吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (4): 982-991.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20180063

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

鲁西齐河地区铁矿控矿特征及找矿标志

郝兴中1,2, 杨毅恒3, 李英平1, 高华丽1, 陈磊1   

  1. 1. 山东省地质调查院, 济南 250014;
    2. 中国地质大学地球科学与资源学院, 北京 100083;
    3. 北京信息科技大学理学院, 北京 100192
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-17 出版日期:2019-07-26 发布日期:2019-07-26
  • 通讯作者: 杨毅恒(1958-),男,教授,博士生导师,主要从事矿产资源数据解析和矿产资源评价工作,E-mail:Yiheng623@163.com E-mail:Yiheng623@163.com
  • 作者简介:郝兴中(1980-),男,高级工程师,博士,主要从事矿产资源评价、地球物理应用、成矿规律研究与预测工作,E-mail:57820696@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    中国地质调查局地质调查项目（DD2016005223，DD20190166）

Ore-Controlling Characteristics and Prospecting Criteria of Iron Deposits in Qihe Area of Western Shandong

Hao Xingzhong1,2, Yang Yiheng3, Li Yingping1, Gao Huali1, Chen Lei1   

  1. 1. Shandong Institute of Geological Survey, Jinan 250014, China;
    2. School of Earth Sciences and Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China;
    3. School of Applied Sciences, Beijing Information Science and Technology University, Beijing 100192, China
  • Received:2018-03-17 Online:2019-07-26 Published:2019-07-26
  • Supported by:
    Supported by Geological Survey Project of China Geological Survey (DD2016005223, DD20190166)

PDF (PC)

541

摘要： 山东省齐河县境内发育有矽卡岩型铁矿，近年来该区铁矿勘查和研究工作取得了较大进展。本文通过对研究区内铁矿勘查研究成果进行统计分析，旨在对其控矿特征和找矿标志进行探讨来促进该区铁矿找矿工作。研究区内铁矿控矿地层为奥陶纪碳酸盐岩和石炭纪-二叠纪碎屑岩地层，成矿地质体为燕山晚期中基性侵入岩体；铁矿体主要赋存于地层和岩体的接触带处，且在碳酸盐岩、碎屑岩地层中和侵入岩体中也赋存有部分铁矿体。区内铁矿体赋存类型多样，其中以接触带赋存式为主，且含有断裂充填式、层间充填式、裂隙贯入式、捕虏体构造式等。铁矿体形态复杂，呈层状、似层状、囊状、透镜状等；矿床典型蚀变分带特征为闪长岩带-蚀变闪长岩带-内矽卡岩带-铁矿体-外矽卡岩带-大理岩化带-灰岩带。该区成矿作用以接触扩散交代作用、接触渗滤交代作用为主，此外还有富矿热液充填作用等。研究区内铁矿找矿标志主要包括地层标志（奥陶纪碳酸盐岩和石炭纪-二叠纪碎屑岩地层）、岩体标志（中基性侵入岩体，且发育有钠长石化的蚀变闪长岩）、构造标志（地层与岩体接触带、构造交汇部位、层间滑脱部位、脆性裂隙部位等）、围岩蚀变标志（磁铁矿化、矽卡岩化、钠长石化、蛇纹石化、金云母化等与成矿关系密切）、地球物理标志（明显的高值磁异常和化极磁异常部位、重力异常梯度带和高-低电阻转换带）。在今后铁矿勘查过程中，需要在综合研究该区控矿特征的基础上，可利用多种找矿标志进行相互配合、互为补充和综合研究，以期达到预期勘查效果。

