基于小流域的地震扰动区降雨型滑坡泥石流危险性评价方法

doi:10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201506201

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

地震扰动区存在大量震裂松散坡体,在持续或者密集的降雨条件下极易转化为滑坡灾害。同时,滑坡又会给泥石流提供大量松散固体物质,增加泥石流的危险性。因此,在震区,灾害通常以"链"的形式出现,比单一灾种危害性大。为了更有效地对地质灾害危险性进行评价,笔者将滑坡、泥石流作为灾害链,综合地加以分析和研究。选择5·12汶川大地震中受灾严重的都江堰市白沙河流域的17条泥石流沟作为研究区,建立滑坡-泥石流危险性评价耦合模型,研究24 h不同降雨量条件下小流域滑坡泥石流危险性的变化。耦合模型包括了坡体稳定性评价模型,水文模型及以泥石流规模、发生频率、流域面积、主沟长度、流域高差、切割密度、不稳定斜坡比为评价因子的泥石流危险性评价统计模型。研究结果表明:随着降雨量的增大,参与泥石流活动的松散物质方量持续增加,但当24 h降雨量超过200 mm后,泥石流沟的危险度等级不再发生变化;17条泥石流沟中4条为中危险度,12条为高危险度,1条为极高危险度。这说明研究区地质灾害问题相当严峻,在多雨季节存在泥石流群发的可能性,直接威胁到居住在泥石流沟附近的人民群众生命财产安全;因此,对于有直接危害对象的高危险度及其以上的泥石流沟,应该按照高等级设防标准进行工程治理及发布预警报。同时也说明,将滑坡、泥石流作为灾害链研究具必要性和可行性。

关键词: 小流域, 地震扰动区, 滑坡, 泥石流, 危险性评价

Abstract:

There are many loose slopes existed in the seismic disturbance area. Landslides and debris flow can be easily induced by a heavy or concentrated rainfall. The hazards often occur in a form of chain in an earthquake region with a severer harm than the one caused by a single disaster. In order to evaluate the geological hazards effectively, we regard the landslide and debris flow as a disaster chain and conduct the analysis synthetically. A coupled model has been developed to assess the hazard degree of debris flow induced by the different 24 h precipitation at watershed level in Baishahe watershed of Dujiangyan City in Sichuan Province. The model comprises of a landslide susceptibility evaluation model, a stability model, a hydrological model to predict unstable slopes and determine the amount of landslides to be involved, and a statistical model to evaluate the hazard degree of debris flow gully by selecting debris flow volume, frequency, basin area, main gully length, height difference, cutting density, and the ratio of unstable gully bed as the evaluation parameters. The results show that the volume of loose material involved in debris flow increase with the intensity of rainfall. However, when 24 h rainfall is over 200 mm, the hazard degree of debris flow does not change any more. Among the 17 debris flows,four debris flows are middle hazardous, twelve debris flows are high hazardous, and one debris flow is very high. It indicates that the potential geological hazard is quite serious in the study area. During the rainy season, 17 debris flows might concentratedly outbreak; which would directly threaten the nearby human lives and properties. The protection engineering and early-alert should be set to eliminate the hazards caused by the debris flows in comply with the high level fortification standard. By the way, it's necessary to take landslide and debris flow as a disaster chain to make the hazard assessment.

Key words: watershed, seismic disturbance area, landslide, debris flow, hazard assessment

中图分类号:

P642.22

王萌, 姜元俊, 黄栋, 李倩倩. 基于小流域的地震扰动区降雨型滑坡泥石流危险性评价方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(6): 1781-1788.

Wang Meng, Jiang Yuanjun, Huang Dong, Li Qianqian. Hazard Assessment on Rainfall-Triggered Landslide and Debris Flow in the Seismic Disturbance Area at Watershed Level[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2015, 45(6): 1781-1788.

参考文献

[1] Jibson R W, Harp E L, Michael J A.A Method for Producing Digital Probabilistic Seismic Landslide Hazard Maps[J]. Engineering Geology, 2000,58: 271-289.

[2] 崔鹏,韦方强,何思明,等.5·12汶川地震诱发的山地灾害及减灾措施[J].山地学报,2008,26(3):280-282. Cui Peng, Wei Fangqiang, He Siming,et al. Mountain Disasters Induced by the Earthquake of May 12 in Wenchuan and the Disasters Mitigation[]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2008,26(3): 280-282.

[3] Rajakumar P, Sanjeevi S, Jayaseelan S,et al. Lan-dslide Susceptibility Mapping in a Hilly Terrain Using Remote Sensing and GIS[J]. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 2007, 35(1): 31-42.

[4] Wang M, Qiao J P, He S M. GIS-Based Earthquake-Triggered Landslide Hazard Zoning Using Contributing Weight Model[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2010, 7:339-352.

[5] Lee C T, Huang C C, Lee J F,et al. Statistical Approach to Earthquake-Induced Llandslide Susceptibility[J]. Engineering Geology, 2008, 100:43-58.

[6] Carrara A, Pike R J. GIS Technology and Models for Assessing Landslide Hazard and Risk[J]. Geomorphology, 2008, 94: 257-260.

