吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (1): 192-200.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20200065

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    

地铁施工对济南白泉泉群流量的影响

束龙仓1,2, 王小博1,2, 李虎3, 倪寒茜1,2, 李罡3, 余亚飞1,2, 王鑫3, 张曼琦1,2   

  1. 1. 河海大学水文水资源与水利工程科学国家重点实验室, 南京 210098;
    2. 河海大学水文水资源学院, 南京 210098;
    3. 济南轨道交通集团有限公司, 济南 250014
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-20 发布日期:2021-02-02
  • 作者简介:束龙仓(1964-),男,教授,博士生导师,主要从事地下水资源评价与管理方面的研究,E-mail:lcshu@hhu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41172203,41572210);山东省重大创新科技工程项目(2019JZZY020105)

Impact of Subway Construction on Flow of Baiquan Spring Group in Jinan

Shu Longcang1,2, Wang Xiaobo1,2, Li Hu3, Ni Hanxi1,2, Li Gang3, Yu Yafei1,2, Wang Xin3, Zhang Manqi1,2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China;
    2. College of Hydrology and Water Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China;
    3. Jinan Rail Transit Group Co., Ltd, Jinan 250014, China
  • Received:2020-03-20 Published:2021-02-02
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41172203,41572210) and the Major Innovation and Technology Projects of Shandong Province (2019JZZY020105)

摘要: 为研究地铁建设对济南白泉泉群的影响,在综合分析白泉泉域地质、水文地质条件的基础上,假定研究区岩溶强径流带位置及水力性质,利用FEFLOW软件建立地下水流数值模型。以规划地铁M1号线为研究对象,分析了济南东站、梁王站、梁王东站分别施工及3个站同时施工4种情景下,采用施工降水或施工降水+人工回灌两种施工方式对白泉泉群流量的影响。结果表明:单独采用施工降水的施工方式使得白泉泉群流量衰减,其中3个站同时施工对泉流量的影响最大,泉流量最大衰减达5.48%;各站分别施工时,济南东站对泉流量影响最大,泉流量较未施工时减少了0.043×104 m3/d。采用施工降水+人工回灌的施工方式,能够有效缓解泉流量的衰减,各车站施工时的泉流量衰减由仅施工降水时的2.26%~5.48%降低至0.08%~1.21%。岩溶强径流带有利于地下水形成优势径流,促进白泉泉群补给,一定程度上缓解因地铁施工引起的泉流量衰减。

关键词: 济南白泉泉群, 岩溶强径流带, 数值模型, 施工方式, 泉群流量

Abstract: In order to study the impact of subway construction on the Baiquan spring group (BSG) in Jinan, on the basis of the comprehensive analysis of the geological and hydrogeological conditions of Baiquan spring area, assuming the location and hydraulic properties of the karst water strong run-off belt in the study area, a numerical model of groundwater flow was established using FEFLOW software. Taking the planned subway Line M1 as the research object, the two construction scenarios of pumping and pumping with artificial recharge were analyzed in Jinan East Station, Liangwang Station, and Liangwang East Station. The impact on the flow of BSG in different construction scenarios was analyzed. The results show that the pumping alone of the subway station of Line M1 decreases the flow of the BSG. The simultaneous construction of the three stations has the greatest impact on the spring flow, and the maximum attenuation is 5.48%. When each of the three station is constructed separately, the Jinan East Station has a greatest impact on the spring flow. The spring flow rate is reduced by 0.043×104 m3/d compared to that without construction. Pumping construction with artificial recharge can effectively mitigate spring flow attenuation. The attenuation of spring flow during the construction of different stationsis reduced from 2.26%-5.48% during the construction of pumping alone to 0.08%-1.21% during the construction of pumping with artificial recharge. The strong run-off belts of karst water will form the preferential run-off of groundwater, promote the recharge of BSG, and alleviate the spring flow attenuation caused by subway construction to a certain extent.

Key words: Jinan Baiquan spring group, karst water strong run-off belts, numerical model, construction methods, springs flow

中图分类号: 

