中国油页岩矿勘查控制程度探讨

doi:10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20200072

吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (1): 13-21.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20200072

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇

中国油页岩矿勘查控制程度探讨

李成博¹, 宁传奇¹, 钟长林², 任建超², 徐人吁³, 殷淑芹²

1. 吉林省自然资源调查规划中心有限公司, 长春 130061;
2. 吉林省地质资料馆, 长春 130061;
3. 吉林省地质调查院, 长春 130061

收稿日期:2020-03-30 发布日期:2021-02-02
作者简介:李成博(1981-),男,高级工程师,主要从事地质矿产勘查及地质环境研究,E-mail:33974112@qq.com
基金资助:
国家矿产资源储量技术标准体系建设项目（CB2017-4-4）

Discussion on Extent of Exploration Control of Oil Shale Deposits in China

Li Chengbo¹, Ning Chuanqi¹, Zhong Changlin², Ren Jianchao², Xu Renyu³, Yin Shuqin²

1. The Natural Resources Survey and Planning Center Co., Ltd., Changchun 130061, China;
2. Geologic Data Library of Jilin Province, Changchun 130061, China;
3. Institute of Geological Survey of Jilin Province, Changchun 130061, China

Received:2020-03-30 Published:2021-02-02
Supported by:
Supported by the Construction Project of National Mineral Resources Reserves Technical Standard System(CB2017-4-4)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为提高我国油页岩矿勘查工作质量，根据我国47个典型油页岩矿勘查评价成果和油页岩矿成矿地质条件及矿层赋存规律，通过综合分析研究，采用探采对比及抽稀试验进行验证，提出了我国油页岩矿勘查评价采用构造复杂程度和矿层稳定程度两种地质因素确定勘查类型。构造复杂程度划分为简单、中等、复杂3类；矿层稳定程度划分为稳定、较稳定和不稳定3型，即"三类三型"。类型为简单、稳定时，参考基本勘查工程间距采用1 000~2 000 m；类型为中等、较稳定时，参考基本勘查工程间距采用500~1 000 m；类型为复杂、不稳定时，参考基本勘查工程间距采用250~500 m。另外，在油页岩矿实际勘查工作中应在构造复杂程度和矿层稳定程度中选择勘查难度大者确定基本勘查工程间距。

关键词: 油页岩矿, 地质因素, 勘查控制程度, 勘查工程间距

Abstract: In order to improve the quality of oil shale exploration, according to the results of exploration and evaluation of 47 typical oil shale deposits in China, the metallogenic geological conditions and ore bed occurrence regularity, it is proposed that two geological factors are used to determine the types of exploration and evaluation of oil shale in China, including structural complexity and ore layer stability. The structural complexity is divided into three kinds: simple, medium and complex, and the ore layer stability consists of three types: Stable, relatively stable and unstable, that is, "three kinds and three types". When the kind and type is simple and stable, the exploration engineering interval is 1 000-2 000 m; when the kind and type is medium and relatively stable, exploration engineering interval is 500-1 000 m; when the kind and type is complex and unstable, exploration engineering interval is 250-500 m. In the oil shale actual exploration work, the exploration engineering interval should be chosen basing on the more complicated one in the structural complexity and the stability of the ore layer.

Key words: oil shale mine, geological factors, extent of exploration control, exploration engineering interval

中图分类号:

P618.12

李成博, 宁传奇, 钟长林, 任建超, 徐人吁, 殷淑芹. 中国油页岩矿勘查控制程度探讨[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(1): 13-21.

Li Chengbo, Ning Chuanqi, Zhong Changlin, Ren Jianchao, Xu Renyu, Yin Shuqin. Discussion on Extent of Exploration Control of Oil Shale Deposits in China[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2021, 51(1): 13-21.

