吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (5): 1222-1234.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20180054

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

辽河盆地西部凹陷古近系沙四上亚段沉积相及演化

王夏斌1, 姜在兴2, 胡光义1, 范廷恩1, 王俊辉3, 卢欢4   

  1. 1. 中海油研究总院有限责任公司, 北京 100028;
    2. 中国地质大学(北京) 能源学院, 北京 100083;
    3. 中国石油大学(北京) 地球科学学院, 北京 102249;
    4. 中海油(有限)公司天津分公司, 天津 300459
  • 收稿日期:2018-04-13 出版日期:2019-09-26 发布日期:2019-10-10
  • 作者简介:王夏斌(1988-),男,在站博士后,主要从事沉积岩石学和储层地质学研究,E-mail:719278851@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技重大专项（2017ZX05009-002）

Sedimentary Facies and Evolution of Upper Fourth Member of Paleogene Shahejie Formation in Western Sag of Liaohe Basin

Wang Xiabin1, Jiang Zaixing2, Hu Guangyi1, Fan Ting'en1, Wang Junhui3, Lu Huan4   

  1. 1. Research Institute Co., Ltd., CNOOC, Beijing 100028, China;
    2. School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083;
    3. College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China;
    4. China Limited Tianjin Branch, CNOOC, Tianjin 300459, China
  • Received:2018-04-13 Online:2019-09-26 Published:2019-10-10
  • Supported by:
    Supported by Major Project of National Science and Technology (2017ZX05009-002)

PDF (PC)

504

摘要： 薄互层砂体研究是湖盆沉积学的研究难点。本文针对辽河西部凹陷沙四上亚段（Es4上）薄互层砂体，以层序地层学、沉积学、测井地质学等理论为指导，综合岩心、测录井和地震等多种资料，对西部凹陷的薄互层砂体进行精细描述和深入剖析。结果表明，研究区主要发育辫状河三角洲和湖泊沉积相，其中，滩坝砂体是湖泊相的主力砂体。通过考虑不同沉积背景下滩坝在岩相组合、发育位置和成因机理的差异性，将滩坝划分成侧缘改造型滩坝、前缘改造型滩坝、基岩改造型滩坝、淹没改造型滩坝和风暴改造型滩坝5种沉积模式；对薄层滩坝砂体的控制因素进行分析，认为其受到"风场-物源-盆地"三端元的控制。

关键词: 辽河西部凹陷, 沙四上亚段, 滩坝, 沉积相

Abstract: The thin interbedded sand body is a difficult point in the study of lacustrine sedimentology. Based on the Fourth Member of the upper Shahejie Formation (Es4) in the Western sag of Liaohe basin, the theory of sequence stratigraphy, sedimentology and logging geology, the thin interbedded sand bodies are described and analyzed integrated with core, logging and seismic data. It is considered that the braided delta and lacustrine sedimentary facies are mainly developed in the study area, among which the beach bar is the main sand body. The beach bar can be divided into five different parts based on their different sedimentary genetic characteristics:the lateral reformed beach bar, the front reformed beach bar, the bedrock reformed beach bar, the flooded reformed beach bar,and the tempestite reformed beach bar. Through analysis of the control factors of the thin beach bar sand bodies,they are controlled by "wind field-source-basin".

Key words: Western sag of Liaohe basin, upper fourth member of Shahejie Formation, beach bar, sedimentary facies

中图分类号: 

