吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (4): 1160-1171.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20200015

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

动态实时洪水风险分析及管理系统

刘永志1,2, 张文婷3, 崔信民1, 孟波波4, 牛帅1, 梁大伟4   

  1. 1. 水文水资源与水利工程科学国家重点实验室, 南京 210029;
    2. 南京水利科学研究院, 南京 210029;
    3. 河海大学水文水资源学院, 南京 210098;
    4. 江苏南大先腾信息产业股份有限公司, 南京 210012
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-02 出版日期:2021-07-26 发布日期:2021-08-02
  • 作者简介:刘永志(1982-),男,教授级高级工程师,博士,主要从事洪水模拟及风险评估等方面的研究,E-mail:yzliu@nhri.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2019YFC1510204);国家留学基金委员会访问学者资助项目(201908320132);国家自然科学基金项目(41471427);中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费项目(Y521002、Y517018);中央高校科研业务费项目(2019B10714)

Dynamic Real-Time Flood Risk Analysis and Management System

Liu Yongzhi1,2, Zhang Wenting3, Cui Xinmin1, Meng Bobo4, Niu Shuai1, Liang Dawei4   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Nanjing 210029, China;
    2. Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing 210029, China;
    3. College of Hydrology and Water Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China;
    4. Jiangsu Century Information Technology Co., Ltd., Nanjing 210012, China
  • Received:2020-03-02 Online:2021-07-26 Published:2021-08-02
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the National Key R & D Program of China (2019YFC1510204), the Grants for Visiting Scholars of China Scholarship Council (201908320132), the National Science Foundation of China (41471427), the Central Public-Interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund (Y521002、Y517018) and the Science Research Business Expenses in Central Universities (2019B10714)

摘要: 当前洪水风险分析按照典型设计标准洪水进行计算的模式难以满足实际防洪管理需要,为了提高洪水风险分析的实时性以及适应洪水演进的动态性,设计了动态实时洪水风险分析框架。在本框架中,先采用一维和二维动态耦合水动力学数值方法耦合溃堤模型,然后在樵桑联围防洪保护区建立洪水演进模拟模型,通过灵活处理模型计算边界条件以及动态设置溃堤功能,计算不同设计标准洪水发生时,堤防出现单一溃口或者组合溃口后保护区内洪水演进过程。按照上述框架开发了樵桑联围动态实时洪水风险图编制与管理应用系统,并利用历史洪水资料开展模型验证,验证结果表明,2008-06洪水马口站、三水站、大熬站、甘竹(一)站的实测最高水位和模型计算最高水位的绝对误差分别为-0.10、0.10、0.09、0.04 m,均满足洪水模拟精度要求。利用模型计算了西江发生200年一遇的洪水情况下,江根堤防出现溃口后的洪水流量及溃口内外洪水水位变化过程,模拟溃口宽度168 m,最大溃口洪水流量达到5 190 m3,分析了堤防溃决后3、6和24 h洪水漫延导致村落淹没情况,结果表明其满足合理性分析。

关键词: 动态洪水风险图, 实时洪水风险, 水动力模型, 溃堤洪水

Abstract: Current flood risk analysis is mainly based on typical design standard floods, which cannot meet the needs of actual flood control management. In order to improve the real-time flood risk analysis and adapt to the dynamics of flooding, in this study, a dynamic real-time flood risk analysis framework was designed. In this framework, one-dimensional and two-dimensional dynamic coupled hydrodynamic numerical methods were used to couple the dyke breach model, and then a flooding simulation model was established in Qiaosang flood protection area. Through improvement, the flood inundation conditions can be simulated and analyzed based on real-time water conditions or arbitrary design floods. By flexibly set the boundary conditions and dynamically set the breach function, the flooding process of the protected area after single breach or combined breach was calculated. According to this framework, the dynamic real-time flood risk map compilation and management application system of the Qiaosang flood protection area was developed, and further verified by using the historical flood data. The verification results show that the absolute errors of the highest water level measured at Makou Station, Sanshui Station, Da'ao Station, and Ganzhu (1) Station during the 2008-06 flood and the highest water level calculated by the model are -0.10 m, 0.10 m, 0.09 m, and 0.04 m, respectively, which meet the requirements of the precision of flood simulation. The model was used to calculate the flood discharge and the water level inside and outside the breach of Jianggen dike when the flood occurs once every 200-year in Xijiang River, when the simulated width of the breach was 168 m, the maximum flow of the breach reached 5 190 m3. The village inundation caused by the flood of 3 h, 6 h and 24 h after the dyke breach was analyzed, and the results satisfy the rationality analysis.

Key words: dynamic flood risk map, real-time flood risk, hydrodynamic model, dike breach flood

中图分类号: 

  • TV122
[1] 李航, 于德万, 刘心玲. 松花江洪水风险图编制及管理应用[J]. 东北水利水电, 2016, 4(3):43-44. Li Hang, Yu Dewan, Liu Xinling. Compilation and Management Application of Songhua River Flood Risk Map[J]. Water Resources & Hydropower of Northeast China, 2016, 4(3):43-44.
[2] 张文婷, 唐雯雯. 基于水动力学模型的沿海城市洪水实时演进模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(1):212-221. Zhang Wenting, Tang Wenwen. Real-Time Flood Routing Simulation of Coastal Cities Based on Hydrodynamic Model[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2021, 51(1):212-221.
[3] Mount J, Alabbad Y, Demir I. Towards an Integrated and Realtime Wayfinding Framework for Flood Events[C]//the 2nd ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop.[L.n.]:ACM, 2019:33-36. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3356395.3365543.
[4] 罗秋实.黄河下游洪水淹没风险实时动态仿真关键技术[J].人民黄河,2018,40(9):2. Luo Qiushi. Key Technologies for Real-Time Dynamic Simulation of Flood Inundation Risk in the Lower Yellow River[J]. Yellow River, 2018, 40(9):2.
[5] 寇嘉玮,董增川,罗赟,等.基于WebGIS的洪泽湖地区动态洪涝管理信息系统[J].长江科学院院报,2019,36(1):145-150. Kou Jiawei, Dong Zengchuan, Luo Yun, et al. Management Information System of Dynamic Flood in Hongze Lake Area Based on WebGIS[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2019, 36(1):145-150.
[6] 牛帅,崔信民.村镇易涝区动态洪水风险分析模型研究[J].中国农村水利水电,2019(4):80-83. Niu Shuai, Cui Xinmin. Dynamic Flood Risk Analysis Model for Waterlogged Areas in Villages and Towns[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2019(4):80-83.
[7] 张小稳,刘国庆,范子武.动态洪水风险图在无锡市城区防洪中的应用研究[J].水资源开发与管理,2019(5):10-17. Zhang Xiaowen, Liu Guoqing, Fan Ziwu. Application Research of Dynamic Flood Risk Map in Flood Control of Wuxi City[J]. Water Resources Development and Management, 2019(5):10-17.
[8] 郭磊,舒全英,刘攀,等.鳌江流域洪水风险动态预警预报研究[J].中国农村水利水电,2019(6):35-38,43. Guo Lei, Shu Quanying, Liu Pan, et al. Research on the Flood Dynamic Warning and Forecasting in Aojiang River Basin[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2019(6):35-38,43.
[9] 顾锦, 刘秀林, 曹丹,等. 衢州市城市洪水风险信息管理系统初探[J]. 浙江水利科技, 2016, 44(3):16-19. Gu Jin, Liu Xiulin, Cao Dan, et al. Preliminary Study on Urban Flood Risk Information Management System in Quzhou City[J]. Zhejiang Hydrotechnics, 2016, 44(3):16-19.
[10] 梁忠民, 王军, 施晔,等. 基于GIS的洪水风险图信息管理系统开发[J]. 水文, 2009, 29(6):65-68. Liang Zhongmin, Wang Jun, Shi Ye, et al. Developmen of Flood Risk Map Information Management System Based on GIS[J]. Hydrology, 2009, 29(6):65-68.
[11] 陈文龙, 宋利祥, 邢领航,等. 一维-二维耦合的防洪保护区洪水演进数学模型[J]. 水科学进展, 2014, 25(6):848-855. Chen Wenlong, Song Lixiang, Xing Linghang, et al. A 1D-2D Coupled Mathematical Model for Numerical Simulating of Flood Routine in Flood Protected Zone[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2014, 25(6):848-855.
[12] 张防修, 韩龙喜, 王明,等. 主槽一维和滩地二维侧向耦合洪水演进模型[J]. 水科学进展, 2014, 25(4):560-566. Zhang Fangxiu, Han Longxi, Wang Ming, et al. Flood Routing Model with Lateral Coupling One-Dimensional Channel and Two-Dimensional Floodplain Simulation[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2014, 25(4):560-566.
