三相生物流化床处理啤酒废水

三相生物流化床处理啤酒废水

黄继国¹,魏海娟¹,王立军²,王铁军¹,俞双¹,黄国鑫¹

1．吉林大学环境与资源学院，吉林长春 130026；2．中国地质大学水资源与环境学院，北京 100083

收稿日期:2004-11-09 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2005-07-26 发布日期:2005-07-26
通讯作者: 黄继国

Beer Wastewater Treatment Using Three-Phase Biofluidized Bed

HUANG Ji-guo¹, WEI Hai-juan¹,WANG Li-jun²，WANG Tie-jun¹,YU Shuang¹, HUANG Guo-xin¹

1. College of Environment and Resources，Jilin University，Changchun 130026,China;2. School of Water Resources and Environmental Science，China University of Geosciences，Beijing 100083,China

Received:2004-11-09 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2005-07-26 Published:2005-07-26
Contact: HUANG Ji-guo

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过三相生物流化床处理啤酒废水的实验研究，探讨曝气量和水力停留时间对处理效果的影响，确定最佳曝气量为0.25 m³/h，最佳水力停留时间为1.5 h。在该实验条件下，COD_cr平均去除率在85％以上，生物浓度高达28.31 mg/L，生物膜活性强，同时反应器具有较强的抗冲击负荷能力。

关键词: 三相生物流化床, 啤酒废水处理, 抗冲击负荷, 生物浓度

Abstract: Beer wastewater treatment using threephase biofluidized bed has been studied by experiments, and the effects of aeration quantity and hydraulic stay time on treatment efficiency have also been discussed. The result shows that the optimal aeration quantity is 0.25 m³/h, and the optimal hydraulic stay time is 1.5 h. Under the selected experimental condition, the average removal ratio of COD_cr could reach more than 85% and the biological concentration could also reach 28.31 mg/L. The experimental result also indicates that the biomembrane is active and the reactor has strong capability to resist impact load.

Key words: threephase biofluidized bed, beer wastewater treatment, resistance to impact load, biological concentration

中图分类号:

X131.2

黄继国,魏海娟,王立军,王铁军,俞双,黄国鑫. 三相生物流化床处理啤酒废水[J]. J4, 2005, 35(04): 510-0514.

HUANG Ji-guo, WEI Hai-juan,WANG Li-jun，WANG Tie-jun,YU Shuang, HUANG Guo-xin. Beer Wastewater Treatment Using Three-Phase Biofluidized Bed[J]. J4, 2005, 35(04): 510-0514.

参考文献

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	刘建峰，迟效国，周燕，王铁夫，金巍，周建波，董春艳，黎广荣. 小兴安岭东北部金林岩体全岩-角闪石Rb-Sr年龄[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 690 -0693 .
[2]	黄冠星, 孙继朝, 张英, 刘景涛, 张玉玺, 荆继红. 珠江三角洲污灌区地下水重金属含量及其相互关系[J]. J4, 2011, 41(1): 228 -234 .
[3]	肖长来，梁秀娟，崔建铭，兰盈盈,张君，李书兰，梁瑞奇，郑策. 确定含水层参数的全程曲线拟合法[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 751 -0755 .
[4]	郭振华，王璞珺，印长海，黄玉龙. 松辽盆地北部火山岩岩相与测井相关系研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(02): 207 -0214 .
[5]	孙永河,付晓飞,吕延防,付广,阎冬. 地震泵抽吸作用与油气运聚成藏物理模拟[J]. J4, 2007, 37(1): 98 -0104 .
[6]	谢忠雷，陈卓，孙文田，尹波. 不同茶园茶叶氟含量及土壤氟的形态分布[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 293 -0298 .
[7]	贾军涛,王璞珺，邵锐，程日辉，张斌，侯景涛，李金龙，边伟华. 松辽盆地东南缘营城组地层序列的划分与区域对比[J]. J4, 2007, 37(6): 1110 -1123 .
[8]	康立明，任战利. 多参数定量研究流动单元的方法--以鄂尔多斯盆地W93井区为例[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 749 -0756 .
[9]	薛永超, 程林松. 白豹油田长8油藏成岩储集相[J]. J4, 2011, 41(2): 365 -371 .
[10]	姜纪沂, 张宇东, 谷洪彪, 左兰丽. 基于灰色关联熵的地下水环境演化模式判别模型研究[J]. J4, 2009, 39(6): 1111 -1116 .