  • P618.13
[1] 李国斌,姜在兴,王升兰,等. 薄互层滩坝砂体的定量预测:以东营凹陷古近系沙四上亚段(Es4上)为例[J]. 中国地质,2010,37(6):1659-1671. Li Guobin,Jiang Zaixing, Wang Shenglan, et al. The Quantitative Prognosis of Thin Interbedded Beach-Bar Sandbodies:A Case Study of the Upper 4th Submember of the Paleogene Shahejie Formation in Dongying Sag[J]. Geology in China, 2010, 37(6):1659-1671.
[2] 赵东娜,朱筱敏,董艳蕾,等. 地震沉积学在湖盆缓坡滩坝砂体预测中的应用:以准噶尔盆地车排子地区下白垩统为例[J].石油勘探与开发,2014,41(1):55-61. Zhao Dongna, Zhu Xiaomin, Dong Yanlei, et al. Application of Seismic Sedimentology to Prediction of Beach and Bar Sandbodies in Gentle Slope of Lacustrine Basin:A Case Study of the Lower Cretaceous in Chepaizi Area, Junggar Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(1):55-61.
[3] 赵贤正,蒲秀刚,王嘉豪,等. 断陷盆地缓坡区控砂控藏机制与勘探发现:以歧口凹陷歧北缓坡带为例[J]. 石油学报,2017,38(7):729-739. Zhao Xianzheng, Pu Xiugang, Wang Jiahao, et al. Sand and Reservoir Controlling Mechanism and Exploration Discovery in the Gentle Slope of Fault Basin:A Case Study of Qibei Slope in Qikou Sag[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017, 38(7):729-739.
[4] 姜在兴,王俊辉,张元福. 滩坝沉积研究进展综述[J]. 古地理学报,2015,17(4):427-440. Jiang Zaixing, Wang Junhui, Zhang Yuanfu. Advances in Beach-Bar Research:A Review[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2015, 17(4):427-440.
[5] 冯有良,鲁卫华,门相勇. 辽河西部凹陷古近系层序地层与地层岩性油气藏预测[J]. 沉积学报,2009,27(1):57-63. Feng Youliang, Lu Weihua, Men Xiangyong. Eogene Sequence Stratigraphy and Stratigraphic and Lithologic Reservoirs Prediction in Liaohe West Depression[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2009, 27(1):57-63.
[6] 王青春,鲍志东,贺萍. 辽河坳陷西部凹陷北区湖盆深陷期层序地层响应[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2010,37(1):11-20. Wang Qingchun, Bao Zhidong, He Ping. Sequence Stratigraphic Responses to the Lacustrine Basin Deep-Faulted Period in the North Area of the Western Sag, Liaohe Depression[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2010, 37(1):11-20.
[7] Keighley D, Flint S, Howell J, et al. Sequence Stratigraphy in Lacustrine Basins:A Model for Part of the Green River Formation (Eocene), Southwest Uinta Basin, Utah, USA[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 2003, 73(6):987-1006.
[8] Smith M, Carroll A, Singer B. Synoptic Reconstruction of a Major Ancient Lake System:Eocene Green River Formation, Western United States[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 2008, 120:54-84.
[9] Tanavsuu M K, Sarg J F, Bartov Y. Depositional Cycles and Sequences in an Organic-Rich Lake Basin:Eocene Green River Formation, Lake Uinta, Colorado and Utah, USA[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 2017, 87(3):210-229.
[10] Iigar A,Nemec W. Early Miocene Lacustrine Deposits and Sequence Stratigraphy of the Ermenek Basin, Central Taurides, Turkey[J]. Sedimentary Geology, 2005, 173:233-275.
[11] Jiang Z, Liu H, Zhang S, et al. Sedimentary Characteristics of Large-Scale Lacustrine Beach-Bars and Their Formation in the Eocene Boxing Sagof Bohai Bay Basin, East China[J]. Sedimentology, 2011, 58:1087-1112.
[12] 罗红梅,朱毅秀,穆星,等. 渤海湾渤南洼陷深层湖相滩坝储集层沉积微相预测[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2011,38(2):182-190. Luo Hongmei, Zhu Yixiu, Mu Xing, et al. Seismic Facies of Lacustrine Beach and Bar Reservoirs Pprediction in the Deep Zone of the Bonan Subsag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2011, 38(2):182-190.