关键词: 鲁西, 齐河, 矽卡岩型, 铁矿, 成矿地质体, 找矿标志

Abstract: There are skarn iron deposits in Qihe County, Shandong Province. In recent years, a great progress has been made in iron ore exploration and research work in the study area. In order to promote the iron ore exploration in this area, the authors discussed the ore-controlling characteristics and prospecting criteria through statistical analysis of the iron ore exploration and research results in this area. The iron ore-controlling strata are the strata of the Ordovician carbonate rocks and Carboniferous-Permian clastic rocks. The ore-forming geological bodies are the medium-basic intrusive rocks in Late Yanshanian, and the iron ore bodies occur mainly in the contact zone of strata and rock mass, and also in some carbonate strata or the intrusive rocks. The occurrence types of iron ore are various, of which the contact belt is the main type, also including the types of fracture filling, interlayer filling, fissure penetration and xenoliths, etc. The ore bodies are complex in shape, such as layered, cystic, and lenticular. The typical alteration zoning is characterized by diorite-altered diorite-inner skarn-iron ore-outer skarn belt-marble belt-limestone. The mineralization is mainly composed of contact diffusion metasomatism and contact permeation metasomatism, including also some rich ore hydrothermal filling, etc. In this area, the iron ore prospecting criteria mainly include stratigraphic marks (Ordovician carbonate rocks and Carboniferous-Permian clastic rocks strata), intrusive rock marks (medium-basic intrusive rock mass with albitized alteration diorite), structure marks (contact zones between strata and rock mass, structure intersections, interlayer slips, brittle fractures), wall-rock alteration marks (magnetization, skarnization, albitization, serpentinization, phlogopization, etc.), and geophysical marks (obvious high value magnetic anomaly and polarization magnetic anomaly, gradient zone of gravity anomaly, high-low resistivity conversion zone). In iron ore exploration in the future, based on the comprehensive study of the ore-controlling characteristics in this area, a variety of prospecting indicators should be used to cooperate and complement each other so as to achieve the desired exploration goal.

Key words: western Shandong Province, Qihe, skarn, iron ore, ore-forming geological body, prospecting criteria

中图分类号: 

