吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3): 639-650.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201603102

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

秘鲁Ucayali盆地石油地质特征与油气成藏

王建君1, 李浩武1, 胡湘瑜1, 王青1, 汪斌2, 杨仓3   

  1. 1. 中国石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 100083;
    2. 中国石油塔里木油田分公司勘探开发研究院, 新疆 库尔勒 841000;
    3. 中国石油海外勘探开发公司, 北京 100034
  • 收稿日期:2016-01-10 出版日期:2016-05-26 发布日期:2016-05-26
  • 作者简介:王建君(1969-),男,高级工程师,主要从事海外油气新项目评价研究,E-mail:wangjianjun@petrochina.com.cn
  • 基金资助:

    国家科技重大专项（2016ZX05029）

Geological Characteristics and Hydrocarbon Accumulation of Ucayali Basin, Peru

Wang Jianjun1, Li Haowu1, Hu Xiangyu1, Wang Qing1, Wang Bin2, Yang Cang3   

  1. 1. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100083, China;
    2. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Tarim Oil Field Branch Company, PetroChina, Korla 841000, Xinjiang, China;
    3. China National Oil and Gas Exploration and Development Corporation, Beijing 100034, China
  • Received:2016-01-10 Online:2016-05-26 Published:2016-05-26
  • Supported by:

    Supported by the National Science and Technology Major Project (2016ZX05029)

PDF (PC)

291

摘要：

基于对Ucayali盆地油气成藏要素的系统解剖，预测盆地内除已发现的逆冲背斜/断背斜外，还可能发育伸展断块、潜山、生物礁、地层尖灭、河道砂及逆冲断层下盘构造等多种圈闭类型，自西向东前展式推覆的逆冲背斜/断背斜为最主要的圈闭类型。前陆运动前盆地构造圈闭发育程度低，现今原油聚集多属前陆运动后二次调整成藏，淡水侵入使浅部油藏普遍遭受轻度降解。由于Shira隆起的分隔作用，西部次盆现今生成的烃类很难运移至东部圈闭中。而东部次盆烃源岩埋深小，Ene组展布面积有限，Ambo群趋于生气，在生油窗内生成的液态烃类相对有限，加之圈闭不断生长，圈闭充满度较低。同时，活动性断层对烃类侧向运移不利，其东侧的背斜圈闭往往无法得到有效充注，形成大规模原油聚集的潜力较小。南部和西部次盆成藏条件配置好，逆冲褶皱发育，圈闭可得到烃类持续充注，主要以天然气为主；南部次盆逆冲断层下盘构造圈闭为重要潜在勘探目标；Ene次盆勘探程度低，烃源岩品质好，仍有发现大型构造圈闭的潜力。

关键词: Ucayali盆地, 石油地质条件, Shira隆起, 运移屏障, 油气成藏, 勘探潜力

Abstract:

Based on the geological and hydrocarbon accumulation characteristics, there will be other types of hydrocarbon traps in Ucayali basin, such as extensional fault block, buried hill, reef, stratigraphic pinchout, channel sand and the footwall of thrust fault, besides the discovered thrust anticline/faulted anticline oil & gas fields. The in-sequence thrust anticline/faulted anticline will be the main traps. The traps were not well developed before the foreland orogeny, and the current hydrocarbon accumulations were mostly the product of secondary migration. The intrusion of freshwater mildly degraded most of oil in shallow reservoirs. Due to the separation of the Shira uplift, it was difficult for the hydrocarbon generating in the Western Sub basin to migrate into the Eastern Sub basin. The source rocks in the Eastern Sub basin was not buried deeply enough, the Ene Formation had limited distribution, the Ambo Group was gas prone, only limited liquid were generated in oil window, and the traps were growing, so the filling of traps were generally low. The active faults also are barriers for hydrocarbon parallel migration, the traps in the eastern side often have charge risk, and have little chance to form large oil accumulation. The Southern and Western Sub basins had good conditions for hydrocarbon accumulation, the thrust folds were well developed, the traps were continuously charging, and most likely to form gas fields. The foot wall anticlines of thrust faults will be the potential targets in Southern Sub basin. The Ene Sub basin is in low degree of exploration, and with perfect source rocks, so it has the potential to find large structural traps.

