J4

• 水文·工程·环境 • 上一篇    下一篇

黄河下游断流对沿岸地下水形成与开发的影响

曹剑峰1,王凯军1,2,姜纪沂1,冶雪艳1   

  1. 1.吉林大学 环境与资源学院,长春 130026;2.吉林省水文水资源局,长春 130022
  • 收稿日期:2006-11-19 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-09-26 发布日期:2007-09-26
  • 通讯作者: 曹剑峰

Impact of Lower Yellow River Flow Cutoff on the Formation and Exploitation of Groundwater in Alongside Areas

CAO Jian-feng1, WANG Kai-jun1,2, JIANG Ji-yi1, YE Xue-yan1   

  1. 1.College of Environment and Resources,Jilin University,Changchun 130026,China;
  • Received:2006-11-19 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2007-09-26 Published:2007-09-26
  • Contact: CAO Jian-feng

摘要: 黄河下游河段断流对沿黄地区生态环境影响严重。以1999年为基准年,利用黄河下游侧渗补给影响带地下水系统模拟模型研究了黄河断流对黄河侧渗量及地下水循环的影响。花园口-河口断流300d,黄河侧渗量减少53.8%。夹河滩-河口全年断流,黄河侧渗量减少75.2%;断流300d,黄河侧渗量减少46.3%。泺口-河口全年断流,黄河侧渗量减少25.1%;断流300d,黄河侧渗量减少19.8%。利津-河口全年断流,黄河侧渗量减少4.7%。断流对黄河侧渗补给影响带地下水流场的形态影响较小,浅层地下水系统边界的水力性质没有改变。断流对黄河下游傍河水源地开采动态水位影响较大,但宏观上对侧渗补给影响带地下水资源不会产生较大影响。

关键词: 黄河断流, 黄河侧渗量, 地下水循环

Abstract: The frequent flow cutoff has serious effect on eco-environment of the region along the lower Yellow River. The authors studies the impact on lateral seepage quantity and groundwater cycling caused by flow cutoff of Yellow River and compares it with that of the year 1999 through the numerical simulation model of groundwater flow system of affected zone. The lateral seepage quantity will decrease 53.8% on condition that the flow cutoff stage from Huayuankou to river entrance and breaking time is 300 days. The lateral seepage quantity will decrease 46.3% if flow cutoff from Jiahetan to river entrance and breaking time were 300 days,and it will decrease 75.2% if flow cutoff occurs throughout the year. The lateral seepage quantity will decrease 19.8% if flow cutoff from Luokou to river entrance and brea king time were 300 days,and it will decrease 25.1% if flow cutoff throughout the year. The lateral see page quantity will decrease 4.7% if flow cutoff from Lijin to river entrance and flow cutoff throughout the year. Flow cutoff of Yellow River has minor effect on shape of groundwater flow domain of affected zone,so the boundary feather of shallow groundwater system will not change. Though flow cutoff has major influence on the riverside source fields in the lower Yellow River,yet it won’t has great effect on groundwater resources in the affected zone of Yellow River.

Key words: flow cutoff of Yellow River, lateral seepage quantity of Yellow River, groundwater cycling

中图分类号: 

  • P641.8
[1] 束龙仓, 李姝蕾, 王松, 克热木·阿布都米吉提, 鲁程鹏, 李砚阁, 李伟. 岩溶水源地安全供水的风险评价指标筛选——以娘子关泉水源地为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 805-814.
[2] 危润初, 肖长来, 方樟. 黑龙江建三江地区地下水动态趋势突变点分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(1): 202-210.
[3] 苏小四,杜守营,杜尚海,宋宪宗,邵广凯,王璜. 基于随机模拟的浑河冲洪积扇地区地下水压采风险预报[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(3): 986-994.
[4] 谷洪彪,迟宝明,姜纪沂. 灾害学定义之下的土壤盐碱化风险评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(5): 1623-1629.
[5] 罗建男,卢文喜,康柱,宋晶,张一博. 表面活性剂强化含水层修复过程的全局灵敏度[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(2): 558-0563.
[6] 江思珉,王佩,施小清,郑茂辉. 地下水污染源反演的HookeJeeves吸引扩散粒子群混合算法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2012, 42(6): 1866-1872.
[7] 刘佩贵, 陶月赞. 均衡法评价地下水可开采量的风险率[J]. J4, 2012, 42(4): 1125-1129.
[8] 李发文, 冯平, 张超. 天津北三河地区垂向耦合产流模型及应用[J]. J4, 2011, 41(2): 459-464.
[9] 温忠辉, 任化准, 束龙仓, 王恩, 柯婷婷, 陈荣波. 岩溶地下河日流量预测的小样本非线性时间序列模型[J]. J4, 2011, 41(2): 455-458.
[10] 卢文喜, 罗建男, 鲍新华. 贝叶斯网络在水资源管理中的应用[J]. J4, 2011, 41(1): 153-158.
[11] 王文科, 杨泽元, 程东会, 王文明, 杨红斌. 面向生态的干旱半干旱地区区域地下水资源评价的方法体系[J]. J4, 2011, 41(1): 159-167.
[12] 孙晓猛|杜继宇|单玄龙|程日辉|王英德|许强伟|田景雄. 龙门山冲断带北段前山带构造分带性及山前带变形特征[J]. J4, 2010, 40(6): 1323-1332.
[13] 杜尙海, 苏小四, 吕航. 不同降水丰枯遭遇条件下滹沱河地下水库人工补给效果[J]. J4, 2010, 40(5): 1090-1097.
[14] 方樟, 肖长来, 姚淑荣, 马喆, 许斌, 任妍儒. 黑龙江宝清露天煤矿首采区多层含水层地下水数值模拟[J]. J4, 2010, 40(3): 610-616.
[15] 王恩|束龙仓|刘波. 地下水系统对水资源开发利用方案的时空响应[J]. J4, 2010, 40(3): 617-622.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!