  • P618.31
[1] 郝兴中. 鲁西地区铁矿成矿规律与预测研究[D]. 北京:中国地质大学, 2014:161-177. Hao Xingzhong. Study on Metallogenic Regularities and Prognosis of Iron Deposits in Western Shandong Province[D]. Beijing:China University of Geosciences, 2014:161-177.
[2] 韩敏强, 王亚红, 李莹. 青海长征沟地区铁矿床地质特征及成因探讨[J]. 中国地质调查, 2017, 4(6):24-32. Han Minqiang, Wang Yahong, Li Ying. Discussion on Geological Characteristics and Genesis of Iron Deposits in Changzhenggou, Qinghai Province[J]. Geological Survey of China, 2017, 4(6):24-32.
[3] 曾广湘, 吕昶, 徐金芳, 等. 山东铁矿地质[M]. 山东:科学技术出版社, 1998:49-84. Zeng Guangxiang, Lü Chang, Xu Jinfang, et al. Shandong Iron Ore Geology[M]. Shandong:Science and Technology Press, 1998:49-84.
[4] 孔庆友, 张天祯, 于学峰, 等. 山东矿床[M]. 济南:山东科学技术出版社, 2006:291-350. Kong Qingyou, Zhang Tianzhen, Yu Xuefeng, et al. Shandong Deposits[M]. Jinan:Shandong Science and Technology Press, 2006:291-350.
[5] 李厚民, 王登红, 李立兴, 等. 中国铁矿成矿规律及重点矿集区资源潜力分析[J]. 中国地质, 2012, 39(3):559-580. Li Houmin, Wang Denghong, Li Lixing, et al. Metallogeny of Iron Deposits and Resource Potential of Major Iron Minerogenetic Units in China[J]. Geology in China, 2012, 39(3):559-580.
[6] 李洪奎, 郝兴中. 鲁西地区铁矿成矿规律研究[M]. 北京:地质出版社, 2016:156-173. Li Hongkui, Hao Xingzhong. Study on Metallogenic Regularity of Iron Ore in Luxi Area[M]. Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 2016:156-173.
[7] 张增奇, 李英平, 王怀洪, 等. 山东省齐河禹城地区发现大型富铁矿[J]. 山东国土资源, 2016, 32(5):94. Zhang Zengqi, Li Yingping, Wang Huaihong,et al. The Discovery of Large Type Rich Iron Ore in Yucheng-Qihe Area, Shandong Province[J]. Shandong Land and Resources, 2016, 32(5):94.
[8] 郭延明, 郝兴中, 钟伟杰, 等. 地面高精度磁测在隐伏铁矿勘查中的应用:以山东省禹城市李屯地区铁矿为例[J]. 山东国土资源, 2017, 33(10):53-57. Guo Yanming, Hao Xingzhong, Zhong Weijie,et al. Application of High Precision Magnetic Measurement in Exploration of Hidden Iron Deposit:Setting Iron Deposits in Litun Area of Yucheng City in Shandong Province as an Example[J]. Shandong Land and Resources, 2017, 33(10):53-57.
[9] 陈晓曼, 王娟, 王继国, 等. 山东省齐河大张铁矿地质特征及找矿前景[J]. 山东国土资源, 2017, 33(12):24-29. Chen Xiaoman, Wang Juan, Wang Jiguo,et al. Geological Characteristics and Prospecting Potential of Dazhang Iron Deposit in Qihe County of Shandong Province[J]. Shandong Land and Resources, 2017, 33(12):24-29.
[10] 郝兴中, 王晶晶, 刘海峰, 等. 鲁西齐河-禹城地区矽卡岩型铁矿成矿条件探讨[C]//朱立新. 2017学术年会论文摘要汇编. 杭州:中国地质学会, 2017:456-457. Hao Xingzhong, Wang Jingjing, Liu Haifeng,et al. Metallogenic Conditions of Skarn Type Iron Ore in Qihe-Yucheng Area, Western Shandong Province[C]//Zhu Lixin. 2017 Academic Annual Conference. Hangzhou:Chinese Geological Society, 2017:456-457.
[11] 郝兴中, 刘伟, 臧凯, 等. 鲁西潘店地区矽卡岩型铁矿成矿规律初探[J]. 山东国土资源, 2018, 34(7):27-33. Hao Xingzhong, Liu Wei, Zang Kai, et al. Primary Study on Metallogenic Regularity of Skarn Type Iron Deposit in Pandian Area in Western Shandong Province[J]. Shandong Land and Resources, 2018, 34(7):27-33.
[12] 刘恒轩, 刘鑫, 廖怡, 等. 青海格尔木市乌腊德铁矿床地质特征及找矿标志[J]. 四川地质学报, 2017, 37(4):573-577. Liu Hengxuan, Liu Xin, Liao Yi, et al. Geological Features and Ore Criteria for the Wulade Fe Deposit in Golmud, Qinghai[J]. Acta Geologica Sichuan, 2017, 37(4):573-577.
[13] 王玉往, 解洪晶, 石煜, 等. 山东省齐河-禹城地区接触交代型富铁矿综合信息找矿预测地质模型[R]. 北京:北京矿产地质研究院, 2017:15-55. Wang Yuwang, Xie Hongjing, Shi Yu, et al. The Comprehensive Information Prospecting Geological Model of Contact Metasomatic Type Rich Iron Ore in Qihe-Yucheng Area, Shandong Province[R]. Beijing:Beijing Institute of Geology for Mineral Resources, 2017:15-55.
