吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (6): 1921-1931.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20200216

• 地球探测与信息技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

低空无人机倾斜摄影测量测图精度实证

芦彦霖, 张森, 汲姣   

  1. 天津市水务规划勘测设计有限公司, 天津 300000
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-02 出版日期:2021-11-26 发布日期:2021-11-24
  • 作者简介:芦彦霖(1994-),女,硕士研究生,助理工程师,主要从事倾斜摄影测量方面的研究,E-mail:1757517778@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFE0119600)

Real Evidence of Mapping Accuracy of Low-Altitude UAV Tilt Photogrammetry

Lu Yanlin, Zhang Sen, Ji Jiao   

  1. Tianjin Water Planning Survey and Design Limited Company, Tianjin 300000, China
  • Received:2020-10-02 Online:2021-11-26 Published:2021-11-24
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFE0119600)

摘要: 为了研究倾斜摄影测量对测图精度的提高作用,以A、B两个测区为例,分别以双片和多片前方交会、竖直和倾斜影像为对比条件,建立立体模型与实景三维模型,并通过对模型和数字线划图中检查点的误差统计,对平面精度和高程精度进行对比分析。相比于基于双片前方交会生成的立体模型,基于多片前方交会生成的实景三维模型精度更高;在地形为高山地的A测区,平面和高程中误差均由分米级提高至厘米级,结合《数字航空摄影测量空中三角测量规范》可以达到1:500比例尺的成图标准。相比于竖直摄影测量,倾斜摄影测量的交会光线更多,因而其模型精度也更高;在地形为山地的B测区,高程精度可与平面精度相当,中误差均在5 cm以内,解决了航空摄影测量因影像采集方式而高程精度较差的难题,基于倾斜实景三维模型进行三维测图,数字线划图中等高线中误差满足《1:500 1:1 000 1:2 000地形图航空摄影测量内业规范》中对1:500比例尺的精度要求。

关键词: 倾斜摄影测量, 实景三维模型, 精度分析

Abstract: In order to study the improvement of surveying accuracy by tilt photogrammetry, taking two survey areas A and B as an example, the two-piece and multi-piece intersection, vertical and tilt images are used as contrast conditions to establish a stereoscopic model and a real scene 3D model. Through the error statistics of the checkpoints in the models and digital line graphic, the plane accuracy and elevation accuracy are compared and analyzed. Compared with the stereoscopic model based on the two-piece front intersection, the real scene 3D model based on the multi-piece front intersection has higher accuracy. In the survey area A where the terrain is highly mountainous, the errors in plane and elevation are increased from decimeter level to centimeter level, and combining with Specifications for Aerotriangulation of Digital Aerophotogrammetry, it can reach the mapping standard of 1:500 scale. Compared with vertical photogrammetry, oblique photogrammetry has more intersection rays, so its model accuracy is higher. In the survey area B where the terrain is mountainous, the elevation accuracy can be equivalent to the plane accuracy, and the median error is within 5 cm, which solves the problem of poor elevation accuracy in aerial photogrammetry due to image acquisition methods, and by 3D mapping based on the tilted real 3D model, the error in the contour meets the accuracy requirements of the 1:500 scale in Specifications for Aerophotogrammetric Office Operation of 1:500 1:1 000 1:2 000 Topographic Maps.

Key words: tilt photogrammetry, scene 3D model, precision analysis

中图分类号: 

