吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2): 554-563.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201702204

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

吉林西部大安灌区土壤贮水能力空间变异特征及土壤水分有效性

卞建民1, 刘彩虹2,3, 杨晓舟1   

  1. 1. 吉林大学地下水资源与环境教育部重点实验室/吉林大学环境与资源学院, 长春 130021;
    2. 山东省水利科学研究院, 济南 250013;
    3. 山东省水资源与水环境重点实验室, 济南 250013
  • 收稿日期:2016-06-22 出版日期:2017-03-26 发布日期:2017-03-26
  • 通讯作者: 刘彩虹(1987),女,博士,主要从事水环境与水生态方面的研究,E-mail:caihongliu1988@sina.com E-mail:caihongliu1988@sina.com
  • 作者简介:卞建民(1968),女,教授,博士,主要从事水环境与水生态方面的研究,E-mail:bianjianmin@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目（41072255）；吉林省自然科学基金项目（20150101116JC）

Spatial Distribution of Soil Water Storage Capacity and Soil Water Availability in West Jilin Province

Bian Jianmin1, Liu Caihong2,3, Yang Xiaozhou1   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment of the Ministry of Education/College of Environment and Resources, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China;
    2. Water Resources Research Institute of Shandong Province, Jinan 250013, China;
    3. Shandong Province Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Environment, Jinan 250013, China
  • Received:2016-06-22 Online:2017-03-26 Published:2017-03-26
  • Supported by:
    Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (41072255) and Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province(20150101116JC)

PDF (PC)

419

摘要： 为研究吉林西部土壤贮水能力的空间分布特征和水分有效性，以吉林西部大安灌区为研究对象，通过试验测定土壤贮水量及根系区土壤的水分特征曲线，并利用van Genuchten模型进行水分特征曲线拟合，结合经典统计和地统计分析方法分析土壤贮水量空间变异特征。结果表明：盐碱土和非盐碱土吸持贮水量、滞留贮水量和饱和贮水量的均值之间不存在显著性差异（P>0.05），实际贮水量均值存在显著差异（P<0.05）；土壤实际贮水量呈现由西向东、由北向南逐渐升高的变化趋势，且南北方向的空间变异性均高于东西方向的空间变异性；轻度盐碱地、水田和旱田实际有效含水量分别占其最大有效含水量的78.94%、58.28%和56.62%，水分有效性较高，蔬菜地、高粱地、草甸土以及中度和重度盐碱土实际有效含水量占其最大有效含水量的20.83%~27.13%，土壤水分有效性较小；水田、轻度和中度盐碱地的贮水和持水能力强，旱田和蔬菜地土壤贮水能力较强，持水能力中等，而重度盐碱地、高粱地、草甸土等土壤的持贮水能力较弱。研究结果对旱改水工程水资源管理和预防次生盐渍化有重要意义。

关键词: 土壤贮水能力, 土壤水分特征曲线, 水分有效性, 大安灌区

Abstract: Analyses of spatial distribution of soil water storage capacity (SWSC) and soil water availability is of great significance for water resources management. Through samples collection in Daan irrigation district, the SWSC were tested and then the spatial variation characteristics were analyzed with classical statistics and geostatistics. The soil water characteristic curves were measured and fitted with the van Genuchten model. Results showed that:There was no significant difference for mean values of the holding SWSC, retained SWSC and saturated SWSC between saline-alkali soil and non-saline-alkali soil, while for mean values of actual SWSC, there was significant difference; The actual SWSC increased from west to east and from north to south;It had larger water availability for light saline-alkali soil, rice land soil and dry land soil with the actual effective water contents were 78.94%, 58.28% and 56.62% of their maximum effective water contents, while the water availability of vegetable soil, sorghum soil, grassland soil and medium-severe saline-alkali soil was less than rice land soil and dry land soil. Therefore, the SWSC and water retention capacity of the rice land soil and light and medium saline-alkali soils were the strongest, and then were the dry land soil and vegetable land soil, the SWSC of the severe saline-alkali soil and sorghum soil and grassland soil were the weakest. The light and medium saline-alkali soils were suitable to be transformed to rice land. The research results were great significance for prevention of soil secondly salinization and harmonizing agricultural water use in Daan irrigation district in west Jilin Province.