参考文献

[1] 刘招君,柳蓉.中国油页岩特征及开发利用前景分析[J].地学前缘,2005, 12(3):315-323. Liu Zhaojun, Liu Rong. Oil Shale Resource State and Evaluating System[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2005, 12(3):315-323.
[2] 刘招君,董清水,叶松青,等.中国油页岩资源现状[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2006, 36(6):869-876. Liu Zhaojun, Dong Qingshui, Ye Songqing, et al. The Situation of Oil Shale Resources in China[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2006, 36(6):869-876.
[3] 刘招君,杨虎林,董清水,等.中国油页岩[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2009:113-114. Liu Zhaojun, Yang Hulin, Dong Qingshui, et al. Oil Shale in China[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2009:113-114.
[4] 高帮飞.合理勘查工程间距导致资源储量估算偏差的原因分析[J].中国矿业,2016, 25(2):150-155. Gao Bangfei. Analysis of Reasonable Exploration Engineering Spacing Causing the Mineral Resources Estimation Bias[J].China Mining Magazine, 2016, 25(2):150-155.
[5] 孙玉建,孟伟,万会.矿产资源储量估算中工程控制程度划分的探索[J].地质与勘探,2006, 42(6):81-84. Sun Yujian, Meng Wei, Wan Hui. A New Method for Classifying Degree of Engineering Controlling in Resources and Reserves Estimation[J]. Geology and Prospecting, 2006, 42(6):81-84.
[6] 高航校,任小华,郭健. 资源量分类中勘查工程间距的确定方法研究[J].地质与勘探,2014,50(2):340-345. Gao Hangxiao, Ren Xiaohua, Guo Jian. A Method of Determining Grid Spacing in Surveys for Classification of Mineral Reserves[J].Geology and Exploration, 2014, 50(2):340-345.
[7] 柳蓉, 刘招君. 国内外油页岩资源现状及综合开发潜力分析[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2006, 36(6):892-898. Liu Rong, Liu Zhaojun. Oil Shale Resource Situation and Multi-Purpose Development Potential in China and Abroad[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2006, 36(6):892-898.
[8] 赵隆业,陈基娘,王天顺.中国油页岩物质成分及工业成因类型[R].北京:中国地质大学,1990. Zhao Longye, Chen Jiniang, Wang Tianshun. Composition and Industrial Original Classification of Oil Shale in China[R]. Beijing:China University of Geosciences, 1990.
[9] 刘招君,孟庆涛,柳蓉. 中国陆相油页岩特征及成因类型[J].古地理学报,2009,11(1):105-114. Liu Zhaojun, Meng Qingtao, Liu Rong. Characteristics and Genetic Types of Continental Oil Shales in China[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2009,11(1):105-114.
[10] 李成博,郭巍,宋玉勤, 等. 新疆博格达山北麓油页岩成因类型及有利区预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2006, 36(6):949-953. Li Chengbo, Guo Wei, Song Yuqin, et al. The Genetic Type of the Oil Shale at the Northern Foot of Bogeda Mountain, Xinjiang and Prediction for Favorable Areas[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2006, 36(6):949-953.
[11] 王永莉,刘招君,荆惠林, 等. 桦甸盆地古近系桦甸组油页岩矿床沉积特征[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2005, 36(5):720-731. Wang Yongli, Liu Zhaojun, Jing Huilin, et al. Sedimentary Characteristics of Oil Shale Deposit of the Huadian Formation of Paleogene in Huadian Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2005, 36(5):720-731.
[12] 宋玉勤,郭巍,刘招君,等. 民和盆地窑街煤田油页岩沉积环境分析和开发前景预测[J].世界地质,2006, 25(1):43-48. Song Yuqin, Guo Wei, Liu Zhaojun, et al. Sedimentary Environmental Analysis and Exploration Perspective Forecasting of Oil Shale in Yaojie Coal Field Minhe Basin[J]. Global Geology, 2006, 25(1):43-48.
[13] 钱家麟,王剑秋,李术元. 世界油页岩资源利用和发展趋势[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2006, 36(6):877-887. Qian Jialin, Wang Jianqiu,Li Shuyuan. World Oil Shale Utilization and Its Future[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2006, 36(6):877-887.
[14] 陈殿义.国内外油页岩开采方法和利用现状[J].吉林地质,2005, 24(4):85-91. Chen Dianyi. The Existing State About the Mining Methods and Using of the Oil Shale at Home and Abroad[J]. Jilin Geology, 2005, 24(4):85-91.
[15] 张海龙,刘招君,张健,等. 油页岩技术可采系数研究与应用[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2006, 36(6):904-908. Zhang Hailong, Liu Zhaojun, Zhang Jian, et al. The Research and Application of the Oil Shale Technology Mining Coefficient[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2006,36(6):904-908.
[16] 游君君,叶松青,刘招君,等. 油页岩的综合开发与利用[J].世界地质,2004, 23(3):261-265. You Junjun, Ye Songqing, Liu Zhaojun, et al. Comprehensive Development and Utilization of Oil Shale[J]. Global Geology, 2004, 23(3):261-265.
[17] 固体矿产地质勘查规范总则:GB/13908-2002[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2002:19-20. General Requirements for Solid Mineral Exploration:GB/13908-2002[S]. Beijing:Standards Press of China, 2002:19-20.
[18] 煤、泥炭地质勘查规范:DZ/T 0215-2002[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2002:10-11. Specifications for Coal,Peat Exploration:DZ/T 0215-2002[S]. Beijing:Standards Press of China, 2002:10-11.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

中国油页岩矿勘查控制程度探讨

Discussion on Extent of Exploration Control of Oil Shale Deposits in China

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 3

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	向家菠, 王团乐, 倪凯军, 宛良朋, 施炎, 胡巍. 乌东德水电站大坝防渗帷幕成幕影响地质因素分析及处理措施[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(5): 1581-1588.
[2]	温志良, 姜福平, 钟长林, 姜雪飞, 王果谦, 齐岩. 松辽盆地东南隆起超大型油页岩矿床特征及成因[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(3): 681-691.
[3]	于红岩, 李洪奇, 郭兵, 孙海涛, 张海霞. 基于成因机理的低阻油层精细评价方法[J]. J4, 2012, 42(2): 335-343.