吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (3): 927-939.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20200277

• 地球探测与信息技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

针对致密砂岩气储层复杂孔隙结构的岩石物理模型及其应用

张益明1, 秦小英2, 郭智奇2, 牛聪1, 王迪1, 凌云1   

  1. 1. 中海油研究总院有限责任公司, 北京 100028;
    2. 吉林大学地球探测科学与技术学院, 长春 130026
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-26 出版日期:2021-05-26 发布日期:2021-06-07
  • 作者简介:张益明(1964—),男,高级工程师,博士,主要从事地震反演和储层预测方面的研究,E-mail:zhangym1@cnooc.com.cn
  • 基金资助:
    中海石油有限公司综合科研项目(YXKY-2019-ZY-04);国家自然科学基金项目(42074153)

Petrophysical Model for Complex Pore Structure and Its Applications in Tight Sand Gas Reservoirs

Zhang Yiming1, Qin Xiaoying2, Guo Zhiqi2, Niu Cong1, Wang Di1, Ling Yun1   

  1. 1. CNOOC Research Institude Co, Ltd., Beijing 100028, China;
    2. College of GeoExploration Science and Techonology, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China
  • Received:2020-11-26 Online:2021-05-26 Published:2021-06-07
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the China National Offshore Oil Corporation Research Project (YXKY-2019-ZY-04) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42074153)

摘要: 针对致密砂岩气储层复杂的微观孔隙结构进行岩石物理建模,在模型中比较了单一孔隙纵横比、双孔隙模型两种表征孔隙结构的表征方式。岩石物理正演分析表明,两种孔隙结构模型均可解释致密砂岩复杂的速度-孔隙度关系。岩石物理反演结果表明,双孔隙模型对测井横波速度的预测精度更高,说明该模型更适用于表征研究区致密砂岩的孔隙结构,反演的软孔比例参数能够反映地层中孔隙结构的非均匀分布。应用双孔隙模型计算致密砂岩地层岩石骨架的弹性模量,与Krief及Pride等传统经验公式相比,该方法考虑了岩石骨架模量与矿物基质、孔隙度和孔隙结构等微观物性因素的关系,理论上更具有严谨性。对致密砂岩骨架模量计算结果的分析表明,少量微裂隙的存在即能够显著影响致密砂岩骨架的弹性性质,同时孔隙空间中的球形孔隙是致密气的主要赋存空间。并且,通过致密砂岩骨架弹性模量,进一步计算了可用于地层评价的Biot系数等岩石物理参数。致密砂岩骨架模量的预测结果可为Gassmann流体替换理论、BISQ孔隙弹性介质理论等岩石物理方法提供关键参数。

关键词: 致密砂岩气, 岩石物理, 孔隙结构, 纵横比, 软孔比例, 岩石骨架

Abstract: We conducted rock physical modeling to investigate the effect of complex pore space on elastic properties of tight gas sands. Two ways for the characterization of pore spaces were compared in the rock physical model. The modeling results show that the complex velocity-porosity relationships from well log data can be interpreted by both the two models. The rock physical inversion using well log data shows that compared to the single pore aspect ratio model, the dual-porosity model gives better prediction in shear wave velocity. It reveals that the dual-porosity model may be a more realistic representation of tight sands, and the obtained parameter of the proportion of soft pores can reflect heterogeneity of pore spaces. The proposed rock physical model is used to evaluate elastic modulus of the tight sand dry frame using logging data. Compared with the conventional empirical formulas such as Krief or Pride, this method considers mineralogy, porosity and complex microstructural pore structures,so it is more rigorous to determine the elastic properties of dry frame. The analysis on the obtained results indicates that a small amount of micro-cracks may play an important role in determining elastic behaviors of dry frame of tight sands, and round pores provide the main storage space for gas. The obtained dry frame modulus can be used to calculate many rock physical parameters for formation evaluation such as the Biot coefficient, and provide key parameters for the Gassmann fluids substitution theory and BISQ theory.

Key words: tight gas sandstone, rock physics, pore structure, aspect ratio, fraction of soft pore, dry frame

中图分类号: 

  • P631
[1] 惠学智,许有为,吕娜娜,等.鄂尔多斯盆地华庆地区长8段成岩主控因素及其对储层的影响[J].世界地质,2019,38(4):1012-1020.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-5589.2019.04.012. Hui Xuezhi,Xu Youwei,Lyu Nana,et al.Major Controlling Factors of Diagenesis and Their Influences on Chang-8 Section Reservoir,Huaqing Area,Ordos Basin[J].Global Geology,2019,38(4):1012-1020.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-5589.2019.04.012.
[2] 刘喜杰,马遵敬,韩冬,等.鄂尔多斯盆地东缘临兴区块致密砂岩优质储层形成的主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(4):481-490.doi:10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2018.02.002. Liu Xijie, Ma Zunjing, Han Dong, et al. Research on the Main Factors of High Quality Tight Sand Stone Reservoir in Linxing Block, Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2018, 29 (4): 481-490.doi:10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2018.02.002.
[3] Tutuncu A N, Podio A L, Sharma M M. An Experimental Investigation of Factors Influencing Compressional-and Shear-Wave Velocities and Attenuations in Tight Gas Sandstones[J]. Geophysics, 1994, 59(1):77-86.doi:10.1190/1.1443536.
[4] Smith T M, Sayers C M, Sondergeld C H. Rock Properties in Low-Porosity/Low-Permeability Sandstones[J]. Leading Edge, 2009, 28(1):48-59.doi:10.1190/1.3064146.
[5] Ruiz F, Cheng A. A Rock Physics Model for Tight Gas Sand[J]. Leading Edge, 2010, 29(12):1484-1489.doi:10.1190/1.3525364.
[6] Yin H, Zhao J, Tang G, et al. Pressure and Fluid Effect on Frequency-Dependent Elastic Moduli in Fully Saturated Tight Sandstone[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth,2017,122(11):8925-8942.doi:10.1002/2017JB014244.
[7] 周枫,徐鸣洁,马中高.等效孔隙结构模型在鄂尔多斯致密含气砂岩中的应用[J].高校地质学报,2013,19(4):588-593.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7493.2013.04.004. Zhou Feng, Xu Mingjie, Ma Zhonggao,et al. Application of Effective Porosity Model to Tight Gas Sands in Ordos Basin[J]. Geological of China Universities, 2013,19 (4): 588-593.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7493.2013.04.004.
[8] 印兴耀,刘欣欣,曹丹平.基于Biot相洽理论的致密砂岩弹性参数计算方法[J].石油物探,2013,52(5):445-451.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2013.05.001. Yin Xingyao,Liu Xinxin,Cao Danping.Elastic Parameters Calculation for Tight Sand Reservoir Based on Biot-Consistent Theory[J].Geological Prospecting for Petroleum,2013,52(5):445-451.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2013.05.001.
[9] 杨志芳,曹宏,姚逢昌,等.复杂孔隙结构储层地震岩石物理分析及应用[J].中国石油勘探,2014,19(3):50-56.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2014.03.006. Yang Zhifang, Cao Hong, Yao Fengchang,et al. Seismic Rock Physical Analysis of Complex Porous Reservoir and Its Application[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2014,19(3): 50-56.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2014.03.006.
[10] 赖锦, 王贵文, 罗官幸, 等. 基于岩石物理相约束的致密砂岩气储层渗透率解释建模[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2014, 29(3):1173-1182.doi:10.6038/pg20140323. Lai Jin,Wang Guiwen,Luo Guanxing, et al. A Fine Logging Interpretation Model of Permeability Confined by Petrophysical Facies of Tight Gas Sandstone Reservoirs[J].Progress in Geophysics,2014,29(3):1173-1182.doi:10.6038/pg20140323.
