吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2023, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (4): 1175-1184.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20210403

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于多因素-多尺度分析的阶跃型滑坡位移预测

熊超,孙红月   

  1. 浙江大学海洋学院,浙江 舟山 316021
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-08 出版日期:2023-07-26 发布日期:2023-08-10
  • 通讯作者: 孙红月(1970—),女,教授,博士生导师,主要从事地质灾害防治方面的研究,E-mail: shy@zju.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:熊超(1997—),男,硕士研究生,主要从事地质灾害防治方面的研究,E-mail: 21934118@zju.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41772276)

Step-Like Landslide Displacement Prediction Based on Multi-Factor and Multi-Scale Analysis

Xiong Chao, Sun Hongyue   

  1. Ocean College, Zhejiang University, Zhoushan 316021, Zhejiang, China
  • Received:2021-12-08 Online:2023-07-26 Published:2023-08-10
  • Supported by:
    the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41772276)

摘要: 为了定量分析阶跃型滑坡位移与诱发因素之间的时滞效应,提高位移预测精度,本文提出新的预测模型并进行对比分析。首先基于时间序列分析将滑坡累计位移分离为趋势项和周期项;然后采用最大信息系数(Cmi)、多元经验模态分解(MEMD)方法进行多因素分析和多尺度分析,构建出多因素-多尺度MEMD预测模型;最后以三峡库区八字门滑坡为例,通过Cmi选取最优滞后期的诱发因素作为模型输入,在用MEMD方法分解多元序列的基础上建立时间多尺度模型,并与单因素-单尺度模型、多因素-单尺度模型及单因素-多尺度EMD(经验模态分解)模型进行对比。结果表明:八字门滑坡降雨和库水位的最优滞后期分别为2 d和4 d;滑坡多元序列经MEMD方法分解后得到3组模态函数,每组均有7个分量,各对应分量的时间尺度一致,其中周期项位移受诱发因素的响应具有时间多尺度特性;多因素-多尺度MEMD预测模型的均方根误差相较于以上3种对比模型分别平均降低49.4%、36.9%和27.4%,平均绝对百分比误差分别平均降低38.0%、26.4%和15.8%。

关键词: 阶跃型滑坡, 位移预测, 多因素分析, 多尺度分析, 最大信息系数, 多元经验模态分解, 三峡库区

Abstract: In order to quantitatively analyze the time-lag effect between displacement and inducing factors of step-like landslide, as well as to improve the accuracy of displacement prediction, in this study, the authors proposed a new prediction model and conducted comparative analysis. First, the cumulative displacement was separated into trend term and periodic term based on time series analysis. Then, using maximum information coefficient (Cmi) and multivariate empirical mode decomposition (MEMD) for multi-factor analysis and multi-scale analysis, the multi-factor and multi-scale MEMD prediction model was constructed. Finally, taking  Bazimen landslide in  Three Gorges Reservoir area as an example, the optimal lag period inducing factors were selected as the model input through Cmi, and multi-scale prediction model was established based on the decomposition of multivariate sequence by MEMD. The proposed model was compared with other models (single-factor and single-scale model, multi-factor and single-scale model, single-factor and multi-scale EMD model). The results showed that the optimal lag periods of rainfall and reservoir water level in  Bazimen landslide were 2 d and 4 d. After decomposing the landslide multivariate sequence by MEMD, three groups of mode functions were obtained, each group had seven components, and the time-scale of each corresponding component was consistent. The response of the periodic term displacement to the inducing factors had a time multi-scale characteristic. Compared with the comparison model, the root mean square error of the multi-factor and multi-scale MEMD prediction model decreased by 49.4%, 36.9% and 27.4% on average, and the mean absolute percentage error decreased by 38.0%, 26.4% and 15.8% on average.

Key words: step-like landslide, displacement prediction, multi-factor analysis, multi-scale analysis, maximum information coefficient, multivariate empirical mode decomposition, Three Gorges Reservoir area

中图分类号: 

  • P642.22
[1] 安百州, 曾昭发, 闫照涛, 张代磊, 于朝阳, 赵勇, 杜亚男. 鄂尔多斯盆地西缘热储构造模式及地热资源分布特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(4): 1286-.
[2] 王孔伟, 路永强, 聂进, 滕明明, 王宵亮. 三峡库区仙女山和九畹溪断裂带水库地震变化规律[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(2): 624-637.
[3] 林松, 王薇, 邓小虎, 查雁鸿, 周红伟, 程邈. 三峡库区典型滑坡地质与地球物理电性特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(1): 273-284.
[4] 王孔伟, 张帆, 邱殿明. 三峡库区黄陵背斜形成机理及与滑坡群关系[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(4): 1142-1154.
[5] 韩舸,龚威,吴婷,赵艳南. 利用粗糙集的滑坡分阶段位移预测方法--以白家包滑坡为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(3): 925-931.
[6] 彭令,牛瑞卿,赵艳南,邓清禄. 区域滑坡灾害风险评估--以长江三峡库区秭归县为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(3): 891-901.
[7] 王孔伟,赵小明, 邓成进,张帆. 三峡库区作辑托背斜和巴东断裂与滑坡类型的关系[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(1): 169-177.
[8] 牛瑞卿, 彭令, 叶润青, 武雪玲. 基于粗糙集的支持向量机滑坡易发性评价[J]. J4, 2012, 42(2): 430-439.
[9] 叶润青, 牛瑞卿, 邓清禄, 张良培, 赵艳南, 吴婷, 江齐英. 基于多源数据三维可视化集成的高切坡解译[J]. J4, 2012, 42(1): 161-168.
[10] 张加桂. 三峡库区巫山县城秀峰寺-大块子古滑坡特征及形成过程[J]. J4, 2008, 38(3): 448-0454.
[11] 李伟忠,吴冲龙,谭照华. 面向勘察与管理的三峡库区地灾勘察点源信息系统[J]. J4, 2006, 36(03): 424-428.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 程立人,张予杰,张以春. 西藏申扎地区奥陶纪鹦鹉螺化石[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 273 -0282 .
[2] 李 秉 成. 陕西富平全新世古气候的初步研究[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 291 -0295 .
[3] 和钟铧,杨德明,王天武,郑常青. 冈底斯带巴嘎区二云母花岗岩SHRIMP锆石U-Pb定年[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 302 -0307 .
[4] 陈 力,佴 磊,王秀范,李 金. 绥中某电力设备站场区地震危险性分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 641 -645 .
[5] 纪宏金,孙丰月,陈满,胡大千,时艳香,潘向清. 胶东地区裸露含金构造的地球化学评价[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 308 -0312 .
[6] 初凤友,孙国胜,李晓敏,马维林,赵宏樵. 中太平洋海山富钴结壳生长习性及控制因素[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 320 -0325 .
[7] 李斌,孟自芳,李相博,卢红选,郑民. 泌阳凹陷下第三系构造特征与沉积体系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 332 -0339 .
[8] 李涛, 吴胜军,蔡述明,薛怀平,YASUNORI Nakayama. 涨渡湖通江前后调蓄能力模拟分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 351 -0355 .
[9] 旷理雄,郭建华,梅廉夫,童小兰,杨丽. 从油气勘探的角度论博格达山的隆升[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 346 -0350 .
[10] 章光新,邓伟,何岩,RAMSIS Salama. 水文响应单元法在盐渍化风险评价中的应用[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 356 -0360 .