吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (3): 705-718.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20170006

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

泥岩盖层内断层垂向封闭能力综合定量评价:以南堡凹陷5号构造东二段泥岩盖层为例

胡欣蕾, 吕延防, 孙永河, 孙同文   

  1. 东北石油大学地球科学学院, 黑龙江 大庆 163318
  • 收稿日期:2017-09-16 出版日期:2018-05-26 发布日期:2018-05-26
  • 作者简介:胡欣蕾(1991-),女,博士研究生,主要从事油气藏形成与资源评价方面的研究,E-mail:dqsyhuxinlei@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家油气重大专项（2016ZX05007-003-03）；国家科技重大专项（2016ZX05006-005）；国家自然科学基金项目（41572127）；东北石油大学校级研究生创新科研项目（YJSCX2017-001NEPU）；中国石油天然气股份有限责任公司重大科技项目（2016D-0702）

Comprehensive Quantitative Evaluation of Vertical Sealing Ability of Faults in Caprock: An Example of Ed2 Mudstone Caprock in Nanpu Sag

Hu Xinlei, Lü Yanfang, Sun Yonghe, Sun Tongwen   

  1. College of Earth Sciences, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing 163318, Heilongjiang, China
  • Received:2017-09-16 Online:2018-05-26 Published:2018-05-26
  • Supported by:
    Supported by National Oil and Gas Major Project (2016ZX05007-003-03),National Science and Technology Major Project (2016ZX05006-005),National Natural Science Foundation of China (41572127),Ortheast Petroleum University Graduate Students' Innovative Project (YJSCX2017-001NEPU),PetroChina Company Limited Science and Technology Major Project (2016D-0702)

PDF (PC)

571

摘要： 为了更加准确地评价盖层内断层垂向封闭能力，在利用实验验证岩石各向异性对排替压力影响的基础上，结合断层岩与储层岩石的力学分解关系，综合考虑不同类型岩石压实成岩时间对排替压力的影响，对断层垂向封闭的断-储排替压力差法进行改进，并以此来定量评价渤海湾盆地南堡凹陷5号构造Fnp5-3和Fnp5-5两条主要断层的垂向封闭能力。研究结果表明：存在一个断-储排替压力差封油气下限值，只有当断层岩排替压力大于储层岩石排替压力且二者差值大于等于封油气下限值时，断层垂向封闭。由此确定反向断层Fnp5-3的封油气下限值为0.221 MPa，顺向断层Fnp5-5的封油气下限值为0.311 MPa；受油气富集部位及断裂带内部结构发育特征的影响，反向断层较顺向断层更易形成封闭，此评价结果与油气分布规律吻合关系较好。而利用改进前方法得到的评价结果（断层垂向不封闭）与实际钻井含油气性相矛盾，表明改进后方法在综合定量评价断层垂向封闭能力时的合理性与可行性。

关键词: 垂向封闭, 排替压力, 压实成岩时间, 岩石各向异性, 泥岩, 南堡凹陷

Abstract: To accurately evaluate the vertical sealing ability of the faults in caprock, based on the experiment of verifying the influence of the rock anisotropy and the mechanical relation of the displacement pressure of the fault rock and the reservoir rock in different directions, we improved the pressure-difference method to evaluate the fault sealing ability,and further analyzed the vertical sealing ability of the main faults Fnp5-3 and Fnp5-5 in 5th structure of Nanpu sag in the Bohai Bay basin, in combination with the differences in diagenetic time of different rocks, as well as the influence of the rock anisotropy on displacement pressure. The results indicate that:there is a low limit of displacement pressure difference between the fault rock and the reservoir rock, and only if the displacement pressure of the fault rock is larger than that of the reservoir rock,and the difference between the above two is larger than or equal to the low limit, then the faults seal vertically. From this, it is determined that the low limit of the reverse fault Fnp5-3 is 0.221 MPa, and the low limit of the forward fault Fnp5-5 is 0.311 MPa. Influenced by the accumulation of oil-gas and the characteristics of the fault internal structure, reverse faults are more likely to seal than forward faults. This is coincided well with the pattern of oil-gas accumulation; while the evaluation results obtained by the previous method without considering the above factors are inconsistent with the actual drilling oil-gas results. The improved method is reasonable and feasible for a comprehensive evaluation of the fault vertical sealing ability.

