琼东南盆地古近纪幕式裂陷及构造、层序和沉积的综合响应过程

J4 ›› 2012, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4): 970-983.

琼东南盆地古近纪幕式裂陷及构造、层序和沉积的综合响应过程

廖计华^1,2, 王华^1,2, 肖军^1,2, 李俊良³,严德天^1,2, 李国良⁴, 夏存银⁵, 李彦丽^1,2, 任桂媛^1,2

1.中国地质大学构造与油气教育部重点实验室|武汉430074;
2.中国地质大学资源学院|武汉430074;
3.中国海洋石油有限公司湛江分公司|广东湛江524057;
4.中国海洋石油有限公司天津分公司|天津300452;
5.中国石油天然气集团公司福山油田|广州510240

收稿日期:2011-10-01 出版日期:2012-07-26 发布日期:2012-07-26
作者简介:廖计华(1984-)|男|博士研究生|主要从事层序地层学和应用沉积学研究|Tel: 027-67883064|E-mail:liaojihua1120@yahoo.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（40702023）；国家“十二·五”科技重大专项（2011ZX05009-002）；中国地质大学构造与油气教育部重点实验室开放课题（TPR-2011-06）

Episodic Rifting and Integrated Response Process of Tectonic, Sequence Stratigraphy and Sedimentary Filling in Paleogene of Qiongdongnan Basin, South China Sea

Liao Ji-hua^1,2, Wang Hua^1,2, Xiao Jun^{1, 2}, Li Jun-liang³, Yan De-tian^1,2, Li Guo-liang⁴, Xia Cun-yin⁵,Li Yan-li^1,2, Ren Gui-yuan^1,2

1.Key Laboratory of Tectonics and Petroleum Resources, Ministry of Education/China University of Geosciences, Wuhan430074, China;
2.Faculty of Earth Resources, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan430074, China;
3.Zhanjiang Branch of China National Offshore Oil Corporation Limited, Zhanjiang524057, Guangdong|China;
4.Tianjin Branch of China National Offshore Oil Corporation Limited, Tianjin300452, China ;
5.Fushan Oilfield, PetroChina Company Limited, Guangzhou510240, China

Received:2011-10-01 Online:2012-07-26 Published:2012-07-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

通过对区域性角度不整合、构造沉降阶段性演化以及断裂幕式活动和古构造格架变化等信息的识别与厘定，揭示了琼东南盆地古近纪构造活动的幕式演化过程及其特征。进一步结合层序地层与沉积充填综合分析，系统论述了幕式裂陷作用对沉积层序形成与演化的控制。研究表明：琼东南盆地古近纪经历了3个裂陷阶段，即裂陷Ⅰ幕（S₁₀₀-S₈₀）、裂陷Ⅱ幕（S₈₀-S₇₀）和裂陷Ⅲ幕（S₇₀-S₆₀），分别对应盆地的初始断陷期、主断陷期和断坳转换期。裂陷活动早期以强烈的差异性块断作用为主导，而晚期逐渐被区域性坳陷作用和少量断裂活动共同控制的均一化沉降作用所取代，整体呈现出弱-强-弱的演化特征。裂陷作用的幕式过程及不同裂陷幕同沉积构造活动的差异性通过对可容纳空间、沉降速率、同沉积断裂活动和古构造格架的深刻影响，进而控制了盆地内层序地层单元与沉积旋回的整体发育、沉积与沉降中心的时空展布以及层序地层格架下沉积体系域的构成样式。

关键词: 琼东南盆地, 古近纪, 幕式裂陷, 沉积充填, 地层学, 南海

Abstract:

Based on the recognition and redefinition of regional angular unconformities, staggered evolution of tectonic subsidence, impulsive activities of growth faults and the change of structural framework, the episodic rifting process and its characteristics of Paleogene in Qiongdongnan basin were revealed. Ulteriorly, the controlling of episodic rifting on the generation and evolution of sedimentary sequences was elucidated systematically in association with the comprehensive analysis on sequence stratigraphy and sedimentary filling of Paleogene. The results show that there are three rifting episodes during the rifting period of Paleogene, namely rifting episodeⅠ(S₁₀₀-S₈₀), rifting episodeⅡ(S₈₀-S₇₀) and rifting episodeⅢ(S₇₀-S₆₀), corresponding to the initial faulted period, the main faulted period and the transition faulted period respectively. The evolutionary trend of rifting activities went from weak to strong and to weak，which is characterized by intense differential subsidence of fault blocks in the early stage of rifting period, while gradually replaced by homogeneous subsidence which was controlled by a combination of regional depression and weak activities of growth faults in the later. Because of the profound influences on accommodation space, tectonic subsidence rate, synsedimentary faulting activity and palaeostructural frameworks, the multistage episodic rifting and differences of tectonic activities among different rifting episodes controlled the development of sequence stratigraphy units and sedimentary cycles at various levels, and the spatial-temporal distribution of depositional and subsidence centers as well as the composition and configuration of depositional system tracts in the sequence stratigraphic frameworks.

Key words: Qiongdongnan basin, Paleogene, episodic rifting, sedimentary filling, stratigraphy, South China Sea

中图分类号:

P542.3

廖计华, 王华, 肖军, 李俊良, 严德天, 李国良, 夏存银, 李彦丽, 任桂媛. 琼东南盆地古近纪幕式裂陷及构造、层序和沉积的综合响应过程[J]. J4, 2012, 42(4): 970-983.

LIAO Ji-hua, WANG Hua, XIAO Jun, LI Jun-liang, YAN De-tian, LI Guo-liang, XIA Cun-yin, LI Yan-li, REN Gui-yuan. Episodic Rifting and Integrated Response Process of Tectonic, Sequence Stratigraphy and Sedimentary Filling in Paleogene of Qiongdongnan Basin, South China Sea[J]. J4, 2012, 42(4): 970-983.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	龚跃华, 杨胜雄, 王宏斌, 梁金强, 梁劲. 琼东南盆地天然气水合物成矿远景[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1030-1042.
[2]	安纯志, 杨振宇, 仝亚博, 李晨皓, 王恒, 高亮, 韩志锐, 徐颖超. 印支地块思茅地区始新统磁倾角偏低现象及其构造意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 511-525.
[3]	贾连凯, 吴时国, 董冬冬, 栾奕. 南海南部深水多次波模拟分析与压制处理[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(2): 611-629.
[4]	杨长清, 李刚, 龚建明, 杨传胜. 中国东南海域中生界油气地质条件与勘探前景[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(1): 1-12.
[5]	苏明，姜涛，张翠梅，张成，何云龙，王振峰. 琼东南盆地中央峡谷体系东段形态-充填特征及其地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(6): 1805-1815.
[6]	姜洪福,张世广. 复杂断块油田高分辨率层序地层学及砂体几何学特征--以海塔盆地贝尔凹陷呼和诺仁油田贝301区块南屯组二段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(5): 1419-1431.
[7]	鲁宝亮,王璞珺,梁建设,孙晓猛,王万银. 古南海构造属性及其与特提斯和古太平洋构造域的关系[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(5): 1441-1450.
[8]	衣健，王璞珺，李瑞磊，赵然磊，陈崇阳，孙玥. 松辽盆地断陷层系地震火山地层学研究：典型火山岩地震相与地质解释模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(3): 715-729.
[9]	杨克红，初凤友，叶黎明，章伟艳，许冬，朱继浩，杨海丽，葛倩. 南海北部甲烷渗漏的沉积地球化学指标(Sr/Ca和Mg/Ca)识别[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(2): 469-479.
[10]	王霄飞, 李三忠，龚跃华，刘鑫，索艳慧，戴黎明，马云，张丙坤. 南海北部活动构造及其对天然气水合物的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(2): 419-431.
[11]	郭荣涛. 燕山西段雾迷山组层序地层格架及古地理演化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(2): 446-459.
[12]	王腾飞,程日辉,沈艳杰. 松辽盆地东南缘营城组流纹岩类型及其在火山岩地层分析中的意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(1): 45-55.
[13]	王东东，邵龙义，李智学，胡一鸿. 鄂尔多斯盆地延安组层序地层格架与煤层形成[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(6): 1726-1739.
[14]	梁建设，张功成，王璞珺，谢晓军. 南海陆缘盆地构造演化与烃源岩特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(5): 1309-1319.
[15]	魏恒飞，陈践发，郭旺，刘高志，张俊华，陈斐然. 西湖凹陷平湖组层序地层划分和聚煤特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(3): 669-679.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed