加工中心组件故障传播影响力评估

doi:10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb20200730

吉林大学学报(工学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (1): 63-69.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb20200730

加工中心组件故障传播影响力评估

申桂香(),栾兰,张英芝(),牟黎明,梁树斌

吉林大学机械与航空航天工程学院，长春 130022

收稿日期:2020-09-22 出版日期:2022-01-01 发布日期:2022-01-14
通讯作者: 张英芝 E-mail:shengx@jlu.edu.cn;zhangyz@jlu.edu.cn
作者简介:申桂香（1957-），女，教授，博士生导师. 研究方向：计算机数控装备及其全寿命周期工程. E-mail：shengx@jlu.edu.cn
基金资助:
吉林省科技发展计划项目(20190302104GX);吉林省自然科学基金项目(20170101212JC);吉林大学博士研究生交叉学科科研资助计划项目(101832020DJX037)

Fault propagation impact assessment of machining center components

Gui-xiang SHEN(),Lan LUAN,Ying-zhi ZHANG(),Li-ming MU,Shu-bin LIANG

College of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering，Jilin University，Changchun 130022，China

Received:2020-09-22 Online:2022-01-01 Published:2022-01-14
Contact: Ying-zhi ZHANG E-mail:shengx@jlu.edu.cn;zhangyz@jlu.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为评估加工中心组件的故障传播影响力，快速、准确地识别系统关键组件，有效控制故障传播，采用故障传播机理分析与有向图结合的方式表征组件间故障传播路径。运用DWNodeRank算法评估组件间故障影响度，并结合故障率指标计算组件的故障传播率。考虑有效可达路径，基于改进ASP算法计算故障传播影响力值，实现对组件故障传播影响力的评估。实例分析和结果表明：DWNodeRank算法考虑了故障传播的方向和传播强度，有效降低了迭代复杂性并准确评估了节点影响度；故障传播率作为故障传播影响力评估的依据，其动态时变特征使得评估结果实时、精确，对于加工中心健康维护具有重要意义。

关键词: 加工中心, 故障传播有向图, 故障传播率, 故障传播影响力

Abstract:

In order to evaluate the influence of fault propagation of machining center components， identify the key components of the system quickly and accurately， and control the fault propagation effectively， the fault propagation path between components is characterized by the combination of fault propagation mechanism analysis and directed graph. DWNodeRank algorithm is used to evaluate the fault influence degree among components， and the fault propagation rate of components was calculated based on the failure rate index. Considering the effective reachable path， the influence force value of fault propagation is calculated based on the improved ASP algorithm， and the fault propagation influence is evaluated. An example analysis results show that the DWNodeRank algorithm can reduce iteration complexity effectively and evaluate node influence degree accurately considering the direction and intensity of fault propagation. The fault propagation rate is used as the basis for evaluating the influence of fault propagation， and its dynamic time-varying characteristics make the evaluation results real-time and accurate， which is of great significance to the health maintenance of machining center.

Key words: machining center, fault propagation directed graph, fault propagation rate, fault propagation influence

中图分类号:

TG659

申桂香,栾兰,张英芝,牟黎明,梁树斌. 加工中心组件故障传播影响力评估[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2022, 52(1): 63-69.

Gui-xiang SHEN,Lan LUAN,Ying-zhi ZHANG,Li-ming MU,Shu-bin LIANG. Fault propagation impact assessment of machining center components[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(1): 63-69.

图/表 8

图1

表1

图2

表2

表3

表4

表5

表6

参考文献 15

1	Muchnik L, Aral S, Taylor S J. Social influence bia:a randomized experiment[J]. Science,2013, 341(6146):647-651.
2	Morone F, Makse H A. Influence maximization in complex networks through optimal percolation[J]. Nature, 2015, 524(7563):65-68.
3	Freeman L C. A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness[J]. Sociometry, 1977, 40(1):35-41.
4	Poulin R, Boily M C, Mâsse B R. Dynamical systems to define centrality in social networks[J]. Social Networks, 2000, 22(3):187-220.
5	Chen D B, Gao H, Zhou T, et al. Identifying influential nodes in large-scale directed networks:the role of clustering[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(10):No. e77455.
6	Brin S, Page L. The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine[J]. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 1998, 30(1-7):107-117.
7	胡庆成,尹龑燊,马鹏斐,等. 一种新的网络传播中最有影响力的节点发现算法[J]. 物理学报, 2013, 62(14):9-19.
	Hu Qing-cheng,Yin Yan-shen,Ma Peng-fei,et al. A new approach to identify influential spreaders in complex networks[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(14):9-19.
8	刘影. 复杂网络中节点影响力挖掘及其应用研究[D]. 成都:电子科技大学航空航天学院, 2016.
	Liu Ying. Research on ranking the influence of nodes on complex networks and its application[D]. Chengdu:School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2016.
9	Kitsak M, Gallos L K, Havlin S, et al. Identification of influential spreaders in complex networks[J]. Nature Physics, 2010, 6: 888-893.
10	Bao Z K, Ma C, Xiang B B, et al. Identification of influential nodes in complex networks:method from spreading probability viewpoint[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2017, 468: 391-397.
11	阮逸润,老松杨,王竣德,等. 一种改进的基于信息传播率的复杂网络影响力评估算法[J]. 物理学报,2017, 66(20):312-322.
	Ruan Yi-run, Lao Song-yang, Wang Jun-de, et al. An improved evaluating method of node spreading inﬂuence in complex network based on information spreading probability[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(20):312-322.
12	赵之滢, 于海, 朱志良, 等. 基于网络社团结构的节点传播影响力分析[J]. 计算机学报, 2014, 37(4):753-766.
	Zhao Zhi-ying, Yu Hai, Zhu Zhi-liang, et al. Identifying influential spreaders based on network community structure[J]. Chinese Journal of Computers, 2014, 37(4):753-766.
13	Morone F, Makse H A. Influence maximization in complex networks through optimal percolation[J]. Nature, 2015, 524(7563): 65-68.
14	胡满玉. 基于链接关系的有向加权复杂网络关键节点识别技术研究[D]. 南京:南京理工大学计算机科学与工程学院, 2012.
	Hu Man-yu. Research on key node recognition technology of directed weighted complex network based on link relationship[D]. Nan Jing:School of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 2012.
15	李庆扬,王能超,易大义. 数值分析[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社, 2008.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

前因组件	故障组件	传播次数
主轴S	刀库M	5
主轴S	进给J	2
数控NC	主轴S	1
数控NC	刀库M	1
数控NC	进给J	1
液压D	主轴S	1
液压D	刀库M	1
电气V	主轴S	1
电气V	刀库M	3
电气V	进给J	2
电气V	数控NC	1
电气V	冷却W	1
气动G	主轴S	1
气动G	刀库M	4
润滑L	主轴S	1
润滑L	刀库M	1
润滑L	进给J	4
冷却W	进给J	1
辅助K	进给J	1

组件	影响度值	排序结果
主轴S	0.0917	3
刀库M	0.0792	9
进给J	0.0792	9
数控NC	0.0887	5
液压D	0.0865	6
电气V	0.1461	1
气动G	0.0913	4
润滑L	0.0953	2
冷却W	0.0814	7
辅助K	0.0814	7
工作台T	0.0792	9

有向边	影响度值	排序	有向边	影响度值	排序
S→M	0.997 322	11	V→NC	0.969 659	16
S→J	0.997 322	11	V→W	0.958 707	17
NC→S	0.999 862	4	G→S	0.999 998	1
NC→M	0.998 398	8	G→M	0.997 479	10
NC→J	0.998 398	8	L→S	0.999 815	5
D→S	0.999 574	6	L→M	0.995 735	13
D→M	0.999 029	7	L→J	0.995 735	13
V→S	0.973 482	15	W→J	0.999 906	2
V→M	0.954 897	18	K→J	0.999 906	2
V→J	0.954 897	18

组件	不同组件下的平均故障率
组件	5000 h	6540 h
主轴S	0.0022	0.0021
刀库M	0.0032	0.0029
进给J	0.0014	0.0011
数控NC	0.0006	0.0005
压D	0.0024	0.0020
电气V	0.0016	0.0014
气动G	0.0008	0.0011
润滑L	0.0012	0.0011
冷却W	0.0028	0.0021
辅助K	0.0008	0.0009
工作台T	0.0016	0.0014

有向边	故障传播率值 5000 h	影响传播率值 6540 h
S→M	0.002 194	0.002 094
S→J	0.002 194	0.002 094
NC→S	0.000 600	0.000 500
NC→M	0.000 599	0.000 499
NC→J	0.000 599	0.000 499
D→S	0.002 399	0.001 999
D→M	0.002 398	0.001 998
V→S	0.001 558	0.001 363
V→M	0.001 528	0.001 337
V→J	0.001 528	0.001 337
V→NC	0.001 551	0.001 358
V→W	0.001 534	0.001 342
G→S	0.000 800	0.001 100
G→M	0.000 798	0.001 097
L→S	0.001 200	0.001 100
L→M	0.001 195	0.001 095
L→J	0.001 195	0.001 095
W→J	0.002 800	0.002 100
K→J	0.000 800	0.000 900

加工中心组件故障传播影响力评估

Fault propagation impact assessment of machining center components

RICH HTML

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 15

相关文章 4

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

系统组件	故障传播影响力（5000 h）/排序	故障传播影响力（6540 h）/排序
主轴S	0.004 388/3	0.004 189/2
刀库M	0/9	0/9
进给J	0/9	0/9
数控NC	0.001 801/6	0.001 500/7
液压D	0.004 807/2	0.004 006/3
电气V	0.007 713/1	0.006 747/1
气动G	0.001 601/7	0.002 202/5
润滑L	0.003 595/4	0.003 295/4
冷却W	0.002 800/5	0.002 100/6
辅助K	0.000 800/8	0.000 900/8
工作台T	0/9	0/9

[1]	杨兆军, 杨川贵, 陈菲, 郝庆波, 郑志同, 王松. 基于PSO算法和SVR模型的加工中心可靠性模型参数估计[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2015, 45(3): 829-836.
[2]	王晓峰, 申桂香, 张英芝, 谷东伟, 李怀洋, 刘葳. 基于改进危害度和DEMATEL方法的 abc轴进给系统的故障排序[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2012, 42(01): 122-127.
[3]	王晓峰, 申桂香, 张英芝, 张立敏, 王志琼, 刘葳. 加工中心可靠性与维修性影响度仿真分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2011, 41(增刊1): 160-163.
[4]	王晓峰,申桂香,张英芝,陈炳锟,李怀洋. 基于群体决策和多种赋值方式的加工中心关键部件RPN分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2011, 41(6): 1630-1635.