吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5): 1543-1551.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201705302

• 地球探测与信息技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

钢厂周边污染土壤的电性与磁性特征及其环境意义

李永涛1, 郭高山1, 顾延生2, 韦林1, 何思远1   

  1. 1. 中国地质大学(武汉)地球物理与空间信息学院, 武汉 430074;
    2. 中国地质大学(武汉)环境学院, 武汉 430074
  • 收稿日期:2017-01-09 出版日期:2017-09-26 发布日期:2017-09-26
  • 作者简介:李永涛(1961),男,教授,博士,主要从事地球物理学和环境磁学研究,E-mail:ytli@cug.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41572153);湖北省科技支撑计划资助项目(2015BCE077)

Electric and Magnetic Properties of Contaminated Soil Around a Steel Plant as Well as Their Environmental Significance

Li Yongtao1, Guo Gaoshan1, Gu Yansheng2, Wei Lin1, He Siyuan1   

  1. 1. Institute of Geophysics and Geomatics, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China;
    2. School of Mathematics and Physics, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
  • Received:2017-01-09 Online:2017-09-26 Published:2017-09-26
  • Supported by:
    Supported by Natural Science Foundation of China (41572153)and Science and Technology Supporting Project of Hubei Province (2015BCE077)

摘要: 利用直流电测深、环境磁学以及矿物学方法,开展对一钢铁厂周边土壤的污染评价研究,获得了土壤垂向电阻率与磁化率分布特征。研究表明,随着污染土剖面的深度由底部至地表,土壤电阻率逐渐减小,磁化率和重金属含量反而增高;该变化特征反映了土壤受污染的程度与钢铁公司历年粗钢产量及武汉市历年汽车保有量的变化程度相对应。通过对污染样品的磁滞回线、热磁曲线和SEM/EDX等矿物学分析,污染样品的矿物成分以磁铁矿和赤铁矿为主,以准单畴(PSD)颗粒存在,形貌特征和物质成分与成土过程中形成的磁性颗粒明显不同。由于土壤的电性与磁性都具有良好的污染程度指示作用,所以土壤的电性与磁性研究可以应用于土壤污染程度的评价,两者联合运用可大大提高土壤污染程度评价的分辨率。

关键词: 钢厂, 污染土壤, 电性, 磁性, 重金属, 环境意义

Abstract: The distributing properties of vertical resistivity and susceptibility of soils around an iron and steel plant have been obtained for pollution assessment using DC depth sounding, environmental magnetism and mineralogy. The study shows that soil resistivity values decrease gradually, while susceptibility and heavy metal content increase from the bottom to the surface of the contaminated soils, indicating a correspondence between the degree of soil pollution and the crude steel output each year and the vehicle numbers of Wuhan City. Through the analyses on hysteresis loop, thermal magnetic curve, and SEM/EDX mineralogy for the contaminated samples, the mineral components of polluted samples are predominantly magnetite and hematite, existing in pseudo-single domain (PSD), obviously different from the magnetic grain formed during pedogenic process in aspect of feature and ingredient. Because the electric and magnetic properties of soil have good indication to pollution degree, the study of soil electric and magnetic properties can be used to assess soil pollution, and the combined use of these two properties can also greatly improve the resolution of soil pollution assessment.

Key words: steel plant, contaminated soil, electric property, magnetic property, heavy metal, environmental significance

中图分类号: 

