J4 ›› 2011, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (3): 629-638.

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

海拉尔盆地贝尔凹陷贝西地区南屯组层序地层特征

杨婷1|金振奎1|张雷2|赵坤1|白雪峰3|王竞娴4   

  1. 1.中国石油大学资源与信息学院|北京102249;
    2.中石油煤层气有限责任公司|北京100028;
    3.大庆油田有限责任公司勘探开发研究院,黑龙江 大庆163712;
    4.吉林大学地球科学学院|长春130061
  • 收稿日期:2010-05-04 出版日期:2011-05-26 发布日期:2011-05-26
  • 作者简介:杨婷(1983-)|女|黑龙江哈尔滨人|博士|主要从事沉积学、层序地层学与油气勘探的研究|E-mail:fiyuta@sina.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家“十一·五”重点科技攻关项目(2008CB701400)

Sequence Stratigraphic Characteristic of the Nantun Formation in the Western Area of Beier Depression|Hailaer Basin

YANG Ting1, JIN Zhen-kui1, ZHANG Lei2, ZHAO Kun1, BAI Xue-feng3, WANG Jing-xian4   

  1. 1.College of Resources and Information,China University of Petroleum, Beijing102249|China;
    2.Petrochina Coalbed Methane Company Limited, Beijing100028|China;
    3.Exploration and Development Research Institute of Daqing Oilfield Company Ltd., Daqing163712|Heilongjiang|China;
    4.College of Earth Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun130061|China
  • Received:2010-05-04 Online:2011-05-26 Published:2011-05-26

摘要:

应用沉积学和层序地层学的原理和方法,利用地震、钻井、岩心等资料,结合盆地区域构造演化特征,建立了海拉尔盆地贝尔凹陷贝西地区南屯组层序地层格架,将南屯组划分为1个超层序、4个三级层序、11个体系域。在层序格架内共识别出扇三角洲、辫状河三角洲、湖底扇、湖泊4种主要沉积相类型及8种亚相类型。南屯组沉积时期区内经历了初始沉降-快速沉降-沉降减弱-萎缩的构造演化过程,并形成与其对应的4个三级层序:SQ1沉积时期,研究区为分割的断陷盆地,湖盆规模较小,主要发育扇(辫状河)三角洲;SQ2沉积时期,湖盆规模迅速增大,统一的湖盆基本形成,沉积格局与SQ1时期相似,但有所不同的是区内西南缘出现物源供给,形成扇三角洲沉积;SQ3沉积时期,湖盆规模最大,区内各个物源方向的扇(辫状河)三角洲沉积规模明显减小,湖底扇及滑塌浊积体等重力流深水沉积相对发育;SQ4沉积时期,湖盆萎缩,湖盆规模迅速减小,同时东南部物源供给不足,造成东南部辫状河三角洲沉积几乎消失。生储盖组合及成藏条件综合分析表明:SQ2、SQ3低位体系域及高位体系域发育优质储层,并由于紧邻规模较大的烃源岩,在邻近断裂发育地区易形成断块圈闭及断背斜圈闭;在斜坡地区和缓坡带可形成不整合面作为遮挡的不整合-岩性圈闭及以各类砂体作为储集空间的地层超覆圈闭。

关键词: 海拉尔盆地, 贝尔凹陷, 南屯组, 层序地层, 沉积演化, 有利区带预测

Abstract:

Seismic data, logging, cores, connecting with the characteristic of structure evolution are used to establish the sequence stratigraphic framework of the Nantun Formation in the western area of Beier depression, Hailaer basin. The Nantun Formation in the study area finally can be divided into one supersequence, four three-order sequences and eleven systems tracts. There are four facies including fan delta, braid river delta, sublacustrine fan and lake, and eight subfacies can be identified in the sequence stratigraphic framework of the Nantun Formation. During the depositing period of Nantun Formation, the study area experienced the tectonic evolution process which experienced from initial subsidence state to a rapid subsidence stage, then to a subsidence decrease stage, and to a shrink stage finally, which respectively corresponded with four three-order sequences. In the depositing period of sequence SQ1, this area was a separated rifted basin, fan delta mainly formed in the northwest and northeast of the area, and braid river delta mainly formed in the southeast of the area; at this time, the area of lake basin is also small. During the depositing period of sequence SQ2, the area of lake basin expanded rapidly with the lake level rising and finally formed a unified lake basin; the sedimentary framework is similar to the depositing period of sequence SQ1, but the difference is that in the southwest of this area, a provenance appeared and then fan delta sedimentary began. In the depositing period of sequence SQ3, the lakebasin area reached to the largest scale; the area scale of all fan(braid river) deltas from corresponding respective provenance direction obviously reduced and deep water sediments including sublacustrine fan and fluxoturbidite formed relatively more. In the depositing period of sequence SQ4, the lake basin area scale decrease rapidly; meanwhile, the sediment from the southeastern provenance supplied not enough to the basin, leading to the braid river delta in the southeast of centre almost disappear at that time. On the basis of comprehensive research on the reservoir-cap combination distribution and the conditions of the migration and accumulation of oil and gas, it shows that most favorable reservoir-cap combination formed in the lowstand system tracts and the highstand system tracts of sequence SQ2 and SQ3 of the Nantun Formation. These fault development areas are prone to form block fault traps and fault anticline traps because of having preferable reservoir rock and being near the hydrocarbon source rock. The slope and ramp can form unconformity-lithologic traps by the unconformity as the barrier bed and the stratigraphic overlap traps by all kinds of sand bodies as the reservoirs.

