城市建设用地,扩张强度,扩张模式,城市空间演变,时空分异特征


," /> 城市建设用地,扩张强度,扩张模式,城市空间演变,时空分异特征


,"/> urban construction land, expansion strength, expansion mode, urban spatial evolution, temporal and spatial differentiation characteristics ,"/> <p class="MsoNormal"> 辽宁省城市建设用地扩张时空分异特征

吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2023, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (5): 1635-1650.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20220287

• 地球探测与信息技术 • 上一篇    

辽宁省城市建设用地扩张时空分异特征

郭力娜1,訾丰娇1,姜广辉2,赵艳霞3,王刚1   

  1. 1.华北理工大学矿业工程学院,河北唐山063210

    2.北京师范大学地理科学学部,北京100875

    3.华北理工大学管理学院,河北唐山063210

  • 出版日期:2023-09-26 发布日期:2023-11-04
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(40801221);辽宁省国土空间生态修复规划编制(专题研究)项目(20210208);华北理工大学教育教学改革研究与实践重点建设项目(ZJ2010)

Spatial-Temporal Differentiation Characteristics of Urban Construction Land Expansion in Liaoning Province

Guo Lina1, Zi Fengjiao1, Jiang Guanghui2,Zhao Yanxia3, Wang Gang1   

  1. 1. College of Mining Engineering, North China University of Technology, Tangshan 063210, Hebei, China

    2. Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China

    3. College of Management, North China University of Technology, Tangshan 063210, Hebei, China

  • Online:2023-09-26 Published:2023-11-04
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the Youth Fund of the National   Natural Science Foundation  of China (40801221), the Territorial Ecological Restoration Planning Preparation (Thematic Research) Project of Liaoning Province (20210208) and the Education Teaching Reform Research and Practice Key Construction Project of North China University of Science and Technology  (ZJ2010)

摘要:

掌握城市建设用地扩张的特征是控制城镇化进程中建设用地无序扩张的前提。研究选取辽宁省不同方位的4个城市(沈阳、大连、丹东、朝阳)作为典型案例城市,基于1990、2000、2010、2020年4期遥感影像数据,采用建设用地占比、扩张强度指数、扩张强度差异指数、公共边测度法等方法对研究区城市建设用地分异特征进行研究。结果表明:4个城市建设用地空间扩张差异明显,1990—2020年,建设用地总体占比由4.74%迅速增至11.58%;1990—2020年,扩张强度从大到小依次为沈阳、大连、丹东和朝阳,其中,大连一直处于高速扩张状态,沈阳和丹东在第一时期为低速扩张,在第二、第三时期转为高速扩张,朝阳由低速扩张转至高速扩张,又转为中速扩张;1990—2020年,沈阳、朝阳及丹东城市扩张差异逐渐减小,大连城市扩张差异增大;4个城市3种扩张模式并存,整体上主要以蔓延式扩张为主,飞地式次之,填充式面积较小。城市发展主要呈现四周扩散的蔓延式发展,但城市间由于自身发展需求不同,存在一定差异。


关键词: 城市建设用地')">

城市建设用地, 扩张强度, 扩张模式, 城市空间演变,
')">时空分异特征


Abstract: Understanding the characteristics of urban land expansion is essential for managing the uncontrolled growth of construction areas during the urbanization process. Four representative cities, namely Shenyang, Dalian, Chaoyang, and Dandong, located in various directions within Liaoning Province, were chosen for this study. Employing remote sensing image data from 1990, 2000, 2010, and 2020, the research employed metrics such as the proportion of construction land, expansion intensity index, expansion intensity difference index, and the public edge measurement method to investigate the distinctive attributes of urban construction land within the designated area. The findings reveal significant variations in the spatial expansion of construction land across the four cities. Between 1990 and 2020, the overall share of construction land expanded considerably from 4.74% to 11.58%. During this period, the order of expansion intensity shifted from high to low as follows: Shenyang, Dalian, Dandong, and Chaoyang. Notably, Dalian exhibited rapid expansion, Shenyang and Dandong initially underwent slow expansion, transitioning to higher rates during the second and third phases, Chaoyang expanded from low speed to high speed, and then to medium speed. Over the same period, the divergence in urban expansion trends of  Shenyang, Chaoyang, and Dandong diminished gradually, while Dalian experienced an increasing discrepancy in its expansion pattern. The four cities employed a combination of three expansion modes, with predominant reliance on sprawl development, followed by enclave development, infill development was relatively minimal. The overarching urban growth trend revolved around outward development. However, distinct development needs led to variations among the cities.

Key words:

text-align:left, urban construction land')">"> urban construction land, expansion strength, expansion mode, urban spatial evolution, temporal and spatial differentiation characteristics

中图分类号: 

  • P237
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 尤敏鑫,刘建民. 同位素地球化学在峨眉山大火成岩省研究中的应用现状与进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(4): 1231 -1243 .
[2] 杨春梅, 李洪奇,陆大卫,张方礼,高 原,邵英超. 不同驱替方式下岩石电阻率与饱和度的关系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 667 -671 .
[3] 祝洪臣,张炯飞,权 恒. 大兴安岭中生代两期成岩成矿作用的元素、同位素特征及其形成环境[J]. J4, 2005, 35(04): 436 -0442 .
[4] 朱建伟, 赵刚, 刘博, 郭巍, 成俊. 油页岩测井识别技术及应用[J]. J4, 2012, 42(2): 289 -295 .
[5] 陈力,梁海安,张文娟,荣帆. 模糊数学方法在城市工程地质环境区划中的应用--以抚顺市城区为例[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 837 -0840 .
[6] 高桂梅,苏 克,王文颖,甘树才,刘招君. 吉林省桦甸油页岩中稀土元素和微量元素的研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(6): 974 -0979 .
[7] 吴孔运,蒋忠诚,叶 晔. 不同植物群落对灰岩试块溶蚀速率的影响[J]. J4, 2007, 37(5): 967 -0971 .
[8] 周彦章,迟宝明,刘中培. 山东夏甸金矿床充水机理构造控制模式[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 255 -0260 .
[9] 张渊,刘连登,孙景贵,陈国华,张洪喜,闫复传,杨开春. 胶东西北部黄埠岭金矿床两期次叠加成矿[J]. J4, 2008, 38(1): 21 -0026 .
[10] 鲁程鹏, 束龙仓, 苑利波, 张蓉蓉, 黄币娟, 王彬彬. 基于示踪试验求解岩溶含水层水文地质参数[J]. J4, 2009, 39(4): 717 -721 .