[11] 邓继新, 周浩, 王欢,等. 基于储层砂岩微观孔隙结构特征的弹性波频散响应分析[J]. 地球物理学报, 2015,58(9):3389-3400. Deng Jixin, Zhou Hao, Wang Huan, et al. The Influence of Pore Structure in Reservoir Sandstone on Dispersion Properties of Elastic Waves[J].Chinese Journal of Geophysics,2015,58(9): 3389-3400.
[12] 王璞, 吴国忱. 基于自相容近似的致密储层岩石物理建模[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2015, 30(5):2233-2238. Wang Pu,Wu Guochen. The Rock Physics Modeling for Tight Reservoir Based on the Self-Consistent Approximation[J]. Progress in Geophysics,2015,30(5):2233-2238.
[13] 姜仁, 曾庆才, 黄家强, 等. 基于岩石物理分析的致密砂岩流体检测方法研究[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2015, 15(1):163-167.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2015.01.030. Jiang Ren, Zeng Qingcai, Huang Jiaqiang, et al. Tight Gas Saturation Detection by Most Sensitive AVO Attributes with Rock Physics Analysis[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2015, 15 (1): 163-167.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2015.01.030.
[14] 刘倩,印兴耀,李超.含不连通孔隙的致密砂岩储层岩石弹性模量预测方法[J].石油物探,2015,54(6):635-642.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2015.06.001. Liu Qian, Yin Xingyao, Li Chao. Rock Elastic Modulus Estimation for Tight Sandstone Reservoirs with Disconnected Pores[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2015,54 (6):635-642.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2015.06.001.
[15] 印兴耀,刘倩.致密储层各向异性地震岩石物理建模及应用[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2016,40(2):52-58. Yin Xingyao, Liu Qian. Anisotropic Rock Physical Modeling of Tight Sandstone and Applications[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2016,40 (2): 52-58.
[16] 王大兴. 致密砂岩气储层的岩石物理模型研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 2016,59(12):4603-4622. Wang Daxing. Study on Rock Physics Model of Gas Reservoirs in Tight Sandstone[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,2016,59 (12): 4603-4622.
[17] 贾凌云, 李琳, 王千遥,等.致密砂岩储层岩石物理模型的优化建立[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018,33(4):416-424.doi:10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2018.04.0416. Jia Lingyun, Li Lin, Wang Qianyao, et al. Optimization of the Rock Physical Model in Tight Sandstone Reservoir[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2018,33(4):416-424.doi:10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2018.04.0416.
[18] 郭梦秋, 巴晶, 马汝鹏, 等. 含流体致密砂岩的纵波频散及衰减:基于双重双重孔隙结构模型描述的特征分析[J]. 地球物理学报, 2018, 61(3):1053-1068.doi:10.6038/cjg2018L0678. Guo Mengqiu,Ba Jing,Ma Rupeng, et al.P-Wave Velocity Dispersion and Attenuation in Fluid-Saturated Tight Sandstones: Characteristics Analysis Based on a Double Double-Porosity Structure Model Description[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2018, 61(3):1053-1068.doi:10.6038/cjg2018L0678.
[19] 何润发,巴晶,陈天胜, 等.致密砂岩气藏裂隙-孔隙型弹性岩石物理模板研究:以川西坳陷A区为例[J].地球物理学进展,2020,35(1):116-123. He Runfa, Ba Jing, Chen Tiansheng, et al. A Study on Fracture-Pore Elastic Rock Physics Template of Tight Sandstone Gas Reservoirs: A Case Study of Area A in West Sichuan Depression[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2020,35 (1): 116-123.