Key words: Hailaer basin, Beier depression, Nantun Formation, sequence stratigraphy framework, sedimentary evolution, favorable hydrocarbon accumulation play prediction

中图分类号: 

  • P618.13
[1] 李阳, 周文博, 王长虹, 刘娜, 苟军, 孙文博, 孙家兴, 孙德有. 海拉尔盆地克鲁伦凹陷赋铀地层沉积物源#br#[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 522-539.
[2] 陈欢庆, 龚亮, 孙磊, 韩洁. 辽河盆地西部凹陷于楼油层高分辨率层序地层学[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 731-744.
[3] 殷文. 低勘探程度地区层序地层分析及沉积规律——以五墩凹陷侏罗系为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 70-83.
[4] 罗洪浩, 孙平昌, 吴会永, 王德伟, 石志衍, 陈俊侠. 河南省太行山东麓深部晚古生代层序地层及其含气系统划分[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(5): 1718-1734.
[5] 谢明贤, 陈广坡, 苏玉平. 海拉尔盆地侏罗系烃源岩特征及发育模式——以红旗凹陷为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(4): 1065-.
[6] 陈贤良, 纪友亮, 杨克明. 川西坳陷中段须四段层序地层格架内沉积特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(6): 1615-1627.
[7] 吴蒙, 朱超, 秦云虎, 秦勇, 申建, 赵恒, 朱士飞. 临兴地区山西组致密砂岩气开采潜力地质评价方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(4): 991-1002.
[8] 蒙启安, 李军辉, 李跃, 邹越. 海拉尔—塔木察格盆地中部富油凹陷高含凝灰质碎屑岩储层成因及油气勘探意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(2): 569-578.
[9] 刘金萍, 王改云, 简晓玲, 王嘹亮, 杜民, 成古. 北黄海东部次盆地层序地层格架中烃源岩发育特征与影响因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(1): 1-17.
[10] 李维禄, 高思宇, 张翼, 张金亮, 韩春花. 末端扇—滨浅湖滩坝组合沉积机制与演化分布:以东濮凹陷卫城油田沙河街组四段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(1): 31-40.
[11] 李汝斌. 吐哈盆地台南凹陷二叠系充填特征及其研究意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(6): 1518-1528.
[12] 吴和源, 赵宗举, 汪建国, 王培玺, 龚发雄, 肖飞. 华北克拉通北缘寒武系层序地层划分[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(6): 1609-1624.
[13] 刘忠宝, 杜伟, 高波, 胡宗全, 张钰莹, 吴靖, 冯动军. 层序格架中富有机质页岩发育模式及差异分布:以上扬子下寒武统为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 1-14.
[14] 赵汉卿, 张建民, 李栓豹, 周连德, 江远鹏. 渤海湾盆地A油田新近系明下段沉积特征及演化模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(4): 1021-1029,1046.
[15] 孙思敏, 季汉成, 刘晓, 赵忠新, 陈亮. 断陷盆地边界断层分段的层序地层响应特征——以南堡凹陷西南庄断层上盘陡坡带东营组为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 382-392.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 尤敏鑫,刘建民. 同位素地球化学在峨眉山大火成岩省研究中的应用现状与进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(4): 1231 -1243 .
[2] 杨春梅, 李洪奇,陆大卫,张方礼,高 原,邵英超. 不同驱替方式下岩石电阻率与饱和度的关系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 667 -671 .
[3] 祝洪臣,张炯飞,权 恒. 大兴安岭中生代两期成岩成矿作用的元素、同位素特征及其形成环境[J]. J4, 2005, 35(04): 436 -0442 .
[4] 朱建伟, 赵刚, 刘博, 郭巍, 成俊. 油页岩测井识别技术及应用[J]. J4, 2012, 42(2): 289 -295 .
[5] 陈力,梁海安,张文娟,荣帆. 模糊数学方法在城市工程地质环境区划中的应用--以抚顺市城区为例[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 837 -0840 .
[6] 高桂梅,苏 克,王文颖,甘树才,刘招君. 吉林省桦甸油页岩中稀土元素和微量元素的研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(6): 974 -0979 .
[7] 吴孔运,蒋忠诚,叶 晔. 不同植物群落对灰岩试块溶蚀速率的影响[J]. J4, 2007, 37(5): 967 -0971 .
[8] 周彦章,迟宝明,刘中培. 山东夏甸金矿床充水机理构造控制模式[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 255 -0260 .
[9] 张渊,刘连登,孙景贵,陈国华,张洪喜,闫复传,杨开春. 胶东西北部黄埠岭金矿床两期次叠加成矿[J]. J4, 2008, 38(1): 21 -0026 .
[10] 鲁程鹏, 束龙仓, 苑利波, 张蓉蓉, 黄币娟, 王彬彬. 基于示踪试验求解岩溶含水层水文地质参数[J]. J4, 2009, 39(4): 717 -721 .