循环荷载下加固土体孔压的模糊正交试验分析

J4 ›› 2011, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (3): 805-811.

循环荷载下加固土体孔压的模糊正交试验分析

闫春岭^1,2|唐益群^1,2|王元东^1,2|李仁杰^1,2

1.同济大学岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室|上海200092;
2.同济大学地下建筑与工程系|上海200092

收稿日期:2010-07-06 出版日期:2011-05-26 发布日期:2011-05-26
通讯作者: 唐益群（1952-），男，江苏常熟人，教授，博士生导师，主要从事工程地质与环境地质方面的教学及研究 E-mail:tangyiqun2@tongji.edu.cn
作者简介:闫春岭(1975-)|男|河北滦南人|博士研究生|讲师|主要从事工程地质与土木工程方面的研究及教学工作|E-mail:yanchunling2003@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（40872178）；上海市重点学科建设项目（B308）

Fuzzy Orthogonal Analysis on Pore Water Pressure of Reinforced Soft Clay Under Cyclic Loads

YAN Chun-ling^1,2|TANG Yi-qun^1,2|WANG Yuan-dong^1,2|LI Ren-jie^1,2

1.Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering, Ministry of Education,Tongji University,Shanghai200092,China;
2.Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai200092, China

Received:2010-07-06 Online:2011-05-26 Published:2011-05-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对地铁循环荷载下加固软粘土的孔隙水压力发展规律，对上海地铁4号线宝山-海伦引导段隧道周围的加固软黏土进行室内GDS循环三轴试验。结合重复正交设计法安排试验，借助模糊数学的理论与方法处理试验数据，充分考虑了振动频率（0.5、1.5、2.5 Hz）、动应力幅值（20、30、40 kPa）、固结比（1、1.4、2）以及超固结比（1、1.5、2）对土体孔隙水压力的影响。研究结果表明:振动频率、动应力幅值、固结比及超固结比对加固软黏土孔隙水压力的影响率分别为0.722、15.821、0.944及6.628;这说明影响加固软粘土孔隙水压力变化的主要因素是动应力幅值及超固结比，而固结比和振动频率的影响不显著。

关键词: 循环荷载, 孔隙水压力, 土动力学, 动力测试系统

Abstract:

Through cyclic triaxial tests for the reinforced soft clay around the tunnel of Baoshan-Hailun station of Shanghai No.4 subway line, the analysis of pore water pressure was made on the reinforced soft clay under subway train loads. The experiments were arranged by orthogonal and repeated design and the factors which had the influence on the pore water pressure were fully considered, including vibration frequency (0.5, 1.5, 2.5 Hz), amplitude of dynamic stress (20, 30, 40 kPa), consolidation ratio (1, 1.4, 2) and over consolidation ratio (1, 1.5, 2). The test data were processed though the fuzzy theory and the fuzzy method to analyze the influence rate of pore water pressure. The result shows the influence rate of pore water pressure on vibration frequency, amplitude of dynamic stress, consolidation ratio and over consolidation ratio is 0.722, 15.821, 0.944 and 6.628 respectively. Main factors which affect the change of pore water pressure are amplitude of dynamic stress and over consolidation ratio. Consolidation ratio and vibration frequency are not significant.

Key words: cyclic loads, pore water pressure, soil dynamics, dynamic test systems

中图分类号:

TU411.8

闫春岭, 唐益群, 王元东, 李仁杰. 循环荷载下加固土体孔压的模糊正交试验分析[J]. J4, 2011, 41(3): 805-811.

YAN Chun-ling, TANG Yi-qun, WANG Yuan-dong, LI Ren-jie. Fuzzy Orthogonal Analysis on Pore Water Pressure of Reinforced Soft Clay Under Cyclic Loads[J]. J4, 2011, 41(3): 805-811.

参考文献

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	于平，李瑞磊，付雷，郝雪，张向军，廉国芬. 松辽盆地滨北地区区域构造特征及意义--地震长剖面给出的证据[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 611 -615 .
[2]	张原庆, 宋炳忠, 王玉福, 张宁. 鲁西铜石岩体金成矿规律和成矿预测[J]. J4, 2010, 40(6): 1287 -1294 .
[3]	李建平，李桐林，张辉，徐凯军. 不规则回线源层状介质瞬变电磁场正反演研究及应用[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 790 -0795 .
[4]	高松，宋莹，王琳，蒋步新. 水体中秋兰姆特效降解菌的筛选及其降解性能研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(03): 455 -457 .
[5]	张凤君,李卿,马玖彤,于广菊. 膜蒸馏处理糠醛废水的实验研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(02): 270 -0273 .
[6]	卢双舫,李吉君,薛海涛,徐立恒. 油成甲烷碳同位素分馏的化学动力学及其初步应用[J]. J4, 2006, 36(05): 825 -829 .
[7]	丁志宏，冯平，毛慧慧. 考虑径流年内分布影响的丰枯划分方法及其应用[J]. J4, 2009, 39(2): 276 -0280 .
[8]	任何军，刘娜，高松，张兰英，张玉玲，周睿. 假单胞菌DN2对多氯联苯的降解及bphA1核心序列测定[J]. J4, 2009, 39(2): 312 -0316 .
[9]	黄奇波, 覃小群, 刘朋雨, 康志强, 唐萍萍. 半干旱区岩溶碳汇原位监测方法适宜性研究[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(1): 240 -246 .
[10]	熊晓亮，孙红月，张世华，蔡岳良. 高扬程虹吸保障条件分析与合理管径选择数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(5): 1595 -1601 .