J4

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

大杨树盆地的构造特征及变形期次

刘志宏1,吴相梅2,朱德丰2,崔敏1,柳行军1,李晓海1   

  1. 1.吉林大学 地球科学学院,长春 130061;2.大庆油田有限责任公司 勘探开发研究院,黑龙江 大庆 163712
  • 收稿日期:2007-02-06 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-01-26 发布日期:2008-01-26
  • 通讯作者: 刘志宏

Structural Features and Deformation Stages of the Dayangshu Basin in Northeast China

LIU Zhi-hong1,WU Xiang-mei2,ZHU De-feng2,CUI Min1,LIU Hang-jun1,LI Xiao-hai1   

  1. 1.College of Earth Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun 130061, China;2.Exploration and Development Research Institute, Daqing Oilfield Company Ltd., Daqing, Heilongjiang 163712,China
  • Received:2007-02-06 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2008-01-26 Published:2008-01-26
  • Contact: LIU Zhi-hong

摘要: 大杨树盆地是叠置于大兴安岭造山带的东部,与松辽盆地紧邻,呈北北东向长条带状展布的中新生代断陷-坳陷型盆地。大杨树盆地经历了多期变形作用,具有以伸展构造为主、并被挤压构造和反转构造叠加的构造特征。早白垩世龙江期主要受到了NWW-SEE向的拉伸作用,形成一系列北北东向控陷犁式正断层组合,在控陷断层的上盘发育小型箕状断陷;早白垩世九峰山期,大杨树盆地受挤压作用控制,使早期形成的断陷盆地发生反转作用,形成正反转构造,同时在某些地段形成逆冲断层和断层传播褶皱;早白垩世甘河期,大杨树盆地再次受到伸展作用,形成了一系列北北东向小型断陷。早白垩世晚期(甘河期之后)-晚白垩世早期,大杨树盆地受到强烈的挤压作用,使早期控陷正断层出现正反转作用,在盆地的浅部形成大型断层传播褶皱,使大杨树盆地全面隆升遭受剥蚀。第四纪大杨树盆地具有伸展的特征,发育一系列小型伸展断陷。

关键词: 构造特征, 变形期次, 伸展构造, 反转构造, 断层传播褶皱, 大杨树盆地

Abstract: Dayangshu Basin is a Mesozoic-Cenozoic basin which is located on the east part of Daxing’anling orogenic belt. It is in a long narrow shape with the NNE trending and next to Songliao Basin to the east. Dayangshu Basin experienced multistage deformations, which is characterized mainly by extensional structures, and was superimposed by compressional structures and positive inversion structures. The basin was suffered NWW-SEE extension during Longjiang stage of the Early Cretaceous, a series of listric normal faults was formed, and the half-grabens were developed on the hanging wall of the controlling fault. Dayangshu Basin was controlled by NW-SE compression during Jiufengshan stage of the Early Cretaceous, the early faulted depressions were inversed by contraction to form inversion structures, and fault propagation folds and thrust faults were formed in some places. Dayangshu Basin was suffered extension again during Ganhe stage of the Early Cretaceous, a series of small NNE trending fault depressions formed. Dayangshu Basin was suffered intensive compression during late stage of the Early Cretaceous to early stage of the Late Cretaceous, and the early depression-controlling normal faults were inversed, and fault propagation folds formed on the upper part of the basin. The basin was raised completely and suffered erosion. Dayangshu Basin was in extensional setting in the Quaternary period, and a series of small extensional half-grabens were formed.

Key words: structural feature, deformation stage, extensional structure, inversion structure, fault propagation fold, Dayangshu Basin

中图分类号: 

  • P544.4
[1] 宋明春, 李杰, 李世勇, 丁正江, 谭现锋, 张照录, 王世进. 鲁东晚中生代热隆-伸展构造及其动力学背景[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 941-964.
[2] 姚刚, 董向欣, 李丽丽, 马国庆, 孟令顺. 东海陆架盆地构造划分的高精度重磁解释技术[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 517-524.
[3] 朱晓颖, 杨海, 匡星涛, 彭巍巍, 张洪瑞. 新疆东昆仑-阿尔金地区航磁反映的断裂构造特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 461-473.
[4] 刘志宏, 孙理难, 王超, 高翔, 宋健, 黄超义, 梅梅. 松辽盆地伏龙泉断陷构造特征及演化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(3): 663-673.
[5] 刘志宏,梅梅,高军义,吴相梅,黄超义,林东成,孙理难. 东北东部虎林盆地的构造特征、成盆机制及敦-密断裂带北东段的形成时代[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(2): 480-489.
[6] 邓宾, 李智武,刘树根,孙东,钟勇,李金玺,汤聪. 大巴山城口弧形断裂带右旋走滑构造特征及其意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(5): 1501-1516.
[7] 刘志宏, 梅梅, 柳行军, 吴相梅, 万传彪, 林东成, 高军义. 海拉尔盆地贝尔凹陷伸展断层转折褶皱作用及其对沉积作用的制约[J]. J4, 2012, 42(5): 1330-1337.
[8] 张玮, 雷刚林, 师骏, 曾昌民, 杜治利, 陈才. 塔西南坳陷甫沙构造带正反转构造及其石油地质意义[J]. J4, 2012, 42(3): 681-688.
[9] 聂凤军, 张可, 刘翼飞, 江思宏, 刘勇, 刘妍. 华北克拉通北缘及邻区印支期岩浆活动与钼和金成矿作用[J]. J4, 2011, 41(6): 1651-1666.
[10] 刘志宏, 周飞, 吴相梅, 孙晓猛, 赵呈祥, 梅梅, 黄超义. 东北地区佳木斯隆起与周缘中新生代盆地群的耦合关系[J]. J4, 2011, 41(5): 1335-1344.
[11] 刘志宏, 黄超义, 王芃, 吴相梅, 梅梅, 周飞. 海拉尔盆地红旗凹陷早白垩世构造特征与变形期次的厘定[J]. J4, 2011, 41(2): 327-334.
[12] 孙晓猛|杜继宇|单玄龙|程日辉|王英德|许强伟|田景雄. 龙门山冲断带北段前山带构造分带性及山前带变形特征[J]. J4, 2010, 40(6): 1323-1332.
[13] 石建基, 张守志. 长乐-南澳断裂带中生代活动特征及大地构造属性[J]. J4, 2010, 40(6): 1333-1343.
[14] 刘志宏, 王芃, 赵呈祥, 沙茜, 周飞. 柴达木盆地北缘白垩纪挤压构造的发现及其地质意义[J]. J4, 2010, 40(5): 979-985.
[15] 李刚, 刘正宏, 徐仲元, 董晓杰, 沙茜, 王挽琼, 王兴安, 张超. 医巫闾山岩体同伸展侵位的证据及其地质意义[J]. J4, 2010, 40(4): 971-978.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!