吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (2): 526-534.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20200212

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

数值优化方法在确定张力计反应时间上的应用性

林鸿州, 郭怡, 白建帮, 彭建兵   

  1. 长安大学地质工程与测绘学院,西安710054
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-21 出版日期:2022-03-27 发布日期:2022-11-22
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41272283);国家重点基础研究发展计划(“973”计划)项目(2014CB744701)

Use of Numerical Optimization to Determine Response Time of Tensiometer

Lin Hungchou, Guo Yi, Bai Jianbang, Peng Jianbing   

  1. School of Geological Engineering and Surveying, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710054, China
  • Received:2020-09-21 Online:2022-03-27 Published:2022-11-22
  • Supported by:
    the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41272283) and the National Key Basic Research and Development Program (“973” Program)  of China (2014CB744701)

摘要: 张力计的反应时间可用于估算非饱和土的渗透系数,并可作为张力计选型的评判依据。为了更加合理且便捷地确定张力计的反应时间,先通过不同含水量条件下的泾阳黄土、定边黄土以及毛乌素砂土的土柱试验测定张力计的响应曲线,再利用半经验图解法与结合通用全局优化(UGO)算法的数值优化方法来确定反应时间,并探讨了数值优化方法的实用价值及其局限性。研究结果表明,张力计的响应曲线可分为张力计安装扰动段、压力反应滞后段以及稳定平衡段,其中,压力反应滞后段建议采用4次多项式函数拟合,而稳定平衡段则采用线性函数拟合。数值优化计算结果表明,在一般情况下,Levenberg-Marquardt优化法(LM+UGO)、BFGS准牛顿优化法(BFGS+UGO)与共轭梯度优化法(CGM+UGO)的拟合程度高,用时短,但对于数据抖动幅度较大或存在突变型曲线特征等复杂形式的张力计响应曲线,数值优化算法不易获得较理想的结果,此时仍需借由经验判断才能确定合宜的反应时间。

关键词: 反应时间, 基质吸力, 张力计, 非饱和土, 数值优化法

Abstract: The response time of a tensiometer  can be used to estimate the hydraulic properties of unsaturated soils, and it is also a critical parameter to assess the applicability  to the measurement of the transient matric suction. In order to determine the response time of tensiometer more reasonably and efficiently, Jingyang loess, Dingbian loess and Maowusu sand column tests were conducted to investigate the characteristics of time response curve of tensiometer. In addition, the numerical optimization methods based on the universal global optimization (UGO) algorithm were used to evaluate the response time of tensiometer. The results of soil colum tests show that the time response curve of tensiometer for soils can be divided  into three stages: Tensiometer installing stage, delayed response stage (pressure difference response stage), and equilibrium stage. Comparing  the results of the graphical method and the numerical optimization method, it is recommended that the delayed response stage and equilibrium stage  are fitted by a quartic function equation and a linear function equation, respectively. Moreover, the Levenberg-Marquardt optimization method with UGO algorithm (LM+UGO), BFGS quasi-Newton method with UGO algorithm (BFGS+UGO), and conjugate gradient method with UGO algorithm (CGM+UGO) are the appropriate numerical optimization methods to determine the response time of tensiometer in general conditions. 

Key words: response time, matric suction, tensiometer, unsaturated soil, numerical optimization

中图分类号: 

  • P642.2
[1] 刘兰兰, 李鸿儒, 常秋影, 李晓乐, 王洪宇, 赵传海. 非饱和土增湿变形的实用计算方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(6): 1790-1798.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 程立人,张予杰,张以春. 西藏申扎地区奥陶纪鹦鹉螺化石[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 273 -0282 .
[2] 李 秉 成. 陕西富平全新世古气候的初步研究[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 291 -0295 .
[3] 和钟铧,杨德明,王天武,郑常青. 冈底斯带巴嘎区二云母花岗岩SHRIMP锆石U-Pb定年[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 302 -0307 .
[4] 纪宏金,孙丰月,陈满,胡大千,时艳香,潘向清. 胶东地区裸露含金构造的地球化学评价[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 308 -0312 .
[5] 初凤友,孙国胜,李晓敏,马维林,赵宏樵. 中太平洋海山富钴结壳生长习性及控制因素[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 320 -0325 .
[6] 李斌,孟自芳,李相博,卢红选,郑民. 泌阳凹陷下第三系构造特征与沉积体系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 332 -0339 .
[7] 李涛, 吴胜军,蔡述明,薛怀平,YASUNORI Nakayama. 涨渡湖通江前后调蓄能力模拟分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 351 -0355 .
[8] 旷理雄,郭建华,梅廉夫,童小兰,杨丽. 从油气勘探的角度论博格达山的隆升[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 346 -0350 .
[9] 章光新,邓伟,何岩,RAMSIS Salama. 水文响应单元法在盐渍化风险评价中的应用[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 356 -0360 .
[10] 王谦,吴志芳, 张汉泉,莫修文. 随机分形在刻划储层非均质特性中的应用[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 340 -0345 .