柴北缘阿日特克山斑岩型铜钼矿床流体包裹体、稳定同位素特征及其地质意义

doi:10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20210404

吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (5): 1525-1539.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20210404

柴北缘阿日特克山斑岩型铜钼矿床流体包裹体、稳定同位素特征及其地质意义

唐名鹰^1,2,3,朱德全^1,2,丁正江^3,4,5,陈建^1,2,王炜晓^1,2,董振昆^1,2,高振华^1,2,苗晓军^1,2,郑成龙^1,2

1.山东省第八地质矿产勘查院，山东日照 276826
2.山东省地矿局有色金属矿找矿与资源评价重点实验室，山东日照 276826
3.山东省深部金矿探测大数据应用开发工程实验室，山东威海 264209
4.山东省第六地质矿产勘查院，山东威海 64209 5.山东理工大学资源与环境工程学院，山东淄博 255000

收稿日期:2021-12-09 出版日期:2022-09-15 发布日期:2022-10-07

Fluid Inclusions, Stable Isotope Characteristics and Geological Significance of Aritekeshan Porphyry Cu-Mo Deposit in Northern Qaidam Basin

Tang Mingying1,2,3,Zhu Dequan1,2,Ding Zhengjiang3,4,5,Chen Jian1,2,Wang Weixiao1,2,Dong Zhenkun1,2,Gao Zhenhua1,2,Miao Xiaojun1,2,Zheng Chenglong1,2

1. No.8 Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources Exploration of Shandong Province, Rizhao 276826,Shandong, China
2. Key Laboratory of Nonferrous Metal Ore Exploration and Resource Evaluation of Shandong Provincial Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, Rizhao 276826, Shandong, China
3. Shandong Provincial Engineering Laboratory of Application and Development of Big Data for Deep Gold Exploration, Weihai 264209, Shandong, China
4. No.6 Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources Exploration of Shandong Province, Weihai 264209, Shandong, China
5. School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, Shandong, China

Received:2021-12-09 Online:2022-09-15 Published:2022-10-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

阿日特克山铜钼矿床位于柴北缘中北段，为近年来新发现的隐伏斑岩型矿床，矿体产出于海西晚期—印支期花岗闪长（斑）岩和古元古代达肯大坂岩群接触部位。为探讨该矿床成矿流体特征和成矿机制，本文对矿床野外地质特征、流体包裹体及稳定同位素组成进行了系统的研究。根据不同类型矿脉之间的相互关系，可将热液成矿期次划分为成矿早期石英阶段、成矿期辉钼矿-多金属硫化物-石英阶段和成矿晚期石英-方解石阶段。流体包裹体岩相学研究表明，阿日特克山铜钼矿床流体包裹体以Ⅰ型（富液相L+V两相水溶液包裹体）、Ⅱ型（富气相L+V两相水溶液包裹体）和Ⅲ型（含子矿物三相水溶液包裹体）为主。显微测温及包裹体拉曼光谱分析结果显示，成矿流体体系为中高温、中低盐度、中高密度的NaCl-H₂O体系，至成矿晚期，流体性质变化为低温、低盐度、高密度流体，矿床形成深度为0.40~4.00 km。氢氧同位素分析测试结果显示，δD_V-SMOW值为-92.9‰~-78.4‰，δ¹⁸O_H2O值为-7.4‰~2.0‰，表明成矿流体以混合流体为主，随着成矿流体的演化，有更多的大气降水不断混入。矿石中金属硫化物δ³⁴S值处于9.4‰~11.7‰之间，平均值为10.2‰，表现出明显的地层硫特征，为岩浆热液与围岩地层相互作用所致。综上认为，阿日特克山铜钼矿床为矽卡岩型-斑岩型矿床，形成于海西晚期—印支期俯冲碰撞构造环境，混合成矿流体强烈的不混溶作用为斑岩型铜钼矿床形成的主要机制。

关键词: 流体包裹体, 稳定同位素, 斑岩型铜钼矿床, 阿日特克山, 柴北缘

Abstract:

Aritekshan Cu-Mo deposit is a newly discovered concealed porphyry deposit, located in the central-north part of the northern Qaidam basin. The orebodies occurred in the contact area between the Late Hercynian-Indosinian granodiorite (porphyry) and Paleoproterozoic Dakendaban Group. In order to explore the characteristics of ore-forming fluids, the ore-forming mechanism and genesis of the deposit, this paper systematically studied the field geological characteristics, fluid inclusions and stable isotope composition of the deposit. According to the relationship between different types of ore veins, the hydrothermal metallogenic stages can be divided into the early mineralization quartz stage, molybdenum-polymetallic sulfide-quartz stage and late mineralization quartz-calcite stage. The fluid inclusions are mainly Type Ⅰ (liquid-rich L+V two-phase aqueous inclusions), Type Ⅱ (gas-rich L+V two-phase aqueous inclusions) and Type Ⅲ (three-phase aqueous solution inclusions containing daughter minerals). The results of microthermometry and inclusion Raman spectrum analysis show that the ore-forming fluid system is NaCl-H₂O system with medium-high temperature, medium-low salinity, and medium-high density. In the late stage of mineralization, the properties of the fluids changed to low temperature, low salinity and high density fluid, with the deposit formation depth of 0.40-4.00 km. The values of D_V-SMOW and δ¹⁸ O_H2O range from -92.9‰ to -78.4‰ and -7.4‰ to 2.0‰ respectively, indicating that the ore-forming fluids are mainly mixed fluids. With the evolution of ore-forming fluids, the continuous mixing of meteoric water affects mineralization. Theδ³⁴S of metal sulfide in the ore ranges from 9.4‰ to 11.7‰, with an average value of 10.2‰, showing obvious characteristics of strata sulfur, which is caused by the interaction between magmatic hydrothermal fluid and surrounding rock strata. It is believed that Aritekshan Cu-Mo deposit is a skarn-porphyry type deposit, which was formed in the subduction and collision during Late Hercynian-Indosinian, which is consistent with the diagenetic age of granodiorite. The strong immiscibility of mixed ore-forming fluids is the main mechanism of the formation of porphyry Cu-Mo deposit.