[13] 冷济高,庞雄奇,李晓光,等. 辽河断陷西部凹陷油气成藏主控因素[J]. 古地理学报,2008,10(5):473-480. Leng Jigao, Pang Xiongqi, Li Xiaoguang, et al. Main Controlling Factors of Hydrocarbon Accumulation in West Sag of Liaohe Rift Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2008, 10(5):473-480.
[14] 鲍志东,赵立新,王勇,等. 断陷湖盆储集砂体发育的主控因素:以辽河西部凹陷古近系为例[J].现代地质,2009,23(4):676-682. Bao Zhidong, Zhao Lixin, Wang Yong, et al. The Main Control Factors of Sandbody Reservoir Development in Rift-Subsidence Lake Basin:An Example from the Paleogene West Sag of Liaohe Basin[J]. Geoscience, 2009, 23(4):676-682.
[15] Hu L, Fuhrmann A, Poelchau H S, et al. Numerical Simulation of Petroleum Generation and Migration in the Qingshui Sag, Western Depression of the Liaohe Basin, Northeast China[J]. AAPG, 2005, 89(12):1629-1649.
[16] Huang L, Liu C, Xu C, et al. New Insights into the Distribution and Evolution of the Cenozoic Tan-Lu Fault Zone in the Liaohe Sub-Basin of the Bohai Bay Basin, Eastern China[J]. Tectonophysics, 2018, 722:373-382.
[17] Zhao W, Wang H, Yuan X, et al. Petroleum Systems of Chinese Nonmarine Basins[J]. Basin Research, 2010, 22(1):4-16.
[18] Neal J, Abreu V. Sequence Stratigraphy Hierarchy and the Accommodation Succession Method[J]. Geology, 2009, 37(9):779-782.
[19] Rasmussen E, Dybkjar K. Sequence Stratigraphy of the Upper Oligocene-Lower Miocene of Eastern Jylland, Denmark:Role of Structural Relief and Variable Sediment Supply in Controlling Sequence Development[J]. Sedimentology, 2010, 52(1):25-63.
[20] Vail P R. Seismic Stratigraphy Interpretation Using Sequence Stratigraphy:Part 1:Seismic Stratigraphy Interpretation Procedure[J]. AAPG, 1988, 27(1):1-10.
[21] 朱筱敏,钟大康,袁选俊,等. 中国含油气盆地沉积地质学进展[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2016,43(5):820-829. Zhu Xiaomin, Zhong Dakang, Yuan Xuanjun, et al. Development of Sedimentary Geology of Petroliferous Basins in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(5):820-829.
[22] Wang J, Jiang Z, Zhang Y. Subsurface Lacustrine Storm-Seiche Depositional Model in the Eocene Lijin Sag of the Bohai Bay Basin, East China[J]. Sedimentary Geology, 2015, 328:55-72.
[23] 王夏斌,姜在兴,袁帅. 海拉尔盆地贝西斜坡多级坡折带对油气圈闭的控制作用[J]. 高校地质学报,2016,22(2):360-367. Wang Xiabin, Jiang Zaixing, Yuan Shuai. Controls of Multistage Slope Breaks on the Hydrocarbon Traps in Beixi Slope of Hailaer Basin[J]. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2016, 22(2):360-367.
[24] 王冠民,王群,王春阳,等. 论湖相滩与坝的成因差异[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2016,46(1):1-10. Wang Guanmin, Wang Qun, Wang Chunyang, et al. Discussion on Genesis Difference of Lake Beach and Bar[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2016, 46(1):1-10.
[25] 张宇焜,胡晓庆,牛涛,等. 古地貌对渤海石臼坨凸起古近系沉积体系的控制作用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2015,45(6):1589-1596. Zhang Yukun, Hu Xiaoqing, Niu Tao, et al. Controlling of Paleogeomorphology to Paleogene Sedimentary System of Shijiutuo Uplift in Bohai Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2015, 45(6):1589-1596.
[26] 姜在兴. 风场-物源-盆地系统沉积动力学:沉积体系成因解释与分布预测新概念[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2016. Jiang Zaixing. Wind-Source-Basin System Sedimentary Dynamics:New Concept of Explaining the Origin and Predicting the Distribution of Depositional Systems[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2016.
