吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (6): 1706-1713.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20190051

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

咸淡水界面位置确定的综合方法(TEcG)及其应用

束龙仓1, 王明昭1, 张惠潼2, 张含明2, 张乃鹏2, 孙影2, 孙超2, 袁鹏杰2   

  1. 1. 河海大学水文水资源学院, 南京 210098;
    2. 东营市水文局, 山东 东营 257099
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-20 发布日期:2019-11-30
  • 作者简介:束龙仓(1964-),男,教授,博士生导师,主要从事地下水资源评价与管理方面的研究,E-mail:lcshu@hhu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41572210)

Comprehensive Method (TEcG) of Determination of the Location of Freshwater and Saltwater Interface and Its Application

Shu Longcang1, Wang Mingzhao1, Zhang Huitong2, Zhang Hanming2, Zhang Naipeng2, Sun Ying2, Sun Chao2, Yuan Pengjie2   

  1. 1. College of Hydrology and Water Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China;
    2. Dongying Bureau of Hydrology, Dongying 257099, Shandong, China
  • Received:2019-03-20 Published:2019-11-30
  • Supported by:
    Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (41572210)

摘要: 准确确定咸淡水界面位置是评价咸水入侵范围的前提。对于咸淡水界面位置的确定,传统研究以水化学法和物探法为主。为克服单一使用传统方法造成的人力、物力和财力的大量浪费,以莱州湾西南岸广饶县小清河以南咸水入侵区为研究对象,在综合分析研究区地下水开采现状、水化学监测结果的基础上,选择3个典型断面,采用水化学法中的野外现场电导率法,快速判断咸淡水界面大致位置(某两眼监测井之间);再在一咸一淡的两眼监测井之间,采用高密度电阻率法快速、准确地确定咸淡水界面的空间分布。结果表明:该地区的地下水电导率若大于1.61 mS/cm,即可认为此处受到咸水入侵;咸淡水界面位置的视电阻率特征值为11~13 Ω·m,咸淡水界面附近咸水体呈舌状入侵并主要发生在地表以下13 m内的浅层地下水中。

关键词: 咸淡水界面, 电导率法, 电导率与氯离子关系, 高密度电阻率法

Abstract: Accurate determination of the location of freshwater and saltwater interface is the premise of evaluation of saltwater intrusion. Hydrochemical analysis method and geophysical investigation method are the main methods to determine the location of freshwater and saltwater interface. In order to overcome the huge waste of human, material and financial resources caused by using only one traditional method, take the saltwater intrusion area south of Xiaoqing River in Guangrao County, southwestern coast of Laizhou Bay as the research object. Based on comprehensive analysis of the current situation of groundwater exploitation and the results of hydrochemical monitoring in the area, three typical sections were selected, and field electrical conductivity method in hydrochemical method was used to rapidly determine the approximate location of the freshwater and saltwater interface. Then, high-density resistivity method was used to rapidly and accurately determine the spatial distribution of freshwater and saltwater interface between saltwater and freshwater monitoring wells. Results show that if the electrical conductivity of underground water in this area is greater than 1.61 mS/cm, it can be considered that the area is intruded by saltwater. The apparent resistivity of the freshwater and saltwater interface is 11-13 Ω·m. The saltwater body near the freshwater and saltwater interface is tongue-shaped and mainly occurs in shallow groundwater within 13 m below the surface.

Key words: freshwater and saltwater interface, electrical conductivity method, correlation of electrical conductivity and chlorine ion, high-density resistivity method

中图分类号: 

