辽西葫芦岛东部表层调查方法比对实验

doi:10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201702305

吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2): 616-625.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201702305

辽西葫芦岛东部表层调查方法比对实验

葛利华^1,2, 姜弢^1,3, 徐学纯⁴, 贾海青^1,3, 杨志超^1,3

1. 吉林大学仪器科学与电气工程学院, 长春 130026;
2. 中国石油大学(北京)地球物理与信息工程学院, 北京 102249;
3. 教育部地球信息探测仪器重点实验室, 长春 130026;
4. 吉林大学地球科学学院, 长春 130061

收稿日期:2016-07-07 出版日期:2017-03-26 发布日期:2017-03-26
通讯作者: 姜弢(1969),女,教授,博士生导师,主要从事地震勘探技术及信号处理研究,E-mail:jiang_t@jlu.edu.cn E-mail:jiang_t@jlu.edu.cn
作者简介:葛利华(1984),女,博士,主要从事相控震源技术及地震信号处理研究,E-mail:gelh09@cup.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家深部探测技术与实验研究专项SinoProbe-09-06（201311197，201011083）；高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金项目（20110061110053）

Comparison Experimental Research of Surface Survey Methods in the Eastern Huludao of Western Liaoning Province

Ge Lihua^1,2, Jiang Tao^1,3, Xu Xuechun⁴, Jia Haiqing^1,3, Yang Zhichao^1,3

1. College of Instrument Science and Electrical Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China;
2. College of Geophysics and Information Engineering, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China;
3. Key Laboratory of Geo-Exploration Instrumentation of Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China;
4. College of Earth Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China

Received:2016-07-07 Online:2017-03-26 Published:2017-03-26
Supported by:
Supported by the Deep Exploration in China SinoProbe-09-06(201311197,201011083) and the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China(20110061110053)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 地震勘探中，近地表的不均匀性给激发、接收和静校正等工作带来较大困难。辽西葫芦岛东部地表地质条件复杂，浅表层速度及厚度差异大，表层调查工作直接影响到地下介质成像效果。为使该地区首次进行的地震勘探能够获取准确的静校正量数据、给井深设计提供依据、研究适合该区域的表层调查方法，同时为满足国家深部探测项目对实验方法比对研究的需求，结合小折射、地面微测井和井中微测井三种表层调查方法的工作原理，在该工区分别应用三种方法做同点比对实验，分析了不同调查方法的适用性及精确度。结果表明，三种方法得到的结果与岩性录井结果一致，均能有效探测高速层埋深，指导井深设计，其中：小折射成本较低，适合地面较平坦区段，虽然不够精细，但能够准确找到高速层，可用于井深设计或作为微测井方法的补充；地面微测井适合山高无水或者造山破碎带造成钻井严重漏水的地区，需要井中检波器与大地良好耦合；井中微测井最为精确，探测层位更为精细，能分辨更多层位，与岩性录井结果最接近，在静校正量获取方面具有明显优势。通过三种表层调查的比对，分析了不同方法的适用范围，为该工区选择合适的表层调查方法及方法参数选取提供依据，同时为其他地表复杂区域进行表层调查提供参考。

关键词: 微测井, 小折射, 表层调查, 地震勘探, 比对实验

Abstract: In seismic exploration, the nonuniformity of near-surface brings great difficulties to excitation, receiving and static correction. The surface survey work directly affects the underground imaging as the geological conditions here is complex, there is a large difference of velocity and thickness for the surface region. In order to obtain accurate static correction data and provide the basis for well depth design, a good surface survey of the region is needed in SinoProbe project. This paper discusses the principle and field construction method of small refraction, ground-microlog and well-microlog. Then we do a comparison test of the three methods at the same site, and analyze the adaptability of different survey methods. The interpretation results of each method are also compared. The results obtained by the three methods are consistent with that of lithology logging. All three methods can effectively detect the depth of high-speed layer, and guide the well depth design. Cost of the small refraction method is the lowest, so it is suitable to relatively flat surface area. Using the method, we can find the high-speed layer accurately, so it can be used as supplement for micro-logging in the design of well depth. Ground-microlog is suitable for high mountain without water or serious leaking drilling area caused by organic fracture zone. This method requires good coupling of geophone and the earth in the hole. Well-microlog is the most accurate one. It can distinguish more layers, and is closest to lithology logging result, so it has obvious advantage in the static correct obtained. In conclusion, this article analyzes the scope where different methods applied, and compares them in three surface survey. It provides evidence on how the appropriate surface investigation method for the work area was chosen, also provides a reference for other complex surface area's surface investigation.

