J4 ›› 2009, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5): 874-881.

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

清江中游隔河岩库区偏山滑坡形成机制及稳定性分析

赵信文1,金维群1,彭轲1,常宏1,黎清华1,黎义勇1,薛永恒2   

  1. 1.中国地质调查局 宜昌地质调查中心|湖北 宜昌443003;2.长江水利资源委员会 综合勘测局,湖北 宜昌443002
  • 收稿日期:2009-03-05 出版日期:2009-09-26 发布日期:2009-09-26
  • 作者简介:赵信文(1980-)|男|贵州遵义人|工程师|主要从 事工程地质、环境地质方面的调查研究|E-mail:zhaoxinwen0413@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    中国地质大调查项目(1212010814008)

Formation Mechanism and Stability Analysis of the Pianshan Landslide in Geheyan Reservoir Area of the Middle Reaches of the Qingjiang River

ZHAO Xin-wen1,JIN Wei-qun1,PENG Ke1,CHANG Hong1,LI Qing-hua1,LI Yi-yong1,XUE Yong-heng2   

  1. 1.Yichang Institute of Geology and Minerals Resources, Yichang,Hubei 443002,China;2.Bureau of Investigation and Survey,Changjiang Water Resources Commission,Yichang,Hubei 443002,China
  • Received:2009-03-05 Online:2009-09-26 Published:2009-09-26

摘要:

偏山滑坡位于清江中游隔河岩库区,距隔河岩大坝54 km,是该库区的大型滑坡之一,其稳定性直接关系到50多户200多人的生命安全及隔河岩水库的正常运行。通过野外调查,采用工程地质测绘、钻探、物探、槽探等工程勘查手段,分析该滑坡的形成机制,查明除地形地貌、地层岩性、物质结构外,滑坡稳定性主要受暴雨、水库水位涨落等外动力因素的影响;从深部位移及地表位移、地表裂缝的监测结果分析,滑坡局部产生变形及位移,正处于蠕变阶段;通过滑坡稳定性计算,结合滑坡形成机制及影响因素分析,滑坡整体稳定性较好,但滑坡在暴雨加库水位骤降条件下,稳定系数有所降低,局部存在滑塌的可能。

关键词: 偏山滑坡, 顺向坡滑坡, 滑坡变形, 清江隔河岩水库

Abstract:

Pianshan landslide, one of the large-scale landslides in Geheyan reservoir, occurs 54 km far away from Geheyan dam in the middle-reach of the Qingjiang River. Since the stability of Pianshan landslide maybe directly threaten the safety of local more than 200 lives and normal operation of the Geheyan reservoir, it is of significance to carry out the study on the formation mechanism of landslide by the means of field investigation techiniques such as engineering geological mapping, drilling, geophysical, trench exploration and so on. The result shows the external driving factor is the mainly influencing factors on the landslide stability,such a as rainstorm and the water level fluctuation of the reservoir and topography, lithology, physical structures are the secondary factors.Monitoring results from deep displacement, surface displacement and surface cracks show the landslide is now in the creep stage and the deformation formed in partial section. Stability calculation of the landslide combined with the formation mechanism and influence factors show that the landslide is in the state of the integral stability, but the stability coefficient will be decreased and even slumping occur in local place under the conditions of rainstorm and sudden drawdown of reservoir water level.

Key words: Pianshan landslide, consequent landslide, landslide deformation, Geheyan reservoir on Qingjiang River

中图分类号: 

  • P642.2
[1] 郭长宝, 李海华, 陈溪华, 和勇, 歹家文, 张能. 滇西芒棒盆地芒棒组碳质粉砂岩的工程地质特性[J]. J4, 2012, 42(4): 1090-1098.
[2] 周洪福, 聂德新. 水电工程坝址区构造应力场三维数值反演[J]. J4, 2012, 42(3): 785-791.
[3] 沈世伟, 佴磊, 徐燕. 不同权重条件下降雨对边坡稳定性影响的二级模糊综合评判[J]. J4, 2012, 42(3): 777-784.
[4] 叶润青, 牛瑞卿, 邓清禄, 张良培, 赵艳南, 吴婷, 江齐英. 基于多源数据三维可视化集成的高切坡解译[J]. J4, 2012, 42(1): 161-168.
[5] 陈祥, 许兆义, 张杰坤. 大型地下水封石油洞库场址评价标准及评价方法[J]. J4, 2012, 42(1): 177-183.
[6] 徐佩华, 黄润秋, 邓辉. 高烈度区浸水高填石路堤稳定性的小型振动台试验[J]. J4, 2011, 41(4): 1092-1097.
[7] 安玉科, 佴磊. 关键块体系统锚固法在加固边坡危岩中的应用[J]. J4, 2011, 41(3): 764-770.
[8] 陈晓利, 周本刚, 冉洪流, 王明明. 汶川地震中擂鼓镇地区的滑坡崩塌规律及预测[J]. J4, 2010, 40(6): 1371-1379.
[9] 罗金辉, 杨永国, 陈玉华. GIS在矿区岩溶陷落柱位置圈定中的应用[J]. J4, 2010, 40(6): 1385-1389.
[10] 李秀珍, 孔纪名, 王成华. 多分类支持向量机在滑坡稳定性判识中的应用[J]. J4, 2010, 40(3): 631-637.
[11] 刘红帅, 年廷凯, 万少石. 三维边坡稳定性分析中的边界约束效应[J]. J4, 2010, 40(3): 638-644.
[12] 张文春, 陈剑平, 张丽. 基于人工神经网络的三峡库区丰都县水库塌岸预测[J]. J4, 2010, 40(2): 378-382.
[13] 孙超, 薄景山, 刘红帅, 齐文浩. 采空区地表沉降影响因素研究[J]. J4, 2009, 39(3): 498-502.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!