Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition) ›› 2026, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (10): 2617-2625.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb.20250429

Previous Articles    

Modeling and regulation of travel mode choice based on multi⁃dimensional cost

Yi-lin SUN1,2(),Zhan-yi GUAN1,Shu-zheng MA1,Hao-shan SUN1,Yuan FENG1,Yi-fang HUANG2   

  1. 1.College of Civil Engineering and Architecture,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058,China
    2.Polytechnic Institute,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310058,China
  • Received:2025-05-14 Online:2026-10-01 Published:2026-10-09

Abstract:

To elucidate the complex mechanisms underlying residents' travel mode choice under urban traffic congestion and to optimize the modal composition of public transport and private-car travel, a multidimensional-cost-based method for travel mode choice modeling and regulation was proposed. By integrating individual daily travel records, 8 368 daily trip chains were generated, and a multinomial Logit model incorporating socioeconomic attributes was developed.Results showed that expenses costs and time costs significantly influenced mode selection. Subsequently, 13 806 filtered travel records were fused with multimodal spatiotemporal data from Baidu Map API to establish cost scenarios. Comparative analysis of machine learning models identified XGBoost as the optimal predictor. Cost regulation simulations demonstrated that reducing public transit costs by 20% led to a significant decline in the proportion of private car usage, with a decrease of 4.65 percentage points. These findings validate the efficacy of cost-driven policy tools in steering travel behavior, providing strategies for differentiated transportation pricing and advancing green urban mobility transitions.

Key words: transportation planning, travel costs, travel mode choice, multinomial Logit model, machine learning modes

CLC Number: 

  • U491.1

Table 1

Cost components of the various modes of trip"

出行方式拥有成本使用成本
电动自行车折旧成本维修成本、耗电成本
共享自行车—使用费用
公共汽车—票费
轨道交通—票费
燃油汽车折旧成本、保险费燃油消耗、停车费、维修成本
电动汽车折旧成本、保险费电费消耗、停车费、维修成本
网约车/出租车—打车费

Table 2

Variables of models"

变量类型属性变量名称说明
特征变量个人属性0~17岁年龄在0~17岁之间(包含0和17)取1;否则取0
18~59岁年龄在18~59岁之间(包含18和59)取1;否则取0
60岁以上年龄在60岁以上(包含60)取1;否则取0
0~10万元家庭年收入低于10万元取1;否则取0
10~50万元家庭年收入高于10万元且低于50万元取1;否则取0
50万元以上家庭年收入高于50万元取1;否则取0
持有驾照持有驾照取1;否则取0

出行属性

MNL模型

出行费用C单日出行费用总和,元
时间成本TC单日出行时间成本总和,元
换乘成本TRC单日出行换乘成本总和,元
体力感知成本PC单日出行体力感知成本总和,元

出行属性

机器学习模型

距离出发地与目的地的距离,km
私家车成本采取私家车出行情况下的4项成本总和与距离之比,元/km
公共交通成本采取公共交通情况下的4项成本总和与距离之比,元/km
骑行成本采取骑行情况下的4项成本总和与距离之比,元/km
步行成本仅采取步行情况下的4项成本总和与距离之比,元/km
网约车/出租车成本采取网约车或出租车出行情况下的4项成本总和与距离之比,元/km
目标变量出行方式私家车出行包含以私家车为主的出行方式
公共交通出行包含轨道交通、公交的出行方式
主动出行包含步行、骑行的出行方式
出租出行包含网约车、出租车的出行方式

Fig.1

Travel cost-travel mode boxplot"

Table3

Parameter estimation result of MNL model"

变量系数
公共交通出行主动出行出租出行
λi-4.695 5***-9.882 9***0.704 7***
0~17岁-0.522 9*-0.689 5**-0.762 3***
18~59岁0.279 4-0.132 5-0.249 5*
60岁以上———
0~10万元1.202 1***0.945 2**0.242 1
10~50万元0.810 0***0.633 6**0.012 7
50万元以上———
持有驾照-1.060 7***-0.951 8***-1.452 1***
出行费用/元-40.848 1***-52.565 7***-1.152 9***
时间成本/元12.712 8***10.945 1***0.254 3
换乘成本/元-1.101 5***-1.790 9***-0.315 1***
体力感知成本/元-4.978 6***-4.849 0***0.610 5***
McFadden's R20.692 3
Cox & Snell R20.803 6
Nagelkerke R20.888 2

Fig.2

Comparison of model evaluation indicators"

Table4

Changes in the proportion of private cars under the cost control of different travel modes"

私家车成本调整幅度/%

私家车比例

变化/%

公共交通成本

调整幅度/%

私家车比例变化/%
-25+10.97-25-4.86
-20+9.53-20-4.65
-15+7.08-15-2.83
-10+5.57-10-1.53
-5+3.75-5-0.21
+5-2.05+5+2.15
+10-3.08+10+2.41
+15-4.81+15+2.04
+20-6.86+20+2.25
+25-7.96+25+2.29

Fig.3

Regulation of private car travel costs-change in private car travel proportion"

Fig.4

Regulation of public travel costs-change in private car travel proportion"

[1] Bai T Z, Li X M, Sun Z Y. Effects of cost adjustment on travel mode choice: analysis and comparison of different logit models[C]∥Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Transport Research(WCTR), Shanghai, China, 2017: 2653-2663.
[2] Andani I G A, Puello L L P, Geurs K. Modelling effects of changes in travel time and costs of toll road usage on choices for residential location, route and travel mode across population segments in the Jakarta-Bandung region, Indonesia[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2021, 145: 81-102.
[3] Huang Y Q, Gao L J, Ni A N, et al. Analysis of travel mode choice and trip chain pattern relationships based on multi-day GPS data: a case study in Shanghai, China[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2021, 93: 103070.
[4] Long Y, Ao Y B, Li H M, et al. Non-linear effects of children's daily travel distance on their travel mode choice considering different destinations[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2024, 118: 103921.
[5] Hamadneh J, Jaber A. Modeling of intra-city transport choice behaviour in Budapest, Hungary[J]. Journal of Urban Mobility, 2023, 3: 100049.
[6] 杨励雅, 赵鹏军. 考虑偏好差异与备选方案相关性的居民出行方式选择模型[J]. 北京大学学报: 自然科学版, 2012, 48(6): 1009-1015.
Yang Li-ya, Zhao Peng-jun. Travel mode choice model accounting for individual preference heterogeneity and correlation among choice alternatives[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2012, 48(6): 1009-1015.
[7] Yang Y N, Li N. Research on Residents' travel behavior based on multiple logistic regression model[J]. IEEE Access, 2023, 11: 74759-74767.
[8] Lu X S, Liu T L, Huang H J. Pricing and mode choice based on nested Logit model with trip-chain costs[J]. Transport Policy, 2015, 44: 76-88.
[9] 孙轶琳, 黄佩, 汤心怡, 等. 基于多项Logit模型的游客组合出行方式选择行为研究[J]. 综合运输, 2024, 46(5): 100-106, 113.
Sun Yi-lin, Huang Pei, Tang Xin-yi, et al. Tourists' travel mode choices based on multinomial logit model[J]. China Transportation Review, 2024, 46(5): 100-106, 113.
[10] Cheng L, Chen X W, de Vos J, et al. Applying a random forest method approach to model travel mode choice behavior[J]. Travel Behaviour and Society, 2019, 14: 1-10.
[11] Hagenauer J, Helbich M. A comparative study of machine learning classifiers for modeling travel mode choice[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2017, 78: 273-282.
[12] Kashifi M T, Jamal A, Kashefi M S, et al. Predicting the travel mode choice with interpretable machine learning techniques: a comparative study[J]. Travel Behaviour and Society, 2022, 29: 279-296.
[13] Li X W, Shi L X, Shi Y, et al. Exploring interactive and nonlinear effects of key factors on intercity travel mode choice using XGBoost[J]. Applied Geography, 2024, 166: 103264.
[14] Tang L, Lin X Z, Yu J C, et al. Integrating travel survey and Amap API data into travel mode choice analysis with interpretable machine learning models: a case study in China[J]. IEEE Access, 2025, 13: 27852-27867.
[15] Vasudevan N, Gore N, Zope R, et al. Determining mode shift elasticity based on household income and travel cost[J]. Research in Transportation Economics, 2021, 85: 100771.
[16] 王殿海, 李逸文, 蔡正义. 收费及奖励策略对通勤出行方式选择的影响分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2024, 24(2): 1-12.
Wang Dian-hai, Li Yi-wen, Cai Zheng-yi. Impact of charging and incentive strategies on commuting mode choice[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2024, 24(2): 1-12.
[17] Xie L Y, Wan H N, Wang Y C. Distributional effects of subway fare surges: evidence from Beijing[J]. Cities, 2025, 158: 105602.
[18] Zhang Y H, Li H J, Ren G. Data-driven exploration of heterogeneous gasoline price elasticities using generalized random forests[J]. Transportation, 2025, 52(1): 215-237.
[19] 叶盈. 出行方式链成本测算方法研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学建筑工程学院, 2015.
Ye Ying. Study on the method of travel mode chaining cost[D]. Hangzhou: College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, 2015.
[20] 孙立军. 沥青路面结构行为理论[M]. 上海:同济大学出版社, 2003.
[21] 王忠仁. 路面管理系统的车辆运营费模型[J]. 北京建筑工程学院学报, 1992(2): 62-69, 34.
Wang Zhong-ren. Vehicle operating cost model in pavement management system[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 1992(2): 62-69, 34.
[22] 隗海林, 王劲松, 王云鹏, 等. 基于城市道路工况的汽车燃油消耗模型[J]. 吉林大学学报: 工学版, 2009, 39(5): 1146-1150.
Kui Hai-lin, Wang Jin-song, Wang Yun-peng, et al. Vehicle fuel consumption model based on urban road operations[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2009, 39(5): 1146-1150.