[20] 逄硕,刘财,郭智奇,等.基于岩石物理模型的页岩孔隙结构反演及横波速度预测[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2017,47 (2):606-615.doi:10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201702304. Pang Shuo,Liu Cai,Guo Zhiqi,et al. Estimation of Pore-Shape and Shear Wave Velocity Based on Rock-Physics Modelling in Shale[J].Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition),2017,47(2):606-615.doi:10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese. 201702304.
[21] 张冰,郭智奇,徐聪,等.基于岩石物理模型的页岩储层裂缝属性及各向异性参数反演[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2018, 48(4):1244-1252.doi:10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20170285. Zhang Bing,Guo Zhiqi,Xu Cong,et al.Fracture Properties and Anisotropic Parameters Inversion of Shales Based on Rock Physics Model[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition),2018,48(4):1244-1252.doi:10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese. 20170285.
[22] 李博南,曲寿利,沈珲.基于岩石物理模型的碳酸盐岩储层微观孔隙特征分析方法[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2020,50 (1):285-293.doi:10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20190001. Li Bonan,Qu Shouli,Shen Hui.Microscopic Characterization Method of Carbonate Reservoirs Based on Rock Physics Model[J].Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2020, 50(1):285-293. doi:10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20190001.
[23] Berryman J G. Mixture Theories for Rock Properties[M].Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union,1995:205-228.doi:10.1029/RF003p0205.
[24] Wood A B, Lindsay R B. A Textbook of Sound[J]. Physics Today, 1956, 9(11):37.doi:10.1063/1.3059819.
[25] Gassmann F.Uber die Elastizitat Poroser Medien[J]. Vier Der Natur Gesellschaft in Zurich, 1951, 96:1-23.
[26] Biot,Maurice A. Theory of Propagation of Elastic Waves in a Fluid-Saturated Porous Solid. I. Low Frequency Range. II. Higher Frequency Range[J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1955, 28(182):168-191.
[27] Dvorkin J,Nur A. Dynamic Poroelasticity: A Unified Model with the Squirt and the Biot Mechanisms[J]. Geophysics, 1993, 58(4):524-533.doi:10.1190/1.1443435.
[28] Dvorkin J,Nolen-Hoeksema R, Nur A. The Squirt-Flow Mechanism: Macroscopic Description[J]. Geophysics, 1994, 59(3):428-438.doi:10.1190/1.1443605.
[29] Yan X F,Yao F C,Cao H, et al.Analyzing the Mid-Low Porosity Sandstone Dry Frame in Central Sichuan Based on Effective Medium Theory[J].Applied Geophysics,2011,18(3):163-170.doi:10.1007/s11770-011-0293-1.
[30] Krief M, Garat J, Stellingwerff J, et al. A Petrophysical Interpretation Using the Velocities of P and S Waves (Full-Waveform Sonic)[J]. Log Analyst, 1990, 31:355-369.
[31] Pride S R,Berryman J G,Harris J M.Seismic Attenuation Due to Wave-Induced Flow[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2004, 109(B1).doi:10.1029/2003JB002639.
[32] Lee M W. A Simple Method of Predicting S-Wave Velocity[J]. Geophysics, 2006, 71(6):F161-F164.doi:10.1190/1.2357833.