  • X83
[1] 薛禹群, 吴吉春, 谢春红, 等. 莱州湾沿岸海水入侵与咸水入侵研究[J]. 科学通报, 1997, 42(22):2360-2368. Xue Yuqun, Wu Jichun, Xie Chunhong, et al. Study on Seawater Intrusion and Saltwater Intrusion Along Laizhou Bay[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 1997, 42(22):2360-2368.
[2] 李福林, 张保祥. 水化学与电法在海水入侵监测中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 1999(5):376-379. Li Fulin, Zhang Baoxiang. The Application of Hydrochemical and Electrical Quantified Indices in the Monitoring of Seawater Encroachment[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 1999(5):376-379.
[3] 王凤和, 孙洪梅. 电导仪法在海水入侵监测分析中的应用[J]. 吉林水利, 2007(12):30-31. Wang Fenghe, Sun Hongmei. Application of Conductance Instrument in the Sea Water Inbreak Monitoring Analysis[J]. Jilin Water Resources, 2007(12):30-31.
[4] 张怡辉, 魏庆菲, 王玉广, 等. 电导率法在海水入侵与土壤盐渍化监测中的应用[J]. 海洋环境科学, 2015, 34(4):593-595. Zhang Yihui, Wei Qingfei, Wang Yuguang, et al. Application of Electric Conductivity Method in Seawater Intrusion and Soil Salinization[J]. Marine Environmental Science, 2015, 34(4):593-595.
[5] 姜光辉, 郭芳, 于奭. 岩溶水系统的水化学曲线及其在水文地质研究中的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(3):899-907. Jiang Guanghui, Guo Fang, Yu Shi. Chemographs of Karst Water System and Its New Application in Hydrogeological Survey[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2015, 45(3):899-907.
[6] 鲁程鹏, 束龙仓, 苑利波, 等. 基于示踪试验求解岩溶含水层水文地质参数[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2009, 39(4):717-721. Lu Chengpeng, Shu Longcang, Yuan Libo, et al. Determination of Hydrogeologic Parameters of Karst Aquifer Based on Tracer Test[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2009, 39(4):717-721.
[7] 孙乃波, 钱玉香, 田仙言, 等. 电导率替代氯离子在海水入侵自动监测管理系统中的应用研究[C]//山东水利科技论坛.济南:山东水利学会, 2007:16-20. Sun Naibo, Qian Yuxiang, Tian Xianyan, et al. Application of Electrical Conductivity Substitution for Chloride Ion in Seawater Intrusion Automatic Monitoring and Management System[C]//Shandong Water Conservancy Science and Technology Forum. Jinan:Shandong Hydraulic and Engineering Society, 2007:16-20.
[8] 刘冀闽, 师沙沙, 韩涛. 电导率法在海水入侵监测中的应用[J]. 中国环境管理干部学院学报, 2009, 19(1):77-79. Liu Jimin, Shi Shasha, Han Tao. The Application of Resistivity Method in Seawater Intrusion Monitoring[J]. Journal of Environmental Management College of China, 2009, 19(1):77-79.
[9] Sylus K J, Ramesh H. The Study of Sea Water Intrusion in Coastal Aquifer by Electrical Conductivity and Total Dissolved Solid Method in Gurpur and Netravathi River Basin[J]. Aquatic Procedia, 2015, 4:57-64.
[10] 佟雪, 孟庆生, 杨俊, 等. 咸水入侵探测中电阻率法测量数值模拟研究[J]. 物探化探计算技术, 2016, 38(1):1-7. Tong Xue, Meng Qingsheng, Yang Jun, et al. Numerical Simulation of Resistivity Mothed in Saltwater Intrusion Prospecting[J]. Computing Techniques for Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2016, 38(1):1-7.
[11] 苏永军, 范剑, 刘宏伟, 等. 高密度电阻率法探测海水入侵咸淡水界限初步调查研究:以莱州湾为例[J]. 地质调查与研究, 2014, 37(3):177-181. Su Yongjun, Fan Jian, Liu Hongwei, et al. Preliminary Survey and Study on Exploring Saltwater Freshwater Interface of Saltwater Intrusion by Using the High-Density Resistivity Method:A Case Study on Laizhou Bay[J]. Geological Survey and Research, 2014, 37(3):177-181.
[12] 刘宏伟, 黄忠锋, 郭旭, 等. 地球物理技术在识别海(咸)水入侵界线中的应用:以莱州湾冲洪积扇区为例[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2016, 32(9):58-63. Liu Hongwei, Huang Zhongfeng, Guo Xu, et al. Application of Geophysical Methods to Detecting Sea Water or Saline Water Intrusion:A Case Study of Alluvial-Proluvial Fan of Laizhou Bay[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2016, 32(9):58-63.
[13] Cimino A, Cosentino C, Oieni A, et al. A Geophysical and Geochemical Approach for Seawater Intrusion Assessment in the Acquedolci Coastal Aquifer (Northern Sicily)[J]. Environmental Geology, 2008, 55(7):1473-1482.
[14] 韩美. 莱州湾地区海水入侵与地貌的关系[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 1996(4):414-420. Han Mei. Relationship Between the Seawater Intrusion and Landforms in Laizhou Bay Area[J]. Oceanologia et Limnologia Sinica, 1996(4):414-420.
