,1980(3):263-276.

[7] 王磊,刘杰,刘树英.往复式活塞隔膜泵曲轴的动态特性分析[J].机械设计与制造,2010(5):238-240. Wang Lei,Liu Jie,Liu Shuying. Analysis on Dynamic Characteristic of Crank Shaft of Reciprocating Piston Diaphragm Pump[J].Machinery Design & Manu-facture,2010(5):238-240.

[8] 梁旭.金属材料疲劳强度影响因素的研究[D].沈阳:东北大学,2009. Liang Xu.Research on Influence Factors on Metal Fatige Strength[D]. Shenyang:Northeastern University,2009.

[9] 陈家旺. 射流式液动冲击器仿真计算与实验研究[D]. 长春:吉林大学,2007:39-113. Chen Jiawang. Research on Simulation Computation and Experiment of Liquid Jet Hammer[D]. Changchun:Jilin University, 2007.

[10] 王人杰, 蒋荣庆. 液动冲击回转钻进技术[M]. 北京:地质出版社,1988:97-104. Wang Renjie, Jiang Rongqing. Hydraulically Impacting-Rotary Drilling Technique[M]. Beijing:Geological Publishing House,1988:97-104.

[11] Chiang L E. ElõÃas D A. Modeling Impact in Down-the-Hole Rock Drilling[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. 2000,37:599-613.

[12] 王福军. 计算流体动力学分析:CFD软件原理与应用[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社, 2004:63-159. Wang Fujun. The Analysis of Computational Fluid Dynamics:CFD Software Principle and Application[M].Beijing:Tsinghua University Press, 2004:63-159.

[13] 殷其雷,殷琨,柳鹤,等.潜孔锤反循环钻进技术在某水电站的试验应用[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2014,44(3):961-968. Yin Qilei, Yin Kun, Liu He,et al.Application Test of DTH Hammer Reverse Circulation Drilling Technique in a Hydropower Station[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2014,44(3):961-968.

[14] 李夕兵,赖海辉,古德生.不同加载波形下矿岩破碎的耗能理论[J]. 中国有色金属学报,1992, 2(4):10-14. Li Xibing,Lai Haihui,Gu Desheng. The Dissipation Theory of Rock Breakage Under Different Loading Waveforms[J]. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 1992, 2(4):10-14.

[15] 许世文,董满生,胡宗军.等. 42CrMo钢疲劳试验研究[J].合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版),2008,31(9):1506-1508. Xu Shiwen, Dong Mansheng, Hu Zongjun, et al. Fatigue Test Research on Steel 42CrMo[J]. Journal of Hefei University of Technology(Natural Science Edition), 2008, 31(9):1506-1508.

[16] 祁宏军.石油、地热钻井冲击回转钻进试验研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2002. Qi Hongjun. Experimental Research of Hydro-Efflux Hammer for Oil and Geothermal Drilling[D].Changchun:Jilin University,2002.

[17] 王多智. 冲击荷载下网壳结构的失效机理研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2010:33-80. Wang Duozhi. Failure Mechanism of Reticulated Shells Under Impact[D]. Harbin:Harbin Institute of Technology, 2010:33-80.
[1] 周柳湘, 余思琴, 陈俊华, 刘城, 陈义, 张鑫鑫, . 潜孔锤与冲击钻机联合钻进工艺成孔碎岩过程数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1608-1618.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 尤敏鑫，刘建民. 同位素地球化学在峨眉山大火成岩省研究中的应用现状与进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(4): 1231 -1243 .
[2] 杨春梅, 李洪奇,陆大卫,张方礼,高 原,邵英超. 不同驱替方式下岩石电阻率与饱和度的关系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 667 -671 .
[3] 祝洪臣，张炯飞，权 恒. 大兴安岭中生代两期成岩成矿作用的元素、同位素特征及其形成环境[J]. J4, 2005, 35(04): 436 -0442 .
[4] 朱建伟, 赵刚, 刘博, 郭巍, 成俊. 油页岩测井识别技术及应用[J]. J4, 2012, 42(2): 289 -295 .
[5] 陈力，梁海安，张文娟，荣帆. 模糊数学方法在城市工程地质环境区划中的应用--以抚顺市城区为例[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 837 -0840 .
[6] 高桂梅,苏 克,王文颖,甘树才,刘招君. 吉林省桦甸油页岩中稀土元素和微量元素的研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(6): 974 -0979 .
[7] 吴孔运，蒋忠诚，叶 晔. 不同植物群落对灰岩试块溶蚀速率的影响[J]. J4, 2007, 37(5): 967 -0971 .
[8] 周彦章，迟宝明，刘中培. 山东夏甸金矿床充水机理构造控制模式[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 255 -0260 .
[9] 张渊，刘连登，孙景贵，陈国华，张洪喜，闫复传,杨开春. 胶东西北部黄埠岭金矿床两期次叠加成矿[J]. J4, 2008, 38(1): 21 -0026 .
[10] 鲁程鹏, 束龙仓, 苑利波, 张蓉蓉, 黄币娟, 王彬彬. 基于示踪试验求解岩溶含水层水文地质参数[J]. J4, 2009, 39(4): 717 -721 .
版权所有 © 《吉林大学学报(地球科学版)》编辑部
地址：长春市西民主大街938号(130026)　电话：+86-431-88502374；13756165364　E-mail: xuebao1956@jlu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发