  • P641.8
[1] 齐欢, 秦品瑞, 耿付强, 等. GMS在白泉湿地公园地下水数值模拟中的应用[J]. 山东国土资源, 2017, 33(9):55-61. Qi Huan, Qin Pinrui, Geng Fuqiang, et al. Application of GMS in Groundwater Numerical Simulation of Baiquan Wetland Park[J]. Shandong Land and Resources, 2017, 33(9):55-61.
[2] 王茂枚, 束龙仓, 季叶飞, 等. 济南岩溶泉水流量衰减原因分析及动态模拟[J]. 中国岩溶, 2008, 27(1):19-23, 31. Wang Maomei, Shu Longcang, Ji Yefei, et al.Cause of Spring's of Flux Attenuation and Simulation of Spring's Regime:A Case in Jinan Karst Spring Area[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2008, 27(1):19-23, 31.
[3] 韩帅. 济南城市交通问题与对策研究[D]. 济南:山东师范大学, 2013. Han Shuai. Research on Jinan Urban Traffic Problems and Countermeasures[D]. Jinan:Shandong Normal University, 2013.
[4] Gisbert J, Vallejos A, González A, et al. Environment and Hydrogeological Problems in Karstic Terrains Crossed by Tunnels:A Case Study[J]. Environmental Geology, 2009, 58(2):347-357.
[5] Li H, Kagami H. Groundwater Level and Chemistry Changes Resulting from Tunnel Construction Near Matsumoto City, Japan[J]. Environmental Geology, 1997, 31(1/2):76-84.
[6] 陈爱侠, 杨晓婷, 王文科. 城市快速轨道交通建设对地下水环境影响分析:以西安市城市轨道交通二号线为例[J]. 西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 38(2):147-151. Chen Aixia, Yang Xiaoting, Wang Wenke.Analysis on the Influence of City Rail Transit Construction on Groundwater Environment:Taking Xi'an Urban Rail Transit Second Line as an Example[J]. Journal of Northwest University (National Science Edition), 2008, 38(2):147-151
[7] 庞炜, 刘永勤, 戴迎春. 济南轨道交通建设对泉水影响预测及情景分析[J]. 都市快轨交通, 2012, 25(1):104-108. Pang Wei, Liu Yongqin, Dai Yingchun.Prediction and Scenario Analysis of the Influence of Urban Rail Transit Construction on Spring Ecosystem in Jinan City[J]. Urban Rapid Rail Transit, 2012, 25(1):104-108.
[8] 郭红梅. 地下水数值模拟在济南地铁规划中的应用研究[J]. 勘察科学技术, 2012(5):36-41. Guo Hongmei.Application of Groundwater Numerical Simulation on Subway Plan in Ji'nan[J]. Site Investigation Science and Technology, 2012(5):36-41.
[9] 王燕. 济南新火车东站及轨道交通建设对济南白泉泉群的影响分析[J]. 山东国土资源, 2014, 30(8):47-50. Wang Yan.Impact Analysis on New East Railway Station and Rail Traffic Construction to Baiquan Spring Field in Jinan City[J]. Shandong Land and Resources, 2014, 30(8):47-50.
[10] 祁晓凡, 李文鹏, 杨丽芝, 等. 济南白泉泉域地下水位动态对降水响应的年内时滞分析[J]. 地球与环境, 2015, 43(6):619-627. Qi Xiaofan, Li Wenpeng, Yang Lizhi,et al. The Lag Analysis of Groundwater Level Anomaliesto Precipitation Anomaly of Jinan Baiquan Springs Watershed[J]. Earth and Environment, 2015, 43(6):619-627.
[11] 李大秋, 高焰, 王志国, 等. 济南泉域岩溶地下水水质变化分析[J]. 中国岩溶, 2002, 21(3):51-54. Li Daqiu, Gao Yan, Wang Zhiguo, et al.Analysis on the Variations of Groundwater Quality in Jinan Spring Basin[J]. Carsologica Sinica, 2002, 21(3):51-54.
[12] 秦品瑞. 济南岩溶水系统数值模拟与保泉供水开采方案[J]. 水资源保护, 2018, 34(3):30-36, 103. Qin Pinrui. Numerical Simulation of Ji'nan Karst Water System and Groundwater Exploitation Scheme of Keeping Spring Spurting and Water Supply[J]. Water Resources Protection, 2018, 34(3):30-36, 103.
[13] 徐军祥, 邢立亭, 佟光玉, 等. 济南泉域地下水环境演化与保护[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2004(6):69-73. Xu Junxiang, Xing Liting, Tong Guangyu, et al. Groundwater Environment Evolution and Its Conservation in Jinan Spring Catchment[J]. Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology, 2004(6):69-73.
[14] 张蓉蓉, 束龙仓, 闵星, 等.管道流对非均质岩溶含水系统水动力过程影响的模拟[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2012, 42(增刊2):386-392. Zhang Rongrong, Shu Longcang, Min Xing, et al. Significance of Conduit Flow on Dynamic Processes in a Heterogeneous Karst Aquifer[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2012, 42(Sup.2):386-392.
[15] 刘光亚.中国北方的岩溶水强径流带[J].河北地质大学学报,2017, 40(2):15-19. Liu Guangya. Strong Runoff Zone in Karst Water in Northern China[J]. Journal of Hebei GEO University, 2017, 40(2):15-19.
[16] 方向清, 傅耀军, 华解明, 等.北方岩溶地下水系统模式及特征[J].合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版),2011, 34(2):286-291. Fang Xiangqing, Fu Yaojun, Hua Jieming, et al. Modes and Characteristics of Karst Groundwater in North of China[J]. Journal of Hefei University of Technology (Natural Science), 2011, 34(2):286-291.
[17] 邓启军, 李伟, 王雨山, 等.鲁中南泰安纸坊泉域岩溶水强径流带成因及特征[J].南水北调与水利科技,2019, 17(2):182-188, 195. Deng Qijun, Li Wei, Wang Yushan, et al. The Causes and Characteristics of Karst Water Strong Run-off Belts in Tai'an Zhifang Spring Area in Central and Southern Parts of Shandong[J]. South-to-North Water Transfers and Water Science & Technology, 2019, 17(2):182-188, 195.
[1] 付晓刚, 唐仲华, 刘彬涛, 蔺林林, 卜华, 闫佰忠. 基于模拟-优化模型的山东羊庄盆地地下水可开采量研究[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(3): 784-796.
[2] 陈雄, 张岩, 王艺伟, 叶淑君, 吴吉春, 于军, 龚绪龙. 苏北沿海三市三维地下水流数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(5): 1434-1450.
[3] 张庆,张延军,周炳强,黄贤龙,于子望,孙永泉. 天然冷源对地下水源热泵的影响规律[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(2): 537-543.
[4] 骆祖江, 曾峰, 郭华, 吴刚. 地下饮用水水源保护区划分三维渗流与溶质运移耦合数值模型[J]. J4, 2010, 40(6): 1353-1358.
[5] 王恩|束龙仓|刘波. 地下水系统对水资源开发利用方案的时空响应[J]. J4, 2010, 40(3): 617-622.
[6] 王金生,滕彦国,吴东杰. 不流动水与非平衡吸附作用对溶质运移影响的数值模型-MIENESOR[J]. J4, 2007, 37(2): 266-270.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!