  • P631.2
[1] Kaminski M D, Landsberger S. Heavy Metal in Urban Soil of East St Louis, IL, Part 1:Total Concentration of Heavy Metal in Soil[J]. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, 2000, 50(9):1667-1679.
[2] 沈明洁,胡守云,U Blaha,等. 北京石景山工业区附近一个污染土壤剖面的磁学研究[J]. 地球物理学报,2006,49(6):1665-1673. Shen Mingjie, Hu Shouyun, Blaha U, et al. A Magnetic Study of a Polluted Soil Profile at the Shijingshan Industrial Area, Western Beijing, China Chinese[J]. Geophysics, 2006, 49(6):1665-1673.
[3] 王学松.城市表层土壤重金属富集淋滤特征与磁学响应[M]. 北京:中国环境科学出版社,2009. Wang Xuesong. City Surface Soil Heavy Metal Accumulation and Leaching Characteristics of Magnetic Response[M]. Beijing:China Environment Science Press, 2009.
[4] 孙亚坤,刘玉强,能昌信,等. 污染土电阻率特性及电阻率法检测的应用研究进展[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2011, 34(12H):165-171. Sun Yakun, Liu Yuqiang, Neng Changxin, et al. Development of Resistivity Method in the Investigation of Contaminated Soils[J]. Environment Science & Technology, 2011, 34(12H):165-171.
[5] Delaney A J, Peapples P R, Arcone S A. Electrical Resistivity of Frozen and Petroleum-Contaminated Fine-Grained Soil[J]. Cold Regions Science Technology, 2001, 32(2):107-119.
[6] Han F X, Banin A, Kingery W L, et al. New App-roach to Studies of Heavy Metal Redistribution in Soil[J]. Advances in Environmental Research, 2003, 8(1):113-120.
[7] 琚宜太,王少怀,张清鹏,等. 福建三明地区被污染土壤的磁学性质及其环境意义[J]. 地球物理学报,2004,47(2):282-288. Ju Yitai, Wang Shaohuai, Zhang Qingpeng, et al. Mineral Magnetic Properties of Pollution Topsoils:A Case Study in Sanming City, Fujian Province, Southeast China[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophyics, 2004, 47(2):282-288.
[8] Rhoades J D, Manteghi N A, Shouse P J, et al. Estimating Soil Salinity from Saturated Soil-Paste Electrical Conductivity[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1989, 53:428-433.
[9] Kapicka A, Jordanova N, Petrovsky E, et al. Mag-netic Study of Weakly Contaminate Forest Soil[J]. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 2003, 48 (2):31-44.
[10] 李永涛,曲赞.武汉东湖(官桥湖)沉积剖面的垂向磁性特征及其对环境污染的响应[J].地质科技情报,2011 36(4):779-788. Li Yongtao, Qu Zan. Vertical Magnetism Characteristic on Sediment Section at East Lake (Guanqiao Lake) of Wuhan,China and Its Response to Environment Pollution[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2014, 36(4):779-788.
[11] 乔庆庆,黄宝春,张春霞.华北地区大气降尘和地表土壤磁学特征及污染来源[J]. 科学通报,2014,59(18):1748-1760. Qiao Qingqing, Huang Baochun, Zhang Chunxia. Magnetic Properties and Pollution Sources in Dusfall and Topsoil of North China[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin,2014, 59(18):1748-1760.
[12] 白兰,周仲华,张虎元,等. 污染土的电阻率特征分析[J]. 环境工程,2008,4(26):66-69. Bai Lan, Zhou Zhonghua, Zhang Huyuan, et al. Analysis the Resistivity Characteristics of Contaminated Soil[J]. Environmental Engineering, 2008, 4(26):66-69.
[13] 张胜业, 潘玉玲. 应用地球物理学原理[M]. 武汉:中国地质大学出版社,2004:268-296. Zhang Shengye, Pan Yuling. Application of the Principle of the Earth Physics[M]. Wuhan:China University of Geosciences Press, 2004:268-296.
[14] 李金铭. 地电场与电法勘探[M]. 北京:地质出版社,2005:136-139. Li Jinming. Electric Field and Electric Prospecting[M]. Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 2005:136-139.
[15] Pan Y X, Zhu R X, Banerjee S K. Rock-Magnetic Properties Related to Thermal-Treatment of Siderite:Behavior and Interpretation[J]. J Geophys Res, 2000, 105(B1):783-794.
[16] 朱日祥,邓成龙,潘永信. 泥河湾盆地磁性地层定年与早期人类演化[J]. 第四纪研究,2007,27 (6):922-944. Zhu Rixiang, Deng Chenglong, Pan Yongxin. Magneto Chronology of the Fluvio-Lacustrine Sequencesin the Nihewan Basin and Its Implications for Early Human Colonization of Northeast Asia[J]. Quaternary Sciences, 2007, 27 (6):922-944.
[17] 韩朋,翟云峰,栗粲圪,等. 末次间冰期以来洛川黄土天然剩磁记录的可靠性[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2017,47(3):793-806. Han Peng, Zhai Yunfeng, Li Cangge, et al. The Reliability of the Natural Remanet Magnetization Recorded Since the Last Interglacial in Luochuan Loess[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edtion), 2017, 47(3):793-806.
[18] Lascu I, Banerjce S K, Berquo T S. Quantifying the Concentration of Ferrimagnetic in Sediments Using Rock Magnetic Methods[J]. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, 2013, 11 (8):4881-4892.
[19] 吕玉甲,戴霜,张有贤,等. 兰州某钢厂周边土壤中磁化率积累速率研究[J].中国环境科学,2015,35(7):2112-2118. Lü Yujia, Dai Shuang, Zhang Youxian, et al. Magnetic Susceptibility Accumulation Rates in Soils Near a Steel Smelter in Lanzhou[J]. China Invironmental Science, 2015, 35(7):2112-2118.
[20] 杨涛. 武汉市东湖地区城市化过程环境磁学响应研究[D]. 武汉:中国地质大学,2008. Yang Tao. Magnetic Responses of Environment During the Urbanization Process in the East Lake Area, Wuhan City[D]. Wuhan:China University of Geosciences, 2008.
[21] 王凯,凌其聪. 武汉市城市土壤重金属粒径分布特征[J].环境化学,2013,32(12):2329-2335. Wang Kai, Ling Qicong. Particla-siz Distribution of Heavy Metals in Urban Soil of Wuhan, China[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2013, 32(12):2329-2335.
[1] 张大奕, 刘志强, 么琳颖, 范晓露, 高静. 微生物诱导碳酸钙沉淀-生物炭联用技术修复农田污染土壤的关键机制和应用前景[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(6): 1958-1980.
[2] 张文静, 涂志鹏, 贾媛媛. 矿区重金属的释放迁移与污染预测研究进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(6): 2001-2027.
[3] 孙旭东, 马举举, 凌嘉宣, 杨化军, 马强, 李昆. 侵入岩模型直流电响应特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1321-1335.
[4] 郭敬民, 陈建波, 张章, 谭捷, 曲炳昌. 渤海湾C油田馆陶组Ⅲ段低电阻率油层成因机制[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 721-730.
[5] 李永刚.  长岭断陷查干花次凹火石岭组水下喷发火山岩相测井响应特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 2061-2074.
[6] 高莲凤, 田释梦, 张振国, 张平, 马瑞雪, 邢佳琪, 张忠鑫, . 钼尾矿资源综合利用研究进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(5): 1544-1557.
[7] 嵇艳鞠, 邓昌伟, 王宇航, 刘航, 吴琼. 基于时域有限差分法的电性源感应-极化效应三维数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1373-1382.
[8] 李英钧, 宋泽峰, 杨悦锁, 邓亚男, 任弘宇, 蔡奎, 胡紫如. 石棉尾矿场地土壤污染地球化学特征及其对微生物多样性的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(3): 980-992.
[9] 赵勇胜, 戴贞洧.