Key words: micro-logging, small refraction, surface survey, seismic exploration, comparison experiment

中图分类号:

P631.4

葛利华, 姜弢, 徐学纯, 贾海青, 杨志超. 辽西葫芦岛东部表层调查方法比对实验[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 616-625.

Ge Lihua, Jiang Tao, Xu Xuechun, Jia Haiqing, Yang Zhichao. Comparison Experimental Research of Surface Survey Methods in the Eastern Huludao of Western Liaoning Province[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(2): 616-625.

参考文献

[1] 林君. 电磁驱动可控震源地震勘探原理及应用[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2004. Lin Jun. Seismic Exploration and Application of Vibrator Driven by Electromagnetic[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2004.
[2] 丁建荣, 毛风鸣, 郝天珧. 表层火成岩覆盖地区的表层结构调查[J]. 地球物理学进展,2007, 22(3):872-878. Ding Jianrong, Mao Fengming, Hao Tianyao. Surface Structure Survey in the Area Where Covered with the Igneous Rock near Surface[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2007, 22(3):872-878.
[3] 王建花, 李庆忠, 邱睿. 浅层强反射界面的能量屏蔽作用[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2003, 38(6):589-596. Wang Jianhua, Li Qingzhong, Qiu Rui. Energy Shielding Effect of Strong Reflection Interface in Near-Surface[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2003, 38(6):589-596.
[4] 林依华, 张中杰, 尹成, 等. 复杂地形条件下静校正的综合寻优[J]. 地球物理学报, 2003, 46(1):101-106. Lin Yihua, Zhang Zhongjie, Yin Cheng, et al. Hybrid Optimization of Static Estimation in Complex Topography[J]. Geophysics, 2003, 46(1):101-106.
[5] 徐锦玺, 邱燕, 何京国, 等. 滩浅海地震勘探采集技术应用[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2005, 20(1):66-70. Xu Jinxi, Qiu Yan, He Jingguo, et al. Seismic Exploration Acquisition Technique Application of Beach Shallow Sea[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2005, 20(1):66-70.
[6] 韩富钱, 刘海宁, 王忠, 等. 陕北长茂滩区表层调查方法探讨[J]. 工程地球物理学报, 2011, 8(2):161-165. Han Fuqian, Liu Haining, Wang Zhong, et al. A Study of Shallow Layer Acquisition and Interpretation Method in Changmaotan Area of Shanbei[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Geophysics,2011, 8(2):161-165.
[7] 蒋爱农, 宋国良, 杨子健. 全方位表层结构调查方法在松南长岭凹陷腰英台工区的应用[J]. 石油物探, 2004, 43(1):67-71. Jiang Ainong, Song Guoliang, Yang Zijian. The Application of Full Surface Structure Survey Method in the Sag Waist Yingtai of Changling in Songnan[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2004, 43(1):67-71.
[8] Yang Kai, Zhou Xing, Li Hui, et al. Near-Surface Velocity Model Construction Based on a Monte-Carlo Scheme[J]. Applied Geophysics, 2012, 9(4):475-482.
[9] Vesnaver A, Bridle R, Ley R, et al. Painting the near Surface Using Geology, Geophysics, and Satellites[J]. Geophysics, 74(3):B61-B69.
[10] 陈吴金, 张志林, 朱勇, 等. 永新地区综合表层调查方法探讨[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2008, 43(12):70-73. Chen Wujin, Zhang Zhilin, Zhu Yong, et al. Discussion on Integrative Near-Surface Survey Method in Yongxin Area[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2008, 43(12):70-73.
[11] 段云卿, 皮金云, 刘兵,等. 三分量小折射表层调查研究[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2008, 43(6):652-655. Duan Yunqing, Pi Jinyun, Liu Bing, et al. Three-Component Surface Survey of Small Refraction Method[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2008, 43(6):652-655.
[12] 王俊茹, 李红阳. 地震表层研究中的若干试验与分析[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2003, 38(3):231-236. Wang Junru, Li Hongyang. Experimental Studies and Analysis of the Surface Survey[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2003, 38(3):231-236.
[13] 王惠濂. 探地雷达专辑[Z]. 地球科学, 1993, 18(3). Wang Huilian. Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) Albums[Z]. Earth Science, 1993, 18(3).