[15] 路政. 淄河下游河道型水库防治咸水入侵的数值模拟研究[D]. 济南:济南大学, 2011. Lu Zheng. Numerical Simulation of Controlling Saltwater Intrusion in the Downstream of Zi River Reservoir[D]. Jinan:University of Jinan, 2011.
[16] Yang C, Tong L, Huang C. Combined Application of Dc and TEM to Seawater Intrusion Mapping[J]. Geophysics, 1999, 64(2):417-425.
[17] Daily W, Ramirez A L. Electrical Imaging of Engineered Hydraulic Barriers[J]. Geophysics, 2000, 65(1):83-94.
[18] 刘恩峰, 张祖陆, 沈吉, 等. 莱州湾南岸潍河下游地区咸水入侵灾害成因及特征[J]. 地球科学与环境学报, 2004(3):78-82. Liu Enfeng, Zhang Zulu, Shen Ji, et al. Origin and Characteristics of Salt-Water Intrusion Disaster in the Downstream of Weihe River on the South Coast of Laizhou Bay[J]. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment, 2004(3):78-82.
[19] 张祖陆, 彭利民. 莱州湾东、南沿岸海(咸)水入侵的地下水水化学特征[J]. 中国环境科学, 1998(2):26-30. Zhang Zulu, Peng Limin. The Underground Water Hydrochemical Characteristics on Sea Water Intruded in Eastern and Southern Coasts of Laizhou Bay[J]. China Environmental Science, 1998(2):26-30.
[20] 刘青勇, 董广清. 电阻率法在防治莱州湾地区海水入侵中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 1999(5):368-372. Liu Qingyong, Dong Guangqing. The Application of Resistivity Technique to the Prevention of Seawater Encroachment in Laizhou Bay Area[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 1999(5):368-372.
[21] 刘黎东, 朱旭东. Super Sting R8/IP高密度电法系统的特点与应用[C]//全国工程物探与工程检测年会论文集. 成都:中国地球物理学会, 2011:200-203. Liu Lidong, Zhu Xudong. Characteristics and Application of Super Sting R8/IP High Density Electrical Resistance Method System[C]//National Annual Conference on Engineering Geophysics and Engineering Detection. Chengdu:Chinese Geophysical Society, 2011:200-203.
[22] 李小彬, 胡美艳, 骆淼, 等. 高密度电法长测线多剖面数据连接及应用实例[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2017, 32(4):1791-1797. Li Xiaobin, Hu Meiyan, Luo Miao, et al. Long Line and Multi-Section Data Linkage of High Density Resistivity Method and Its Application Example[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2017, 32(4):1791-1797.
[23] 陈松, 刘磊, 刘怀庆, 等. 北部湾咸淡水分界面划分中的电法应用分析[J]. 地球物理学进展,2019,34(4):1592-1599. Chen Song, Liu Lei, Liu Huaiqing, et al. Application Analysis of Electrical Method in Dividing Saltwater and Freshwater Interface in Beibu Bay[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2019,34(4):1592-1599.
[24] 何玉海. 高密度电法在莱州湾海水入侵调查中的研究与应用[J]. 海洋环境科学, 2016, 35(2):301-305. He Yuhai. Research and Application of High-Density Resistance Method in Seawater Invasion Investigation of Laizhou Bay[J]. Marine Environmental Science, 2016, 35(2):301-305.
[1] 李永涛, 郭高山, 顾延生, 韦林, 何思远. 钢厂周边污染土壤的电性与磁性特征及其环境意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(5): 1543-1551.
[2] 曹玲珑,王建华,黄楚光,倪志鑫,金钢雄,瓦西拉里,陈慧娴. 大亚湾表层沉积物重金属元素形态特征、控制因素及风险评价分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(6): 1988-1999.
[3] 严加永,吕庆田,葛晓立. GIS支持下的土壤重金属污染预测预警研究[J]. J4, 2007, 37(3): 592-0596.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 宋铁红,赵勇胜,崔玉波,韩相奎,董婵. 厌氧折流板反应器中酸化菌活性研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(03): 429 -432 .
[2] 邹新宁,孙 卫,张盟勃,万玉君. 地震属性分析在岩性气藏描述中的应用[J]. J4, 2006, 36(02): 289 -0294 .
[3] 张新宇,肖克炎,刘光胜,揣媛媛. 阿舍勒铜矿可视化储量计算的指示克里格法应用研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(02): 305 -0308 .
[4] 李向民,夏林圻,夏祖春,徐学义,马中平,王立社. 东天山石炭纪企鹅山群火山岩岩石成因[J]. J4, 2006, 36(03): 336 -341 .
[5] 马中平,夏林圻,徐学义,李向民,夏祖春,王立社. 南天山北部志留系巴音布鲁克组火山-侵入杂岩的形成环境及构造意义[J]. J4, 2006, 36(05): 736 -743 .
[6] 高红梅,高福红,樊馥,高玉巧. 鸡西盆地早白垩世烃源岩可溶有机质地球化学特征[J]. J4, 2007, 37(1): 86 -0090 .
[7] 黄继国,黄国鑫,聂广正,魏海娟,吕爱民,王雪松. 中温UBF与UASB两相厌氧系统处理垃圾渗滤液的实验研究[J]. J4, 2007, 37(1): 144 -0147 .
[8] 索忠伟,殷琨,徐克里,于平. 射流式液动锤内部动力过程的数学模型及仿真分析[J]. J4, 2007, 37(1): 200 -0203 .
[9] 王 蛟. 山东沾化凹陷孤岛油田馆上段浅水湖泊沉积[J]. J4, 2007, 37(3): 500 -0505 .
[10] 任留东,王彦斌,赵越. 南极拉斯曼丘陵高级区假蓝宝石及有关矿物组合的形成过程[J]. J4, 2007, 37(5): 848 -0855 .