Key words: vertical sealing ability, displacement pressure, diagenetic time, anisotropy of rock, mudstone, Nanpu sag

中图分类号: 

  • P618.13
[1] Hager D. Practicle Oil Geology[M].New York:McGraw-Hill, 1915:20-35.
[2] Landes K K. A Scrutiny of the Abstract[J]. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 1951, 35:1660-1966.
[3] Perkins H. Fault-Closure Type Fields, Southeast Louisiana:Gulf Coast[J]. Association of Geological Societies Transactions, 1961, 11:177-196.
[4] Weber K J, Daukora E. Petroleum Geology of the Niger delta[C]//Satoh Y. Deltaic Deposits and Petroleum. Tokyo:9th World Petroleum Congress, 1975:209-221.
[5] Weber K J, Mandl G, Pilaar W F, et al. The Role of Faults in Hydrocarbon Migration and Trapping in Nigerian Growth Fault Structures[C]//Weber K. 10th Annual OTC. Houston:Offshore Technology Conference, 1978:2643-2653.
[6] Watts N L. Theoretical Aspects of Cap-Rock and Fault Seals for Single and Two Phase Hydrocarbon Columns[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 1987, 4:274-307.
[7] 吕延防,沙子萱,付晓飞,等. 断层垂向封闭性定量评价方法及其应用[J]. 石油学报, 2007, 28(5):34-38. Lü Yanfang, Sha Zixuan, Fu Xiaofei, et al. Quantitative Evaluation Method for Fault Vertical Sealing Ability and Its Application[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2007, 28(5):34-38.
[8] 吕延防,黄劲松,付广,等. 砂泥岩薄互层段中断层封闭性的定量研究[J]. 石油学报, 2009, 30(6):824-829. Lü Yanfang, Huang Jinsong, Fu Guang, et al. Quantitative Study on Fault Sealing Ability in Sandstone and Mudstone Thin Interbed[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2009, 30(6):824-829.
[9] 史集建,李丽丽,付广,等. 盖层内断层垂向封闭性定量评价方法及应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2012, 42(增刊2):162-170. Shi Jijian, Li Lili, Fu Guang, et al. Quantitative Evaluation Method and Application of Vertical Sealing Property of Faults in Caprock[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2012, 42(Sup.2):162-170.
[10] 吕延防,王伟,胡欣蕾,等. 断层侧向封闭性定量评价方法[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43(2):1-7. Lü Yanfang, Wang Wei, Hu Xinlei, et al. Quantitative Evaluation Method of Fault Lateral Sealing[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(2):1-7.
[11] Allan U S. Model for Hydrocarbon Migration and Entrapment Within Faulted Structures[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1989, 73:803-811.
[12] Knipe R J. Juxtaposition and Seal Diagrams to Help Analyze Fault Seals in Hydrocarbon Reservoirs[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1997, 81(2):187-195.
[13] Lindsay N G, Murphy F C, Walsh J J, et al. Outcrop Studies of Shale Smears on Fault Surfaces[J]. Special Publications of the International Association of Sedimentologists, 1993, 15:113-123.
[14] Fulljames J R, Zijerveld L J J, Franssen R C M W. FaultSeal Processes:Systematic Analysis of Fault Seals Over Geological and Production Time Scales[J]. Norwegian Petroleum Society Special Publications, 1997, 7(7):51-59.
[15] Yielding G. Shale Gouge Ratio:Calibration by Geo-history[J]. Norwegian Petroleum Society Special Publications, 2002, 11(2):1-15.
[16] Bretan P, Yielding G, Jones H. Using Calibrate Shale Gouge Ratio to Estimate Hydrocarbon Column Heights[J]. AAPG, 2003, 87(3):397-413.
[17] Tveranger J, Braathen A, Skar T, et al. Centre for Integrated Petroleum Research:Research Activities with Emphasis on Fluid Flow in Fault Zones[J]. Norwegian Journal of Geology, 2005, 85(1/2):63-71.
[18] Bozkurt Ç N, Laurent L, Julian S, et al. Efficiency ofa Faulted Regional Top Seal, Lakes Entrance Formation, Gippsland Basin, SE Australia[J]. Petroleum Geoscience, 2014, 20:241-256.