  • P231.5
[1] 林卉, 王仁礼. 数字摄影测量学[M]. 徐州:中国矿业大学出版社, 2015. Lin Hui, Wang Renli. Digital Photogrammetry[M].Xuzhou:China University of Mining and Technology Press, 2015.
[2] 李明. 基于倾斜影像的城市三维场景重建若干关键技术研究[D].武汉:武汉大学, 2016. Li Ming. Key Technologies Research of City Three-Dimensional Scene Reconstruction Based on Oblique Images[D]. Wuhan:Wuhan University, 2016.
[3] 李英杰. 航空倾斜多视影像匹配方法研究[D].北京:中国测绘科学研究院, 2014. Li Yingjie. Research on Multi-View Matching Method of Multiple Aerial Image[D]. Beijing:Chinese Academy of Surveying and Mapping, 2014.
[4] Zhen W, Zou J, Zhao X, et al. Research on 3D Modeling Technology Based on Digital Photogrammetry[C]//Sixth International Conference on Digital Earth. Beijing:ISDE, 2009:1-7.
[5] 周杰. 倾斜摄影测量在实景三维建模中的关键技术研究[D]. 昆明:昆明理工大学, 2017. Zhou Jie. Research on the Key Technology of Oblique Photogrammetry in 3D Modeling of Real Scene[D]. Kunming:Kunming University of Science and Technology, 2017.
[6] Jeschke W. Digital Close-Range Photogrammetry for Surface Measurement[C]//Close-Range Photogrammetry Meets Machine Vision.[S.l.]:The International Society for Optical Engineering, 2017:1058.
[7] 吴迪军, 张萌萌, 潘飞, 等. 多片前方交会法无人机测图技术[J].测绘科学, 2018,43(10):125-130. Wu Dijun, Zhang Mengmeng, Pan Fei, et al.Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Mapping Technology of Multiple Images Space Forward Intersection[J]. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 2018,43(10):125-130.
[8] 鲁勇奇, 郭佳郁, 冯振贵. 浅谈两点前方交会角对测点的精度影响[J].海峡科技与产业, 2017(7):122-123. Lu Yongqi, Guo Jiayu, Feng Zhengui. Talking About the Influence of the Intersection Angle of Two Points on the Accuracy of the Measuring Point[J]. Technology and Industry Across the Straits, 2017(7):122-123.
[9] 李忠美, 边少锋, 瞿勇. 多像空间前方交会的抗差总体最小二乘估计[J].测绘学报, 2017,46(5):593-604. Li Zhongmei, Bian Shaofeng, Qu Yong. Robust Total Least Squares Estimation of Space Intersection Appropriate for Multi-Images[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2017,46(5):593-604.
[10] 张剑清, 胡安文. 多基线摄影测量前方交会方法及精度分析[J].武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2007,32(10):847-851. Zhang Jianqing, Hu Anwen. Multi-Baseline Photogrammetry Forward Intersection Method and Accuracy Analysis[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2007, 32(10):847-851.
[11] 隋婧, 金伟其. 双目立体视觉技术的实现及其进展[J].电子技术应用, 2004(10):4-6. Sui Jing,Jin Weiqi. Realization and Progress of Binocular Stereo Vision Technology[J]. Application of Electronic Technique, 2004(10):4-6.
[12] 宋文平. 无人机航测系统集成及影像后处理有关问题研究[D]. 西安:长安大学, 2016. Song Wenping. Research on Integration of Low Altitude Remote Sensing System of UAV and Related Questions of Image Data Processing[D]. Xi'an:Chang'an University, 2016.
[13] 李伟哲. 基于ContextCapture实景建模及应用[J].西北水电, 2018(3):27-31. Li Weizhe. Real Scene Modeling and Application Based on ContextCapture[J]. Northwest Hydropower, 2018(3):27-31.
[14] 数字航空摄影测量空中三角测量规范:GB/T 23236-2009[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2009. Specifications for Aerotriangulation of Digital Aerophotogrammetry:GB/T 23236-2009[S]. Beijing:China Quality and Standards Publishing & Media Co Ltd, 2009.
[15] 范攀峰, 李露露. 基于Smart3D的低空无人机倾斜摄影实景三维建模研究[J]. 测绘通报, 2017(增刊2):77-81. Fan Panfeng, Li Lulu. A Three-Dimensional Modeling Study Based on the Technique of Low-Altitude UAV Oblique Photogrammetry and Smart3D Software[J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2017(Sup. 2):77-81.
[16] 1:5001:10001:2000地形图航空摄影测量内业规范:GB/T 7930-2008[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2008. Specifications for Aerotriangulation Office Operation of 1:5001:10001:2000 Topographic Maps:GB/T 7930-2008[S]. Beijing:China Quality and Standards Publishing & Media Co Ltd, 2008.
[1] 于小平,张廷玉,刘财,陈增宝,许惠平,庞贺民. 应用GPS数据与重力数据确定大地水准面[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 904-0907.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 程立人,张予杰,张以春. 西藏申扎地区奥陶纪鹦鹉螺化石[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 273 -0282 .
[2] 李 秉 成. 陕西富平全新世古气候的初步研究[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 291 -0295 .
[3] 和钟铧,杨德明,王天武,郑常青. 冈底斯带巴嘎区二云母花岗岩SHRIMP锆石U-Pb定年[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 302 -0307 .
[4] 陈 力,佴 磊,王秀范,李 金. 绥中某电力设备站场区地震危险性分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 641 -645 .
[5] 纪宏金,孙丰月,陈满,胡大千,时艳香,潘向清. 胶东地区裸露含金构造的地球化学评价[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 308 -0312 .
[6] 初凤友,孙国胜,李晓敏,马维林,赵宏樵. 中太平洋海山富钴结壳生长习性及控制因素[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 320 -0325 .
[7] 李斌,孟自芳,李相博,卢红选,郑民. 泌阳凹陷下第三系构造特征与沉积体系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 332 -0339 .
[8] 李涛, 吴胜军,蔡述明,薛怀平,YASUNORI Nakayama. 涨渡湖通江前后调蓄能力模拟分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 351 -0355 .
[9] 旷理雄,郭建华,梅廉夫,童小兰,杨丽. 从油气勘探的角度论博格达山的隆升[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 346 -0350 .
[10] 章光新,邓伟,何岩,RAMSIS Salama. 水文响应单元法在盐渍化风险评价中的应用[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 356 -0360 .