Key words: soil water storage capacity (SWSC), soil water characteristic curve, soil water availability, Daan irrigation district

中图分类号: 

  • S152.7
[1] Federer C A, Vorosmarty C, Fekete B. Sensitivity of Annual Evaporation to Soil and Root Properties in Two Models of Contrasting Complexity[J]. J Hydrometeorol, 2003, 4:1276-1290.
[2] Tetegan M, Richer de Forges A C, Verbeque B, et al. The Effect of Soil Stoniness on the Estimation of Water Retention Properties of Soils:A Case Study from Central France[J]. Catena, 2015, 129:95-102.
[3] Jia X X, Shao M A, Wei X R, et al. Hill Slope Scale Temporal Stability of Soil Water Storage in Diverse Soil Layers[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2013, 498:254-264.
[4] Liu B X, Shao M A. Estimation of Soil Water Storage Using Temporal Stability in Four Land Uses over 10 Years on the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2014, 517:974-984.
[5] Tokumoto I, Heilman J L, Schwinning S, et al. S-mall-Scale Variability in Water Storage and Plant Available Water in Shallow, Rocky Soils[J]. Plant Soil, 2014, 385:193-204.
[6] Seyfried M S, Wilcox B P. Soil Water Storage and Rooting Depth:Key Factors Controlling Recharge on Rangelands[J]. Hydrol Process, 2006, 20:3261-3276.
[7] Li X Z, Shao M A, Jia X X, et al. Landscape-Scale Temporal Stability of Soil Water Storage Within Profiles on the Semiarid Loess Plateau of China[J]. J Soils Sediments, 2015, 15:949-961.
[8] Alliaume F, Rossing W A H, García M, et al. Cha-nges in Soil Quality and Plant Available Water Capacity Following Systems Redesign on Commercial Vegetable Farms[J]. Europ J Agronomy, 2013, 46:10-19.
[9] She D L, Liu D D, Liu Y Y, et al. Profile Chara-cteristics of Temporal Stability of Soil Water Storage in Two Land Uses[J]. Arab J Geosci, 2014, 7:21-34.
[10] Brocca L, Melone F, Moramarco T, et al. Soil Moi-sture Temporal Stability over Experimental Areas in Central Italy[J]. Geoderma, 2009, 148:364-374.
[11] Heathman G C, Cosh M H, Merwade V, et al. Multi-Scale Temporal Stability Analysis of Surface and Subsurface Soil Moisture Within the Upper Cedar Creek Watershed, Indiana[J]. Catena, 2012, 95:91-103.
[12] 李昌华,何万云.松嫩平原盐渍土主要类型、性质及其形成过程[J].土壤学报,1963,6(2):196-208. Li Changhua, He Wanyun. Characteristics, Main Types and Formation Process of Saline-Alkali Soil in Songnen Plain[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,1963,6(2):196-208.
[13] 宋长春,邓伟.吉林西部地下水特征及其与土壤盐渍化的关系[J].地理科学,2000,20(3):246-250. Song Changchun, Deng Wei. Characters of Groundwater and Influence on the Interior Salt-Affected Soils in the West of Jilin Province[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2000,20(3):246-250.
[14] 李取生,李秀军,李晓军,等.松嫩平原苏打盐碱地治理与利用[J].资源科学,2003,1(1):15-20. Li Qusheng, Li Xiujun, Li Xiaojun, et al. Sodium Bicarbonate Soil Management and Utilization in Songnen Plain[J]. Resources Science, 2003, 1(1):15-20.
[15] 汤洁,梁爽,张豪,等. 吉林西部盐碱水田区冻融期土壤水盐运移特征及酶活性变化[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2014,44(2):636-644. Tang Jie, Liang Shuang, Zhang Hao, et al.Study on the Charateristics of Water-Salt Transfer and Enzyme Activity Variations During Freeze-Thaw Period of the Saline-Alkaline Paddy Soil in Western Jilin Province[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2014,44(2):636-644.