[14] 杨海申. VSP三分量微测井技术在表层调查中的应用[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2005, 40(1):97-102. Yang Haishen. Application of Three-Component VSP Uphole Survey in Surface Survey[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2005, 40(1):97-102.
[15] 孙巧玲, 赵辉, 宋红玲. VSP微测井技术在四川盆地的应用效果分析[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2004, 27(2):16-19. Sun Qiaoling, Zhao Hui, Song Hongling. Application of VSP Uphole in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2004, 27(2):16-19.
[16] 邓述全, 洪月英, 王永, 等. 电测井和电阻率法在表层调查中的应用[J]. 勘探地球物理进展, 2004, 27(1):66-71. Deng Shuquan, Hong Yueying, Wang Yong, et al. Application of Electric Logging and Resistivity Method in Surface Survey in Complex Areas[J]. Progress in Exploration Geophysics, 2004, 27(1):66-71.
[17] 王永涛, 江汶波, 王天平. 油泉子地区表层结构调查方法[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2005, 40(4):472-477. Wang Yongtao, Jiang Wenbo, Wang Tianping. Surface Survey in Youquanzi[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2005, 40(4):472-477.
[18] 夏训银, 徐新学, 张进国, 等. 综合物探方法在南盘江表层结构调查中的应用[J]. 勘察科学技术, 2004(3):59-62. Xia Xunyin, Xu Xinxue, Zhang Jinguo, et al. Application of Synthetic Geophysical Exploration Methods in Geological Structure Survey of Surface Layers in Nanpanjiang[J]. Investigation of Science and Technology, 2004(3):59-62.
[19] 李天树, 陈宝德, 苏德仁. 双井微测井技术在表层结构调查中的应用[J]. 石油物探, 2004, 43(5):471-474. Li Tianshu, Chen Baode, Su Deren. Application of Twin-Well Microlog in near Surface Investigation[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2004, 43(5):471-474.
[20] 李驰, 于鹏, 李波, 等. 合理选择炸药震源最佳激发条件的因素分析[J]. 石油物探, 1997, 36(3):105-111. Li Chi, Yu Peng, Li Bo, et al. Factor Analysis of Rationally Selecting Optional Excitation Condition of Dynamite Source[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 1997, 36(3):105-111.
[21] 孙巧玲, 赵辉, 宋红玲. VSP微测井技术在四川盆地的应用效果分析[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2004, 27(2):16-19. Sun Qiaoling, Zhao Hui, Song Hongling. Analysis of Application Effect of VSP Microlog Technique in Sichuan[J]. Natural Gas Exploration & Development, 2004, 27(2):16-19.
[22] 陈吴金, 张志林, 朱勇. 永新地区综合表层调查方法探讨[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2008, 43(增刊2):70-73. Chen Wujin, Zhang Zhilin, Zhu Yong, et al. Discussion on Integrative Near-Surface Survey Method in Yongxin Area[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2008, 43(Sup. 2):70-73.
[23] 张光德, 刘斌, 张志林, 等. 柴达木盆地三湖地区盐岩区表层调查方法研究[J].石油物探, 2013, 52(2):195-200. Zhang Guangde, Liu Bin, Zhang Zhilin, et al. Surface Investigation of Salt Beds in Sanhu Area, Qaidam Basin[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2013, 52(2):195-200.
[24] 葛利华, 姜弢, 徐学纯, 等. 辽西葫芦岛东部表层结构调查及速度建模[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2014, 44(3):1039-1047. Ge Lihua, Jiang Tao, Xu Xuechun, et al.Surface Survey and Velocity Model Building in Eastern Huludao of Western Liaoning Province[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2014, 44(3):1039-1047.
[25] 许敏, 薛林福, 王东坡. 辽西地区中生代火山-沉积盆地群特征及成因机制[J]. 世界地质, 1997, 16(2):35-39. Xu Min, Xue Linfu, Wang Dongpo. The Characteristics and Mechanism of Mesozoic Volcanic-Sedimentary Basin Group of Western Liaoning[J]. Global Geology, 1997, 16(2):35-39.
[26] 王孝. 西部复杂地表条件下静校正方法研究[D]. 成都:成都理工大学, 2011. Wang Xiao. The Study of Static Correction in the Western with Complex Surface Condition[D]. Chengdu:Chengdu University of Techology, 2011.
[27] 李明海. 地面微测井在山地表层结构调查中的应用[J]. 勘探地球物理进展, 2008, 31(5):378-382. Li Minghai. Application of Uphole Methods in the Investigation of near Surface Structure[J]. Progress in Exploration Geophysics, 2008, 31(5):378-382.
[28] 郭全仕. 井间三分量检波器方位估算[J]. 勘探地球物理进展, 2006, 29(5):318-321. Guo Quanshi.Estimation of Crosswell 3-D Component Geophone Orientation[J]. Progress in Exploration Geophysics, 2006, 29(5):318-321.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