[14] 杨承海, 许文良, 杨德彬, 等. 鲁西中生代高Mg闪长岩的成因:年代学与岩石地球化学证据[J]. 地球科学:中国地质大学学报, 2006, 31(1):81-92. Yang Chenghai, Xu Wenliang, Yang Debin,et al. Petrogenesis of the Mesozonic High-Mg Diorites in Shandong:Evidence from Chronology and Petro-geochemistry[J]. Earth Science:Journal of China University of Geosciences, 2006, 31(1):81-92.
[15] Huang Xiaolong, Zhong Junwei, Xu Yigang. Two Tales of the Continental Lithospheric Mantle Prior to the Destruction of the North China Craton:Insights from Geochemical Comparison of the Early Cretaceous Mafic Intrusions in Western Shandong, East China[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2012, 96:193-214.
[16] 钟军伟, 黄小龙. 鲁西早白垩世基性侵入岩的锆石Hf同位素组成变化及其成因[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2012, 36(4):572-580. Zhong Junwei, Huang Xiaolong. SpatialVariation of Zircon Hf Isotopes for the Early Cretaceous Mafic Intrusions in Western Shandong and Its Genesis[J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 2012, 36(4):572-580.
[17] 韩鎏. 山东莱芜含矿岩体成因及其与铁矿的关系[D]. 北京:中国地质大学, 2014:8-53. Han Liu. Genesis and Relationship with the Iron Mine of Ore-Bearing Rock Mass in Laiwu of Shandong Province[D]. Beijing:China University of Geosciences, 2014:8-53.
[18] Xie Qiuhong, Zhang Zhaochong, Hou Tong, et al. Petrogenesis of the Zhangmatun Gabbro in the Jinan Complex, North China Craton:Implications for Skarn-Type Iron Mineralization[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2015, 113:1197-1217.
[19] 张超, 崔芳华, 张照录, 等. 鲁西金岭地区含矿闪长岩体成因:来自锆石U-Pb年代学和地球化学证据[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6):1732-1745. Zhang Chao, Cui Fanghua, Zhang Zhaolu, et al. Petrogenesis of Ore-Bearing Dioritic Pluton in Jinling Area in Western Shandong:Evidence from Zircon U-Pb Chronology and Petro-Geochemistry[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(6):1732-1745.
[20] 郝兴中, 李英平, 智云宝, 等. 山东省单县铁矿地质特征及找矿方法探讨[C]//2013年华东六省一市地学科技论坛文集. 福州:福建省地图出版社, 2013:303-310. Hao Xingzhong, Li Yingping, Zhi Yunbao, et al. Study on Geological Characteristics and Ore Exploration Method of Shanxian Iron Deposit in Shandong Province, China[C]//2013 Geological Science & Technology Forum of East China Six Provinces and One City. Fuzhou:Fujian Provincal Map Publishing House, 2013:303-310.
[21] 郝兴中, 杨毅恒, 李英平, 等. 综合找矿方法在覆盖区的应用:以山东省单县大刘庄铁矿勘查为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(2):641-648. Hao Xingzhong, Yang Yiheng, Li Yingping, et al. Application of the Integrated Ore Prognosis Method in Coverage Area:A Case Study of Shanxian Iron Deposit in Shandong Province, China[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2013, 43(2):641-648.
[22] 郝兴中, 杨毅恒, 李英平, 等. 山东省苍峄铁矿带预测模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(4):1136-1142. Hao Xingzhong, Yang Yiheng, Li Yingping, et al. Prospecting Model of the Cangyi Iron Metallogenic Belt in Shandong Province, China[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2013, 43(4):1136-1142.
[23] 董英君. 应用重磁方法勘查铁矿的效果:以辽宁建昌县马道铁矿为例[J]. 矿床地质, 2006, 25(3):321-328. Dong Yingjun. Effects of Applying Gravity and Magnetic Method to Exploration of Iron Deposit:Case Study of Madao Iron Deposit in Jianchang County, Liaoning Province[J]. Mineral Deposits, 2006, 25(3):321-328.
