Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition)

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Accuracy and Application of EMM2010 in Chinese Mainland

Xu Rugang1,Li Zhejun1,Zhang Weijing2,Zhang Yi1,Tan Xin1,Wang Lei1,Yuan Jiehao3,Zhai Hongtao1   

  1. 1.Earthquake Administration of Anhui Province, Hefei230031,China;
    2.National Earthquake Response Support Service, Beijing100049,China;
    3.Institute of Geophysics, China Seismological Administration, Beijing100081,China
  • Received:2013-06-12 Online:2014-05-26 Published:2014-05-26

Abstract:

Using the latest geomagnetic data of 1 334 groups, including the geomagnetic declination D, the geomagnetic inclination I and the geomagnetic total intensity F at 1 302 sites and 32 observatories in Chinese mainland, the precision and application of the enhanced magnetic model (EMM2010) have been studied. Basing on the research results, some conclusions have been drawn as follows:①The general accuracy of EMM2010 for D,I and F  in Chinese mainland, is 10.45′, 8.08′ and 112.85, respectively. Among the various regions in mainland China, the precision of EMM2010 is different. The precision in Northeast China, North China and Xinjiang is 13.07′, 8.90′ and 139.57 nT, while the precision in South China, Tibet plateau and its eastern margin is 7.07′, 6.65′ and 82.43 nT, respectively. The accuracy of the EMM2010 are caused by the factors of the limited truncation order of the EMM2010, the geomagnetic anomaly condition in various regions of China, the errors of the geomagnetic observation data and so on. ②The accuracy of EMM2010 has a distinct regional characteristic in Chinese mainland. EMM2010 accuracy is closely related to distribution, complex degree and gradient of geomagnetic anomaly condition. The higher complex degree and gradient of magnetic anomaly, the lower the accuracy of EMM2010. ③Compared with WMM2010 and IGRF11, the average accuracy of EMM2010 is increased by 50% in different magnetic elements. The main reason is that the EMM2010 includes not only the main geomagnetic field, but also the crust magnetic field. ④The analysis example of the EMM2010 used in Chinese mainland shows that it has the certain applicability, but has its limitations. The EMM2010 cannot calculate the geomagnetic field in Chinese mainland accurately. Therefore, it is necessary to study a higher accuracy geomagnetic field model to best fitting Chinese magnetic field on the basis of EMM2010 with latest survey data from different sectors for practical application.

Key words: EMM2010, WMM2010, IGRF11, Chinese mainland, accuracy

CLC Number: 

  • P631.2
[1] Li Haoxuan, Wang Qingyan, Zhong Weiling, Sheng Jie, Li Linghao, Jin Zengwu. IR-90 Full Hydraulic Iron Roughneck Clamping Positioning Accuracy and Its Influencing Factors [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2024, 54(4): 1305-1315.
[2] Zhao Yongsheng, Chen Zhen, Zhang Jiawen, Xiao Lele, Chen Jin. Image Processing Method of Dye Tracer Experiment in Sand Box [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(3): 846-853.
[3] Liu Yongliang, Li Tonglin, Zhu Cheng, Guan Zhenwei, Su Xiaobo. Precision Analysis of 3D Electromagnetic Field Numerical Modeling Based on Quasi-Linear Integral Equation Method [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(4): 1268-1277.
[4] YU Xiao-ping, ZHANG Ting-yu, LIU Cai, CHEN Zeng-bao, XU Hui-ping,PANG He-min. Determination of Geoid by GPS and Gravity Data [J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 904-0907.
[5] TENG Ji-wen,LIU Jian-ming,LIU Cai,YAO Jing-jin,HAN Li-guo,ZHANG Yong-qian. Prospecting for Metal Ore Deposits in Second Deep Space of Crustal Interior, the Building of Strategy Reserve Base of Northeast China [J]. J4, 2007, 37(4): 633-0651.
[6] SU Xiao-si, LIN Xue-yu, DONG Wei-hong, WAN Yu-yu. Application of Inverse Geochemical Modeling in the Correction of Groundwater 14C Dating:advances and Thoughts [J]. J4, 2007, 37(2): 271-277.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] LIU Jian-feng, CHI Xiao-guo, ZHOU Yan, WANG Tie-fu,JIN Wei, ZHOU Jian-bo, DONG Chun-yan, LI Guang-rong. Rb-Sr Isotopic Dating of the Jinlin Pluton by Whole Rock-Hornblende Method in the Northeast Xiao Hinggan Mountains[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 690 -0693 .
[2] HUANG Guan-xing, SUN Ji-chao, ZHANG Ying, LIU Jing-tao, ZHANG Yu-xi, JING Ji-hong. Content and Relationship of Heavy Metals in Groundwater of Sewage Irrigation Area in Pearl River Delta[J]. J4, 2011, 41(1): 228 -234 .
[3] XIAO Chang-lai,LIANG Xiu-juan, CUI Jian-ming, LAN Ying-ying,ZHANG Jun, LI Shu-lan, LIANG Rui-qi, ZHENG Ce. Whole Curve Matching Method for Aquifer Parameters Determination[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 751 -0755 .
[4] GUO Zhen-hua, WANG Pu-jun, YIN Chang-hai, HUANG Yu-long. Relationship Between Lithofacies and Logging Facies of the Volcanic Reservoir Rocks in Songliao Basin[J]. J4, 2006, 36(02): 207 -0214 .
[5] SUN Yong-he, FU Xiao-fei, LV Yan-fang, FU Guang, YAN Dong. Suction Role of Seismic Pumping and Physical Simulation on Hydrocarbon Migration and Accumulation[J]. J4, 2007, 37(1): 98 -0104 .
[6] XIE Zhong-lei, CHEN Zhuo,SUN Wen-tian, YIN Bo. Content of Fluoride in Tea Leaves and Distribution of Fluoride in Soils from Different Tea Gardens[J]. J4, 2008, 38(2): 293 -0298 .
[7] JIA Jun-tao, WANG Pu-jun, SHAO Rui,CHENG Ri-hui, ZHANG Bin, HOU Jing-tao, LI Jin-long, BIAN Wei-hua. Stratigraphical Sequence and Regional Correlation of Yingcheng Formation in the Southeast of Songliao Basin[J]. J4, 2007, 37(6): 1110 -1123 .
[8] KANG Li-ming,REN Zhan-li. Study on Multi-Parameters Discrimination Method for Flow Units-Taking W93 Wellblock in Ordos Basin as An Example[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 749 -0756 .
[9] XUE Yong-chao, CHENG Lin-song. The Diagenetic Reservoir Facies of Chang 8 Reservoir in Baibao Oilfield[J]. J4, 2011, 41(2): 365 -371 .
[10] JIANG Ji-yi, ZHANG Yu-dong, GU Hong-biao, ZUO Lan-li. Study on the Evaluation Model of Groundwater Environment Evolution Pattern Based on Grey Correlation Entropy[J]. J4, 2009, 39(6): 1111 -1116 .