黏性土,多元线性回归,模型诊断,模型评价,交互效应," /> 黏性土,多元线性回归,模型诊断,模型评价,交互效应,"/> cohesive soil, multiple linear regression, model diagnostics, model evaluation, interaction effect,"/> <p class="pf0"> <span class="cf0">基于多元线性回归的黏性土物理力学参数相关性:</span>以长春市中心城区为例

吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (4): 1225-1239.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20230321

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于多元线性回归的黏性土物理力学参数相关性:以长春市中心城区为例

宋腾蛟1, 2, 刘英1, 王琰1, 张淼1   

  1. 1. 吉林建筑大学测绘与勘查工程学院,长春 130118

    2. 深部岩土力学与地下工程国家重点实验室(中国矿业大学),江苏 徐州 221116

  • 收稿日期:2023-11-19 出版日期:2025-07-26 发布日期:2025-08-05
  • 作者简介:宋腾蛟(1988—),男,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事岩土力学与工程地质方面的研究,E-mail: songtengjiao@jlju.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    吉林省科技发展计划项目(YDZJ202501ZYTS563);吉林省教育厅科学研究项目(JJKH20190874KJ);国家自然科学基金项目(42002263)

Correlation of Physical and Mechanical Parameters of Cohesive Soil Based on Multiple Linear Regression: Taking Central Urban Area of Changchun City as an Example

Song Tengjiao1, 2, Liu Ying1, Wang Yan1, Zhang Miao1   

  1. 1. School of Geomatics and Prospecting Engineering, Jilin Jianzhu University, Changchun 130118, China

    2. State Key Laboratory for GeoMechanics and Deep Underground Engineering (China University of Mining and Technology), Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, China

  • Received:2023-11-19 Online:2025-07-26 Published:2025-08-05
  • Supported by:

    the Science and Technology Development Plan Project of Jilin Province (YDZJ202501ZYTS563),the Scientific Research Project of Jilin Provincial Education Department (JJKH20190874KJ) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42002263)

摘要:

为提高建设项目工程地质勘察的经济效益,准确揭示黏性土物理力学参数之间的相关关系,以长春市中心城区黏性土为研究对象,基于收集的1 092个黏性土样本的常规物理试验、压缩试验和直剪试验等数据,构建了两个多元回归模型,重点分析了模型前提假设的合理性及解释变量间的交互效应。结果表明:1)残差概率密度图和残差正态Q-Q(quantile-quantile)图证实模型误差项服从正态分布;方差齐性且误差相互独立,满足多元回归模型的基本假设。2)双因素交互效应图和Johnson-Neyman图显示含水量、密度、孔隙比、液性指数之间交互效应明显,考虑交互作用的回归模型能更准确地预测压缩系数。利用多元线性回归方法分析黏性土物理力学参数相关关系具有可行性。

关键词: 黏性土')">黏性土, 多元线性回归, 模型诊断, 模型评价, 交互效应

Abstract:

To enhance the economic efficiency of engineering geological investigations for construction projects and accurately reveal the correlations between the physical and mechanical parameters of cohesive soils, in this study taking the cohesive soils in central urban area of Changchun as the research object, based on the data from 1 092 physical tests, compression tests and direct shear tests, two multiple regression models were constructed to emphatically analyze the rationality of the model’s premise assumptions and the interaction effects among explanatory variables. The results show that: 1) The residual probability density plot and residual normal Q-Q (quantile-quantile) plot confirm that the model error terms follow a normal distribution, with homogeneous and mutually independent variances, satisfying the basic assumptions of the multiple regression model. 2) The two-factor interaction effect plots and Johnson-Neyman plots indicate significant interaction effects among water content, density, void ratio and liquidity index. A regression model considering interaction effects can more accurately predict the compression coefficient. It is feasible to use multiple linear regression to analyze the correlations between physical and mechanical parameters of cohesive soils.

Key words: cohesive soil')">cohesive soil, multiple linear regression, model diagnostics, model evaluation, interaction effect

中图分类号: 

  • TU42
[1] 张军华, 刘震, 李琴, 任雄风, 赵杰. 东营凹陷红层地球物理特征分析及有利储层预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(4): 1256-1267.
[2] 嵇艳鞠,冯雪,于明媚,徐江,呼彦朴,关珊珊. 基于多元线性回归的HTEM三维异常体电导率-深度识别[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(5): 1687-1694.
[3] 薛群威,刘艳辉,唐灿. 突发地质灾害气象预警统计模型与应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(5): 1614-1622.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 程立人,张予杰,张以春. 西藏申扎地区奥陶纪鹦鹉螺化石[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 273 -0282 .
[2] 李 秉 成. 陕西富平全新世古气候的初步研究[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 291 -0295 .
[3] 和钟铧,杨德明,王天武,郑常青. 冈底斯带巴嘎区二云母花岗岩SHRIMP锆石U-Pb定年[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 302 -0307 .
[4] 陈 力,佴 磊,王秀范,李 金. 绥中某电力设备站场区地震危险性分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 641 -645 .
[5] 纪宏金,孙丰月,陈满,胡大千,时艳香,潘向清. 胶东地区裸露含金构造的地球化学评价[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 308 -0312 .
[6] 初凤友,孙国胜,李晓敏,马维林,赵宏樵. 中太平洋海山富钴结壳生长习性及控制因素[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 320 -0325 .
[7] 李斌,孟自芳,李相博,卢红选,郑民. 泌阳凹陷下第三系构造特征与沉积体系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 332 -0339 .
[8] 李涛, 吴胜军,蔡述明,薛怀平,YASUNORI Nakayama. 涨渡湖通江前后调蓄能力模拟分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 351 -0355 .
[9] 旷理雄,郭建华,梅廉夫,童小兰,杨丽. 从油气勘探的角度论博格达山的隆升[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 346 -0350 .
[10] 章光新,邓伟,何岩,RAMSIS Salama. 水文响应单元法在盐渍化风险评价中的应用[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 356 -0360 .