[13] 朱婷, 王鑫. 基于MIKE FLOOD模型的中顺大围洪水风险研究[J]. 中国水运,2016(7):71-74. Zhu Ting, Wang Xin. Research on Flood Risk of Zhongshun Dawei Based on MIKE FLOOD Model[J]. China Water Transport, 2016(7):71-74.
[14] 李传奇, 侯贵兵. 一维二维水动力模型耦合的城市洪水模拟[J]. 水利水电技术, 2010, 41(3):83-85. Li Chuanqi, Hou Guibing. Simulation on Urban Flood Based on Coupling of 1D and 2D Hydrodynamic Models[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2010, 41(3):83-85.
[15] 尹宏伟. 基于水动力数学模型评估孝义市护城河行洪排涝能力[J]. 水资源开发与管理,2018, 32(9):29-34. Yin Hongwei. Assessment of Flood Discharge Capacity of the Moat in Xiaoyi Based on Hydrodynamic Mathematical Model[J]. Water Resources Development and Management, 2018, 32(9):29-34.
[16] 李芮, 潘兴瑶, 邸苏闯,等. 北京城区典型内涝积水原因诊断研究:以上清桥区域为例[J].自然资源学报, 2018,33(11):1940-1952. Li Rui, Pan Xingyao, Di Suchuang, et al. Diagnostic Analysis of the Waterlogging Influence Factors in Beijing City:A Case Study of Shangqingqiao Catchment[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2018, 33(11):1940-1952.
[17] 张涛,单既连,亓立云,等.考虑漫溢过程的一维堤防溃决分洪计算研究[J].人民黄河,2018,40(6):53-56. Zhang Tao, Shan Jilian, Qi Liyun, et al. Research on One-Dimensional Calculation of Levee Breach and Flood Diversion Simulation with the Consideration of Overflow Process[J]. Yellow River, 2018, 40(6):53-56.
[18] 王小笑,雷声,傅群. 基于GIS反演技术的鄱阳湖蓄滞洪区洪水风险图绘制研究[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2014(5):170-172. Wang Xiaoxiao, Lei Sheng, Fu Qun. Research on Flood Risk Map of Poyang Lake's Flood Storage and Detention Areas Based on Inversion Technology of GIS[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2014(5):170-172.
[19] 冯涛,马振坤,谢忱, 等.英德市北江干堤防洪工程对飞来峡水利枢纽防洪调度影响[J].水利水运工程学报,2016(2):69-75. Feng Tao, Ma Zhenkun, Xie Chen, et al. Impacts of Yingde Beijiang Stem Dike Flood Control Works on Flood Control Operation for Feilaixia Hydroproject[J]. Hydro-Science and Engineering, 2016(2):69-75.
[20] 张强. 基于Web Services的洪水风险图信息管理系统设计与实现[D]. 大连:大连理工大学, 2013. Zhang Qiang. Design and Implementation of the Flood Risk Maps Information Management System Based on Web Services[D]. Dalian:Dalian University of Technology, 2013.
[1] 张文婷, 唐雯雯. 基于水动力学模型的沿海城市洪水实时演进模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(1): 212-221.
[2] 丁志宏, 张金良, 冯平. 黄河中游汛期水沙联合分布模型及其应用[J]. J4, 2011, 41(4): 1130-1135.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 尤敏鑫,刘建民. 同位素地球化学在峨眉山大火成岩省研究中的应用现状与进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(4): 1231 -1243 .
[2] 杨春梅, 李洪奇,陆大卫,张方礼,高 原,邵英超. 不同驱替方式下岩石电阻率与饱和度的关系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 667 -671 .
[3] 祝洪臣,张炯飞,权 恒. 大兴安岭中生代两期成岩成矿作用的元素、同位素特征及其形成环境[J]. J4, 2005, 35(04): 436 -0442 .
[4] 朱建伟, 赵刚, 刘博, 郭巍, 成俊. 油页岩测井识别技术及应用[J]. J4, 2012, 42(2): 289 -295 .
[5] 陈力,梁海安,张文娟,荣帆. 模糊数学方法在城市工程地质环境区划中的应用--以抚顺市城区为例[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 837 -0840 .
[6] 高桂梅,苏 克,王文颖,甘树才,刘招君. 吉林省桦甸油页岩中稀土元素和微量元素的研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(6): 974 -0979 .
[7] 吴孔运,蒋忠诚,叶 晔. 不同植物群落对灰岩试块溶蚀速率的影响[J]. J4, 2007, 37(5): 967 -0971 .
[8] 周彦章,迟宝明,刘中培. 山东夏甸金矿床充水机理构造控制模式[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 255 -0260 .
[9] 张渊,刘连登,孙景贵,陈国华,张洪喜,闫复传,杨开春. 胶东西北部黄埠岭金矿床两期次叠加成矿[J]. J4, 2008, 38(1): 21 -0026 .
[10] 鲁程鹏, 束龙仓, 苑利波, 张蓉蓉, 黄币娟, 王彬彬. 基于示踪试验求解岩溶含水层水文地质参数[J]. J4, 2009, 39(4): 717 -721 .