Key words: Ucayali basin, petroleum conditions, Shira uplift, migration barrier, hydrocarbon accumulation, exploration potential

中图分类号: 

  • P618.13

[1] Mathalone J M P, Montoya R M. Petroleum Geology of the Sub-Andean Basins of Peru[C]//Tankard A J, Suarez S, Welsink H J. Petroleum Basins of South America. Tulsa:AAPG Memoir 62,1995:423-444.

[2] Krabbenhoft A, Bialas J, Kopp H, et al. Crustal Struc-ture of the Peruvian Continental Margin from Wideangle Seismic Studies[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2004, 159(2):749-764.

[3] IHS Company. IHS Basin Monitor:22217-Ucayali Basin[R].Geneva:IHS Company,2009:1-26.

[4] Clift P D, Hartley A J. Slow Rate of Subduction Erosion and Coastal Underplating Along the Andean Margin of Chile and Peru[J]. Geology, 2007, 35(1):503-506.

[5] Zelasco L D N. Tectonic Evolution of the Contaya Arch Ucayali Basin, Peru[D]. Texas:Texas A & M University, 2010:1-57.

[6] Alvarez J O S. Structural and Stratigeraphic Evolution of Shira Mountains,Central Ucayali Basin, Peru[D]. Texas:Texas A & M University, 2007:1-116.

[7] Bump A, Kennan L, Fallon J. Structural History of the Andean Foreland, Peru, and Its Relation to Subduction Zone Dynamics[R]. Texas:AAPG Annual Convention, Search and Discovery Article 30060, 2008:20-23.

[8] Decou A, Von Eynatten H, Mamani M, et al. Cenozoic Forearc Basin Sediments in Southern Peru (15°-18°S) Stratigraphic and Heavy Mineral Constraints for Eocene to Miocene Evolution of the Central Andes[J]. Sedimentary Geology, 2011, 237(1):55-72.

[9] Dumont J F, Fournier M. Geodynamic Environment of Quaternary Morphostructures of the Subandean Foreland Basins of Peru and Bolivia-Characteristics and Study Methods[J]. Quaternary Internatioal, 1994, 21:129-142.

[10] Boekhout F,Spikings R,Sempere T, et al. Mesozoic Arc Magmatism Along the Southern Peruvian Margin During Gondwana Breakup and Dispersal[J]. Lithos, 2012(146/147):48-64.

[11] Tankard Enterprises Limited.Tectonic Framework of Basin Evolution in Peru[R].Lima:Tankard Enterprises Ltd, 2002:1-45.

[12] Bolanos R L, Wine G D. Hydrocarbon Potential of the Ucayali Basin, Peru[R]. Barcelona:AAPG International Conference, Search and Discovery Article 90017, 2003:1.

[13] Higley D K. The Putumayo-Oriente-Maranon Province of Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru:Mesozoic, Cenozoic and Paleozoic Petroleum Systems[R]. Denver:USGS Digital Series 63, 2000:1-40.

[14] Torres M A, Porta R, Brisson I. Applications and Deve-lopments of Sequence Stratigraphy in Latin America:Synthesis of Exploration and Development Experiences in the Sub-Andean Basins[R]. Buenos Aires:Proceedings SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, SPE Paper No 69446, 2001:14.

[15] 张申, 田世存, 郭建宇,等秘鲁乌卡亚利盆地油气勘探潜力分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2012, 23(2):268-278. Zhang Shen, Tian Shicun, Guo Jianyu, et al. Evaluation of Petroleum Potential in Ucayali Basin, Peru[J].Natural Gas Geoscience, 2012, 23(2):268-278.

[16] C & C Reservoir. Field Evaluation Report-Cashiriari and San Martin Fields, Ucayali Basin, Peru[R]. Houston:C & C Reservoir, 2005:1-42.

[17] C & C Reservoir.Field Evaluation Report-Aguaytia Field,Ucayali Basin, Peru[R]. Houston:C & C Reservoir, 2009:1-32.

[18] 王青, 王建君, 汪平, 等. 秘鲁Ucayali盆地油气地质特征及勘探潜力分析[J]. 石油实验地质, 2012, 34(3):296-302. Wang Qing, Wang Jianjun, Wang Ping, et al. Petroleum Geology and Exploration Potential of Ucayali Basin, Peru[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment. 2012, 34(3):296-302.