[33] Biot M A.General Theory of Three-Dimensional Consolidation[J]. Journal of Applied Physics,1941,12(2):155-164.doi:10.1063/1.1712886.
[34] Han D H,Batzle M. Gain Function and Hydrocarbon Indicators[J]. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts,2003, 22(1):1695.doi:10.1190/1.1817633.
[1] 王梓麟, 时婧玥, 杨英, 徐栋, 曾泉树, 张益畅. 深层煤岩孔隙结构表征及压裂缝导流能力影响因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1061-1076.
[2] 路研, 刘宗宾, 廖新武, 李超, 王亚. 低渗透砂岩油藏水驱渗流特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1077-1090.
[3] 高波, 潘哲君, 刘连杰, 李玲玲, 洪淑新, 潘会芳, 张波. 松辽盆地徐家围子断陷沙河子组砂砾岩储层有效性综合评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 31-45.
[4] 王亚, 刘宗宾, 马奎前, 路研, 刘超. 基于LDA协同SSOM算法的低渗透砂岩孔隙结构评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 298-311.
[5] 郑轩, 宗兆云, 付亚群, 骆坤. 海域油气盖层叠前地震反演预测方法及应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 2128-2141.
[6] 李建光, 孙超, 蔡来星, 屈少波, 童雪瑞, 窦中浩, 姜志海. 煤系岩石电性特征与含水饱和度定量关系实验——以山西宁武榆树坡为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(5): 1724-1735.
[7] 于正军, 张军华, 周昊, 任瑞军, 陈永芮, 杨玉龙. 准噶尔盆地东南缘页岩油储层脆性预测与评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(5): 1711-1723.
[8] 刘宗宾, 李超, 路研, 王亚, 黄建廷. 基于孔隙结构表征的低渗透砂岩流体赋存特征及渗透率评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1124-1136.
[9] 谢通, 陈威, 潘诗洋, 石万忠, 王亿, 张焱林, 段轲, 任志军. 鄂西地区二叠系大隆组含气页岩岩相类型及储层特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1154-1176.
[10] 张文, 蓝升, 马文良, 王佳. 新疆油页岩升温过程中孔隙结构演化特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(6): 1689-1705.
[11] 熊安亮, 程国峰, 李东涛, 丁维盼, 刘宇羲, 陈刚, 杨磊, 袁耀利, 朱玉双, 刘林玉. 超低渗储层微观孔隙结构及剩余油分布特征——以吴起油田白豹地区长4+5为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(5): 1338-1351.
[12] 赵越, 李磊, 司运航, 王会敏. 浅层页岩气储层孔隙分形特征及控制因素——以云南昭通地区龙马溪组为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(6): 1813-1829.
[13] 张立亚, 徐 文, 沈艳杰. 松辽盆地南部深层致密砂岩气储层形成机制及成藏主控因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(5): 1707-1717.
[14] 黄鑫, 段冬平, 刘彬彬, 李炳颖, 丁芳, 王伟, 娄敏. 西湖凹陷花港组绿泥石成因及其对储层物性的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(3): 669-679.
[15] 吴蒙, 秦勇, 王晓青, 李国璋, 朱超, 朱士飞. 中国致密砂岩储层流体可动性及其影响因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(1): 35-51.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 于 平,李瑞磊,付 雷,郝 雪,张向军,廉国芬. 松辽盆地滨北地区区域构造特征及意义--地震长剖面给出的证据[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 611 -615 .
[2] 张原庆, 宋炳忠, 王玉福, 张宁. 鲁西铜石岩体金成矿规律和成矿预测[J]. J4, 2010, 40(6): 1287 -1294 .
[3] 李建平,李桐林,张 辉,徐凯军. 不规则回线源层状介质瞬变电磁场正反演研究及应用[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 790 -0795 .
[4] 高松, 宋莹, 王琳,蒋步新. 水体中秋兰姆特效降解菌的筛选及其降解性能研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(03): 455 -457 .
[5] 张凤君,李 卿,马玖彤,于广菊. 膜蒸馏处理糠醛废水的实验研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(02): 270 -0273 .
[6] 卢双舫,李吉君,薛海涛,徐立恒. 油成甲烷碳同位素分馏的化学动力学及其初步应用[J]. J4, 2006, 36(05): 825 -829 .
[7] 丁志宏,冯平,毛慧慧. 考虑径流年内分布影响的丰枯划分方法及其应用[J]. J4, 2009, 39(2): 276 -0280 .
[8] 任何军, 刘娜,高松,张兰英,张玉玲,周睿. 假单胞菌DN2对多氯联苯的降解及bphA1核心序列测定[J]. J4, 2009, 39(2): 312 -0316 .
[9] 黄奇波, 覃小群, 刘朋雨, 康志强, 唐萍萍. 半干旱区岩溶碳汇原位监测方法适宜性研究[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(1): 240 -246 .
[10] 熊晓亮,孙红月,张世华,蔡岳良. 高扬程虹吸保障条件分析与合理管径选择数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(5): 1595 -1601 .