[19] 付广,王浩然,胡欣蕾. 断层垂向封闭的断-储排替压力差法及其应用[J]. 石油学报, 2014, 35(4):687-691. Fu Guang, Wang Haoran, Hu Xinlei. Modification and Application of Fault-Reservoir Displacement Pressure Differential Method for Vertical Sealing of Faults[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2014, 35(4):687-691.
[20] 付广,陈章明,姜振学. 盖层物性封闭能力的研究方法[J]. 中国海上油气, 1995, 9(2):83-88. Fu Guang, Chen Zhangming, Jiang Zhenxue. Research Method on Capillary Sealing Ability of Caprocks[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 1995, 9(2):83-88.
[21] 张立宽,罗晓容,宋国奇,等. 油气运移过程中断层启闭性的量化表征参数评价[J]. 石油学报, 2013, 34(1):92-100. Zhang Likuan, Luo Xiaorong, Song Guoqi, et al.Quantitative Evaluation of Parameters to Characterize Fault Opening and Sealing during Hydrocarbon Migration[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(1):92-100.
[22] 席道瑛,陈林. 岩石各向异性参数研究[J]. 物探化探计算技术, 1994(1):16-21. Xi Daoying, Chen Lin. On Anisotropismof Rock in Geophysics[J]. Computing Techniques for Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 1994(1):16-21.
[23] 吕延防,陈章明,付广,等. 盖岩排替压力研究[J]. 大庆石油学院学报, 1993, 17(4):1-7. Lü Yanfang, Chen Zhangming, Fu Guang, et al. Research on the Displacement Pressure of Caprock[J]. Journal of Daqing Petroleum Institute, 1993, 17(4):1-7.
[24] 黄志龙,郝石生. 盖层突破压力及排替压力的求取方法[J]. 新疆石油地质, 1994, 15(2):163-166. Huang Zhilong, Hao Shisheng.A Method of Estimating Breakthrough Pressure and Displacement Pressure of Caprock[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 1994, 15(2):163-166.
[25] 付晓飞,方德庆,吕延防,等. 从断裂带内部出发评价断层垂向封闭性的方法[J]. 地球科学:中国地质大学学报, 2005, 30(3):328-336. Fu Xiaofei, Fang Deqing, Lü Yanfang, et al. Method of Evaluating Vertical Sealing of Faults in Terms of the Internal Structure of Fault Zones[J]. Earth Science:Journal of China University of Geosciences, 2005, 30(3):328-336.
[26] 王思琦,鲜本忠,万锦峰, 等. 南堡凹陷滩海地区东营组和沙河街组一段储层特征及其成因机制[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2015, 39(4):54-62. Wang Siqi, Xian Benzhong, Wan Jinfeng, et al.Reservoir Characteristics and Controlling Factors in the Offshore Areas, the Eocene Period of the Nanpu Sag[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2015, 39(4):54-62.
[27] 刘之的,杨双定,刘有霞,等. 南梁油田长4+5储层泥质含量计算方法[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 30(2):25-29. Liu Zhidi, Yang Shuangding, Liu Youxia, et al. Calculation Method of Shale Content of Chang 4+5 Reservoir in Nanliang Oilfield[J]. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition), 2015, 30(2):25-29.
[28] 刘畅,陈冬霞,董月霞,等. 断层对南堡凹陷潜山油气藏的控制作用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2015, 36(1):43-50. Liu Chang, Chen Dongxia, Dong Yuexia, et al. Control of Faults on Hydrocarbon Accumulation of Buried Hill Reservoirs in the Nanpu Sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2015, 36(1):43-50.
[29] 曹中宏,张红臣,刘国勇,等. 南堡凹陷碳酸盐岩优质储层发育主控因素与分布预测[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2015, 36(1):103-110. Cao Zhonghong, Zhang Hongchen, Liu Guoyong, et al. Main Control Factors and Distribution Prediction of High-Quality Carbonate Reservoirs in the Nanpu Sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2015, 36(1):103-110.
[30] 柳波,贾梦成,吕延防,等. 南堡凹陷不同相态天然气成因联系及勘探意义[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2016, 45(1):101-109. Liu Bo, Jia Mengcheng, Lü Yanfang, et al. Genesis Connections Among Different Phase States of Natural Gas in Nanpu Sag and Their Exploration Significance[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2016, 45(1):101-109.
[31] 吕延防,许辰璐,付广,等. 南堡凹陷中浅层盖-断组合控油模式及有利含油层位预测[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2014,35(1):86-97. Lü Yanfang, Xu Chenlu, Fu Guang, et al. Oil-Controlling Models of Caprock-Fault Combination and Preidiction of Favorable Horizons for Hydrocarbon Accumulation in Middle-Shallow Sequences of Nanpu Sag[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2014,35(1):86-97.
