Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition) ›› 2018, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (2): 373-378.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20170271

Previous Articles     Next Articles

GF-2 Image Classification Based on Extreme Learning Machine

Wang Mingchang1,2,3, Zhang Xinyue1, Zhang Xuqing1, Wang Fengyan1, Niu Xuefeng1, Wang Hong2   

  1. 1. College of GeoExploration Science and Technology, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China;
    2. Faculty of Resources and Environment, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China;
    3. Key Laboratory of Urban Land Resources Monitoring and Simulation, Ministry of Land and Resources, Shenzhen 518000, Guangdong, China
  • Received:2017-09-07 Online:2018-03-26 Published:2018-03-26
  • Supported by:
    Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China(41430322), Open Fund of Key Laboratory of Urban Land Resources Monitoring and Simulation, Ministry of Land and Resources (KF-2016-02-008) and Open Research Fund Program of Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Regional Development and Environmental Response(2015(B)003)

Abstract: The classification of remote sensing image is an important part of extracting effective information of images. In order to explore the optimal classification methods, many machine learning algorithms are gradually applied to the classification of remote sensing images. Because of the high efficiency, speediness, and good performance generalization, extreme learning machines (ELM) have been widely used in pattern recognition. This paper aims to classify high-resolution remote sensing images, and analyze the performance of extreme learning machine algorithms for the accuracy of classification of remote sensing images, and compare ELM algorithm with support vector machines (SVM) algorithm and Maximum likelihood method. The GF-2 data from some area in Changchun City were selected to test the accuracy of all the three methods for classification with the fused image as the original data. The results show that the overall accuracy of ELM algorithm is more than 85%, and the kappa coefficient is 0.718. Compared with the other two classification methods, the ELM classification accuracy is the best, and its running time is faster than the support vector machine by 2 480 s, 1/8 of the support vector machine's. An even better performance can be obtained in a shorter training time. ELM is valuable for classification of remote sensing images.

Key words: extreme learning machine, remote sensing image classification, GF-2 image, supervised classification, support vector machines

CLC Number: 

  • P237
[1] 陈圣波,刘彦丽,杨倩,等.植被覆盖区卫星高光谱遥感岩性分类[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2012,42(6):1959-1965. Chen Shengbo,Liu Yanli,Yang Qian,et al. Lithologic Classification from Hyperspectral Data in Dense Vegetation Cover Area[J].Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition),2012,42(6):1959-1965.
[2] Nitish S,Geoffrey H,Alex K,et al. Dropout:A Simple Way to Prevent Neural Networks from Overfitting[J].Journal of Machine Learning Research,2014,15(6):1929-1958.
[3] Huang G B,Zhu Q Y,Siew C K. Extreme Learning Machine:A New Learning Scheme of Feedforward Neural Networks[J]. Proc Int Joint Conf Neural Netw,2004,2(2):985-990.
[4] Zong W W,Huang G B,Chen Y Q. Weighted Extreme Learning Machine for Imbalance Learning[J]. Neurocomputing,2013,101:229-242.
[5] Huang G B,Ding X J,Zhou H M. Optimization Me-thod Based Extreme Learning Machine for Classification[J]. Neurocomputing,2010,74:155-163.
[6] Zong W W,Huang G B. Face Recognition Based on Extreme Learning Machine[J].Neurocomputing,2011,74(16):2541-2551.
[7] Huang G B,Li M B,Chen L,et al. Incremental Extreme Learning Machine with Fully Complex Hidden Nodes[J]. Neurocomputing,2008,71(4):576-583.
[8] 王士同,钟富礼.最小学习机[J].江南大学学报(自然科学版),2010,9(5):505-510. Wang Shitong,Zhong Fuli. On Least Learning Machine[J]. Journal of Jiangnan University (Natural Science Edition),2010,9(5):505-510.
[9] 邓万宇,郑庆华,陈琳,等.神经网络极速学习方法研究[J].计算机学报,2010,33(2):280-287. Deng Wanyu,Zheng Qinghua,Chen Lin,et al. Research on Extreme Learning of Neural Networks[J].Chinese Journal of Computer,2010,33(2):280-287.
[10] 王杰,毕浩洋.一种基于粒子群优化的极限学习机[J].郑州大学学报(理学版),2013,45(1):100-104. Wang Jie,Bi Haoyang. A New Extreme Learning Machine Optimized by PSO[J]. Journal of Zhengzhou University (Natural Science Edition),2013,45(1):100-104.
[11] 陈建原,何建农.基于在线连续极限学习机的图像分类改进算法[J].福州大学学报(自然科学版),2015,42(2):176-181. Chen Jianyuan,He Jiannong. A Modified Algorithm for Image Classification Based on Online Sequential Extreme Learning Machine[J].Journal of Fuzhou University (Natural Science Edition),2015,42(2):176-181.
[12] 王礼云,毛文涛,胡武鹏.极限学习机多目标模型选择研究[J].计算机仿真,2014,31(8):387-391. Wang Liyun,Mao Wentao,Hu Wupeng. Multi-Objective Model Selection for Extreme Learning Machine[J]. Computer Simulation,2014,31(8):387-391.
[13] 吴军,王士同,赵鑫.正负模糊规则系统、极限学习机与图像分类[J].中国图象图形学报,2011,16(8):1408-1417. Wu Jun,Wang Shitong,Zhao Xin. Positive and Negative Fuzzy Rule System,Extreme Learning Machine and Image Classification[J].Journal of Image and Graphics,2011,16(8):1408-1417.
[14] 崔利凯,孙建孟,闫伟超,等.基于多分辨率图像融合的多尺度多组分数字岩心构建[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2017,47(6):1904-1912. Cui Likai,Sun Jianmeng,Yan Weichao,et al. Construction of Multi-Scale and Component Digital Cores Based on Fusion of Different Resolution Core Images[J].Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition),2017,47(6):1904-1912.
[1] Chen Yongliang, Li Xuebin. Method and Application of Kernel Probabilistic Distance Clustering [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2013, 43(1): 312-318.
[2] YANG Jia-jia, JIANG Qi-gang, ZHAO Jing, XU Yan, MENG Xiang-chong. Standard Mineral Quantitative Calculation Based on the Improved SVM and Hyperspectral Remote Sensing [J]. J4, 2012, 42(3): 864-871.
[3] WANG Li-hua, ZHOU Yun-xuan, TIAN Bo. Detecting Coral Reefs at Dongsha Atoll Using Landsat TM and ETM+Images [J]. J4, 2011, 41(5): 1630-1637.
[4] XU Hong-min, YANG Tian-xing. Evaluation of Lake Water Quality Based on Classification Algorithms of Support Vector Machines [J]. J4, 2006, 36(04): 570-573.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!