Key words: fluid inclusion, stable isotope, porphyry Cu-Mo deposit, Aritekeshan, northern Qaidam basin

中图分类号:

P618.56

唐名鹰, 朱德全, 丁正江, 陈建, 王炜晓, 董振昆, 高振华, 苗晓军, 郑成龙. 柴北缘阿日特克山斑岩型铜钼矿床流体包裹体、稳定同位素特征及其地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(5): 1525-1539.

Tang Mingying, Zhu Dequan, Ding Zhengjiang, Chen Jian, Wang Weixiao, Dong Zhenkun, Gao Zhenhua, Miao Xiaojun, Zheng Chenglong. Fluid Inclusions, Stable Isotope Characteristics and Geological Significance of Aritekeshan Porphyry Cu-Mo Deposit in Northern Qaidam Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2022, 52(5): 1525-1539.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	门兰静, 薛晓刚, 董福湘, 宋海峰, 孙景贵. 黑龙江省东宁市金厂铜金矿床成矿机制：流体包裹体和稀有气体同位素的制约[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 789-804.
[2]	王常东, 郝晓飞, 杨东光, 宁君, 翁海蛟, 严兆彬, 张韶华, 武飞. 松辽盆地南部新生代辉绿岩及其与砂岩型铀成矿的关系[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 775-788.
[3]	李学杰, 田成静, 钟和贤, 张江勇, 廖志良. 南海晚更新世以来火山玻璃分布特征与物源分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 1-14.
[4]	王存柱, 徐明芳, 刘长纯, 张苍江, 郑大贺, 李国郡, 金忠宝, 许帅农, 王刚. 吉林桦甸地区二道甸子金矿床成因与成矿背景[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 139-154.
[5]	张雅静, 刘万臻, 卢禹含, 聂喜涛, 张佳楠. 吉林延边和龙地区华集岭钼矿床成矿时代、成矿流体特征及成矿物质来源[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 2154-2170.
[6]	斯尚华, 喻意, 王小龙, 王新星, 赵玉涛, 吴伟涛, . 松辽盆地三肇凹陷扶余油层致密油气充注期次及其成藏贡献 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(5): 1457-1467.
[7]	李斌, 臧兴运, 王永胜, 刘振宇, 苏斌, 闫冬. 夹皮沟成矿带小北沟金矿床成矿流体特征及其地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(5): 1575-1591.
[8]	李晓光, 倪智勇, 宋到福, 张旋, 韩子敬, 张威, 安川. 杭锦旗地区二叠系储层油气成藏期次及流体势特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1110-1123.
[9]	李勇霖, 倪智勇, 李晓光, 韩子敬, 张威, 安川. 鄂尔多斯盆地杭锦旗地区断控气藏差异[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(3): 773-783.
[10]	张笑天, 孙景贵, 韩吉龙, 王抒, 余日东, 刘阳, 冯洋洋. 吉林夹皮沟金矿集区三道岔金矿床成矿流体来源与演化：流体包裹体和H-O同位素的制约[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(3): 748-766.
[11]	李欣航, 白令安, 胡乔帆, 谢兰芳, 庞保成, 岳志恒. 桂西北金牙金矿床成矿流体性质与成矿机制[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(3): 840-852.
[12]	辛未, 孟元库, 许志河, 孙丰月, 钱烨. 哀牢山成矿带长安金矿床成因：地质特征、流体包裹体测温和H-O-S-Pb同位素制约[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(5): 1610-1625.
[13]	王硕, 孙丰月, 王冠, 刘凯, 刘云华. 黑龙江省四平山金矿床成矿作用及矿床成因：来自矿床地质、地球化学、锆石U-Pb年代学及H-O-S同位素的制约[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(5): 1626-1648.
[14]	何锦, 郑一迪, 邓启军 , 何雪琴. 我国北方新生代玄武岩地下水化学特征及其成因：以河北省张北县为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(1): 171-.
[15]	韩强, 云露, 蒋华山, 邵小明, 金仙梅. 塔里木盆地顺北地区奥陶系油气充注过程分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(3): 645-658.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

柴北缘阿日特克山斑岩型铜钼矿床流体包裹体、稳定同位素特征及其地质意义

Fluid Inclusions, Stable Isotope Characteristics and Geological Significance of Aritekeshan Porphyry Cu-Mo Deposit in Northern Qaidam Basin

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10