[27] 姜在兴,王雯雯,王俊辉,等. 风动力场对沉积体系的作用[J]. 沉积学报,2017,35(5):863-876. Jiang Zaixing, Wang Wenwen, Wang Junhui, et al. The Influence of Wind Field on Depositional Systems[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2017, 35(5):863-876.
[28] Wang J, Jiang Z, Xian B, et al. A Method to Define the Palaeowind Strength from Lacustrine Parameters[J]. Sedimentology, 2017, 65(2):461-491.
[1] 罗洪浩, 孙平昌, 吴会永, 王德伟, 石志衍, 陈俊侠. 河南省太行山东麓深部晚古生代层序地层及其含气系统划分[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(5): 1718-1734.
[2] 陈思芮, 王卫学, 曲希玉, 纪友亮, 鲜本忠, 刘英男. 东营凹陷北带沙四上亚段砂砾岩储层物性主控因素分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(4): 1091-.
[3] 陈贤良, 纪友亮, 杨克明. 川西坳陷中段须四段层序地层格架内沉积特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(6): 1615-1627.
[4] 王鑫, 林承焰, 马存飞, 陈柄屹, 杜凯, 李志鹏. 东营凹陷北部陡坡带利563区块沙四上亚段砂砾岩扇体沉积特征及沉积模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(3): 705-720.
[5] 李维禄, 高思宇, 张翼, 张金亮, 韩春花. 末端扇—滨浅湖滩坝组合沉积机制与演化分布:以东濮凹陷卫城油田沙河街组四段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(1): 31-40.
[6] 李汝斌. 吐哈盆地台南凹陷二叠系充填特征及其研究意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(6): 1518-1528.
[7] 于翠玲, 李宝刚. 渤海湾盆地东营凹陷牛庄洼陷岩性油气藏平面富集主控因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(1): 240-247.
[8] 贾艳聪, 操应长, 林畅松, 王健. 东营凹陷博兴洼陷沙四上亚段滩坝优质储层形成机理与分布特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 652-664.
[9] 张兵, 杨凯, 贾雪丽, 郑荣才, 郭强, 文华国. 开江梁平台内海槽东段长兴组白云岩储层沉积-成岩系统研究[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1631-1641.
[10] 蔡来星, 王蛟, 郭兴伟, 肖国林, 朱晓青, 庞玉茂. 南黄海中部隆起中—古生界沉积相及烃源岩特征——以CSDP-2井为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(4): 1030-1046.
[11] 陈欢庆, 穆剑东, 王珏, 邓西里. 扇三角洲沉积储层特征与定量评价——以辽河西部凹陷某试验区于楼油层为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(1): 14-24.
[12] 张立强, 卢旭宁, 葛雪莹, 张曙光. 饶阳凹陷留北地区新近系河流相沉积模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(4): 1021-1029.
[13] 马奔奔, 操应长, 王艳忠, 刘惠民, 高永进. 东营凹陷盐家地区沙四上亚段砂砾岩储层岩相与物性关系[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(2): 495-506.
[14] 尤丽，张迎朝，李才，张哨楠，招湛杰. 基于沉积成岩-储集相分析确定文昌9区低渗储层“甜点”分布[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(5): 1432-1440.
[15] 郭 荣 涛. 燕山西段雾迷山组层序地层格架及古地理演化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(2): 446-459.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 尤敏鑫，刘建民. 同位素地球化学在峨眉山大火成岩省研究中的应用现状与进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(4): 1231 -1243 .
[2] 杨春梅, 李洪奇,陆大卫,张方礼,高 原,邵英超. 不同驱替方式下岩石电阻率与饱和度的关系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 667 -671 .
[3] 祝洪臣，张炯飞，权 恒. 大兴安岭中生代两期成岩成矿作用的元素、同位素特征及其形成环境[J]. J4, 2005, 35(04): 436 -0442 .
[4] 朱建伟, 赵刚, 刘博, 郭巍, 成俊. 油页岩测井识别技术及应用[J]. J4, 2012, 42(2): 289 -295 .
[5] 陈力，梁海安，张文娟，荣帆. 模糊数学方法在城市工程地质环境区划中的应用--以抚顺市城区为例[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 837 -0840 .
[6] 高桂梅,苏 克,王文颖,甘树才,刘招君. 吉林省桦甸油页岩中稀土元素和微量元素的研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(6): 974 -0979 .
[7] 吴孔运，蒋忠诚，叶 晔. 不同植物群落对灰岩试块溶蚀速率的影响[J]. J4, 2007, 37(5): 967 -0971 .
[8] 周彦章，迟宝明，刘中培. 山东夏甸金矿床充水机理构造控制模式[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 255 -0260 .
[9] 张渊，刘连登，孙景贵，陈国华，张洪喜，闫复传,杨开春. 胶东西北部黄埠岭金矿床两期次叠加成矿[J]. J4, 2008, 38(1): 21 -0026 .
[10] 鲁程鹏, 束龙仓, 苑利波, 张蓉蓉, 黄币娟, 王彬彬. 基于示踪试验求解岩溶含水层水文地质参数[J]. J4, 2009, 39(4): 717 -721 .
版权所有 © 《吉林大学学报(地球科学版)》编辑部
地址：长春市西民主大街938号(130026)　电话：+86-431-88502374；13756165364　E-mail: xuebao1956@jlu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发