[16] 王洪英,杨文文,张学培.晋西黄土区坡面林地土壤持水性能研究[J].干旱地区农业研究, 2005, 23(6):147-151. Wang Hongying, Yang Wenwen, Zhang Xuepei. Soil Water Characteristics of Woodlands on Slope in Loess Areas in West Shanxi[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2005, 23(6):147-151.
[17] 郑培龙,肖江伟,吴云,等.重庆缙云山典型林分林地土壤贮水特性研究[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(2):195-197. Zheng Peilong,Xiao Jiangwei,Wu Yun,et al. Research on Forest Soil Water Retaining Properties of Typical Forests in Jinyun Mountain in Chongqing City[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2006,13(2):195-197.
[18] 李子忠,徐洋,卢宪菊,等. AquaCrop模型在大葱生物量和土壤贮水量模拟中的应用和验证[J]. 中国农业大学学报,2011,16(4):59-66. Li Zizhong, Xu Yang, Lu Xianju, et al. Evaluation of the Aqua Crop Model for Simulating Biomass for Chinese Green Onion and Soil Water Storage[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2011,16(4):59-66.
[19] 董立国,李生宝,蒋齐,等. 宁夏半干旱黄土丘陵区不同土地利用类型土壤贮水量变化分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2011,25(10):184-189. Dong Liguo,Li Shengbao,Jiang Qi, et al. Soil Moisture Storage of Different Land Use Types in Ningxia Semiarid Loess Hilly Area[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2011,25(10):184-189.
[20] 邵孝侯,王宇,毕利东,等. 基于最优分割理论的土壤水分有效性评价[J]. 农业工程学报,2010,26(3):109-111. Shao Xiaohou, Wang Yu, Bi Lidong,et al. Evaluation on Soil Water Validity Using Optimum Partitioning Clustering Method[J].Transactions of the CSAE, 2010, 26(3):109-111.
[21] 李笑吟,毕华兴,张建军,等.晋西黄土区土壤水分有效性研究[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(5):205-208,211. Li Xiaoyin, Bi Huaxing,Zhang Jianjun, et al. Study on the Validity of Soil Moisture in Loess Area[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2006,13(5):205-208,211.
[22] 易亮,李凯荣,张冠华,等.黄土高原人工林地土壤水分亏缺研究[J]. 西北林学院学报,2009, 24(5):5-9. Yi Liang, Li Kairong, Zhang Guanhua, et al. Soil Moisture Deficit in Artificial Forest Land in Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2009, 24(5):5-9.
[23] 黄仲冬,齐学斌,樊向阳,等. 土壤水分有效性及其影响因素定量分析[J]. 水土保持学报,2014,28(5):71-76. Huang Zhongdong, Qi Xuebin, Fan Xiangyang, et al. Quantative Analysis of Soil Water Availability and Its Influencing Factors[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2014, 28(5):71-76.
[24] 中国气象科学数据共享服务网站.白城气候资料日值数据集[Z/OL]. (2013-09-30)[2014-12-10]. http://www.escience.gov.cn/metdata/page/index.html. China Meteorological Data Sharing Service Network. Baicheng Climate Data Daily Data Set[Z/OL]. (2013-09-30)[2014-12-10]. http://www.escience.gov.cn/metdata/page/index.html.
[25] 中国科学院南京土壤研究所.土壤理化分析[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1978. Institute of Soil Science,Chinese Academy of Sciences.Soil Physical and Chemical Analysis[M]. Shanghai:Shanghai Science and Technology Press,1978.
[26] 雷志栋. 土壤水动力学[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1998. Lei Zhidong. Soil Water Dynamics[M]. Beijing:Tsinghua University Press,1998.
[27] van Genuchten M T. A Closed-Form Equation for Pre-dicting the Hydraulic Conductivity of Unsaturated Flow[J]. Soil Sci Soc Am J,1980,44:892-898.
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 《吉林大学学报(地球科学版)》编辑部
地址：长春市西民主大街938号(130026)　电话：+86-431-88502374；13756165364　E-mail: xuebao1956@jlu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发