吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (4): 1264-1279.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20240347

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

苏北地区辉绿岩床群岩石成因及原生金刚石成矿潜力

邱磊1,张凯涵2,周琦忠1,张琪1,王国强1, 罗跃1,王博1,范明森2   

  1. 1.江苏省地质局第五地质大队,江苏 徐州 221000
    2.南京大学地球科学与工程学院,南京 210023
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-23 出版日期:2026-07-26 发布日期:2026-08-11
  • 通讯作者: 范明森(1989—), 男, 助理研究员, 博士, 主要从事矿床学方面的研究, E-mail: fmsnju2016@163.com
  • 作者简介:邱磊(1993—), 男, 工程师, 硕士, 主要从事地质矿产勘查方面的研究, E-mail: 838405146@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省地质局科技创新项目(2023KY07,2021KY09);江苏省自然科学基金项目(BK20242019);江苏省地质局地质勘查项目(苏地矿发\[2023\]77号,苏地矿发\[2022\]83号)

Petrogenesis and Primary Diamond Mineralization Potential of Dolerite Sills in Northern Jiangsu Region

Qiu Lei1, Zhang Kaihan2, Zhou Qizhong1, Zhang Qi1, Wang Guoqiang1, Luo Yue1, Wang Bo1, Fan Mingsen2   

  1. 1. The Fifth Geological Bridge of Jiangsu Geological Bureau, Xuzhou 221000, Jiangsu, China
    2. School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
  • Received:2024-12-23 Online:2026-07-26 Published:2026-08-11
  • Supported by:
    the Science and Technology Innovation Project of Jiangsu Geological Bureau (2023KY07,2021KY09), the Natural Science Foundation Project of Jiangsu Province (BK20242019)  and the Geological Exploration Project of Jiangsu Geological Bureau (Su Di Kuang Fa \[2023\]77, Su Di Kuang Fa \[2022\]83)

摘要: 苏北地区位于华北克拉通东南缘,是潜在的优质原生金刚石找矿靶区。毗邻苏北的栏杆地区辉绿岩中虽已发现大量Ib型原生金刚石,但苏北地区的金刚石勘探工作仍无重大突破。辉绿岩的岩石成因缺乏系统研究,原生金刚石成矿潜力尚未深入探讨,限制了进一步的勘探部署。本研究系统分析了苏北地区两个含金刚石岩体和四个具有勘探潜力岩体的地球化学特征,并与栏杆地区的老寨山辉绿岩进行对比。结果表明:含金刚石和不含金刚石的辉绿岩地球化学特征无显著差异,均为拉斑系列亚碱性玄武岩,形成于大陆板内环境;两类岩体普遍富集大离子亲石元素(如Rb、Ba、La、Eu)和高场强元素(如Nb、U、Nd、Ti);部分含金刚石的辉绿岩可能经历了轻微地壳混染,但混染程度较低;源区性质指向过渡型地幔,稀土和微量元素特征介于OIB(洋岛玄武岩)和E-MORB(富集型洋中脊玄武岩)之间,推测为地幔柱成因,此类辉绿岩的源区深度通常为60~140 km,与Ib型金刚石的稳定深度相符,表明苏北地区辉绿岩在理论上具备作为金刚石载体的条件;辉绿岩中寻找原生金刚石矿床仍面临挑战,结合团队先前研究发现,此类Ib型原生金刚石在地幔中存留时间相对较短,处于初生阶段即被带出金刚石稳定区而停止生长,总体经济价值有限。后续勘探重点应转向金伯利岩或钾镁煌斑岩类的目标岩体。

关键词: 苏北地区, 辉绿岩床群, 新元古代, 原生金刚石矿, 成矿潜力

Abstract: The northern Jiangsu region, located on the southeastern margin of the North China craton, is a potential target for primary diamond exploration. Although numerous Ib-type diamonds have been discovered in the dolerite of the Langan area, Anhui, no significant breakthrough has been made in diamond exploration in northern Jiangsu. The petrogenesis of these dolerites and their primary diamond mineralization remain poorly understood, which hampers further exploration. This study systematically analyzed the geochemical characteristics of two diamond-bearing and four potentially diamond-bearing dolerite samples from northern Jiangsu, and compared them with the diamond-bearing dolerite from Laozhaishan in the Langgan area. The results show that there are no significant geochemical differences between diamond-bearing and non-diamond-bearing dolerites. Both are tholeiitic sub-alkaline basalts formed in an intraplate setting, enriched in large-ion lithophile elements (e.g., Rb, Ba, La, Eu) and high-field-strength elements (e.g., Nb, U, Nd, Ti). Some diamond-bearing dolerites may have experienced minor crustal contamination, but its effect is limited. The source characteristics indicate a transitional mantle origin, with rare-earth and trace-element patterns intermediate between OIB and E-MORB, suggesting a plume-related origin. The estimated source depth is typically 60-140 km, consistent with the stability depth of Ib-type diamonds, suggesting that the dolerite in northern Jiangsu could serve as a suitable host rock for diamonds. However, the search for primary diamond deposits in dolerite remains challenging. Based on previous research, Ib-type primary diamonds have a relatively short residence time in the mantle. Once they are transported out of the diamond stability field during their early formation, their growth ceases, resulting in limited economic value. Future exploration should therefore more on locating kimberlites or lamproites.

Key words: northern Jiangsu region, dolerite sill swarms, Neoproterozoic, primary diamond deposit, mineralization potential

中图分类号: 

  • P581
[1] 龚辉, 高福红, 贾啸宇.

吉林省通化地区南芬组地球化学特征对新元古代大氧化事件的响应 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 438-449.

[2] 苑东洋, 石威, 刘德民, 黄天统, 徐龙生, 陈超, 孔令耀.

鄂北耿集-板桥地区新元古代变火山岩系地层归属——来自锆石U-Pb测年、Hf同位素的证据 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(2): 516-530.

[3] 张琪, 周琦忠, 孙超, 施建斌, 王博, 侯琪, 罗跃, 冯学知, 王国强. 苏鲁造山带新沂地区新元古代花岗片麻岩成因及对Rodinia超大陆裂解的响应#br#[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(1): 140-159.
[4] 李研, 聂逢君, 王东旭, 贾立城, 卢胜军, 严兆彬, 罗敏, 刘晓辉. 松辽盆地北部砂岩型铀矿成矿潜力分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(4): 1075-1089.
[5] 丁清峰, 吴睿哲, 张强, 周轩. 青海东昆仑洪水河铁矿床新元古代含铁建造铁同位素特征及其成因意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(5): 1497-1511.
[6] 任军平, 王杰, 刘晓阳, 贺福清, 何胜飞, 左立波, 许康康, 龚鹏辉, 孙凯, 刘宇. 非洲中南部铜多金属矿床研究现状及找矿潜力分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(4): 1083-1103.
[7] 郭宇飞, 杨言辰, 韩世炯, 谈艳, 薄军委. 大兴安岭北部凤凰山地区英云闪长岩地球化学特征与锆石U-Pb定年[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(5): 1406-1417.
[8] 邓奇,王剑,汪正江,江新胜,杜秋定,伍皓,杨菲,崔晓庄. 扬子北缘西乡群大石沟组和三郎铺组凝灰岩锆石U-Pb年龄及其地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(3): 797-808.
[9] 李艳霞, 旷红伟. 中国辽吉地区新元古代臼齿碳酸盐岩中分子化石及早期生命演化[J]. J4, 2012, 42(1): 136-143.
[10] 李晓敏, 胡瑞忠, 毕献武, 彭建堂. 湘南骑田岭花岗岩岩体地球化学特征及锡成矿潜力[J]. J4, 2010, 40(1): 80-92.
[11] 覃小锋,夏 斌,李 江,黎春泉,陆济璞,许 华,周府生,胡贵昂,李 乾. 阿尔金南缘构造带西段新元古代-早古生代变质岩系的变质作用[J]. J4, 2007, 37(5): 856-0867.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 程立人,张予杰,张以春. 西藏申扎地区奥陶纪鹦鹉螺化石[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 273 -0282 .
[2] 和钟铧,杨德明,王天武,郑常青. 冈底斯带巴嘎区二云母花岗岩SHRIMP锆石U-Pb定年[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 302 -0307 .
[3] 李斌,孟自芳,李相博,卢红选,郑民. 泌阳凹陷下第三系构造特征与沉积体系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 332 -0339 .
[4] 旷理雄,郭建华,梅廉夫,童小兰,杨丽. 从油气勘探的角度论博格达山的隆升[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 346 -0350 .
[5] 李雪平,唐辉明. 基于GIS的分组数据Logistic模型在斜坡稳定性评价中的应用[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 361 -0365 .
[6] 赵宏光,孙景贵,陈军强,赵俊康,姚凤良,段 展. 延边小西南岔富金斑岩铜矿床的含矿流体起源与演化——H,O,C,S,Pb同位素示踪[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 601 -606 .
[7] 梁秀娟, 林学钰, 于 军. 虚拟现实技术在水文地质研究中的应用[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 636 -640 .
[8] 殷 文,印兴耀, 张繁昌. 基于并行遗传算法的地震属性优化研究[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 672 -676 .
[9] 赵 峰,范海峰,田竹君,王志刚. 吉林省中部不同土地利用类型的土壤侵蚀强度变化分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 661 -666 .
[10] 姜月华,殷鸿福,王润华,康晓钧. 湖州市土壤磁化率与重金属元素分布规律及其相关性研究[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 653 -660 .