侵入岩,直流电阻率法,空间-波数混合域算法,电性特征,地球物理勘探 ," /> 侵入岩,直流电阻率法,空间-波数混合域算法,电性特征,地球物理勘探 ,"/> intrusive rock,direct current resistivity method,algorithm of space-wavenumber hybrid domain,electrical properties,geophysical exploration ,"/> <span class="cf0">侵入岩模型直流电响应特征</span>

吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (4): 1321-1335.doi: 10. 13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20240114

• 地球探测与信息技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

侵入岩模型直流电响应特征

孙旭东1,马举举2,凌嘉宣3,杨化军1,马强1,李昆4   

  1. 1. 甘肃煤田地质局一四六队,甘肃 平凉 744000

    2. 甘肃绿动陇原地质生态环境研究院有限责任公司,甘肃 平凉 744000

    3. 桂林航天工业学院计算机科学与工程学院,广西 桂林 541004

    4. 西南石油大学地球科学与技术学院,成都 610500

  • 收稿日期:2024-05-23 出版日期:2025-07-26 发布日期:2025-08-05
  • 通讯作者: 凌嘉宣(1989—),男,讲师,博士,主要从事电磁法数值模拟及反演成像研究,E-mail: 381639600@qq.com
  • 作者简介:孙旭东(1982—),男,高级工程师,主要从事地球物理勘探技术工作,E-mail: 1924296786@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(42204133);广西自然科学基金项目(2025GXNSFBA069422);广西高校中青年教师科研能力提升项目(2024KY0800);桂林航天工业学院特色优势学科交叉发展战略研究专项课题(TS2024452)

Characteristics of Direct Current Response over Intrusive Rock Models

Sun Xudong1, Ma Juju2, Ling Jiaxuan3, Yang Huajun1, Ma Qiang1, Li Kun4   

  1. 1. Gansu Coal Geology Bureau 146th Team, Pingliang 744000, Gansu, China

    2. Gansu Lvdong Longyuan Geological-Ecological Environment Research Institute Limited Liability Company, Pingliang 744000,

    Gansu, China

    3. School of Computer Science and Engineering, Guilin University of Aerospace Technology, Guilin 541004, Guangxi, China

    4. School of Geoscience and Technology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China

  • Received:2024-05-23 Online:2025-07-26 Published:2025-08-05
  • Supported by:

    the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42204133),the Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi (2025GXNSFBA069422), the Middle-Aged and Young Teachers’ Basic Ability Promotion Project of Guangxi (2024KY0800) and the GUAT Special Research Project on the Strategic Development of Distinctive Interdisciplinary Fields (TS2024452)

摘要: 直流电阻率法作为地球物理勘探中的重要方法之一,已在地质勘探领域中发挥重要作用。本文采用基于空间-波数混合域的直流电三维数值算法对侵入岩模型的电性响应特征开展研究。引入总电场归一化系数T3,对无矿化带侵入岩模型和矿化带侵入岩模型的三极装置和偶极-偶极装置的电场响应特征进行比较分析。特别考虑了矿化带电阻率为各向同性、各向异性以及激电效应的模型,以揭示不同电性条件下的响应差异。分析结果表明:总电场归一化系数比电场分量对地下介质的响应特征更明显;偶极-偶极装置观测到的T3响应异常优于三极装置,且不同电性矿化带的T3响应特征存在显著差异;相较于极化率各向异性,电阻率各向异性对观测结果具有更深刻的影响。矿化带侵入岩模型的响应特征远比无矿化带侵入岩模型复杂,特别是当矿化带为电各向异性时,不同电参数观测到的T3形态差异较大。

关键词: 侵入岩')">

侵入岩, 直流电阻率法, 空间-波数混合域算法, 电性特征, 地球物理勘探

Abstract:

The direct current resistivity method, as one of the important methods in geophysical exploration, has played a significant role in various geological exploration fields. This paper conducts a study on the electrical response characteristics of intrusive rock models using a three-dimensional direct current numerical algorithm based on space-wavenumber hybrid domain. The total electric field normalization coefficient T3 is introduced, and the electric field response characteristics of pole-dipole array and dipole-dipole array configuration of non-mineralized and mineralized intrusive rock models are comparatively analyzed. Special consideration is given to the effects of isotropic and anisotropic mineralization zones, as well as the induced polarization effect, in order to reveal the response differences under different electrical conditions. The analysis results show that the total electric field normalization coefficient has a more pronounced response to the underground medium than electric field components. The T3 response anomaly detected by dipole-dipole array is superior to that of pole-dipole array, and different electrical mineralized zones exhibit significant differences in T3 response features. Compared to polarizability anisotropy, resistivity anisotropy has a more profound impact on the observation results. The response characteristics of the mineralized model are far more complex than those of the non-mineralized model, especially when the mineralized zone is electrically anisotropic, the observed T3 morphology of different electrical parameters is quite different.

Key words: intrusive rock')">

intrusive rock, direct current resistivity method, algorithm of space-wavenumber hybrid domain, electrical properties, geophysical exploration

中图分类号: 

  • P631.3
[1] 李永刚.  长岭断陷查干花次凹火石岭组水下喷发火山岩相测井响应特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 2061-2074.
[2] 杨志龙, 殷长春, 张博, 刘云鹤, 任秀艳, 惠哲剑. 全拖曳式深海直流电阻率法三维任意各向异性正演模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(6): 1845-1853.
[3] 刘斌, 李术才, 李树忱, 聂利超, 钟世航, 宋杰, 刘征宇. 隧道含水构造电阻率法超前探测正演模拟与应用[J]. J4, 2012, 42(1): 246-253.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 程立人,张予杰,张以春. 西藏申扎地区奥陶纪鹦鹉螺化石[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 273 -0282 .
[2] 李 秉 成. 陕西富平全新世古气候的初步研究[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 291 -0295 .
[3] 和钟铧,杨德明,王天武,郑常青. 冈底斯带巴嘎区二云母花岗岩SHRIMP锆石U-Pb定年[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 302 -0307 .
[4] 陈 力,佴 磊,王秀范,李 金. 绥中某电力设备站场区地震危险性分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 641 -645 .
[5] 纪宏金,孙丰月,陈满,胡大千,时艳香,潘向清. 胶东地区裸露含金构造的地球化学评价[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 308 -0312 .
[6] 初凤友,孙国胜,李晓敏,马维林,赵宏樵. 中太平洋海山富钴结壳生长习性及控制因素[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 320 -0325 .
[7] 李斌,孟自芳,李相博,卢红选,郑民. 泌阳凹陷下第三系构造特征与沉积体系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 332 -0339 .
[8] 李涛, 吴胜军,蔡述明,薛怀平,YASUNORI Nakayama. 涨渡湖通江前后调蓄能力模拟分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 351 -0355 .
[9] 旷理雄,郭建华,梅廉夫,童小兰,杨丽. 从油气勘探的角度论博格达山的隆升[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 346 -0350 .
[10] 章光新,邓伟,何岩,RAMSIS Salama. 水文响应单元法在盐渍化风险评价中的应用[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 356 -0360 .