[24] 邱光辉, 王海焦, 张海亮, 等. 重磁方法在程家村隐伏磁铁矿勘查中的应用[J]. 山东国土资源, 2016, 32(9):44-47. Qiu Guanghui, Wang Haijiao, Zhang Hailiang, et al. Application of Gravity and Magnetic Methods in Prospecting Buried Magnetite Deposit in Chengjiacun[J]. Shandong Land and Resources, 2016, 32(9):44-47.
[25] 郝兴中, 王巧云. 鲁中隆起区中北部矽卡岩型铁矿成矿预测[J]. 地质学刊, 2016, 40(3):443-449. Hao Xingzhong, Wang Qiaoyun. Metallogenic Prospection of Sharn Type Iron Ore in the Central and Northern Luzhong Uplift, East China[J]. Journal of Geology, 2016, 40(3):443-449.
[26] 叶天竺, 吕志成, 庞振山, 等. 勘查区找矿预测理论与方法(总论)[M]. 北京:地质出版社, 2014:319-352. Ye Tianzhu, Lü Zhicheng, Pang Zhenshan, et al. The Theory and Method of Prospecting and Prediction in the Exploration Area (General Theory)[M]. Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 2014:319-352.
[27] 叶天竺, 韦昌山, 王玉往, 等. 勘查区找矿预测理论与方法(各论)[M]. 北京:地质出版社, 2017:319-356. Ye Tianzhu, Wei Changshan, Wang Yuwang, et al. The Theory and Method of Prospecting and Prediction in the Exploration Area (Each Theory)[M]. Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 2017:319-356.
[28] 杨昌彬, 宗信德, 卢铁元, 等. 浅析莱芜接触交代-热液铁矿的双交代渗滤作用[J]. 地质找矿论丛, 2006, 21(增刊):85-89. Yang Changbin, Zong Xinde, Lu Tieyuan, et al. Preliminary Analysis of Bi-Metasomatism Infiltration of Laiwu Style Contact Fe Deposits[J]. Contributions to Geology and Mineral Resources Research, 2006, 21(Sup.):85-89.
[29] 宗信德, 贾东亮, 刘超, 等. 山东莱芜接触交代-热液铁矿矿体形态研究[J]. 山东国土资源, 2010, 26(11):13-18. Zong Xinde, Jia Dongliang, Liu Chao,et al. Study on Ore Occurrence of Laiwu Contact and Geothermal Metasomatic Iron Deposit in Shandong Province[J]. Shandong Land and Resources, 2010, 26(11):13-18.
[30] 宗信德, 李卫, 赵宏生, 等. 山东莱芜接触交代-热液铁矿多因素成矿及特征[J]. 地质与资源, 2011, 20(5):370-375. Zong Xinde, Li Wei, Zhao Hongsheng, et al. The Contact Metasomatic-Hydrothermal Iron Deposit in Laiwu, Shandong Province:Multi-Factor Metallogenesis[J]. Geology and Resources, 2011, 20(5):370-375.
[31] 方邵平, 赵映普. 山东淄博金岭铁矿区王旺庄矿床地质特征及控矿因素简析[J]. 能源研究与管理, 2017(1):57-61. Fang Shaoping, Zhao Yingpu. Shandong Zibo Area of Wangwangzhuang Ore in Jinling Iron Mine Geological Features and Ore Controling Factors Analysis[J]. Energy Research and Management, 2017(1):57-61.
[32] 耿安凯. 山东省莱芜地区矿产特征及成矿模式分析[J]. 世界有色金属, 2017(22):136-137. Geng Ankai. Analysis of Mineral Characteristics and Metallogenic Model in Laiwu Area of Shandong Province[J]. World Nonferrous Metals, 2017(22):136-137.
[33] 李伟, 谢桂青, 姚磊, 等. 鄂东南地区程潮大型矽卡岩型铁矿区岩体成因探讨[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(6):1827-1855. Li Wei, Xie Guiqing, Yao Lei, et al. Genesis of Intrusive Rocks in the Chengchao Large Skarn Iron Deposit, Southeastern Hubei Province[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2014, 44(6):1827-1855.
[34] 郝兴中, 李英平, 杨毅恒, 等. 山东单县覆盖区铁矿特征及找矿方向研究[J]. 山东国土资源, 2014, 30(3):56-61. Hao Xingzhong, Li Yingping, Yang Yiheng, et al. Study on Iron Deposit Characteristics and Prospecting Direction of Coverage Area in Shanxian, Shandong Province[J]. Shandong Land and Resources, 2014, 30(3):56-61.
[1] 张万仁, 吴保祥, 韦枫, 杨维刚, 刘杰. 甘肃省宕昌—崖湾地区水系沉积物地球化学特征与锑找矿预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1462-1480.
[2] 任云生, 李京谋, 郝宇杰, 徐文坦. 吉黑东部矽卡岩型钨矿床白钨矿原位微量元素特征及其指示意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(6): 1706-1721.
[3] 何军成, 刘军, 李小伟, 王晓彤, 孙鹏.