[23] Gwilliam K M. The value of time in economic evaluation of transport projects: lessons from recent research[J/OL]. [2025-04-25]..
[24] Jara-díaz S R, Gschwender A. Towards a general microeconomic model for the operation of public transport[J]. Transport Reviews, 2003, 23(4): 453-469.
[25] 王殿海, 叶盈, 朱文韬, 等. 基于条件价值法的公交车内拥挤成本测算模型[J]. 吉林大学学报: 工学版, 2016, 46(1): 57-62.
Wang Dian-hai, Ye Ying, Zhu Wen-tao, et al. Estimation of crowding costs in bus based on contingent valuation method[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2016, 46(1): 57-62.
[26] Gschwender A, Jara-diaz S, Bravo C. Feeder-trunk or direct lines? Economies of density, transfer costs and transit structure in an urban context[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2016, 88: 209-222.
[27] 杭州市统计局.2024杭州市统计年鉴[EB/OL]. [2025-04-30]..
[28] 王江波, 连芝锐, 冯涛, 等. 基于机器学习的时空出行选择行为研究综述与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2024, 43(8): 1649-1665.
Wang Jiang-bo, Lian Zhi-rui, Feng Tao, et al. A review and outlook of machine learning-based travel choice behavior research[J]. Progress in Geography, 2024, 43(8): 1649-1665.
[1] Yuan-wen LAI,Yang-fan WU,Jian-hong LIANG,Yuan-chen CAI,Shu-yi WANG. Multi⁃modal evacuation strategies for metro operational disruptions [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2026, 56(9): 2340-2349.
[2] Bei ZHOU,Qian-xi ZHOU,Zhuang-lin MA,Ling-xiao CAI,Xi LU. Mechanisms of traffic conflicts in expressway weaving areas under different weather condition [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2026, 56(9): 2329-2339.
[3] Wen-jing WU,Zi-xi JIA,Hong-fei JIA,Xu YANG,Guo-fan LU. Low⁃carbon oriented carpooling willingness and incentive strategies for ride⁃hailing services [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2026, 56(9): 2350-2360.
[4] Yan-li WANG,Chen-xi WANG,Xin-ran ZHAO,Bing WU. Prediction of route selection behavior for mixed road network considering multi⁃class attributes [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2026, 56(8): 2067-2076.
[5] Kang-lin LIU,Ze-yu ZHANG,Jing-wen JIANG,Xun GONG,Yao CHEN. Distributionally robust optimization for drone delivery facility location and allocation problem [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2026, 56(2): 464-472.
[6] Guo-zhu CHENG,Qiang LIU,Li-zhuang FANG,Zhi-dong YOU,Shuang GU. Modeling and simulation of heterogeneous traffic flow on freeway under low visibility conditions [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2026, 56(10): 2566-2577.
[7] Yi ZHANG,Sha-wen CHEN,Yan CHEN,Xiang-yu FAN,Si-qi WANG,Huan WU,Peng-fei JIAO. Dynamic operation and maintenance evaluation and predictive maintenance of mechanical and electrical equipment on highways [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2026, 56(1): 170-182.
[8] Yao SUN,Dong-xuan BAI,Bao-zhen YAO,Zi-jian BAI. Characteristics analysis of port and city transportation network based on percolation theory [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2026, 56(1): 199-208.
[9] Hong-fei JIA,Bo ZHUANG,Qing-yu LUO,Ling LIU,Qiu-yang HUANG. Decision optimization of urban road network performance restoration under waterlogged conditions [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(9): 2969-2977.
[10] Dong WANG,Yu-xuan LI,Huan WU,Fang ZONG. Rating algorithm for open test road of intelligent connected vehicle based on random forest [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(9): 2998-3006.
[11] Hui-zhi XU,Dong-sheng HAO,Xiao-ting XU,Shi-sen JIANG. Expressway small object detection algorithm based on deep learning [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(6): 2003-2014.
[12] Qing-ling HE,Yu-long PEI,Lin HOU,Jing LIU,Sheng PAN. Hybrid strategy improves WOA⁃BiLSTM speed prediction of expressway exit ramp [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(6): 2038-2049.
[13] Wen-jing WU,Chun-chun DENG,Hong-fei JIA,Shu-hang SUN. Evaluation of road network unblocked reliability and identification of critical sections under influence of flooding [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(4): 1250-1257.
[14] Hao YUE,Xiao CHANG,Jian-ye LIU,Qiu-shi QU. Customized bus route optimization with vehicle window [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(4): 1266-1274.
[15] Xiang-hai MENG,Guo-rui WANG,Ming-yang ZHANG,Bi-jiang TIAN. Traffic accident prediction model of mountain highways based on selection integration [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(4): 1298-1306.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!