吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (4): 1081-1094.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20220343

• 地质与资源 •    下一篇

南沙海槽—西北巴拉望构造特征及其意义

李学杰,汪俊,王哲,姚永坚,祝嵩   

  1. 中国地质调查局广州海洋地质调查局/自然资源部海底矿产资源重点实验室,广州 511400
  • 收稿日期:2023-12-15 出版日期:2024-07-26 发布日期:2024-07-26
  • 作者简介:李学杰(1964—),男,教授级高工,博士,主要从事海洋基础地质调查与研究工作,E-mail: xuejieli@yeah.net
  • 基金资助:
    中国地质调查局项目(DD20160138,GZH201300502,DD20190378);南方海洋科学与工程广东省实验室(广州)人才团队引进重大专项(GML2019ZD0207)

Tectonic Characteristics of Nansha Trough-Northwest Palawan and Its Significance

Li Xuejie,Wang Jun,Wang Zhe,Yao Yongjian,Zhu Song   

  1. Guangzhou Marine Geological Survey/Key Laboratory of Marine Mineral Resources, MNR,Guangzhou 511400, China
  • Received:2023-12-15 Online:2024-07-26 Published:2024-07-26
  • Supported by:
    the Project of China Geological Survey (DD20160138,GZH201300502,DD20190378) and the Key Special Project for Introduced Talents Team of Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou) (GML2019ZD0207)

摘要: 南沙海槽-西北巴拉望构造对认识南海成因与演化至关重要。综合南海南缘地质地球物理资料分析认为:南沙海槽极薄地壳可能不是古南海的残余,是夭折的扩张中心;南沙海槽存在挤压逆冲作用,形成时间很晚,与南海扩张无关,是南海形成后挤压的结果。南沙海槽挤压作用与西北巴拉望Pagasa楔变形对比表明,南海南缘的挤压作用停止时间东部早于西部;中、南巴拉望蛇绿岩来自其南部往北逆冲的产物,可能表明古南海由南往北俯冲。综上认为南巴拉望蛇绿岩可能来自新特提斯洋壳,中巴拉望蛇绿岩来自古南海洋壳;不同时期洋壳俯冲残余最终被逆冲至岛弧系之上;巴拉望蛇绿岩是长期由南往北逆冲的结果,最后就位时间可能是中晚中新世。

关键词: 南海南缘, 南沙海槽逆冲构造, 古南海, 巴拉望蛇绿岩

Abstract: The tectonics of the Nansha trough-Northwest Palawan is important for understanding the origin and evolution of the South China Sea (SCS). Based on the analysis of geological and geophysical data in the southern margin of SCS, we suggest that the very thin crust of the Nansha trough may not be the remnant of the Proto South China Sea (PSCS), but may be an abandoned spreading center. As a result of a compressional event after the formation of the SCS, the thrusting structures developed very late on the Nansha trough and were not related to the opening of the SCS. The comparison between the extrusion of the Nansha trough and the Pagasa wedge in Northwest Palawan shows that the time of compressional termination in the east is earlier than in the west in the southern margin of the SCS. The ophiolite in South and Central Palawan was the product of its southern northward thrusting, indicating that the PSCS may subduct from south to north. It is suggested that the Southern Palawan ophiolite may derive from the oceanic crust of Neo-Tethys and the Central Palawan ophiolite may come from the PSCS. The subducted remnants of oceanic crust in different periods were finally overthrusted onto the island arc system. The Palawan ophiolite is the result of a long-term thrusting from south to north, and the time of the final emplacement may be the Middle-Late Miocene.

Key words: Southern margin of South China Sea, Nansha trough thrust structure, Proto South China Sea, Palawan ophiolite

中图分类号: 

  • P548
[1] 鲁宝亮,王璞珺,梁建设,孙晓猛,王万银. 古南海构造属性及其与特提斯和古太平洋构造域的关系[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(5): 1441-1450.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 程立人,张予杰,张以春. 西藏申扎地区奥陶纪鹦鹉螺化石[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 273 -0282 .
[2] 李 秉 成. 陕西富平全新世古气候的初步研究[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 291 -0295 .
[3] 和钟铧,杨德明,王天武,郑常青. 冈底斯带巴嘎区二云母花岗岩SHRIMP锆石U-Pb定年[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 302 -0307 .
[4] 纪宏金,孙丰月,陈满,胡大千,时艳香,潘向清. 胶东地区裸露含金构造的地球化学评价[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 308 -0312 .
[5] 初凤友,孙国胜,李晓敏,马维林,赵宏樵. 中太平洋海山富钴结壳生长习性及控制因素[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 320 -0325 .
[6] 李斌,孟自芳,李相博,卢红选,郑民. 泌阳凹陷下第三系构造特征与沉积体系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 332 -0339 .
[7] 李涛, 吴胜军,蔡述明,薛怀平,YASUNORI Nakayama. 涨渡湖通江前后调蓄能力模拟分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 351 -0355 .
[8] 旷理雄,郭建华,梅廉夫,童小兰,杨丽. 从油气勘探的角度论博格达山的隆升[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 346 -0350 .
[9] 章光新,邓伟,何岩,RAMSIS Salama. 水文响应单元法在盐渍化风险评价中的应用[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 356 -0360 .
[10] 王谦,吴志芳, 张汉泉,莫修文. 随机分形在刻划储层非均质特性中的应用[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 340 -0345 .