黑龙江省团结沟浅成低温热液金矿床成因——锆石U-Pb定年、元素地球化学和Hf-S-Pb-He同位素证据 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(5): 1437-1466.
[4] 李玉洁, 李成禄, 杨元江, 袁茂文, 李博文, 苏 航. 大兴安岭东北部多宝山矿集区二道坎银铅锌矿床磁铁矿地球化学特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(2): 436-.
[5] 张凯, 雷如雄, 孙晓辉, 吴昌志, . 中天山地块沙垄铁建造矿石矿物原位微量元素特征及其意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(1): 88-105.
[6] 杨冰彬, 胡菲菲, 荆国强, 刘治国, 伍群, 张鑫. 新疆东准噶尔扎河坝蛇绿岩中铬铁矿特征及大地构造环境[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(6): 1867-1878.
[7] 丁清峰, 吴睿哲, 张强, 周轩. 青海东昆仑洪水河铁矿床新元古代含铁建造铁同位素特征及其成因意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(5): 1497-1511.
[8] 王跃, 周奇明, 张金龙, 周光峰. 鲁西地区新太古代地壳增生事件：来自花岗岩和二长花岗岩U-Pb年代学、Hf同位素和岩石地球化学的证据[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(2): 463-485.
[9] 张贵山, 邱红信, 温汉捷, 彭仁, 孟乾坤. 攀西红格钒钛磁铁矿矿田富钴硫化物中钴的地球化学特征及其地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(6): 1740-1752.
[10] 董娟, 李成禄. 大兴安岭永新金矿床黄铁矿热电性特征及其指示意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(1): 95-106.
[11] 王宇晴, 董春艳, 白文倩, 颉颃强, 万渝生. 鲁西莲花山地区新太古代晚期二长花岗岩中的表壳岩包体——SHRIMP锆石U-Pb定年和地球化学特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(1): 141-153.
[12] 程家龙, 崔子良, 李俊. 云南省保山市西邑大型铅锌隐伏矿床找矿预测地质模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(5): 1450-1461.
[13] 贺根文, 路思明, 彭琳琳, 于长琦, 李伟, 刘翠辉. 赣南狮吼山硫铁多金属矿区花岗岩地球化学、年代学特征及其成因[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(5): 1491-1504.
[14] 陶利鑫, 甄世民, 白海军, 王江, 王大钊, 查钟健. 河北大白阳金矿床黄铁矿微量元素及S-Pb同位素地球化学特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(5): 1582-1598.
[15] 郝宇杰, 商青青, 任云生, 刘小禾, 陈聪. LA-ICP-MS原位分析白钨矿稀土元素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(4): 1029-1041.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘建峰，迟效国，周燕，王铁夫，金巍，周建波，董春艳，黎广荣. 小兴安岭东北部金林岩体全岩-角闪石Rb-Sr年龄[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 690 -0693 .
[2] 黄冠星, 孙继朝, 张英, 刘景涛, 张玉玺, 荆继红. 珠江三角洲污灌区地下水重金属含量及其相互关系[J]. J4, 2011, 41(1): 228 -234 .
[3] 肖长来，梁秀娟，崔建铭，兰盈盈,张君，李书兰，梁瑞奇，郑策. 确定含水层参数的全程曲线拟合法[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 751 -0755 .
[4] 郭振华，王璞珺，印长海，黄玉龙. 松辽盆地北部火山岩岩相与测井相关系研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(02): 207 -0214 .
[5] 孙永河,付晓飞,吕延防,付广,阎冬. 地震泵抽吸作用与油气运聚成藏物理模拟[J]. J4, 2007, 37(1): 98 -0104 .
[6] 谢忠雷，陈卓，孙文田，尹波. 不同茶园茶叶氟含量及土壤氟的形态分布[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 293 -0298 .
[7] 贾军涛,王璞珺，邵 锐，程日辉，张 斌，侯景涛，李金龙，边伟华. 松辽盆地东南缘营城组地层序列的划分与区域对比[J]. J4, 2007, 37(6): 1110 -1123 .
[8] 康立明，任战利. 多参数定量研究流动单元的方法--以鄂尔多斯盆地W93井区为例[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 749 -0756 .
[9] 薛永超, 程林松. 白豹油田长8油藏成岩储集相[J]. J4, 2011, 41(2): 365 -371 .
[10] 姜纪沂, 张宇东, 谷洪彪, 左兰丽. 基于灰色关联熵的地下水环境演化模式判别模型研究[J]. J4, 2009, 39(6): 1111 -1116 .
版权所有 © 《吉林大学学报(地球科学版)》编辑部
地址：长春市西民主大街938号(130026)　电话：+86-431-88502374；13756165364　E-mail: xuebao1956@jlu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发