海泡石改性土-膨润土泥浆阻截墙阻截地下水重金属阳离子污染 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(5): 1549-1559.

[10] 高科宁, 邓居智, 刘文玉, 余辉, 陈辉, 周聪, 王彦国, 刘宝山.

黑龙江省三合屯金矿床深部电性结构与成矿模式 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(3): 684-700.

[11] 李晓艳, 张青伟, 洪松涛, 袁雨婷, 余金燕, 潘俐傧, 刘莹红. 不同氧化还原条件下铅锌矿尾砂中重金属元素活化迁移规律[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(2): 434-441.
[12] 齐彦福, 李貅, 孙乃泉, 戚志鹏, 周建美, 张明晶, 邢涛. 电性源短偏移距瞬变电磁地形影响特征分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(1): 247-.
[13] 樊文鑫, 李光明, 梁生贤. 西藏扎西康铅锌多金属矿床控矿构造的电性特征及找矿预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(6): 1709-1719.
[14] 董娟, 李成禄. 大兴安岭永新金矿床黄铁矿热电性特征及其指示意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(1): 95-106.
[15] 赵文晋, 高淼, 鹿豪杰, 任黎明, 马冠群, 董军. 改性Mg(OH)2对多种重金属污染土壤的修复效果[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(1): 240-246.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 尤敏鑫,刘建民. 同位素地球化学在峨眉山大火成岩省研究中的应用现状与进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(4): 1231 -1243 .
[2] 杨春梅, 李洪奇,陆大卫,张方礼,高 原,邵英超. 不同驱替方式下岩石电阻率与饱和度的关系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 667 -671 .
[3] 祝洪臣,张炯飞,权 恒. 大兴安岭中生代两期成岩成矿作用的元素、同位素特征及其形成环境[J]. J4, 2005, 35(04): 436 -0442 .
[4] 朱建伟, 赵刚, 刘博, 郭巍, 成俊. 油页岩测井识别技术及应用[J]. J4, 2012, 42(2): 289 -295 .
[5] 陈力,梁海安,张文娟,荣帆. 模糊数学方法在城市工程地质环境区划中的应用--以抚顺市城区为例[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 837 -0840 .
[6] 高桂梅,苏 克,王文颖,甘树才,刘招君. 吉林省桦甸油页岩中稀土元素和微量元素的研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(6): 974 -0979 .
[7] 吴孔运,蒋忠诚,叶 晔. 不同植物群落对灰岩试块溶蚀速率的影响[J]. J4, 2007, 37(5): 967 -0971 .
[8] 周彦章,迟宝明,刘中培. 山东夏甸金矿床充水机理构造控制模式[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 255 -0260 .
[9] 张渊,刘连登,孙景贵,陈国华,张洪喜,闫复传,杨开春. 胶东西北部黄埠岭金矿床两期次叠加成矿[J]. J4, 2008, 38(1): 21 -0026 .
[10] 鲁程鹏, 束龙仓, 苑利波, 张蓉蓉, 黄币娟, 王彬彬. 基于示踪试验求解岩溶含水层水文地质参数[J]. J4, 2009, 39(4): 717 -721 .