[7] 兰恒星,伍法权,周成虎,等.GIS支持下的降雨型滑坡危险性空间分析预测[J].科学通报,2003,48(5): 507-512. Lan Hengxing, Wu Faquan, Zhou Chenghu ,et al. Rainfall-Induced Landslide Hazard Spatial Analyze and Prediction Based on GIS[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2003,48(5): 507-512.

[8] Muntohar A, Liao H. Rainfall Infiltration: Iinfinite Slope Model for Landslides Triggering by Rainstorm[J]. Natural Hazards, 2010, 54(3): 967-984.

[9] Baum, R L, Savage W Z, Godt J W. TRIGRS :A Fortran Program for Transient Rainfall Infiltration and Grid-Based Regional Slope Stability Analysis[J]. US Geological Survey Open-File Report,2002,424: 38.

[10] 庄建琦,彭建兵,张利勇. 不同降雨条件下黄土高原浅层滑坡危险性预测评价[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版,2013,43(3):867-876. Zhuang Jianqi, Peng Jianbing, Zhang Liyong. Risk Assessment and Prediction of the Shallow Landslide at Different Precipitation in Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Jilin University:Earth Science Edition, 2013, 43(3): 867-876.

[11] Montogery D R, Dietrich W E. A Physically Based Model for the Topographic Control on Shallow Landsliding[J]. Water Resources Research, 1994, 30:1153-1171.

[12] O'Loughlin E M. Prediction of Surface Saturation Zones in Natural Catchments by Topographic Analysis[J]. Water Resources Research, 1986, 22:794-804.

[13] Griswold J P, Iverson R M. Mobility and Statistics and Automated Hazard Mapping for Debris Flows and Rock Avalanches[R]. Reston, VA:U S Geological Survey. Scientific Investigations Report 2007-5276,2008:22.

[14] 刘希林,莫多闻.泥石流风险评价[M].成都:四川科学技术出版社,2003:17-22. Liu Xilin, Mo Duowen. Debris Flow Risk Assessment[M]. Chengdu: Sichuan Science and Technology Press,2003:17-22.

[15] 刘希林,唐川.泥石流危险性评价[M].北京:科学出版社,1995:1-93. Liu Xilin, Tang Chuan. Debris Flow Risk Assessment[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1995:1-93.

[16] Guzzetti F, Ardizzone F, Cardinali M,et al. Lan-dslide Volumes and Landslide Mobilization Rates in Umbria, Central Italy[J]. Earth and Planetary Science, 2009, 279:222-229.

相关文章 15

[1]	周孙超, 宋腾蛟, 王琰, 蔡宗佑. 基于小龙虾优化算法的BP神经网络模型在滑坡易发性评价中的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 937-950.
[2]	张文, 王骏城, 陈俊淇, 崔洪海, 孔祥礼, 郭涛, 王明, 王佳, 张书睿, 孙琦, 张涵, . 长白山山脉基本地质概况与火成岩崩滑灾变类型及机制[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 568-583.
[3]	安雪莲, 密长林, 孙德亮, 文海家, 李晓琴, 辜庆渝, 丁悦凯. 基于不同评价单元的三峡库区滑坡易发性对比——以重庆市云阳县为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(5): 1629-1644.
[4]	文海家, 胡吉威, 张辉, 向学坤, 黄勤. 泥石流危险范围Laharz修正模型及其应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(3): 905-918.
[5]	徐兴华, 肖双粟, 冯杭建, 吕庆. 低频性沟谷型泥石流水动力学冲蚀启动机制及动态监控[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(3): 919-932.
[6]	王芃, 邵广周, 恒翔天, 蓝笛瑄, 王国顺, 霍科宇. 滑坡面瑞雷波波场模拟及H/V谱比探测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(3): 1031-1041.
[7]	王常明, 刘辛磊, 王飞. 品字形桩林防护结构对泥石流冲击桥墩作用的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(6): 1773-1784.
[8]	年廷凯, 王国栋, 郑德凤, 王大伟. 南海北部陆坡区典型峡谷陡坡群地震稳定性[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(6): 1785-1798.
[9]	刘鑫, 张文, 李根, 刘波. 高位远程崩滑碎屑流-泥石流灾害链的演变过程与影响范围预测：以“4·5”四川洪雅县铁匠湾地质灾害链为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(6): 1799-1811.
[10]	熊超, 孙红月. 基于多因素-多尺度分析的阶跃型滑坡位移预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(4): 1175-1184.
[11]	唐军峰, 唐雪梅, 周基, 钟辉亚, 谢尚智. 滑坡堆积体变形失稳机制——以贵州剑河县东岭信滑坡为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(2): 503-516.
[12]	张田田, 杨为民, 万飞鹏, . 浑河断裂带地质灾害发育特征及其成因机制[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(1): 149-.
[13]	雷怡, 帅飞翔, 孙红月, 张泽坤, 熊超. 边坡负压排水非稳定流研究[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(1): 162-.
[14]	周越, 曾昭发, 唐海燕, 张建民, 何滔. 公路勘察中滑坡体的地球物理特征与分析——以张榆线公路勘察为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(2): 638-644.
[15]	安玉科, 樊江, 马胜午, 马建全, 高娟, 毛立军. 堆积阶地古老滑坡识别方法及其在线状工程地质勘察中的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(6): 1787-1794.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed