地下水,背景值,预筛选法,数理统计法,基于图谱的探索性数据分析,组合方法


," /> 地下水,背景值,预筛选法,数理统计法,基于图谱的探索性数据分析,组合方法


,"/> groundwater, natural background levels, pre-selection methods, statistics methods, exploratory data analysis based on graphs, combination of methods ,"/> <span>Research Progress on  Assessment of Natural Background Levels in Groundwater</span>

Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition) ›› 2025, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (5): 1655-1670.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20240199

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Research Progress on  Assessment of Natural Background Levels in Groundwater

Yan Gangli1, Feng Shen1, Liu Ruinan2, Huang Guanxing2   

  1. 1. Department of Civil and Traffic Engineering, Yellow River Conservancy Technical Institute, Kaifeng 475004, Henan, China

    2. Institute of Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050061, China

  • Online:2025-09-26 Published:2025-11-15
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the Science and Technology Strategy Research Project of Natural Resource (2023-ZL-10) and the Science and Technology Development Program of Kaifeng City (2303056)

Abstract: Selecting an appropriate method for assessing natural background levels (NBL) in groundwater is crucial for objectively understanding the NBL in groundwater. On the basis of reviewing the development process of NBL in groundwater, this article focused on summarizing the current methods for the assessment of NBL in groundwater with their advantages and disadvantages, and pointed out the development trend of the assessment for NBL in groundwater in the future. The methods for assessing NBL in groundwater can be roughly divided into five categories: Methods based on uncontaminated groundwater samples, pre-selection methods, statistics methods, exploratory data analysis methods based on graphs, and the combination of multi-methods. The method based on uncontaminated groundwater samples has been rarely adopted due to its inherent limitations. Pre-selection and statistics method are two commonly used independent methods in the study of groundwater NBL. Generally, the former one is more subjective than the latter one. Nowadays, the combination of multiple methods becomes a development trend in the research of groundwater NBL assessment, because some limitations of one method for assessing groundwater NBL may be avoided by the combination with another method. Among them, the combination of pre-selection and statistics methods is the most common way of combination. In addition, the combination of emerging exploratory data analysis methods based on graphs with pre-selection methods and/or statistics methods is commonly better than the combination of pre-selection and statistics methods. However, the use of the former combination often requires a good understanding of the hydrogeochemical characteristics in study areas. Therefore, the former ones for assessing groundwater NBL are less convenience and universality in comparison with the latter ones.

Key words: groundwater')">

groundwater, natural background levels, pre-selection methods, statistics methods, exploratory data analysis based on graphs, combination of methods

CLC Number: 

  • P641.2
[1] Yan Baizhong, Xu Wenjie, Li Yuhan, Sun Jian, Bi Pan, Li Yao, Zhang Xu. Optimal Layout of Pumping and Recharging Wells for Groundwater Source Heat Pump and Parameter Sensitivity [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2023, 53(1): 218-229.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!