吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (1): 298-311.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20230190

• 地球探测与信息技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于LDA协同SSOM算法的低渗透砂岩孔隙结构评价

王亚,刘宗宾,马奎前,路研,刘超   

  1. 中海石油(中国)有限公司天津分公司,天津 300452
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-07 出版日期:2025-01-26 发布日期:2025-02-07
  • 作者简介:王亚(1994—),男,高级工程师,博士,主要从事海上油气田开发与油藏描述工作,E-mail:wangya5@cnooc.com.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技重大专项(2016ZX05058001)

Pore Structure Evaluation of Low-Permeability Sandstones Based on LDA Assisted SSOM Algorithm

Wang Ya, Liu Zongbin, Ma Kuiqian, Lu Yan, Liu Chao   

  1. Tianjin Branch, CNOOC China Limited, Tianjin 300452, China
  • Received:2024-01-07 Online:2025-01-26 Published:2025-02-07
  • Supported by:
    the National Science and Technology Major Project  of China (2016ZX05058001)

摘要: 孔隙结构决定了储层的储集特征和渗流能力,控制了油田的初期产能乃至开发中后期的剩余油分布,然而目前孔隙结构的表征尺度多停留在岩心尺度。为了实现孔隙结构的升尺度表征,基于由高压压汞、核磁共振以及常规物性分析实验获取的孔隙和喉道大小、流体可动性和物性参数划分岩心孔隙结构类型,作为学习监督样本;利用线性判别分析(linear discriminants analysis, LDA)算法挖掘对孔隙结构特征敏感的测井曲线,与有监督自组织映射(supervised self-organizing map, SSOM)算法协同建立了孔隙结构非线性测井预测模型,对渤海湾盆地J油田沙四段低渗透砂岩的孔隙结构进行评价。结果表明,研究区发育6类孔隙结构类型:Ⅰ类孔隙结构中微裂缝发育,具有低孔相对高渗的特征;Ⅱ类孔隙结构主要发育在细砂岩中,由残余粒间孔隙和次生溶孔组成;Ⅲ类孔隙结构主要由次生溶孔和少量残余粒间孔隙组成,在粉砂岩中常见;Ⅳ类孔隙结构主要由次生溶孔组成,常见孔隙充填式碳酸盐胶结物;Ⅴ类孔隙结构以强碳酸盐胶结为特征,孔隙系统被微孔喉主导;Ⅵ类孔隙结构中泥质杂基体积分数高,常出现相对高孔低渗现象。LDA-SSOM预测模型总体正确率达86.20%,且盲测正确率(82.67%)相比LDA-BP(back propagation)(77.00%)、LDA(65.67%)、SSOM(73.33%)预测模型更高,能够达到孔隙结构研究尺度升级的目标。

关键词: 低渗透砂岩, 孔隙结构评价, 线性判别分析, 有监督自组织映射

Abstract: The pore structure determines the storage and seepage capacity of the reservoir, and controls the initial production capacity of the oilfield and even the distribution of the remaining oil in the middle and late stages of development. However, at present, the characterization of the pore structure mostly stays in the core scale. To up-scale characterization of pore structure, pore structure types of cores are divided based on pore and throat size, fluid mobility and physical property parameters obtained from high-pressure mercury intrusion, nuclear magnetic resonance, and conventional physical property analysis experiments, and are used as learning supervised samples. LDA (linear discriminant analysis) algorithm is used to excavate log curves sensitive to pore structure features, and a nonlinear log prediction model is established in collaboration with SSOM (supervised self-organizing map) algorithm to evaluate pore structure of  low-permeability sandstones  in the fourth member of J oilfield in Bohai Bay basin. The results show that there are six types of pore structures developed, among which, microfractures are developed in the type Ⅰ pore structure, which is characterized by low porosity and relative high permeability. The type Ⅱ pore structure is mainly developed in fine sandstone and consists of residual intergranular pores and secondary dissolved pores. The type Ⅲ pore structure is mainly composed of secondary dissolution pores and a few residual intergranular pores, which are common in siltstone. The type Ⅳ pore structure is mainly composed of secondary dissolved pores, and pore-filled carbonate cements are commonly observed. The type Ⅴ pore structure is characterized by extensive carbonate cementation, and the pore system is dominated by micropore throats. The volume fraction of argillaceous matrix in type Ⅵ pore structure is high, and the phenomenon of relatively high porosity and low permeability often occurs. The overall accuracy rate of the LDA-SSOM prediction model attains 86.20%. In terms of the accuracy rate in blind tests, which stands at 82.67%, it outperforms prediction models like LDA-BP (back propagation) (77.00%), LDA (65.67%), and SSOM (73.33%). Moreover, it is capable of fulfilling the objective of escalating the research scale regarding pore structure.

Key words: low-permeability sandstones, pore structure evaluation, linear discriminants analysis, supervised self-organizing map

中图分类号: 

  • TE122
[1] 张熠, 刘萍, 周翔. 松辽盆地王府地区泉四段常规、非常规油气有序分布及成藏主控因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 46-56.
[2] 刘宗宾, 李超, 路研, 王亚, 黄建廷. 基于孔隙结构表征的低渗透砂岩流体赋存特征及渗透率评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1124-1136.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 程立人,张予杰,张以春. 西藏申扎地区奥陶纪鹦鹉螺化石[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 273 -0282 .
[2] 李 秉 成. 陕西富平全新世古气候的初步研究[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 291 -0295 .
[3] 和钟铧,杨德明,王天武,郑常青. 冈底斯带巴嘎区二云母花岗岩SHRIMP锆石U-Pb定年[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 302 -0307 .
[4] 陈 力,佴 磊,王秀范,李 金. 绥中某电力设备站场区地震危险性分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 641 -645 .
[5] 纪宏金,孙丰月,陈满,胡大千,时艳香,潘向清. 胶东地区裸露含金构造的地球化学评价[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 308 -0312 .
[6] 初凤友,孙国胜,李晓敏,马维林,赵宏樵. 中太平洋海山富钴结壳生长习性及控制因素[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 320 -0325 .
[7] 李斌,孟自芳,李相博,卢红选,郑民. 泌阳凹陷下第三系构造特征与沉积体系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 332 -0339 .
[8] 李涛, 吴胜军,蔡述明,薛怀平,YASUNORI Nakayama. 涨渡湖通江前后调蓄能力模拟分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 351 -0355 .
[9] 旷理雄,郭建华,梅廉夫,童小兰,杨丽. 从油气勘探的角度论博格达山的隆升[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 346 -0350 .
[10] 章光新,邓伟,何岩,RAMSIS Salama. 水文响应单元法在盐渍化风险评价中的应用[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 356 -0360 .