[19] Perupetro. Promotion Tour-Peruvian Sub-Andean Basins-Ucayali Basin[R]. Lima:Perupetro,2005:1-32.

[20] Gandhi A, Torres-Verdín C, Voss B, et al. Correction of Invasion Effects on Well Logs in Camisea Gas Reservoirs, Peru, with the Construction of Static and Dynamic Multilayer Petrophysical Models[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2013, 97(3):379-412.

[21] Gandhi A, Torres-Verdín C, Voss B. Construction of Reliable Static and Dynamic Multi-Layer Petrophysical Models in Camisea Gas Reservoirs, Peru[C]//51st Annual Logging Symposium. Perth:SPWLA, 2010:1-16.
[1] 李昂, 鞠林波, 张丽艳. 塔里木盆地古城低凸起古-中生界构造演化特征与油气成藏关系[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 545-555.
[2] 张焕旭, 陈世加, 路俊刚, 刘超威, 陈娟, 李勇, 徐坤. “膨胀力”作用下致密砂岩储层石油运聚特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(5): 1341-1351.
[3] 付金华，郭少斌，刘新社，王义刚. 鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界山西组页岩气成藏条件及勘探潜力[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(2): 382-389.
[4] 王伟明，邓海，卢双舫，徐建军，王贵磊，陈国辉. 断陷盆地单层暗色泥岩厚度与优质烃源岩的关系及其对成藏的控制——以海拉尔盆地为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2012, 42(6): 1610-1616.
[5] 李军辉. 海拉尔盆地呼和湖凹陷下白垩统层序构成样式及油气成藏模式[J]. J4, 2012, 42(4): 961-969.
[6] 刘洛夫, 尚晓庆, 孟江辉, 陈治军, 宁松华, 王萍, 李燕. 滨里海盆地东南部S区块下二叠统空谷阶盐岩特征及其对盐上层系油气成藏的影响[J]. J4, 2012, 42(2): 304-311.
[7] 马中振, 谢寅符, 耿长波, 张凡芹. 巴西坎波斯(Campos)盆地石油地质特征与勘探有利区分析[J]. J4, 2011, 41(5): 1389-1396.
[8] 庄新兵, 邹华耀, 李楠, 魏刚, 孙和风. 秦南地区天然气成因与油气勘探潜力分析[J]. J4, 2011, 41(3): 680-688.
[9] 刘洛夫, 孟江辉, 王维斌, 靳军, 吴琳, 赵彦德, 王萍, 支东明. 准噶尔盆地西北缘车排子凸起上、下层系原油的地球化学特征差异及其意义[J]. J4, 2011, 41(2): 377-390.
[10] 卢双舫, 胡慧婷, 刘海英, 邵明礼, 王立武, 张世广, 黄文彪, 仲维维, 吴高平. 英台断陷深层的气源条件及勘探潜力[J]. J4, 2010, 40(4): 912-920.
[11] 于明德,王璞珺,施昌瑞,张 辉,唐华风,李凤勋. 焉耆盆地包裹体特征和伊利石测年对油气成藏期次的指示[J]. J4, 2009, 39(1): 45-0052.
[12] 吕延防，万 军，刘江涛，沙子萱. 用灰色理论预测齐家-古龙凹陷中心线以西油气储量分布[J]. J4, 2008, 38(3): 425-0429.
[13] 高长海，杨子玉，查明. 埕北断坡区油气成藏组合特征及分布规律[J]. J4, 2008, 38(1): 63-0068.
[14] 史 建 南. 准噶尔盆地排2井区油气成藏机理[J]. J4, 2007, 37(3): 531-0534.
[15] 刘志宏,万传彪,任延广,李春柏,张 宏,柳行军. 海拉尔盆地乌尔逊-贝尔凹陷的地质特征及油气成藏规律[J]. J4, 2006, 36(04): 527-534.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 《吉林大学学报(地球科学版)》编辑部
地址：长春市西民主大街938号(130026)　电话：+86-431-88502374；13756165364　E-mail: xuebao1956@jlu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发