[32] 罗群,庞雄奇. 海南福山凹陷顺向和反向断裂控藏机理及油气聚集模式[J]. 石油学报, 2008, 29(3):363-367. Luo Qun, Pang Xiongqi. Reservoir Controlling Mechanism and Petroleum Accumulation Model for Consequent Fault and Antithetic Fault in Fushan Depression of Hainan area[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2008, 29(3):363-367.
[33] 韦丹宁,付广. 反向断裂下盘较顺向断裂上盘更易富集油气机理的定量解释[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(3):702-710. Wei Danning, Fu Guang. Quantitative Explanation of Mechanism About Lower Wall of Antithetic Faults Accumulating More Oil-Gas than Upper Wall of Consequent Faults[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2016, 46(3):702-710.
[1] 何中波, 冀华丽, 胡宝群, 孙萧, 钟军, 杨喆, 陈虹. 准噶尔盆地北部晚白垩世至新近纪沉积介质环境演化特征及其对铀成矿的制约[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(3): 800-810.
[2] 任思远, 倪万魁, 陈军廷, 拓文鑫, 杨珍珍. 基于分数阶理论的软泥岩一维次固结蠕变模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(1): 242-252.
[3] 李彦泽, 商琳, 王群会, 孙彦春, 邢建鹏, 蒋东梁, 陈浩. 断陷盆地强非均质低渗-致密砂岩储层综合分类——以渤海湾盆地南堡凹陷为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(6): 1830-1843.
[4] 夏景生, 王志坤, 王海荣, 薛林, 王恺, 刘成权. 渤海湾盆地南堡凹陷西斜坡中深层“混合型河口坝”成因及沉积学意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1642-1653.
[5] 展铭望, 付广, 仇翠莹, 杨在增. 一种新的断裂破坏泥岩盖层程度的综合研究方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1687-1694.
[6] 李亚龙, 于兴河, 单新, 王娇, 史新, 胡鹏. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部山西组泥岩封盖性能评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(4): 1070-1082.
[7] 孙思敏, 季汉成, 刘晓, 赵忠新, 陈亮. 断陷盆地边界断层分段的层序地层响应特征——以南堡凹陷西南庄断层上盘陡坡带东营组为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 382-392.
[8] 韦丹宁, 付广. 反向断裂下盘较顺向断裂上盘更易富集油气机理的定量解释[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(3): 702-710.
[9] 杜庆祥, 郭少斌, 曹中宏, 张晓龙, 李媛姝. 南堡凹陷南部沙一段控砂模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(2): 348-357.
[10] 吕延防, 韦丹宁, 孙永河, 胡明, 刘哲, 孙同文, 王海学, 许辰璐. 南堡凹陷断层对中、上部含油组合油气成藏的控制作用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(4): 971-982.
[11] 王伟明，邓海，卢双舫，徐建军，王贵磊，陈国辉. 断陷盆地单层暗色泥岩厚度与优质烃源岩的关系及其对成藏的控制——以海拉尔盆地为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2012, 42(6): 1610-1616.
[12] 刘立, 王力娟, 杨永智, 于志超. 松辽盆地南部HX井上白垩统青山口组黑色泥岩的矿物组成与自生微晶石英成因[J]. J4, 2012, 42(5): 1358-1365.
[13] 秦月霜, 陈友福, 叶萍. 薄窄砂体地震跟踪预测方法[J]. J4, 2012, 42(1): 269-274.
[14] 付晓飞, 温海波, 吕延防, 贺向阳. 勘探早期断层封闭性快速评价方法及应用[J]. J4, 2011, 41(3): 615-621.
[15] 许中杰, 程日辉, 李飞, 王嘹亮, 张莉. 粤西高明地区晚三叠世小坪组元素地球化学特征[J]. J4, 2010, 40(2): 305-303.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘建峰，迟效国，周燕，王铁夫，金巍，周建波，董春艳，黎广荣. 小兴安岭东北部金林岩体全岩-角闪石Rb-Sr年龄[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 690 -0693 .
[2] 黄冠星, 孙继朝, 张英, 刘景涛, 张玉玺, 荆继红. 珠江三角洲污灌区地下水重金属含量及其相互关系[J]. J4, 2011, 41(1): 228 -234 .
[3] 肖长来，梁秀娟，崔建铭，兰盈盈,张君，李书兰，梁瑞奇，郑策. 确定含水层参数的全程曲线拟合法[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 751 -0755 .
[4] 郭振华，王璞珺，印长海，黄玉龙. 松辽盆地北部火山岩岩相与测井相关系研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(02): 207 -0214 .
[5] 孙永河,付晓飞,吕延防,付广,阎冬. 地震泵抽吸作用与油气运聚成藏物理模拟[J]. J4, 2007, 37(1): 98 -0104 .
[6] 谢忠雷，陈卓，孙文田，尹波. 不同茶园茶叶氟含量及土壤氟的形态分布[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 293 -0298 .
[7] 贾军涛,王璞珺，邵 锐，程日辉，张 斌，侯景涛，李金龙，边伟华. 松辽盆地东南缘营城组地层序列的划分与区域对比[J]. J4, 2007, 37(6): 1110 -1123 .
[8] 康立明，任战利. 多参数定量研究流动单元的方法--以鄂尔多斯盆地W93井区为例[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 749 -0756 .
[9] 薛永超, 程林松. 白豹油田长8油藏成岩储集相[J]. J4, 2011, 41(2): 365 -371 .
[10] 姜纪沂, 张宇东, 谷洪彪, 左兰丽. 基于灰色关联熵的地下水环境演化模式判别模型研究[J]. J4, 2009, 39(6): 1111 -1116 .
版权所有 © 《吉林大学学报(地球科学版)》编辑部
地址：长春市西民主大街938号(130026)　电话：+86-431-88502374；13756165364　E-mail: xuebao1956@jlu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发