辽西葫芦岛东部表层调查方法比对实验

Comparison Experimental Research of Surface Survey Methods in the Eastern Huludao of Western Liaoning Province

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 14

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	安振芳, 张进, 张建中. 海洋三维VC观测系统优化设计[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 271-284.
[2]	贾海青，姜弢，徐学纯，葛利华，杨志超. 辽西深反射地震勘探采集试验[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(4): 1357-1368.
[3]	葛利华，姜弢，徐学纯，贾海青，杨志超. 辽西葫芦岛东部表层结构调查及速度建模[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(3): 1039-1047.
[4]	王志强，韩立国，巩向博，凌云. 起伏地表检波器组合响应[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(2): 694-703.
[5]	秦宁，李振春，杨晓东，张凯，王俊. 共散射点道集与角道集串级优化叠前偏移速度分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(2): 623-631.
[6]	周辉, 谢春临, 王尚旭, 李国发. 复杂地表地震资料叠前深度偏移成像[J]. J4, 2012, 42(1): 262-268.
[7]	王俊秋, 林君, 姜弢, 巩向博, 张林行. 可控震源地震方法在金昌铜镍矿区的应用实验[J]. J4, 2011, 41(5): 1617-1622.
[8]	林红波, 李月, 徐学纯, 马海涛. 减小离散误差的时频峰值滤波算法[J]. J4, 2011, 41(2): 572-578.
[9]	马见青, 李庆春. 面波压制的TT变换法[J]. J4, 2011, 41(2): 565-571.
[10]	石颖, 刘洪, 历玉英. 逆数据域表面多次波压制方法[J]. J4, 2011, 41(1): 271-276.
[11]	聂鹏飞, 曾谦, 马海涛, 李月, 林红波. 消减地震勘探随机噪声：导数算子约束下的维纳滤波[J]. J4, 2010, 40(6): 1471-1478.
[12]	王忠仁, 高健, 耿亮. 基于非周期伪随机序列的可控震源信号调制技术[J]. J4, 2009, 39(6): 1146-1149.
[13]	邓小英，李月. 基于Ricker子波核的支持向量回归方法及其在地震勘探记录去噪处理中的应用[J]. J4, 2007, 37(4): 821-0827.
[14]	王者江，何樵登，田钢，曾昭发，薛建. 工程反射地震非常规方法野外施工的探讨[J]. J4, 2005, 35(06): 796-0800.